Why China Can't Lure Tech Talent (bloomberg.com) 219
China may have been hoping to attract tech talent to its nation, but it is unlikely that people in the tech industry will move there. A columnist at Bloomberg explains why: The biggest problem is government control of the internet. For a software developer, the inconvenience goes well beyond not being able to access YouTube during coffee breaks. It means that key software libraries and tools are often inaccessible. In 2013, China blocked Github, a globally important open-source depository and collaboration tool, thereby forcing developers to seek workarounds. Using a virtual private network to "tunnel" through the blockades is one popular option. But VPNs slow uploads, downloads and collaboration. And it isn't just developers who suffer. Among the restricted sites in China is Google Scholar, a tool that indexes online peer-reviewed studies, conference proceedings, books and other research material into an easily accessible format. It's become a crucial database for academics around the world, and Chinese researchers -- even those with VPNs -- struggle to use it. The situation grew so dire this summer that several state-run news outlets published complaints from Chinese scientists, with one practically begging the nationalist Global Times newspaper: "We hope the government can relax supervision for academic purposes." The cumulative impact of these restrictions is significant. Scientists unable to keep up with what researchers in other countries are publishing are destined to be left behind, which is one reason China is having difficulty luring foreign scholars to its universities. Programmers who can't take advantage of the sites and tools that make development a global effort are destined to write software customized solely for the Chinese market. The author has raised several other reasons to make his case.
How strange (Score:4, Insightful)
Dixie cups (Score:5, Insightful)
I suspect the people being recruited are concerned that the goal is to transfer the expertise they have to Chinese engineers/scientists. Once that transfer is done the foreigner will no longer have any value.
Re: (Score:2)
You are just a condom waiting to be discarded the moment [you come in].
Geez, why do I even have to fix this for you. I thought slashdotters were supposed to be smart.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
The Asian countries take racism to a different level even though they are all basically from the same racial group. The Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, Korean (both north and south varieties), and all the other Asian racial sub-groups all hate each other. The sheer nuance of their racism is dumb founding when you consider skin color is not the primary means of identifying the various groups. And it would be one thing if you could blame the animosity totally on nationalism but their animosity for one another
Re: (Score:3)
I don't think China is a scared of the US as you think. They could crash our economy and throw us into turmoil in a second. Then, if military action is involved, they have so much established manufacturing and natural resources, they could ramp up like we did in WWII but faster and better. Not to mention, with Russia and N Korea just around the corner, they could easily establish partnerships that put the US at a lot of risk.
To make matter worse, they have a huge population they can toss into a meat grin
Re: (Score:2)
Re:How strange (Score:5, Interesting)
I've lived in Shanghai and the most eye opening part about it is was how spectacularly wrong my American colleagues were about China. Before I left to live there, I was told how Communist it was, how dangerous it was, how there was no freedom. What I found was a country that is way more capitalist than the US and people pretty much leading the life they wanted. There are so many things that squash your freedom in the West but you don't notice it because you've known no better,
Re: (Score:2)
Still when it comes to luring employees, countries are competing. So not whether it is reasonable in China but how well it competes against other employment centres. So for China, logically relocating tech companies seeking to bring in foreign employees to Hainan https://www.lonelyplanet.com/c... [lonelyplanet.com] makes sense. Employment conditions and wages will not drive recruitment, lifestyle when not at work will. At the end of the day, sticking to this list makes the most sense for employers and employees http://www.eco [economist.com]
Re: (Score:3)
I've lived in Shanghai and the most eye opening part about it is was how spectacularly wrong my American colleagues were about China. Before I left to live there, I was told how Communist it was, how dangerous it was, how there was no freedom. What I found was a country that is way more capitalist than the US and people pretty much leading the life they wanted. There are so many things that squash your freedom in the West but you don't notice it because you've known no better,
Whilst I agree that Americans tend to swallow a lot of propaganda about China that is horribly incorrect (yep, China is communist in name only and provided you don't rock the boat you can get away with a lot), Shanghai and Hong Kong are oddities amongst China because of the high levels of foreign activities in these cities, even after the PLA took Shanghai in 1947, Beijing never really controlled it and still don't to a large degree. Beijing are content to leave Shanghai to it's own devices as long as they
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Daily life in China is closer to that in the USA than to North Korea.
Most personal, daily life is even freer than in the USA. For example, nobody gives a shit where you smoke, and hardly any concern about how you drive, where you park, etc.
