Vostochny Launch Building Built To the Wrong Size 102
schwit1 writes: The Russians have just discovered that their Soyuz 2 rocket does not fit in the building just finished at their new spaceport at Vostochny: "The cutting-edge facility was meant be ready for launches of Soyuz-2 rockets in December, but an unidentified space agency told the TASS news agency late Thursday that the rocket would not fit inside the assembly building where its parts are stacked and tested before launch. The building 'has been designed for a different modification of the Soyuz rocket,' the source said, according to news website Medusa, which picked up the story from TASS." The rocket had just been delivered to Vostochny for assembly, so this report, though unconfirmed at this time, fits well with current events.
Is building in danger of being crushed by a dwarf? (Score:5, Funny)
"Putin gave me a drawing that said 18 inches. Now, whether or not he knows the difference between feet and inches is not my problem. I do what I'm told."
Re: Is building in danger of being crushed by a dw (Score:2)
Yup, perfect reference. Spinal Tap for those who don't know. Well played.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Ironically, US is the last developed country that uses imperial system. So US is the last colony.
I want to see the video... (Score:2)
... where all of the engineers have rounded up their buddies with trucks and backhoes and are trying to jam the rocket parts into place. "Come oooooon, it has to fiiiiit...."
I feel bad for whoever it is who will end up being declared a foreign agent embezzling money to support Ukrainian Nazis after this fiasco.
Re: (Score:2)
The Rada voted Yanukovich out - even including a majority of his own party. Russia claims that "proper parliamentary procedure" was not followed, but they're not the arbiter of that, the Ukrainian constitutional court is.
Correct me if I am wrong, but IIRC the constitutional court was revoked before it had its word on Yanukovich revocation procedure.
But breaking constitutional rule may be okay, if this is the People will. After all, any serious revolution is about changing constitution (or creating one). My understanding of Ukraine's new power sins is that constitution was broken, but no new constitution was produced. As a result, the supreme rules seems to apply in some situations but not others, which makes it illegitimate
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The first thing a new government done after kicking out Yanukovich was to organise a democratic elections for a new president
That does not fix the constitutional problem. Poroshenko may claim some legitimacy because he won election by a high margin, but the constitution itself is now viewed as illegitimate by a lot of people. Poroshenko is the legitimate president of an entity that is not Ukraine as we knew it.
It would have been easy to fix that, by just crafting a new constitution and having it approved by the People of Ukraine. I still do not understand why it was not done.
Re: (Score:1)
No...this one is the fault of Bloody Stupid Johnson. The entire Wizard's Guild has been too busy dealing with the "Modo Tranmogrification Incident" to comment.
Meters (Score:5, Funny)
One group was using Putin's left arm length for Russia's official designation of the meter, while another group was using his right arm. Apparently he isn't perfectly symmetrical.
Re: (Score:1)
But of COURSE Comrade Putin is symmetrical! The measurements must have been performed by a substandard "western" device which was improperly calibrated. Comrade Putin is the most symmetrical among the party leaders, saying otherwise is treason tovarisch.
Re: (Score:2)
But of COURSE Comrade Putin is symmetrical!
In fact, he's a polygon of 132 sides.
I'd heard he was two-faced, but for someone like Putin I can easily believe he's 132-faced.
Re: (Score:1)
Apparently he isn't perfectly symmetrical.
That's what she said!
Re: (Score:2)
Do you prefer furlongs or rods as a measure of distance? Imperial or US gallons as a measure of liquid volume?
Etc.
It's not an error (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I wonder if the CIA ever did something like this... had a spy change the measurement on some engineering specs just slightly, make them waste a ton of money.
Perhaps I should re-phrase... I wonder how many times the CIA has done something like this....
Re: (Score:3)
Well, it is rumored that the Concorde team put in circulation a set of blueprints with errors because they expected the Soviets to steal those designs for the Tu-144.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder if the CIA ever did something like this... had a spy change the measurement on some engineering specs just slightly, make them waste a ton of money.
