Zika Virus Outbreak Prompts CDC To Expand Travel Advisory (washingtonpost.com) 83
turkeydance writes: The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is asking pregnant women to avoid 22 countries that have seen outbreaks of the Zika virus. That's up eight from just yesterday. Disturbingly, the mosquito-borne virus, which may be causing abnormally small heads in newborns, has also been linked to yet another debilitating disease. The Zika virus has been spreading rapidly over the past several months, most prominently in Brazil. Its spread has been associated with a dramatic increase in microcephaly, a rare condition in which babies are born with abnormally small heads.
"Yet another debilitating disease" (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
Oh... you mean you're a Windows user?
Re: (Score:1)
Linux use causes men to have an abnormally small penis or no penis at all.
I recently ditched Windows for Linux Mint. So far no issues. (Down below, I mean.) I'll update you in a couple of months if you want, just say how long this virus' incubation period is expected to be.
Or does Mint/Ubuntu not really count?
+ abnormally small head, not to be confused with (Score:4, Funny)
Thank you for that. So Guillain-Barre and microcephaly (abnormally small small heads), not to be confused with bureaucracy (abnormally small brains).
Re:"Yet another debilitating disease" (Score:5, Informative)
I'm from the affected area. North-east Argentina, near Paraguay. There have been hundreds of cases of Dengue Fever in the past week. All of this is happening because of the floodings, caused by excessive rainfall by El Niño. Temperatures have been extremely high too (37C at my city today).
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
I'm from the affected area. North-east Argentina, near Paraguay. There have been hundreds of cases of Dengue Fever in the past week. All of this is happening because of the floodings, caused by excessive rainfall by El Niño. Temperatures have been extremely high too (37C at my city today).
My fellow neighbor. There's reason to believe [Brazilian experts say] that the Zika virus was introduced in the Americas on the occasion of the 2014 FIFA World Cup in Brazil. I'm on the same latitude as you are, suffering the same problems [except with unseasonably cool summer [which is nice]. Regards.
And still those Republicans... (Score:1)
want to cut funding for the CDC.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
It's because they don't care about children. Don't care about children.
The CDC's budget was over $7,000,000,000 last year, and they have 15,000 employees. Sounds like they do care. I used to work for the CDC Foundation which is an independent nonprofit associated with the CDC. When we needed money for things that had a ROI, it wasn't the Democrats that supported us.
And, why do liberals always repeat themselves?
Re: And still those Republicans... (Score:1)
And then there was Jimmy Two Times, who got that nickname because he said everything twice, like "I'm gonna go get the papers, get the papers"
Re: (Score:1)
It's because they don't care about children. Don't care about children.
I don't care too much, given that children is a renewable resource. As long as we lose fewer kids than what we can compensate for by more sex, it shouldn't be a big concern except at the individual emotional level, including hardship trying to keep a dying child alive for as long as possible.
TL;DR: Abort, retry
Re: (Score:2)
Child euthanasia is legal in several countries, under restrictive conditions. Offspring with severe microcephaly likely qualifies. [wikipedia.org]
Filicide isn't all that uncommon either, although taboo in countries with Judeo-Christian religious traditions and beliefs that human life is somehow "sacred".
Just mentioning it here is asking for a flamebait or troll moderation, even if the intent is rational discussion. The taboo runs too deep, and gut feelings get the better of people.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Truman didn't create it. It was originally created from the Malaria Commission which was created by John D. Rockefeller, and then renamed to the CDC. He was the richest American that ever lived, so there's probably not a single person that was more Republican than him. You just know he hated the average person.
Re: And still those Republicans... (Score:1)
No. The rulers of this site, like all wealthy people, are republicans.
Re: (Score:1)
They funded the Nazis so im not so sure.
Dupe WITHIN summary... (Score:2)
Nice, editors.
which may be causing abnormally small heads in newborns,
a rare condition in which babies are born with abnormally small heads.