What FREEDOM means (Score:4, Insightful)
Daily life in China is freer than in the USA only because the government in China lacks the resources to apply its oppression more pervasively; freedom is the ability of the common man to evade or resist imposition.
Re: (Score:2)
Daily life in China is freer than in the USA only because the government in China lacks the resources to apply its oppression more pervasively; freedom is the ability of the common man to evade or resist imposition.
"Wrong!!"
Communism as it was with Stalen or Mao is history. Communism today is a one party system, with opposition, with debates on capital expenditures, studies and planning infrastructures, and maintaining a competitive standard of living for the well educated. You rarely hear of senior Chinese wanting to leave. Why should they? They have a good education system, universal medicare, good pension and vacation plans, job security, time off to both parents for the first months of newborn babies. They can
Re: (Score:2)
Apparently, the US has enough to offer that many wealthy leave China and open up "Chinese" restraunts all over, as well as the birth tourism of the welathy Chinese.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/... [huffingtonpost.com]
But I guess you know more than all those Chinese looking for a better life in the US.
http://www.migrationpolicy.org... [migrationpolicy.org]
Re:How strange (Score:5, Insightful)
What about my freedom to be free of your secondhand smoke?
Re: (Score:2)
What about my freedom to be free of your secondhand smoke?
Then you need modern America style freedom. :)
(BTW I don't live there or anything, was just watching some YouTube videos featuring western guys working in China.)
Re: (Score:2)
What about my freedom to be free of your secondhand smoke?
Firstly I agree with your point. Fortunately most smokers in the UK are extremely polite about their bad habits.
But I have to ask, have you ever been to China? People smoke everywhere there.
That is a huge part of the reason why people dont want to work there. If you want to attract talent, you either have to offer insane wages and packages like they used to in Dubai or offer good wages and packages in some place people want to live. Expats are attracted to places like California, Southern England, Par
Re: (Score:3)
>> For example, nobody gives a shit where you smoke, and hardly any concern about how you drive, where you park, etc.
where you spit, where you piss, etc. no thanks.
Re: (Score:2)
Daily life in China is closer to that in the USA than to North Korea.
Most personal, daily life is even freer than in the USA. For example, nobody gives a shit where you smoke, and hardly any concern about how you drive, where you park, etc.
Where you smoke? While I'm myself a non-smoker - have always been - I've lost count of the number of states that have banned smoking both indoors and outdoors at most establishments
Re:How strange (Score:5, Funny)
I've lost count of the number of states that have banned smoking
I'm thinking no more than 50.
Re: (Score:2)
Your definition of freedom needs work.
Re: (Score:2)
Also, the pollution (Score:4, Informative)
I went to Beijing and it was pollution hell. Couldn't see further than 50 feet in front of you somedays.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I went to Beijing and it was pollution hell. Couldn't see further than 50 feet in front of you somedays.
I went to Guangzhou and it was quite nice.
YMMV.
Re: (Score:2)
It was Spring. The weather was ok.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
But... the Chinese Government has much more control than the EPA could dream...
Maybe less meddling by the government is what is actually the good thing; after all, "private" property owners want their property kept in good condition.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I hope you do not actual write Software with that logic.
Having Control and using it to control pollution are not the same. They would rater make money then have Clean air. Just like Americain Companies did before the EPA.
You logic is the less Government control the cleaner the Air? History Disagrees.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Also, the pollution (Score:5, Insightful)
The EPA could certainly be run better. It could certainly do a better job. I've yet to hear real suggestions about that, as opposed to knee-jerk "Government bad, private sector free market good" drivel. The private sector would murder babies if it increased profits and nobody stopped them, because that's how capitalism works if left unchecked. Capitalism can do very good things, but like nuclear energy, if you don't control it, it makes a huge frakking mess. Don't believe me? Go read up on Slavery. (No, Slavery wasn't about race at first - it was about money. The racist stuff was what people invented to help themselves feel less terrible about the terrible things they were doing to other humans).
Clearly the problem is that we need to do a better job of controlling our government - but I think the problem is less that the agencies run amuck, so much as some of the people we're sending to Washington who have no interest in seeing the government be run well. We elect people that say "Government is Terrible", and then we're surprised when they give us terrible government?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
The statement re "private" society mobilizing to create change is still valid.
