Flat-Earth Argument Results in Rap Battle (npr.org) 235
New submitter mjjochen writes: A little something to make you smile (or cry). NPR reports on astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson calling out rapper B.o.B. in a Twitter (& rap) argument over the status of the earth (are we round or flat?). Rapper B.o.B. references the usual conspiracy theories to support his case in his throwdown (music). Neil deGrasse Tyson responds (actually, his nephew does), on why B.o.B.'s points are not very well-informed (music). As Tyson puts it, "Duude — to be clear: Being five centuries regressed in your reasoning doesn't mean we all can't still like your music." Shall we start leeching the four humors from the body again to achieve balance? Hrm.
Common sense ain't all that common (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Time Cube (Score:4, Informative)
This rapper is in on the conspiracy himself and doesn't know it. Help spread the word!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org] /s
Why the fuck is this on Slashdot?! (Score:5, Insightful)
Holy shit. I think that Slashdot may have hit a new all-time low with this submission. Everything about this submission is dumb and irrelevant.
Come on! Can't we get some relevant submissions onto the front page, rather than total shit like this submission? It's not like they don't exist. They're sitting there in the goddamn queue, while donkey shit like this submission ends up on the front page.
Seriously, why the fuck is Slashdot reporting about a flat-earth argument of all things? Why the fuck is Slashdot reporting about a goddamn rap battle over some flat-earth argument? The people involved aren't even remotely important in any way.
What a fucking stupid submission! It's utterly stupid in every single way!
Re: Why the fuck is this on Slashdot?! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Because it's an awesome rap battle involving science.
Sheesh you must be a fun dude to hang out with.
Re:Why the fuck is this on Slashdot?! (Score:5, Insightful)
B.o.B. WTF (Score:2)
Why is anyone paying attention to that goofball B.o.B. anyway? He's a boring rapper with weak rhymes as well as weak science. I mean, his stage name is an initialism for Battery Operated Boyfriend (i.e. a vibrating dildo). All this does is draw more attention to him and his shitty rap. No-one could possibly believe the flat earth theory these days anyway when you can easily fly or sail around the world.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Errr...there is good rap?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's not that there has been nothing good... just not a lot that's new. The labels own libraries of copyright material and just keep churning it out with a new spin. Playing the same thing on a keyboard with a different effect over and over doesn't make it new or good and can make something you used like very old and tired.
Re: (Score:2)
old man with a closed mind ranting
Sounds like this rapper, though he's a bit young to be doing so much closed-mind ranting.
On the other hand, I want to see more angry old men rapping.
Re:B.o.B. WTF (Score:4, Insightful)
I have long since given up on making statements about the stupid shit people can or will believe.
I've met more than enough people who insist on believing the most outrageous things ... and even if they're doing it as an act, any sufficiently advanced attention seeking/denial of reality is indistinguishable from actually being an idiot.
I no longer differentiate between those who are idiots, and those who merely want to seem like idiots.
Re: (Score:2)
I no longer differentiate between those who are idiots, and those who merely want to seem like idiots.
Who wants to seem like an idiot? Most of the time you can tell the idiots because they want to seem smart.
Re: (Score:2)
If for some reason you find a post that is well thought out, could probably fool someone of less than average intelligence, and has no basis in fact what so ever. It was probably my brother who likes to troll the people that believe in this stuff. He may have also messed up a few wiki articles so that the facts are only slightly incorrect.
Re: (Score:2)
It's cheap and easy publicity...
Re: (Score:2)
Why is anyone paying attention to that goofball B.o.B. anyway?
No one is. Tyson is being his usual annoying attention whore self - he's just mixing it up a bit by introducing one of his relatives into the mix.
Sometimes.... (Score:3, Insightful)
I love a good conspiracy theory, I really do. I'm a big fan of the X-files... but... and I think this is a big reason why I only engage in them for entertainment purposes:
The Government cannot simultaneously be incompetent and engage in these "vast conspiracies", as the people who engage in the latter are always complaining about the former so often do. Just because a villain in a Bond flick can ensure the loyalty of silence of the hundreds or thousands of workers from Blofeld to the lowliest janitor in the underground complex does not mean that this is how the real world works. Even the Mafia can't (and isn't able to) do that.
