Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Education NASA Space Technology

The 'Human Computer' Behind the Moon Landing Was a Black Woman (thedailybeast.com) 269

Reader bricko writes: The 'Human Computer' Behind the Moon Landing Was a black woman (video). She calculated the trajectory of man's first trip to the moon by hand, and was such an accurate mathematician that John Glenn asked her to double-check NASA's computers. To top it off, she did it all as a black woman in the 1950s and 60s, when women at NASA were not even invited to meetings. And you've probably never heard of her. Meet Katherine Johnson, the African American woman who earned the nickname 'the human computer' at NASA during its space race golden age.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The 'Human Computer' Behind the Moon Landing Was a Black Woman

Comments Filter:
  • Link? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Sir_Eptishous ( 873977 ) on Thursday April 07, 2016 @02:43PM (#51862347)
    I'm curious, was there supposed to be a link in the summary?
    A link to an interesting and relevant story about Katherine Johnson...
    Or were we supposed to just Google or Wiki her?
  • Computers (Score:5, Insightful)

    by rupert.applin ( 2568619 ) on Thursday April 07, 2016 @02:46PM (#51862393)
    It's interesting how quickly what was a job title for someone, became so quickly a term used solely the device. Where in the 1940's a "computer" was someone who did math, then by the 1960's, someone who did the same job as her peers 20 years prior was given that as a nickname. http://crgis.ndc.nasa.gov/hist... [nasa.gov]
    • by DarkOx ( 621550 )

      I wish I had mod points. That is clearly the most interesting aspect of this. I wonder what the effects will be for other jobs currently being automated like waiter, host(ess), etc

      • by arth1 ( 260657 )

        I wish I had mod points. That is clearly the most interesting aspect of this. I wonder what the effects will be for other jobs currently being automated like waiter, host(ess), etc

        "Waiter" got its secondary meaning long before "computer" with "dumbwaiter".

        Another transmogrified title include "calculator". It's even come full circle with the expression "human calculator" for someone good at arithmetic in their head. All calculators used to be human.

      • by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M ( 4212163 ) on Thursday April 07, 2016 @03:27PM (#51862817)

        Well, if history is any indication, any job ending in "er" will be replaced by machines.

        Computer, driver, teacher, waiter, progra-GO BACK TO WORK, SLAVES!

      • When you say it's interesting, is that because you'd never heard it before? And if the answer is in the affirmative, are you Amish?

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      Seems to undersell her work somewhat. A computer simply computes the results of someone else's equations, but according to Wikipedia she was doing much more.

    • It's interesting how quickly what was a job title for someone, became so quickly a term used solely the device. Where in the 1940's a "computer" was someone who did math, then by the 1960's, someone who did the same job as her peers 20 years prior was given that as a nickname.

      I want to see proof that this was actually a nickname at that time. In the 1950s and 1960s it was still quite common to refer to humans who did intensive calculations as "computers." The idea that this particular person was referred to as "the human computer" as a laudatory nickname in an era when her job title was likely still "computer" seems really bizarre.

      It sounds more likely to me that TFA was written by someone who didn't understand that people back then were still referred to as "computers," so

    • Human adding machines in a sense. Though they did multiplication and division too and could look up in tables. I think some people look back from the present day with a mindset that computers are amazing, mathematics is very difficult and hard without an electronic calculator, and so think that someone doing this work must be completely amazing. Yet it was very commonplace. Now being very good at that job gets one promotions or opportunities in better jobs, but ultimately there's some more important pe

    • The name didn't exactly change. Machines that did the job of a computer (i.e. perform computations) were referred to as mechanical computers and then as electronic computers. After a while, electronic computers they became so cheap that there was no reason to employ (human) computers and no reason to build (more expensive) mechanical computers and so the adjective was dropped because there was no longer a need for disambiguation.

      The same thing has happened with the word 'camera' far more quickly. 10 y

  • by Anonymous Coward

    I be fair, I couldn't name anyone else on the Apollo engineering team, either.

  • by cablepokerface ( 718716 ) on Thursday April 07, 2016 @02:47PM (#51862413)
    ... to write these things as being remarkable. She's black and a woman. Impossibru, she must be as dumb as a door nail!

    I have no doubt they have good intentions writing this, though. But still.

    • Impossibru, she must be as dumb as a door nail!

      Well yeah, it sounds stupid today. But there was a time when that sentence was "common knowledge".
    • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward

      She's not black, she's even whiter than Michael Jackson: picture [visionaryproject.org].
      Maybe she is of African descent, I don't know. But if they want to call her black she should have dark skin...

      • She's very much like Michael Jackson. No, not *that*, and it was never proved anyway.

        Scroll down for the younger photo.