The fact that a very few CEOs might actually respond to public concern does happen. McDonald's is one example. Another is Johnson's Wax. The then CEO Sam Johnson was aware of the damage to the ozone caused by chlorofluorocarbons. He instituted a complete change in all their aerosol products and thus was compliant before it ever became law. Sam and, more recently, his son also instituted alternative energy strategies that have resu
Re: (Score:2)
again proving libertarians are ignorant of history.
Re: (Score:3)
So, the people insisted that the government help clean up the environment, and the government "of the people and by the people" followed the people's lead and did just that, and that's evidence that it's all the government's fault?
Re:Also, the pollution (Score:4, Interesting)
So imagine what would happen if the coal mines and coal plants were owned/run by the same people who were best buddies with, and members of the same party as, the people who run the government. The government may well have the power to shut down those coal plants overnight, but it doesn't matter a damn if they're not going to use it.
Re: (Score:3)
You mean like trump making the exxon guy sec of state? Welcome to the new USA or as I like to call it now BRA, Banana Republic of America. And the mnemonic so fits our tic-tac prez elect.
The real reason (Score:1)
Are they trying to? (Score:5, Interesting)
I am not sure they are really trying too hard in the first place. I speak Mandarin (have been studying for many years), have a good resume and appropriate technical background, and spent substantial time in China to have a general idea of how things are - yet I have never been able to attract interest of any Chinese company. Given what I know about their local tech workforce, that's not at all surprising. They have excellent pool of well qualified candidates.
That's not to say that article does not bring good points - internet use in China is encumbered and painful. But that's has little to do with "attracting tech talent".
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
They said tech "talent".
http://www.npr.org/sections/th... [npr.org]
From the linked article:
And it turns out that the job done in China was above par - the employee's "code was clean, well written, and submitted in a timely fashion. Quarter after quarter, his performance review noted him as the best developer in the building," according to the Verizon Security Blog.
All told, it looked like he earned several hundred thousand dollars a year, and only had to pay the Chinese consulting firm about fifty grand annually," according to the Security Blog.
Maybe they're not the best of the best, but neither are most slashdotters or coder either. These bunch are probably better and cheaper than most of you here.
Re:Are they trying to? (Score:5, Interesting)
Same here. I have a strong telecom background. Lived in Shanghai with my wife for 3 year. Looked for a job for the 7 months. Nothing.
I ended up teaching English at a private school and private lessons. I made 3 times what doing that as what I was paid as an engineer in the states.
There was some downsides, to be sure.
1. Stalkers. Seriously, some of those girls were certifiable. Never imagined I would have to deal with that.
2. The environment is dirty. You walk down the street and it looks nice and tidy. Looks past the bushes and you can see where all the garbage went.
3. The air is pretty dirty. I would run every day and I would be blowing black out of my nose the entire day.
4. The crowds are not for everyone. Seriously, it is crowed on the metro. And loads of the people do not know about deodorant.
5. Naked capitalism. People in the US like to think that they live in a capitalist society. Bullshit. You don't. China, is the most capitalist place I have ever been. If you were on fire, someone come over and try to sell you a bucket of water. They would never through it on you though. You would need to pay someone else to do that. It is pure capitalism without regard for anything else. That is the reason their environment is so F'ed up.
Having said that, I enjoyed living in China. I do not think I could ever live there again purely from the health point of view. But, by and large the people treated me well and I had a lot of fun. For now, I think I will stick to Germany.
Re: (Score:2)
I lived there in 2008 and had an amazing time too. Did you ever read Peter Hessler's "River Town: Two Years on the Yangtze"? Pretty much captured my experience and daily frustrations until I started figuring it out.
Re: Are they trying to? (Score:2)
And never, ever mention the war.
Like this [youtube.com]?
Re: (Score:2)
I visited London maybe 25 years ago, and found that, on days I took the tube (subway, for Americans), I blew black stuff out of my nose.
Re:Are they trying to? (Score:5, Interesting)
I am not sure they are really trying too hard in the first place. I speak Mandarin (have been studying for many years), have a good resume and appropriate technical background, and spent substantial time in China to have a general idea of how things are - yet I have never been able to attract interest of any Chinese company.
I am in a situation very similar to you and have been actually interviewing to some Chinese companies and also know people working in those. I am very confident that China is actually trying to lure tech talent from abroad, but they prefer people who have worked in big companies and do not speak Chinese. The reason for the first is that they are very interested in the information they can get from their competitors and use for their advantage, and the reason for the second is that their own company internal information is all in Chinese and they don't want these same employees to leak that to their foreign competitors.
