2015 'Dance Your PhD' Winner Announced (sciencemag.org) 18
sciencehabit writes: Jargon seems unavoidable in science. When you try to explain your work, it becomes a minefield of technical concepts and abstract reasoning. But what if we just want the gist of what you do, the essence of your research? Oh, and make it a dance. The results are in from Science magazine's annual 'Dance Your PhD' contest. The winners include a ballet about a protein, a tango about entangled photons, a Bollywood spectacle about the immune system and, this year's top prize-winner, a dance by Florence Metz of the University of Bern, Switzerland, who combined hip hop, salsa, and acro-yoga to explain her PhD on the intricacies of water protection policies. She goes home with $1000 and a trip to Stanford University in the spring to screen her PhD dance and give a talk — hopefully jargon-free.
Pole Dance (Score:2)
FTW!
Re: (Score:2)
I'm just dancing while I finish my post-Doc ...
Nah, not really. (Score:1)
The less you have to say, the more you add icing.
Contrast with how things were done 50 years ago:
https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/techr... [cam.ac.uk]
This guy basically invented pretty much everything, and you can read it in an evening.
Wonderfully surreal and out-of-the box (Score:2)
I'm surprised there isn't more chatter here about this. A good many of these entries are quite clever and creative.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm surprised there isn't more chatter here about this. A good many of these entries are quite clever and creative.
The average slashdotter can't dance and doesn't have a PHd, so it's unclear as to what there is to attract us to this story. This seems like a story for people who claim to love science but can't tell you how the scientific method works.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, I think it probably stems from people in highly specialized fields trying to explain really really domain specific information and getting utterly blank stares.
From the second link:
So, you know, have fun with it, and see if you can explain to your mom what you've been researching.
Honestly, un
Re: (Score:2)
Honestly, un-clench a little.
Don't worry, I'm not butt-hurt. I'm just trying to help some people understand why some other people might think this is dumb. Me, I don't think some content that makes you say "meh" is worthy of comment.
Why? (Score:2)
This is fucking stupid. All the stupid.
Re: (Score:2)
Because it's hilarious.
Why does it need to have a reason?