Re: (Score:2)
That's what always gets me about these conspiracy theorists. They claim that the government is incredibly competent at keeping a secret (most times across multiple administrations/Congresses). Yet, this same "incredibly competent at keeping secrets" government messes up in such a way that is obvious to your average conspiracy theorist of modest means. With a computer and some old news footage, they are able to "see
Re: (Score:2)
That's what they want you to think so you wouldn't recognize the truth when you see it.
Most government conspiracies are rooted in misdirection and trying to keep something else secret or to trick certain actors into taking certain actions. In other words, they start at the government or an enemy of the government trying to get the government to divulge information in response.
Re: (Score:2)
But that's the staple of conspiracy theories. Whoever is the conspirator is at the same time a scheming mastermind with infinite resources because they can pull off insane feats to bring on the end of humanity, and at the same time bumbling fools because even harebrained idiots like the average conspiracy nut can see through their plans.
Re: (Score:3)
The harebrained conspiracy nuts don't consider themselves idiots...quite the contrary, they consider their belief in conspiracies to be evidence that they're more clever than the scheming masterminds (not to mention the rest of humanity, hence the word "sheeple").
Dunning-Krugery at its finest.
Who? (Score:3)
I did some intertube searches for this guy and 95% of the results have to do with this rap battle thinger. Why is this guy getting attention?
Re: (Score:3)
Yeah, but both those songs were years ago now. He seemed to be a bit of a one-hit wonder who (thankfully) disappeared. This is probably all a publicity stunt to try and get people to notice him again.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, but both those songs were years ago now. He seemed to be a bit of a one-hit wonder who (thankfully) disappeared. This is probably all a publicity stunt to try and get people to notice him again.
The "publicity stunt" is all on Tyson's side.
Re: (Score:2)
We have very diverging definitions for the word "famous" it seems.
Re: (Score:2)
Nothin' on You ft. Bruno Mars
First time I heard this song was some amateur performing a cover. And after I got done making fun of how bad the lyrics were and how stupid it was, I was informed that it was a famous song.
Name change (Score:2)
Maybe he should change his name to B Square B :)
More than five centuries (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Without reading TFA, I have to point out that if Tyson tweeted that the rapper was "five centuries regressed in your reasoning" in order to indicate that five centuries ago people all thought that the earth was flat, then Tyson's statement is ironically also uninformed. There's a common myth that Columbus "discovered" that the earth was round. In fact people had believed that the earth was round for centuries before Columbus, but nobody had ever demonstrated this fact to mainland Europe by means of sailing.
I thought that it was now believed that even in Columbus' time many people believed the Earth was round, they just thought it was a lot smaller or, like you said, just contained water. Remember, he wasn't looking to prove the Earth was round, he was looking for a quicker trading route to Asia.
Re:More than five centuries (Score:4, Informative)
many people believed the Earth was round, they just thought it was a lot smaller
Both that the Earth is round and a very good approximation of the size were known for centuries before Columbus. *Columbus* underestimated the size of the Earth and thought he could make it; other people refused to support him because they knew that he could not load his ships with enough provisions to survive the trip.
Re: (Score:3)
Which is extremely silly
20/20 hindsight
because there are Central American ruins with old Hebrew wording etched into the stone
Citation direly needed
Re: (Score:3)
yeah... hebrew wording. Uh huh. You know, there was a cute time-traveling RPG called Time & Time Again that played on that sort of nonsense, although they used Ogham which -- if you believe things asserted without evidence -- is found in places humans have never been.
The "Nordic naval expanse", depending on what you mean by that, is partially true. Eric the Red sailed west from Greenland and landed around Newfoundland, IIRC. They called the indigenous people "skraelings". We know this because there was
Re:More than five centuries (Score:5, Informative)
Nope; it was Columbus who thought it was smaller, and was wrong. The Earth's size was first accurately estimated by Eratosthenes around 200 BC by using the shadows cast by the sun in different locations, and his figure (which was in fact only 0.16% off from the true figure) has been the generally accepted one ever since.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
but much of the time, it would've been detrimental to mention those alternative theories publicly.
Even today, you probably can't get elected president of the US if you're an avowed atheist.
Re:More than five centuries (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe not, but their book does. And last time I checked they think that bronze age tome is infallible and right and holy and shit.
Let's take a look, shall we?