So to put it short, they want to leech information out of their competition by hiring their ex-workers in any ways possible, but at the same time make sure that they are not leaking out anything. And the fact that you speak Mandarin and understand the Chinese culture to some extent makes you a unattractive candidate. It's much safer to hire Chinese candidates for the basic jobs and hire foreigners (who speak no Chinese) to the positions where they have serious need to catch up.
I would love to find out I'm just making this all up as a big conspiracy theory, but I have a bit too much stories and examples to support my assertion...
Re: (Score:2)
Keynes said, "In the long run we are all dead." Keynes is seen as the Moses of modern economic thought. This mentality explains quite a bit about US economic and business policy.
Re: (Score:3)
I am not sure they are really trying too hard in the first place. I speak Mandarin (have been studying for many years), have a good resume and appropriate technical background, and spent substantial time in China to have a general idea of how things are - yet I have never been able to attract interest of any Chinese company. Given what I know about their local tech workforce, that's not at all surprising. They have excellent pool of well qualified candidates.
I've been to China too and I've seen ads placed in English in major foreign newspapers that seem willing to theoretically hire foreigners, but a problem with almost all of these is that they have additional requirements that almost impossible for a foreigner to meet. For example, you can't just speak Mandarin and English but you have to also be fluent or really close to it in Cantonese or Shanghaiese. If a foreigner really knew all those languages they might really have a chance to be hired, but you can
Re: (Score:3)
The requirement for Shanghainese or Cantonese for some jobs in China is similar to the requirement for knowing Spanish in the USA. For some jobs, you will never know what is *really* going on if you don't know the language people curse at each other in and you will be completely ineffective.
For front-office jobs that are populated by token "whites", generally knowing a little Mandarin (Putonghua) is enough. They don't really want you to know too much about what is really going on anyways...
Also, the native language sucks (Score:2, Interesting)
Tone-based languages are a terrible idea; now, add to that a logographic writing system, and you've got a real cluster fuck!
The Information Age has no time for such nonsense.
Re:Also, the native language sucks (Score:5, Interesting)
Tonal languages are not, in and of themselves, an inherently bad idea. It's just one more parameter which can be used to add information density without having to rush the actual mechanics of the speaker. The fact that some people are tone-deaf may pose a problem, just like the fact that some people are color-blind makes color coding a troublesome way to transmit critical information.
The character set used is not necessarily tied to this – it would be perfectly workable to retain the character set but speak a non-tonal language, and it is perfectly workable to write a tonal language in a phonetic alphabet. It just takes a lot of diacritical marks. If keeping the density high is an important goal, Hangul retains that feature while using a phonetic system by forming the characters into blocks representing syllables.
The most telling argument against change is that with the vast majority able to read and write, it would take a very large investment to change the writing system. Hangul did it in an era where most people couldn't read – the investment was correspondingly smaller, and it was the right move at the right time. Another argument is that even as languages drift or even have completely different origins, the writing system remains comprehensible to all users Such is not necessarily the case with phonetic languages – given enough time, what's written and what's spoken will diverge even if the spelling made perfect sense at the time it was codified. So maybe the thought process is:
1. It will take a lot of time and money.
2. It will break the means of communication between the multiple languages spoken in the country.
3. It will only provide temporary benefits.
4. The status quo puts up a significant barrier to foreign meddling.
Don't underestimate the power of the fourth one.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The character set used is not necessarily tied to this
. Korea and Japan have used Chinese characters at some point in their histories and theirs are not tonal languages. Vietnam too but I think that is a tonal language.
Re: (Score:3)
What's a "useful language"? Was there some committee where that was decided? If you grew up where tone was a part of the meaning, you'd have no problems. Just because you lack to capacity to imagine someone with that ability doesn't make it not useful.
Who said "Western Music" is endlessly better? What is Western Music? Does Bjork count as Western Music? A lot of Westerners hates her music. Is Blues and Jazz Western Music, even though they come from bl
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Also, the native language sucks (Score:3)
China's dialects and writing systems work quite well. They're just optimized in slightly different ways than English.
English has lots of what computer scientists would call "forward error correction" -- you can really, REALLY fuck up and mangle English, yet still be understood. In contrast, you could say that Chinese has built-in spatial & temporal data compression... at the expense of error-tolerance.
