Argonne National Laboratory Shuts Down Online Ask a Scientist Program 106
itamblyn writes In a surprising decision, Argonne National Laboratory has decided to pull the plug on its long-standing NEWTON Ask A Scientist Program. NEWTON is (soon to be was) an on online repository of science questions submitted by school children from around the world. A volunteer group of scientists contributed grade-level appropriate answers to these questions. For the past 25 years, a wide range of topics ranging have been covered, including the classic "why is the sky blue" to "is there way to break down the components of plastics completely into their original form". Over the years, over 20,000 questions have been answered. According to ANL, the website will be shut down permanently on 1 March. There is no plan to make the content available in an alternate form or to hand over stewardship to another organization. When contacted about transferring the repository to another institution or moving to a donation model, the response from ANL was simply: "Thank you again for all your support for Newton. Unfortunately, moving Newton to another organization is not a possibility at this time. Thank you again for your energy and support."
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
How do you get mod points?
You'd probably know if you read the freakin' FAQ [slashdot.org]. Also, please don't post "frist psot!" comments, they're considered to be extremely juvenile and bad manners.
Re: (Score:3)
"Last Post" is fine though. You can keep posting those.
Re: (Score:1)
but argon is noble (Score:1)
Probably hit the same problem as /r/AskScience (Score:2, Insightful)
The same questions over and over and over again, with no one bothering to search the 20,000 existing answers.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I've seen other more minor outreach efforts go down the tube in part because of that issue. Several colleagues of mine used to answer questions online in various places, including redit. But they would frequently get see the same questions over and over, and questions about topics that have been heavily written about. It gets a bit frustrating linking to a very well written answer or discussion of a question, and have people not only ignore linked content, but get indignant that you didn't rewrite and pa
Politics? (Score:5, Insightful)
In my experience, events like this point to some petty internal political battle. It was great for people using it, and I assume there was minimal overhead to running the program, so "stupidity and greed" seem like the most likely course. Unfortunate. Maybe some bureaucrat had a KPI to reduce external facing servers software cost...
Re:Politics? (Score:5, Interesting)
In my experience, events like this point to some petty internal political battle.
Another possibility is that this is the Washington Monument Syndrome [wikipedia.org]. This happens when an agency's budget is reduced, and rather than cutting the least important program, they cut the most visible program, in an attempt to get their funding restored.
Re:Politics? (Score:5, Insightful)
Honestly, though, a qestion-answer service for school children probably does rank among the least important programs for a research lab. I very much doubt this is part of their written remit (as opposed to communicate their actual research to the public), and the people spending time at work answering the questions certainly get zero professional recognition for it.
It does sound like a very nice, fun service. And I do agree that this kind of outreach is important. But if this is not part of what their funders want them to do, then it should come as no surprise if it's among the first things to go when money becomes tight.
You want this kind of thing to continue? Make sure there's funding (and paid time) earmarked for doing it. In fact, that may be a good idea in general: add a small fraction (.1% or even less) to any research grant over a certain size for general science outreach. If it's part of your funding, that also removes the career obstacles toward doing outreach we too often have now.
Re: (Score:3)
Because 1) they'll put it behind a paywall, more than likely, 2) they'll use it to gather Yet More Information on me (I trust the government with my info lots more than any for-profit company) 3) they'll slap ads all over it in order to "monetize" a system that has always been free.
Private enterprise is not a cure-all, much as the old rich white men running the companies would like you to believe.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Politics? (Score:1)
Its mildly racist (not sure if hatin' on white folks is ever considered racist), but its definitely not ignorant. You seem overly angry at this comoment. Are you an old white man whose company is trying to amass personal information about people?
Re: (Score:3)
It's a great non sequitur, isn't it. Some people will look for any excuse to push their agenda. All you need to do is make a statement that isn't 100% anti-government and off they go.
Re: (Score:2)
Boy, that escalated quickly.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: Cost savings (Score:2)
"You want this kind of thing to continue? Make sure there's funding (and paid time) earmarked for doing it."
So let's see. A simple web-app with a database hosted on a crappy server computer somewhere.
That's going to cost the whopping sum of what $50 a year to maintain right?
I for one welcome our new fiscal watchdog overlords.
Re: Cost savings (Score:5, Insightful)
Simple web app: $1000
Shared web hosting: $50/yr
Managing a pool of postgrads, postdocs, researchers, and other subject matter experts to answer children's questions while fending off the Creationists, Tea-Partiers, and other assorted nutjobs who insist on being given equal access and status to teach the Truth to counter the Liberal Ivory-Tower Acedemic lies? Priceless...
Re: Cost savings (Score:4, Interesting)
The time spent selecting questions, then answer them in a simple and understandable way is not free. Especially in a climate where even keeping a blog in your spare time is sometimes seen as a suspect frivolity that takes time from your research.
Re: (Score:2)
Ever heard of a brain break?
(Of course you have. You're doing slashdot.)
The idea that you can get better productivity out of scientists and engineers by preventing them from taking brain breaks in between their manic periods is ridiculous newbie MBA talk.