1 Chronicles 16:30:
Tremble before him, all the earth! The world is firmly established;
it cannot be moved.
Psalm 93:1:
The Lord reigns, he is robed in majesty;
the Lord is robed in majesty and armed with strength;
indeed, the world is established, firm and secure.
Daniel 4:10-11:
These are the visions I saw while lying in bed: I looked, and there before me st
Re: (Score:2)
Given that all motion is relative, the statement that something cannot be moved is nonsense. It has no meaning. It's like saying "The world is firmly established; it wakalixes."
Re: (Score:2)
Well, 5000 years ago people didn't know that, so they wrote something that we know today is not true, but to them it was pretty much the state of their knowledge.
Why this should be in any way relevant today or even "holy" is beyond me, though.
Re: (Score:2)
"Without reading TFA, I have to point out that if Tyson tweeted that the rapper was "five centuries regressed in your reasoning" in order to indicate that five centuries ago people all thought that the earth was flat, then Tyson's statement is ironically also uninformed. There's a common myth that Columbus "discovered" that the earth was round."
Maybe Tyson was not referring to Columbus but Elcano, you know, the first guy that factually rounded the Earth about five centuries ago (1522), setting forever the q
Re: (Score:2)
Magellan (well, some of his men, technically) completed his circumnavigation in 1522, a few decades after Columbus, who didn't circumnavigate shit. He went out and came back. I would guess that Tyson meant, "it wasn't proven experimentally that the earth was round until 500 years ago" (494 to be exact).
The first person known to have proposed a heliocentric [wikipedia.org] system, however, was Aristarchus of Samos (c. 270 BC).
Notorious N.dG.T. ain't nuthin' to fuck with (Score:2)
This would be a much better story if this had been a proper rap battle and Neil deGrasse Tyson had dropped a real rap joint and done a video with girls with big round butts and guns and low-rider cars with hydraulics.
https://youtu.be/fJuapp9SORA [youtu.be]
Flat Earth? (Score:2)
As a submariner, one of the most important thing you can do is get ranges to other vessels. You do this by using their visible height and your height of eye, allowing you to calculate how much is hidden by the horizon. As the range decreases, you can watch the visible height increase, something you wouldn't see with a flat earth. This happens until the vessel is at the horizon, and you can see the entire thing (which happens at roughly 5100m for a 2 meter tall person, or 5600yd/3.16 miles for a 6 foot ta
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps flat-earthers just need to spend some time on a boat to get the real picture.
Only if you use your ranging skills to sink it.
Have any Hollywood biggies signed on yet? (Score:2)
Has Jenny McCarthy been approached about endorsing this? I would love to see a floor fight at the Philadelphia convention this year as McCarthy, with whoever Baldwins and Kardashians she can bring along as co-protesters, noisily accuses the party front-runners of being pawns of Big Astronomy. With some native Hawaiian anti-astronomy protesters for ethnic color, this could become one of the coolest viral videos of all time.
Re: (Score:2)
That... that guy has some good ideas. Where do I subscribe to your pamphlets?
Comedy gold, right here.
Leeching humours (Score:2)
God dammit slashdot. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Actually, this isn't even a new marketing technique. The old adage still stands : there is no such thing as bad publicity.
Tell that to Jerry Sandusky.
There is no "Flat Earth *Argument*" (Score:2)
It's essentially an elaborate troll by anti-intellectuals.
It can be solved, simply, by taking someone up high enough that they can actually see the curvature of the planet in no unambiguous terms.
And all these purported flat-earthers have is "Nuh uh!".
So, again, that's not an argument.
Kansas (Score:4, Funny)
I live in Kansas. All you have to do is look around and you can see the earth is flat.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Can you see Russia from your house?
Both are wrong (Score:2)
The earth is neither flat nor round. It is spherical, however.
B.o.B. (Score:2)
B.o.B. stands for "Brainless, obtuse bonehead".
I just love these jackass geocentrists, so smug and self-assured, convinced that they and they alone know "the truth" while every scientist in the world is wrong.
This clown couldn't tell a Bunsen burner from a baseball bat, but somehow he's managed to suss it all out...uncover the hidden truth...and with a single stroke of his drippy dick, negate centuries of careful scientific research.