In that case someone should tell the CIA to stop messing with US defence programs (F35, Zumwalt, SBX, GMD, etc). The mess they've made there makes a Russian hangar pale into insignificance.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What you say may be true, but this kind of error isn't one of advanced technology. This is more like the Mars probe that hard impacted because of a units mix-up. And that wasn't the first. Using high tech doesn't get you away from low tech errors. (Even with just metric you can mix-up cm and mm, though it's more difficult.)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
controls were developed in Ukraine, and are now lost to Russians
Tsar Putin is working to correct that, please hold...
Re: (Score:2)
They would just build two more towers, each twice as big as the other.
They don't have to be twice as big, they just have to go to 11 instead of only 10.
Well there's your problem (Score:3)
"I cut it three times and it's STILL too short!" - Russian construction worker
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
The funny thing is that in 2013 they actually lost a Proton-M and $1.3B of technical equipment because a technician installed the angular velocity sensors upside down. There was one problem in doing so, in that they didn't even fit upside down - but no worries, he was able to hammer them into place ;)
Re: (Score:2)
There was one problem in doing so, in that they didn't even fit upside down - but no worries, he was able to hammer them into place ;)
Lol, Russian ingenuity will overcome anything, including common sense and "fits-only-one-way" parts.
Re: (Score:2)
More likely, nepotism rarely produces successes and only exists because how else will those losers get a job. The more nepotism is entrenched in a bureaucracy the worse the outcomes.
Re:Well there's your problem (Score:5, Interesting)
My grandpa worked for Lockheed's space and missile division way back in the day. He said the attitude sensors for one of the rockets could be installed (or connected; I forget which) backwards and the rocket would think it was pointed in the opposite direction of its actual orientation and try to turn around. The bureaucracy involved in redesigning that single part was so cumbersome they just added a new pre-flight check. Send someone up the gantry to push the rocket and verify that the readings matched the push.
Fast-forward a few decades and one of my roommates worked for Lockheed. This was when they had a series of failed launches and were trying to figure out what the heck was going on. My roommate was on the team investigating one of the botched launches and they came to the conclusion that the rocket decided it was pointed 180 degrees from its actual orientation and it tried to turn around.
CSB, I have some telemetry strips from the Discoverer launches way back in the day. Found them when cleaning out my grandpa's garage a few years ago. Almost threw them out because they'd clearly been defiled by mice but I unrolled one a little bit and realized what they were.
Re: (Score:2)
push the rocket and verify that the readings matched the push.
I've actually done this, but in lab.
In soviet russia (Score:2)
Re:In soviet russia (Score:5, Funny)
Great, now I'm picturing a Russian version of the "Monorail song", with the Lyle Lanley guy having a heavy Russian accent.
The Soyuz will not fit in there
"The building's tall, like Russian bear!"
What if perchance the roof should bend?
"Not on your life, my Yakut friend!"
What about us cleptocrats?
"Your wallets will grow very fat!"
My vodka's gone and now I'm sad.
"Have another, dear comrade!"
Were you sent here by the Kremlin?
(displeased voice) ".... Next question please." (waves for undercover agents to take him out of the room)
"You see it's Vostochny only choice. Now throw up hands and raise the voice."
Cosmodrome! Cosmodrome! Cosmodrome!
Re: (Score:2)
In soviet russia ... rocket launch building built to wrong size for you!
FTFY
I wonder if... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder if it was something as embarrassing as an imperial/metric conversion gone wrong? :)
This is Russia, surely they don't use freedom units!!!??
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm guessing you know this, but the the only countries that don't are the USA, Liberia, and Myanmar, formerly known as Burma.
To the 'Murcan 'freedom' units are 'Imperial units', the other units are 'surrender monkey units' and their simple base 10 system is beneath 'Murca.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
'Murcan' freedom is not freedom at all.