For an understanding of how tones work, think about all the different meanings the word "fuck" can have
Re: Also, the native language sucks (Score:2)
One small detail -- Chinese is AT LEAST as genderless as English. It's one somewhat unique feature both languages got RIGHT. The only real advantage English has over Chinese re: gender is that English might make it slightly easier to be intentionally vague about a PERSON's gender. Neither language has silliness like "boats are female (unless they're submarines), chairs are male, and teenage girls are neuter". Or that radio is male if it's an electronic device, but female if it's broadcast content.
No green cards, No ownership (Score:5, Informative)
I lived in China for a year. I loved it. I love the culture, I love the country side. Even the pollution can be handled with a decent apartment with good window seals and air scrubbers. They people are fine (let's face it, all countries have great people and terrible people). But, the reason I, as a software engineer, won't go back: no green cards and you can't own property or start a business. Maybe when your 25 years old, the lack of unfettered internet is the worst thing you can think of. But, as you get older, you become more risk adverse. Why would I invest a life in a country where I cannot be granted permanent residence, even if I marry a citizen? [youtube.com] I wouldn't; that's foolish.
Re: No green cards, No ownership (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Try to think logically.
Well, if nothing else, you win today's internet award for unnecessarily smug douchiness.
Do they need to? (Score:3, Funny)
I mean, this is China. They just copy the talent they already have. :)
*ducks and runs*
Is stackoverflow blocked? (Score:5, Funny)
As long as stackoverflow isn't blocked I can still get everyone else to write my code, so I'm good!
You will always be a foreigner (Score:5, Interesting)
From what I heard it is impossible to be treated like one of them if you don't look Chinese, even if you speak perfect Mandarin, socialize and marry a local, etc...
Permanent visas, let alone citizenship, are extremely difficult to get and some places don't accept foreigners.
I suppose this gets on your nerves after some time.
Re: You will always be a foreigner (Score:2)
Re: You will always be a foreigner (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think that you are wrong about this.
It can take decades to get a green card, but once you have a green card, it's just 5 years residence in the USA required before you can apply for citizenship. I don't think that the time to get US citizenship is particularly dependent on your country of origin, or current citizenship.
Depending on who you are, or perhaps what day of the week you apply, you may find that the FBI takes more time to approve your application for citizenship. My wife's application went throug
Re: (Score:2)
Most other countries require a very long time to get citizenship, although there are a few exceptions (Panama, St. Lucia, St. Kitts, Dominican Republic, etc).
Re: (Score:3)
Depending on current nationality. I think that they are currently processing green card applications from about 2005 for Indian nationals.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If you are an American living and working legally in France for five years, or you are married to or were born to a French citizen, you may apply for French citizenship.
If youâ(TM)ve successfully completed two years of higher education in France, the five-year residency period can be reduced to two years.
Re: (Score:2)
but have one hobby that goes against the stereotype and people will start going: "You sure you're black?".
Whew, that's some serious racism there.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:You will always be a foreigner (Score:4, Interesting)
Veering slightly off-topic here, but in addition to what you said, the limitations on internal migration (for Chinese citizens) are absolutely insane by Western standards. Imagine that you couldn't attend school or obtain a driver's license or even legally reside in California despite being born there because your parents were "registered" as Illinois residents and moved without permission. As someone who rarely has to deal with any government agency more oppressive than the local DMV office, I can't imagine living in a country with that level of control over my life, even if they were handing out citizenship papers freely.
Re: (Score:2)
From Wikipedia [wikipedia.org]:
"Since the 1980s, an estimated 200 million Chinese live outside their officially registered areas and under far less eligibility to education and government services, living therefore in a condition similar in many ways to that of illegal immigrants... There are around 130 million such home-staying children, living without their parents, as reported by Chinese researchers."
Of course if the Chinese government was less secretive and obsessed with control, we could probably find more accurate st
Re:You will always be a foreigner (Score:4, Informative)
Indeed, China has 1,448 naturalised Chinese in total. Almost no foreigners are able to become citizens.
Even Japan, better known for hostility to immigration, naturalises around 10,000 new citizens each year; in America the figure is some 700,000.
If I had one wish this holiday season... (Score:3)
1. People don't like to move.
2. People especially don't like to move someplace far away.
3. People especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country.
4. People especially especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country where they don't speak the language and they have a completely different cuisine and culture.