Never mind the fact that all modern physics contradicts him, and that time
First things first (Score:2)
Rappers haven't solved the magnets thing yet.
Wait a minute... Ignorance on display in a RAP? (Score:2)
Is that unusual?
Tyson's being kind (Score:2)
We've known for three thousand years that the earth is round (no, Columbus's detractors didn't think the earth was flat. They thought is was bigger than Columbus did--and they were right.).
leeches (Score:2)
"Shall we start leeching the four humors from the body again to achieve balance?"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
actually... leeches have started to be used again in the western medical world because the removal of blood - especially blood which has heavy toxins or other dangerous pollutants - can have a beneficial effect (obviously), and leaches automatically inject anti-coagulants.
just because they didn't necessarily understand the exact science *doesn't* mean that over centuries of empirical observation
22 centuries ... (Score:2)
Not 5 centuries ...
The earth has been known to be round for at least 22 centuries.
Eratosthenes, proved it by measuring the circumference of the earth around 240 BC.
Actually, Neil DeGrasse Tyson's predecessor, Carl Sagan explains it very well in this Cosmos video [youtube.com] .
Re:The earth is flat? (Score:5, Interesting)
I'd expect the flat-earthers to have a stock reply for that one. Much like the believers of other ridiculous things have their toolkit of responses to use to deflect the truth.
Having said that, I would be really interested in their explanation of how it can be noon in Hawaii at the same time as it's the middle of the night in Paris. That's got to be a good one.
Re:The earth is flat? (Score:5, Insightful)
Having said that, I would be really interested in their explanation of how it can be noon in Hawaii at the same time as it's the middle of the night in Paris.
That's easy it's a combination of turtles with mirrors and sun blocker discs on their backs . . .
. . . all the way down.
Re:The earth is flat? (Score:5, Funny)
Actually... only one turtle. And four elephants.
Speed of Light (Score:3)
Having said that, I would be really interested in their explanation of how it can be noon in Hawaii at the same time as it's the middle of the night in Paris. That's got to be a good one.
Simple it's the incredibly slow speed of light. That way when the sun rises over the rim it takes hours for the dawn to reach the hub. Of course now you have to add all us physicists to the conspiracy theory.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
globe
A flat-earther just had an aneurysm.
Re: (Score:3)
That's correct. The place is filled with such a strong magical field that the light travels through it like a fly through molasses. Just this day I had to pay to renew the countercurses on my PC's motherboard; the communication delays prevented it from even booting. Alas, the wife's iPhone is suspiciously unaffected. I wonder what kind of pacts did late Mr. Jobs sign, and when do they expire.
Re:The earth is flat? (Score:5, Informative)
Actually, according to them the North Pole really isn't the issue. It's the South Pole that doesn't exist. Instead there's a wall of ice around Antarctica that's guarded by NASA employees to keep people from finding the truth (I'm not actually making that up, unfortunately).
Re: (Score:2)
Who was guarding it prior to the 40s/50s?
Re:The earth is flat? (Score:5, Informative)
Well, there may be no NASA employees at exactly the south pole, there are certainly NASA
employees and contractors in Antarctica flying balloons...
http://www.csbf.nasa.gov/antar... [nasa.gov]
Re: (Score:3)
True enough... but the folks I knew flying baloons there for cos-ray experiments were not nasa employees...
That's not quite as interesting as NASA employees in cosplay experiments [vice.com].
Re:The earth is flat? (Score:4, Funny)
"Having actually been to the south pole, I can definitely say that there are NO NASA employees there."
Clearly you're involved.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, according to the very brad definition of music, me rhythmically slamming my dick to the desk could also be considered music. I know it's just a tiny level above rap but hey, nobody's perfect.
Re: (Score:2)
...my dick...it's just...tiny.... but hey, nobody's perfect.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh man, I'd totally forgotten about the C-Rap genre, which includes pretty much every thing today.
Last rap song that was any good was pretty much Bust a Move. But that was out back in "the day" when the earth was still round.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't even try. By having been to the South Pole, you're part of the huge conspiracy.
Re: (Score:2)
Government privatization has shifted the conspiracy over to contractors. But contractors like money so they have incentive to perpetuate the conspiracy.
Re: (Score:2)
Now, what I'd love to see is the crackpot math that explains how GPS works on a flat earth.