This message messaged to you by the redundant department of redundancy department.
Re: (Score:2)
And that, class, is where Trump voters came from.
Re: (Score:2)
He's not mad, he's laughing.
Mosquitoes (Score:2)
I was in the Kona, HI airport yesterday and someone had a mosquito net over his head. It wasn't to protect him from mosquitoes, it was to protect the local mosquitoes from him. I believe he had just been released from a hospital after arriving from South America.
Re: (Score:2)
He was let in because he was a white man from your town. There is actually a guy in your town who has flown on an air-o-plane, and he went to Bra-zil! But only one.
We had a special liberal vote to allow people from your town to fly on airplanes. But we're reconsidering it.
The thing I don't understand is why now? (Score:5, Interesting)
1. The Zika virus has been Africa and Southeast Asia since forever.
2. They don't seem to have microcephalic cases like Brazil has.
3. The virus was introduced into Brazil sometime around 2015.
4. 2015 Brazil sees a 10x increase in microcephalic cases.
So far that seems compelling that Zika is causing the cases. But why aren't we seeing the same thing in Africa or Asia? It's not like the Zika virus in Brazil has had thousands of years to mutate into a version that causes microcephaly, but not the original strain in Africa and Southeast Asia. It's the same virus.
It's not like the people in Brazil don't have the same "immunity" that people in Africa and Southeast Asian people have -- a large percentage of the Brazilian people *have* West African ancestors where the Zika virus has been found.
Here's an alternate hypothesis: some kind of chemical has been introduced into Brazil in 2015 that's causing the birth defects. Maybe a pesticide that hasn't been properly tested, or a morning sickness drug that wasn't tested.
Citations:
For pesticides and birth defects: http://www.counterpunch.org/20... [counterpunch.org] http://americanpregnancy.org/p... [americanpregnancy.org] and http://www.beyondpesticides.or... [beyondpesticides.org]
Pesticides and microcephaly: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pm... [nih.gov] and http://www.gmls.eu/beitraege/1... [www.gmls.eu]
For morning sickness drugs: http://www.aboutkidshealth.ca/... [aboutkidshealth.ca]
Re: (Score:1)
Each country has endemic and epidemic diseases. Would be interesting to know the current statistics for children with problems in these African countries. The real problem here is that no one of our countries (I live in Costa Rica), was prepared to deal with this "foreign" disease. We have other issues to worry about, some even don't exist in Africa, but Zika was something rare for us and our emergency and heal
Re: (Score:1)
The drought have been so strong here that I have not seen mosquitoes in a while and maybe thats helping to keep the mosquito in low numbers, just today it rained for the first time in 2 months, in the friggin Andean heights, but that
Re:The thing I don't understand is why now? (Score:4, Interesting)
Well, Influenza has a variety of strains, some of which cause illnesses that are little worse than a head cold, and others that can be almost as bad as Ebola. Maybe Zika also has variations.
What would be helpful (Score:2)
I think it would be helpful if they medical people in the affected countries would take statistics on how many children were born to woman known to be infected with Zika and keep track of how many were babies were born with microcephaly vs. those who were not. If Zika really is involved then the ratio
#microcephaly & zika/ #no microcephaly & zika should be significantly different than the ratio #microcephaly & no Zika/#no microcephaly & no Zika.
I've seen in the news items of women who were t
Re:What would be helpful (Score:5, Insightful)
I've seen in the news items of women who were tested for Zika after microcephaly, but that's just confirmation basis (sic).
It's incomplete data, but it isn't confirmation bias.
If the researchers were taking tests of women who gave birth to microcephalic babies, and Zika was not the cause, you'd expect that the women being tested would have some closer-to-even distribution between Zika infected and non-Zika infected, given a suitable sample size.
Now if the testing were done the other way around (checked for microcephaly only in women known to have had the Zika virus), then you'd potentially have confirmation bias if the results appeared to show a correlation. The problem you'd run into here is that without checking against the birth results of mothers who didn't have Zika, you wouldn't know if there were some other cause for the microcephaly.