5. People especially especially especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country where they don't speak the language and they have a completely different cuisine and culture.and where you have to live in a tiny apartment in an overcrowded city with really bad air pollution.
To me, that seems like that should be enough reasons. But okay, sure:
6. People especially especially especially especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country where they don't speak the language and they have a completely different cuisine and culture.and where you have to live in a tiny apartment in an overcrowded city with really bad air pollution AND the government won't let you go to all the internet sites you might want to.
Re: (Score:1)
1. People don't like to move.
2. People especially don't like to move someplace far away.
3. People especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country.
4. People especially especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country where they don't speak the language and they have a completely different cuisine and culture.
5. People especially especially especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country where they don't speak the language and they have a completely different cuisine and culture.and where you have to live in a tiny apartment in an overcrowded city with really bad air pollution.
To me, that seems like that should be enough reasons. But okay, sure:
6. People especially especially especially especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country where they don't speak the language and they have a completely different cuisine and culture.and where you have to live in a tiny apartment in an overcrowded city with really bad air pollution AND the government won't let you go to all the internet sites you might want to.
7. People especially especially especially especially especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country where they don't speak the language and they have a completely different cuisine and culture.and where you have to live in a tiny apartment in an overcrowded city with really bad air pollution AND the government won't let you go to all the internet sites you might want to AND you can get thrown in Jail for no reason at all and left to rot until you die...
Re: (Score:2)
1. People don't like to move. 2. People especially don't like to move someplace far away. 3. People especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country. 4. People especially especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country where they don't speak the language and they have a completely different cuisine and culture. 5. People especially especially especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country where they don't speak the language and they have a completely different cuisine and culture.and where you have to live in a tiny apartment in an overcrowded city with really bad air pollution.
To me, that seems like that should be enough reasons. But okay, sure:
6. People especially especially especially especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country where they don't speak the language and they have a completely different cuisine and culture.and where you have to live in a tiny apartment in an overcrowded city with really bad air pollution AND the government won't let you go to all the internet sites you might want to.
You don't have an actual point until #5. For 1-4 Speak for yourself. Many people like to experience other places and cultures and foods. And I know people who change jobs and countries every few years just for the enjoyment of trying something new.
Not everyone is boring.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
You don't have an actual point until #5. For 1-4 Speak for yourself. Many people like to experience other places and cultures and foods. And I know people who change jobs and countries every few years just for the enjoyment of trying something new.
Not everyone is boring.
Sure. But most people are. That's what makes them boring, if you think about it. If everybody was a thrill-seeker, it's the homebodies who would be the exciting and exotic ones.
Mind blown, right?
Re: If I had one wish this holiday season... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
That explains why the US and Canada are overflowing with Chinese, Japanese, East Indians, and many other cultures. Because people don't like to move. Fucking moron.
Cool, so you can help me move this weekend?
Because living in China is a nightmare (Score:3, Interesting)
No sane person would subject him- or herself to living under an authoritarian regime with little freedom of speech, which is horribly overcrowded, and where breathing the air can literally kill you, where the food is generally horrendous, where grown adults spit all over the place, and where children have slits cut into the crotches of their pants so they can piss and shit in the street. (And no, I am not kidding about that last one. Look it up.)
I spent six weeks backpacking China in 2006 and it was an absolute nightmare. I imagine it's worse now that the pollution is truly out of control.
Hong Kong is good. Taiwan is good. Mainland China is a nightmare. (Shanghai is not the worst place on earth either. But that's only because the rest of China *is* the worst place on earth.)
Lol no, that's not it (Score:2)
In China, that answer is no. Also you'll get arrested for doing basically anything. That's a bit of a downside as well.
in US too (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I worked for a US company, as a software developper, that decided to block all the "shareware" "freeware" open source" and al websites, so we had no access to github, stack overflow, forums or anything interesting for developpers. We had to fight HR (it seems HR head had the decision to unblock site, try to explain what open source is...) to access them. It was a true nightmare, they were control freak of the web. The number of times you did a search, click on the answer you were looking for and bam! blocked!
We had bypass using different DNS or 3G on our phone, etc.
I think you fail to grasp the totality of it in China...and the implication of it being done by a government rather than simply an employer.
For one thing, there's no amount of web surfing you could have possibly done at your job that would have gotten you in prison...short, that is, of going after child porn. But in China, people have been arrested for comments posted online, participation in certain groups, etc. And even without arrest, you have to worry about being under investigation.
