Researchers Develop App That Accurately Determines Sperm Quality (scientificamerican.com) 101
New submitter omaha393 writes: A team of researchers at Harvard Medical School have developed a point-of-care microfluidic detector capable of determining sperm quality using the simple device and a standard smartphone. Typical male fertility screens require a team of trained laboratory professionals and a screening process taking days to weeks and incurring high costs. The alternative home sperm measuring kits rely on chemical probes and only give measurements of quantity, not quality.The new method offers an easier, cheaper approach, with processing time taking about 5 seconds with no sample processing or wash steps required. The team found their device meets WHO guidelines with 98% accuracy of sperm quality measurements and is comparable to clinical results. The new device uses 35 microliters of sample to accurately measure both concentration and motility at a manufacturing cost of less than $5 per device. The device must still undergo FDA evaluations before being available to consumers, and the technology has yet to be named. The results of the study were published in the journal Science Translational Medicine. Further reading: NPR, Ars Technica, Scientific American
App? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
A $5 peripheral is pretty damn good - you'd be spending that in postage fees shuttling the sample from point of collection to point of analysis in the traditional system.
Re: (Score:2)
they're still $5 a pop
Seen them for $1 at a dollar store.
Re: (Score:3)
...everything gains +9001% media attention...
That's a pretty specific figure - are you sure you didn't mean +ISO 9001%?
Re: App? (Score:3)
I think he's referring to what the scouter says about the media's power level.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't you know? The real summary of a Slashdot article is in the second post (or the first post during school hours).
Dating sites (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
But then, why is sperm quality a major selection criteria?
Re: (Score:2)
But then, why is sperm quality a major selection criteria?
Fitness for breeding, of course.
Re: (Score:2)
Or fitness for not breeding, depending on the desires of the participants.
Re: (Score:2)
1) The measure of "fitness for breeding" encompasses those who aren't fit for breeding.
2) "fitness for not breeding" is -- at best -- horrible grammar, and at worst makes no sense.
Re: (Score:2)
When they say quality they aren't talking about the taste?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Which person?
No, cancel that. Too much information.
Re: (Score:2)
I've made jokes about a fleshlight app... scary to think that may wind up a reality.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not searching for it at work but there is a Chinese company that makes, basically, a medical-grade jack-off machine for sperm sample collection. Basically a fleshlight on a reciprocating mechanism.
Can we just have medical tricorders already? (Score:2)
Please? This drip and dribble of single techs to extend the smartphone is maddening. Just unify the blessed things and give everyone a medical tricorder already!
Re:Can we just have medical tricorders already? (Score:5, Informative)
Please? This drip and dribble of single techs to extend the smartphone is maddening. Just unify the blessed things and give everyone a medical tricorder already!
If we did have a fully integrated tricorder, it would legally be a medical device, and complex enough that it wouldn't earn FDA approval by any stardate that today's investors could envision. Drips and dribbles of single technologies, each one below the FDA radar, is the way to go.
Re: (Score:1)
Drips and dribbles...is the way to go.
I see what you did there.
Re: (Score:2)
If a reading happens to be wrong or inaccurate, little harm is done.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Re: (Score:3)
Can I introduce you to Theranos [wikipedia.org]. They are a major reason that in 2012, the regulations were changed and diagnostic devices were required to get FDA approval. That is, one giant scam caused a regulation to come down and need to be imposed over everyone. I don't know how you missed it as it got [slashdot.org] a [slashdot.org] lot [slashdot.org] of [slashdot.org] coverage [slashdot.org] on [slashdot.org] Slashdot. [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Someone -- specifically you -- doesn't realize how complicated the human body is.
Re: (Score:2)
How about Two new peripheral devices for smart phones:
1. device to stimulate production of the sperm sample
2. device to check sperm quality / quantity
If they connect via USB then they could be made to work with laptops as well as smartphones.
The new device uses 35 microliters of sample... (Score:2)
Uh, what's that in units that people on here can understand?
Re:The new device uses 35 microliters of sample... (Score:5, Funny)
A bit less than a mouthful.
Re: (Score:2)
A bit less than a mouthful.
That's a bit premature
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah right, that'll mean something to the average /. nerd, when they're looking at their hand, estimating.
Anyway, it's the amount of a drop of water.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:The new device uses 35 microliters of sample... (Score:5, Funny)
GP said "people on here can understand".
So that would be roughly "half a handful".
Re: (Score:2)
I think, translated to /. units it would be one percent of a handful. I think we can agree that they find microliters confusing...
Re: (Score:2)
Or about fifteen jack-off sessions.
Why is everyone looking at me like that?
Re: (Score:2)
Because they're all thinking, calculating in their heads.
Re: (Score:2)
Going with the SI standard unit, that would be 3.5e-8 m^3
HTH, HAND
Re: (Score:2)
An average drop of water is about 50 microliters.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Nice try but a bit too high.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Hm, that doesn't look right. That would be like 0.5 mg or 10 times too much. Unless it's me who is mistaken now...
Re: (Score:2)
Pricing circus begins (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Or did you mean after insurance pays?
Re: (Score:2)
The app will sell for $500. The device is probably disposable and will be $150/ea.
Not stated (Score:2)
"The new device uses 35 microliters of sample to accurately measure both concentration and motility at a manufacturing cost of less than $5 per device. "
The smartphone is required for the high-bandwidth link to youporn.com. An incognito browser is also recommended.
Big Improvement (Score:4, Funny)
5 seconds is pretty good. The old way took 1 to 9 months just to gauge the base effectiveness and final quality results could take decades of analysis.
Re: (Score:2)
5 seconds is pretty good.
Unless you're 14 years old, acquiring a sample is going to take longer.
Naming (Score:4, Funny)
the technology has yet to be named
In the light of recent app naming schemes, I propose:
- Jizzr
- MyLoad
- Cumcountify
Re: (Score:2)
the technology has yet to be named
In the light of recent app naming schemes, I propose: - Jizzr - MyLoad - Cumcountify
Those names are pretty cumbersome.
I prefer Sploogeinator
Re: (Score:2)
CumQuantify. The icon would be a cumquat.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Opportunity knocks. (Score:2)
Time to invest in screen protector manufacturers
Peripheral Name Competition (Score:2)
In App Purchases (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Nancy Pelosi..
Re: (Score:1)
Thanks for that. I'll never have a boner again.
I think I've got a good brand name for this... (Score:2)
"Shoot 'n' Scoot" would work. The logo, of course, would have to be a white swallow.
Mean Joke?? (Score:2)
Are you sure this isn't just some asshole trying to trick people into ejaculating on their phones?
Re: (Score:2)
More accurately, a pre-divorce test. How can she and the feminist trained judge have insane child support awarded when he can't reliably father children?
Class A troll! (Score:2)
> ...and the technology has yet to be named.
Damn, ace trolling. They knew we couldn't resist.
WhackFact ...brought to you by the Sperm Firm.
SemenDemon
The Jizz Whiz
(I feel like I'm 14 again)
Re: (Score:2)
huhuhuh... that was cool. huhuhuhuh.. Beavis, report to the ball washer. now.
Re: (Score:2)
Wankavision.
Re: (Score:2)
Vasectomy results (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
In theory it should. There should be no sperm in the sample after a vasectomy.
Btw, IANAD.
Re: (Score:2)
that can take months after the procedure to be true though. First testing is usually done after 16 weeks
Sperm Wheelchairs? (Score:1)