This of it this way. If you went to a village and rounded up every mother who had a microcephalic baby, and you found that 99+% of them had Zika, there is no confirmation bias. You'd still want to determine how many other mothers infected with Zika had non-microcephalic babies, and you'd further need to determine when during pregnancy the Zika infection began (as it's possible that microcephaly only occurs if caught at or before a certain point of gestation), but the result would point to possible avenues for research.
If, however, you rounded up all of the women who had Zika during their pregnancy, and found that 80% of them had microcephalic babies and stopped there, then you'd have a case of confirmation bias. It could turn out that 80% of non-Zika infected mothers also had microcephalic babies. That is confirmation bias. What you called "confirmation bias" is good research methods. It's certainly not the end of the research, but correlations are not confirmation biases in and of themselves.
Yaz
Re: (Score:1)
Re:The thing I don't understand is why now? (Score:5, Informative)
But why aren't we seeing the same thing in Africa or Asia? It's not like the Zika virus in Brazil has had thousands of years to mutate into a version that causes microcephaly, but not the original strain in Africa and Southeast Asia. It's the same virus.
First off, it doesn't take a thousand years for a virus to mutate. Influenza mutates on a yearly basis, for example. And as a general rule, any organism that finds itself in a different environment faces different selective pressures, which may influence the mutation rate, or at the very least, the likelihood of a mutation being more fit for the environment than the pre-mutated strain.
If the cause were due to chemicals, you should see an equal number of non-Zika infected mothers giving birth to children with microcephaly. That doesn't seem to be happening from what I've read. There is no data pointing towards chemicals being involved in any manner. Obviously more diagnosis and testing is needed -- as yet we don't know whether or not Zika has mutated in South America, how the virus is passing the placental barrier, or the exact action which is causing the microcephaly once infected. Wild guesses won't get us closer to a solution to these outstanding questions.
Yaz
Re: (Score:2)
1. The Zika virus has been Africa and Southeast Asia since forever.
2. They don't seem to have microcephalic cases like Brazil has.
As I am a citizen of an African country, I wish to disagree and posit an alternative theory. I think that the virus mutated in the recent past. Before that, it only affected the brains and not the more exterior and visible tissue. It has now mutated to affect larger areas in that region of the body.
Source: a majority of politicians in my country and neighboring countries, born anywhere in the past 3 decades and further back. Although, to be sure, one would need to research the travels of all these peoples'
Re: (Score:2)
It's not like the people in Brazil don't have the same "immunity" that people in Africa and Southeast Asian people have -- a large percentage of the Brazilian people *have* West African ancestors where the Zika virus has been found.
I doubt that having the same ancestors would make them immune. Possible reason could be that since Africans and South East Asians had been living w/ it all the while, their immunity developed, whereas Zika only got to Brazil last year. So people would need time to develop it.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Healthcare, and medical research is more developed and advanced than what most African countries have.
It might have been happening all this time in Africa, and went unnoticed all this time because nobody cared enough to study it.
Re: (Score:1)
Wow (Score:2)
Holy Batman, what a mess of a summary! It must be linked to yet another debilitating but apparently not so rare condition in which Slashdot editors are born with abnormally small heads.
Re:Wow (Score:4, Funny)
"Debilitating"? To the contrary, that's exactly the adaptation I would want if *I* were forced to stick my head up there like that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Aren't all babies... (Score:2)
Re:Aren't all babies... (Score:5, Informative)
No. The little bastards have abnormally large heads.
Signed
Mothers Everywhere
Re: (Score:2)
(Aren't all babies) [b]orn with abnormally small heads?
If all babies were born with small heads, we wouldn't classify it as abnormal, would we?
Yaz
Re: (Score:2)
beginning of the end? (Score:1)
Children of Men takes place in 2027. Just sayin'.
The second disease is Guillain-Barré sy (Score:2)