      • by nbauman ( 624611 )

        http://www.visionaryproject.or... [visionaryproject.org]

        Though her father had quit school after the sixth grade, he considered education of paramount importance for Katherine and her older siblings Charles, Margaret and Horace. Since the local schools only offered classes to African Americans through the eighth grade, he enrolled his children in a school that was 125 miles away from their home. Katherineâ(TM)s high school was part of the West Virginia Collegiate Institute (formerly the West Virginia Colored Institute). In 19

      • Are you always this stupid or did you hit your head this morning?
    • Were her calculations any "blacker" than others? Or more "feminine"? No? Then why should anyone care? You might as well talk about someone's shoe size or the length of their nose.

    • by dissy ( 172727 ) on Thursday April 07, 2016 @04:43PM (#51863445)

      ... to write these things as being remarkable. She's black and a woman. Impossibru, she must be as dumb as a door nail!

      You should probably read a history book or two before making such a stupid comment.

      Of course it was remarkable in 1940!

      Women we're not given jobs doing anything more than trivial tasks, and black people typically were NOT given jobs by white people at all because actually paying them anything was more than their labor was seen as worth.

      You do realize it wasn't even illegal to discriminate against blacks or women until 1964 right?
      It was perfectly common back then to not hire either women or black people and to outright tell them it was because they were a women or black, and they just had to suck up the injustice of it without any recourse.

      The fact she was both brings down the wrath of two groups of discrimination that ran very strong, and continued to do so for decades beyond that point in time, yet did such amazing mathematical work, should give you a slight idea of the effort and work she had to put into her life and career to even get to that point.

      The fact she had a job what so ever was pretty exceptional, let alone a job typically only given to college graduates, which blacks weren't welcome to attend for the most part, and was again perfectly legal to not allow them to, and as a woman the fact her skills knowledge and ambitions were more than "I want to sew or bring the man of the office coffee" was fairly unheard of.

      Unheard of... as evidenced by the fact you and most people haven't heard of her.

      Also the very fact stories like this are so rare is not an indication of how "behind the times" the author is, but a testament to exactly how rare such a situation was at the time.

      Just because you haven't experienced or witnessed discrimination since the year of your birth to now, doesn't mean it was anything close to how it was in the past.

      Again I can't stress enough, you need to read some history if for no other reason than to learn your limits and not make such authoritative sounding yet factually incorrect stupid statements.

      • I'm well aware of the history. As is any sane person, obviously.

        See, you're doing it wrong. And you're missing entirely why. If you (and many others) keep pointing to history instead of looking forward and keep pointing to racial differences while being well intentioned you're actually keeping them alive. Much more so than actual racists, who are intellectually easier to ignore.

        If we, as people, have the discipline to raise 1 or 2 generations of people who aren't told how truely remarkable it is when
    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      It makes more sense in the historical context. Remember that in the 50s there were still laws segregating black people. Access to education was difficult for most black people. Feminism and women's lib was only starting to have an effect. Well done to her for overcoming those hurdles, and props to NASA for being progressive.

    • OTOH, if you want to find subversive text in all this, I find it a little bit racist to refer to her strictly as a "black" woman, when clearly she's extremely light skinned and only lightly exhibits the typical facial features of african heritage (which is a real thing before the SJ kneejerkers scream racism: http://johnhawks.net/explainer... [johnhawks.net] , as did her parents, which strongly suggests a white lineage as well.
      This doesn't matter academically of course, she did what she did because of who she was, not w
    • a black woman in the 50s had the proverbial snowballs chance in hell of doing what she did. It's speaks volumes to her genius that she wasn't shut out.
    • And so do I. Now, for the sake of the thought experimentation, let's imagine we have a second scenario. Same color, however exactly opposite academic and professional achievements. No achievements or accomplishments, to be precise.

      All of the sudden, discussing about racism and underprivileged becomes acceptable. To me, that is the real racism.

      As if women of color are not capable of making decisions. They are more than capable and there are a lot of inspiring examples, let's start from Madam C.J.Walker ( htt [wikipedia.org]

  • by bigdady92 ( 635263 ) on Thursday April 07, 2016 @02:54PM (#51862465) Homepage
    Good for <INSERT COLOR OF SKIN> <INSERT SEXUAL GENDER/IDENTITY> who did <INSERT AMAZING THINGS> during <INSERT PERIOD WHERE ISSUE IS PRESENT>.

    That way we can get all the outrage and praise in all at once.
  • by ihtoit ( 3393327 ) on Thursday April 07, 2016 @02:55PM (#51862469)

    There was a pool of women (and men) at NASA who were ALL referred to as "computers". NASA didn't start using electronic computers for flight dynamics calculations until 1962, and continued to rely on the pool to crosscheck the electronic calculations until 1984.