Then, consider the
Wrong asumptions (Score:3, Interesting)
Quote: "The biggest problem is government control of the internet."
WRONG! (properly capitalized)
The biggest problem is that China is a country with a dictatorship and that shit in Human Rights.
(Real) example: I'm gay. If I go there to work I'm not allowed to live (if I go to the street and kiss my couple, or even f**k at home, both get killed and the Government send the bullets bill to our families).
Your Mileage May Vary (Score:5, Interesting)
There are, as described above, many reasons...but I think the "main" reason for any particular person will depend upon the person.
I was once contacted by Huawei about becoming an executive at their organization, in Beijing. Now..this is curious to me since I neither speak Mandarin nor Cantonese. I find it hard to imagine that I would make a very effective VP in a technical role, without even a basic conversational grasp of their language. (And don't even think about reading...)
However, interestingly enough, I also have a background in doing cyber security for the military in which role I got access to quite a lot of things. So...yeah. NO WAY was I going to entertain the job offer, for even a millisecond.
But you know what? Even without that creepiness, I wouldn't have considered it because of the air pollution. I can't imagine exercising outdoors in a place where the air is so filthy you can taste it. Hell no.
For some people, a reason not to go would be the culture shock...but for me, that's actually a plus. Or maybe the food? Nope...I love exploring new cuisines, and have always been fantastically happy getting authentic local food in any country I've visited. The crowding? Uh uh...I'm a hardcore urbanite. But for some others, these would be downsides instead of upsides...it all depends on the person.
Re: (Score:2)
Thankfully (Score:2)
Thankfully I remembered to download the entire Internet to a blank CD before I left for Chin++++NO CARRIER
Re: (Score:2)
Thankfully I remembered to download the entire Internet to a blank CD before I left for Chin++++NO CARRIER
Don't laugh, but didn't I hear that Google's doing something like that for Cuba [slashdot.org]? ;^)
USA grad programs benefit both China and USA (Score:2)
The fuck... (Score:2)
Dear China... (Score:2)
Want Tech talent? Pay in US dollars at 4X the rate of the highest paid tech job in the USA. Plus give us special status equal to your government officials that make us exempt from your laws like they are.
Then you will get a lot of talent coming there, that would be enough for us to put up with the rampant bullshit we see coming from your companies in design failures and trying to work people to death.
$2.2million per year paid in US dollars with a 20% increase yearly and a $20million balloon payout after
Idiotic Article (Score:2)
I've got rooms of PhD developers in Beijing, all of whom make almost Silicon Valley salaries, are smart enough to understand tunneling and VPN's like most everyone except maybe hairstylists and bicycle mechanics.
Sooo (Score:2)
PMI China isn't a chapter of the Project Management Institute... it is a use of the PMI license and part of the communist party... and is patrolled during meetings by the PLA. That is a significant discourager of talent.
Living there is a mixed bag (Score:4, Informative)
The good:
- The people are generally nice, easy to get on with.
- It is generally safe, I was never worried about where I went or when, within reason.
- The food is good, once you learn the gotchas.
- The electronics markets are the best in the world.
The bad:
- The Internet is truly horrible. I spent half my spare time curating VPNs to try and stay online. It is genuinely holding back China's tech sector. I was so glad when I returned home where the Internet just worked.
- Bureaucracy is a pain, everything is way more complicated than it needs to be. It took me a full day to change the ownership of my car when I sold it and I mean a full day, not just a few hours. Back home this take less than 5 minutes.
- Driving on China's roads is very stressful because of the lack of rule enforcement. I will never complain about drivers back home again.
- Pollution can make you feel unwell, much like having a cold. This was only a problem in the big cities, in small cities it is low enough to not affect you directly.
It has been a couple of years now since I lived there and from what I hear the Internet and pollution have both got worst since then.
Re:Living there is a mixed bag (Score:4, Informative)
Is that by-design, though? (Score:2)
Programmers who can't take advantage of the sites and tools that make development a global effort are destined to write software customized solely for the Chinese market.
Hmmmmmmmmm...
China does not need you (Score:2)
If they want they can learn in the West and bring back ideas and concepts as they are been created in Western universities and think tanks, research labs.
The Communist Party and mil does not need some foreigner wondering around for years asking questions, looking at things, learning about local issues.
Not many people in the West have anything that China needs. If China sees a product or service it wants it