Re: (Score:2)
(inside which, depending on who you ask, the lost tribes of israel and/or the nazis that didn't end up on the moon or in south america, reside).
You denier! It's where the lizard people live. The need to be inside the earth to warm their cold blood, yes that makes sense.
Re: (Score:2)
GPS is simple triangulation. Works just fine on a flat surface. Of course, the earth isn't *flat* like a piece of paper, it is flat like a pizza - generally flat but kinda bumpy in areas. We still have elevation changes otherwise there wouldn't be mountains and valleys.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I mean the stuff up there goes in circles, so what's the big deal with some GPS birds :)
Re: (Score:2)
Even if you believe the Earth is spherical (or whatever), the north pole is an imaginary point. It doesn't exist in the physical world, it's only part of a model, a model that depends on the earth not being flat and on the Earth rotating.
Re:Diversity (Score:5, Funny)
Well you sure typed some words on the internet
Re: (Score:3)
Of course the Earth is flat. However it creates a field that warps time and space to give the illusion of being (roughly) spherical. The math is too complex to reproduce here, but I'm sure it is available somewhere on the internet.
Re: (Score:2)
The earth is flat.
The earth is round.
The earth is an oblate spheroid.
Within some error bar.
From http://chem.tufts.edu/answersi... [tufts.edu]
To put it another way, on a flat surface, curvature is 0 per mile everywhere. On the earth's spherical surface, curvature is 0.000126 per mile everywhere (or 8 inches per mile). On the earth's oblate spheroidal surface, the curvature varies from 7.973 inches to the mile to 8.027 inches to the mile.
The correction in going from spherical to oblate spheroidal is much smaller than going from flat to spherical. Therefore, although the notion of the earth as a sphere is wrong, strictly speaking, it is not as wrong as the notion of the earth as flat.
Re: (Score:2)
Uh, we knew 5000 years ago the Earth was round. You think the Egyptians were morons?
That reminds me of a school project I was involved*:
Two classes of different schools went out on the same day, hundreds of miles apart but on the same geographic length, placed a rod vertically on the ground and measured the angles of the resulting shadows at noon.
Given the distance between the two points (via google earth) and using a bit of (school-) geometry they then could calculate earth's circumference.
Considered earth's "potatoness" the results were not bad at all.
And that's precisely what they
Re: (Score:2)
*) I provided one of the rods, heh.
I hope you used protection.
Re: (Score:2)
Wow. Google Earth has been around a long time. Must have been hard using it with IP over smoke signal.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Uh, we knew 5000 years ago the Earth was round. You think the Egyptians were morons?
There is no evidence that the Egyptians knew the earth was round. The Greeks figured it out by about 400BC, and also roughly calculated the size, but as far as we know, no one knew earlier than that.
Re: (Score:2)
If you can really believe this idea in this day and age then humanity has major problems. Sadly I don't even think a round the world flight (which I've done) would cure them they'd probably think the pilot turned the flight around slowly?
Humanity has major problems Now that anti-government is turning to anti-all-science, I suspect that a sizable percentage of the US populous will gleefully return the country - if not the world - to the dark ages.
Re: (Score:2)
The conspiracy is that they are keeping it a secret. Its not like they are saying nobody else bothered to notice, rather - the moon landings were fake, space doesn't exist, NASA are keeping it a secret with fake space launches/photos/etc, the military/NASA are guarding the giant mountains around Antarctica (the 'edge of the world') and you are a sheep (just open your mind man, the evidence is all out there but you have to find it yourself (for some reason)).
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, the way this shit runs, it pretty much is a conspiracy. Because (according to the loonies) the world is flat, the North Pole is at the center, the South pole is not really a pole but some kinda "wall" around the edge of the world, and any sane proof against it is from some government agency that is of course in on it. Like NASA, because they claim there's satellites, something that's of course not really possible on a flat earth, so they're in on the conspiracy. Apparently along with all the other
Re: (Score:2)
We should get the flat earth society folks, and the hollow earth folks together, in a room (with padded walls), and let them fight it out to determine which it is...
because according to them, there's a hole in the north pole, and a hole in the south pole...
Re: (Score:2)
Whoever loses.
We win.
Though I wouldn't consider it impossible that they band together and somehow come up with a combined conspiracy.