Perhaps you meant to imply it, but your signature is lacking the case where corporate interests own both media and government. That would seem to be the case in 'the land of the free'.
well obviously its a reference to media corporations... which effectively own democratic governments.
At least totalitarian regimes have some claim to legitimacy. Democratic governments have none.
same thing happened (Score:1)
Idiocracy is now. (Score:1)
Measure twice cut once.
Re: (Score:2)
Doesn't help when you have the wrong target measurement.
Re: (Score:1)
I see two gerunds and a verb.
Curious (Score:2)
Per Wikipedia, the Soyuz-FG has a height of 49.5m, and the Soyuz-2 has a height of 46.1m, with identical widths. Now, it's possible that the Soyuz-FG figure includes the payload while the Soyuz-2 figure does not, but it's also possible this article is wrong (either it's something specific sized that "rocket is too small" can be a problem, or it's complete bullshit).
I'm actually not sure who would be more likely to be wrong, given a choice between Wikipedia and a Russian news source. Both have a pretty good
Re: (Score:1)
Wikipedia is usually accurate for purely technical articles. It's when the SJWs get involved that it goes to crap. I can't see them caring much about the dimensions of Russian rockets, except to the extent that long, cylindrical things glorify the evil whitemale patriarchy and encourage rape culture.
Re: (Score:2)
Oy. Give it a rest already.
Re: (Score:2)
Huh?
Re: (Score:2)
Social Justice Warriors - there's apparently a lot of history re-writing going on in some articles.
I can't point you to any of them because technical (and historical > 500 years ago) articles are pretty much all I read on WP...
Re: (Score:1)
Now, dig inside the article:
1. They cited Medusa (may be Meduza.io, that's what Google said). That said:
according to news website Medusa, which picked up the story from TASS.... but an unidentified space agency of a of a told the TASS
But,
The quote could not be found on TASS, a state-owned news agency
They did not said the quote was deleted, or it's never published?? Who is unidentified agency??? Such a confusion, when no one but Medusa can confirm (and may be never).
2. The article quality is full of spelling errors. May be they jus
Re: (Score:2)
After fighting with Russian words (Google translator) and searching with Yandex (you can't find the meaningful result with Google). Here some useful infos:
1) All sources cited from Meduza.io
2) check out the forum:
http://novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru... [novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru]
https://translate.google.com/t... [google.com]
According to the external dimensions of the package is the same in both products. And air rudders have both.
3) Official respond (predictable, they claim the rumor is wrong):
http://www.ampravda.ru/2015/10... [ampravda.ru]
Carrier rocket "Soyuz-2", which is to start from the cosmodrome Vostochny, fully meets the technical requirements and the size of the object space of the harbor. Special train with the spacecraft for a few days is at the railway station waiting for the spaceport and transport nodes "Soyuz" in the assembly and test complex (MIC). It will build and launch preparations for the launch.
.......
According to the press service of the Center of Operation of Land Space Infrastructure (COLSI), the only obstacle preventing to get to work — not full readiness of MIKa
In the forum posts above, they post image of "special train" mentioned in the article:
http://obor [oborona.gov.ru]
Maybe the rocket doesn't work? (Score:1)
Could be that Russia is doing a bit of CYA while they figure out technical difficulties with the rocket, so they just say "It doesn't fit" for now?
Re: (Score:2)
This incident is trivial when compared to the Hubble space telescope fiasco. After it was placed in orbit they discovered the main optical lens had been installed backwards. This then required a Shuttle mission to correct the problem.
Re: (Score:2)
You have to admit it had to be very embarrassing to the people working on the project. You build an orbital telescope platform and right off the bat they needed to install contact lenses.
reminds me of the time (Score:2)
I couldn't get my rocket in the package er building it was meant for.
Read As (Score:1)
Could be worse... (Score:2)
A defense contractor welded a section of a British submarine upside down.
http://articles.latimes.com/1988-04-09/news/mn-814_1_nuclear-powered-submarines [latimes.com]
Lack of QA (Score:1)