  • by kairis ( 865663 ) on Thursday April 07, 2016 @03:01PM (#51862527)
    Margaret Hamilton wrote the on-board flight software.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
    To me, all of them are great scientists, regardless of race.
    • I've never heard of her. I got off on a bit of a googling tangent, and found the company she started, Hamilton Technologies. They claim to have this thing called Universal Systems Language that incorporates all the lessons learned from developing the Apollo software. Maybe it does, but it's a proprietary language. By no means am I a free software zealot; but this looks like a classic case of holding on too tightly. I could not even find a "hello world" example in that language. Does anybody use it? I

    • "To me, all of them are great scientists, regardless of race."

      I guess that means YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT WOMEN, HUH? /sarc
  • All I can think is if she's going to be remembered because of her work at NASA /or/ that she just because she was a black woman. In other words, would this video, this article, her popularity, etc etc, exist if she were not a black woman? Hmm.
    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      Let's name all the other people who worked with her.

      What do you mean, we can't? There's your answer.

      It's sort of a first-man-on-the-moon scenario.

    • Can you name another NASA engineer who wasn't a nazi?

      I didn't think so.

    • by Nkwe ( 604125 )

      All I can think is if she's going to be remembered because of her work at NASA /or/ that she just because she was a black woman. In other words, would this video, this article, her popularity, etc etc, exist if she were not a black woman? Hmm.

      Personally I would have been just as interested in the story if it were titled and about "The human computer that made the moon landing possible". Sure the black woman thing makes it more interesting to a broader audience (maybe), but as nerd (for which this site is supposed to cater to), the fact that it was a human that was used to double check a computer's computations, is interesting enough.

  • All that headline leave out is the exclamation mark at the end. Why is it that we have to express such astonishment over the fact that a *black woman" (OMG!) calculated trajectories.

          Or is this less about this competent mathemetician's imopressive accomplishments, or it is to, yet again, wring our little hands over the injustice of modern society and how terrible we should all feel about how bad we are?

          The latter, I think

  • If she had been a man, we wouldn't have heard of him a lot either.

  • by swb ( 14022 ) on Thursday April 07, 2016 @03:26PM (#51862807)

    If she could get so good at math back then, why anyone should be able to do it now, right? We don't need to worry about the so-called education gap or take a bunch of extra steps to help black people overcome so-called obstacles because obviously if she was able to do it then, it should be much easier for even less skilled people to do it now.

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      One person overcoming the odds doesn't mean that everyone can do it. That's why they are called the odds.

      Also, if we want to have a meritocracy then everyone has to have a fair and equal chance. Different people start life in different positions (parent's wealth, location, and yeah, race) so unless some effort is made to even things out it's not selection on merit, it's selection on merit + personal circumstances.

  • I guess this would be a lot more impressive if we had actually gone to the moon in the 60's. But it's a nice feel good story and helps perpetuate Nixon's myth.
  • by IcarusMoth ( 631872 ) on Thursday April 07, 2016 @03:44PM (#51862965)
    I mean, if you are bold enough to spout racially regressive ideology, maybe attach your mostly anonymizing screen name to it. Many of the Anonymous Coward comments in this thread are part of the reason why the accomplishments of minorities and women continue to be seen as remarkable. Racism and sexism are endemic within tech industries, they are part of what drive the high turnover rate for minorities. I for one, choose not to work in private industry as I don't find the casual racism that exists there conducive to my quality of life. You ACs want to tell us one more thing about the negro?
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward

      I've worked in tech for a few years now, and while I've never heard anyone advocating discrimination against women, blacks or hispanics, I have frequently heard people advocating discrimination against men, whites and asians. So I have to agree with you that racism and sexism are endemic within tech industries.

      Fortunately, it seems that a majority still believe that people should be treated the same, regardless of their race or sex.

  • >"the African American woman who earned the nickname 'the human computer' at NASA during its space race golden age."

    There are probably a number black women as well as European American women, and all kinds of people people of all races, creeds, religions, sexual orientations, etc behind all the workings of NASA that we have never heard of before.

  • by Theovon ( 109752 ) on Thursday April 07, 2016 @05:02PM (#51863575)

    Actually it IS amazing that a person who is BLACK and a WOMAN could get into such an important position back in the 1950’s and 1960’s. Today we recognize it as foolish and stupid to prejudge someone’s abilit to DO MATH (for instance) on the basis of gender or skin color. But back then?

    What this tells us is that she’s fucking awesome, more awesome than you and me. She’s so awesome that people at NASA in an era that only valued white men simply were unable to deny the level of her skill. To break through the prejudice required that she have skill way beyond what a white male would have needed to get into the same job.

    So yeah. Kudos to this woman for her intelligence, skill, and persistence in an era that would have otherwise begrudged her a job as a toilet cleaner.

  • I remember those days. Used to crash into the suface all the time playing lem.bas on a teletype. Glad she was better than me.
  • I knew that they had faked the moon landing and that Stanley Kubrick had been enlisted by Nixon to help win the space race against Russia but now you're telling me that rather than have a real computer plot the course they just used a black woman?

No spitting on the Bus! Thank you, The Mgt.

Working...