Re: (Score:2)
It is ridiculous of course. It is also a common attitude among PI's toward their postdocs and students, especially in high-profile, high-pressure labs.
This letter from a PI to a worker made the rounds a few years ago. The PI claimed later it was a joke. It doesn't read like a joke, and the exact same attidude is not uncommon at all:
http://www.chemistry-blog.com/... [chemistry-blog.com]
Re: (Score:3)
Someone like Dr Karl (http://www.abc.net.au/science/drkarl/) - priceless, but you've still got to pay a salary, and most likely not just for one person.
Re: (Score:3)
They said nothing will happen with the program. You can toss funds in a pot, but without knowing why it was shut down you are foolish to do so. People giving to the pot are going to want their money back at some point. We all know that stuff like this gets lost in the bureaucracy and may take decades to come up for air.
I'm not being a downer, but a realist. Your answer could be to start your own site doing something similar and have a visible hand off policy in case you stop for some reason like NEWTON.
Re: (Score:2)
It's likely that they realized their question-and-answer format was replaced by Google.
Re: (Score:3)
I never knew that had a name, thanks. I think everyone has seen their local government threaten funding cuts to firefighters, emergency service (911, etc), parks, schools, and other popular services unless special bonds are passed.
It certainly could be that, although another possibility is that Wikipedia and other online resources have essentially supplanted the need for such a service.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
That's one good explanation. However, my first thought was that some muppet has sent a DMCA or copyright claim on some or all of the answers, they've taken the affected content out and shot it, THEN some middle manager said something like "We can't afford these; if we remove it all will they stop?" Alternatively, there's a patent troll who's managed to get "ask a question on a computer" through as a patent and they've been caught up in the ensuring tsunami of stupid.
Can't the National Library of the US dema
Re:Waybackmachine to the rescue! (Score:5, Informative)
I'm snapshotting it right now. It'll be in the Internet Archive tonight or tomorrow.
Re: (Score:1)
FTP has a _lot_ of stuff in /pub.
There's some files dating to the late 1980s and some 15 year old RedHat isos.
One of the stranger things found was a shell script for solving tensors.
Someone P O'ed? (Score:2)
It sounds to me like ANL pissed someone off, either a higher up at DOE, or in Congress.
Re: (Score:1)
Either the joke went over my head or you two know something specific about this that nobody else seems to on the outside.
Mirror? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
a big fuck you to the world (Score:2)
The fact that they won't open source the data and make it available, which costs them nearly nothing...is a big fuck you to the American people from our friends in the government. Is this part of their war on STEM?
Re: (Score:2)
Oh yeah nearly nothing, disk space, bandwidth, admins. Like you would have a clue what to do with any data they would release.
Re: (Score:2)
they have many, many heavy duty servers and big internet pipes already.
just like their dropping mirrors for open source, it's a big fuck you to the taxpayer.
Re: (Score:2)
bullshit, open source saves them MASSIVE amounts of money, they are a huge customer. They can give back a very little bit, they already have the pipes and the servers. The mirring is automatic, very very little effort needed.
Re: (Score:2)
The site is copied on the Internet Archive as the previous post points out.
The site is redundant. Students could get answers to most of the questions posted by using google.
Searching for "Ask a Scientist" returns scores of similar websites.
There are still lots of websites like HowStuffWorks.com.
The students still have teachers they can ask too.
This site shutdown may be an inconvenience to folks that have it bookmarked but I wouldn't call it a war on STEM.
Argonne National Lab (ANL) Public Mirror Closed (Score:3, Informative)
And another recent article concerning ANL:
"Public access to the Argonne National Laboratory Software Mirror was closed down as of 1 Feb 2015. ... Many Linux mirrors, not just all of Ubuntu."
http://ubuntuforums.org/showth... [ubuntuforums.org]
public torrent. (Score:1)
Same ol' same ol' (Score:2)
Calling everyone in Illinois (Score:1)
Everyone in Illinois should write their US Senators requesting that Argonne invite other institutions to take over this project or at the very least become the custodian of existing data on the condition that it be maintained as a publicly-available resource.
Those in Illinois's 3rd Congressional District (where Argonne is) should also write their US House Representative.
Re: (Score:2)
Why just Illinois? This is a national laboratory funded by the US government. If there is a reduction in public services, then there should be a commesurate decrease in their funding by at least the value to the public of those services.
Re: (Score:1)
Your point is well taken, but the Congressman and Senators who represent the people who live in and around Argonne are much more likely to have the informal political "pull" to get things done quickly without the need for formal action on Capitol Hill than other House and Senate members.
Other members to target would be those serving on or better yet those chairing the committees that do a lot of business related to Argonne.
Re: Calling everyone in Illinois (Score:1)
Hm, it is the other way around. Our funding has been steadily decreasing and we were trying to keep doing as much as before hoping for better times to come. If the congress keeps at it with the axe as they are doing, soon national labs and US science in general will be cutting their major mission critical programs... What used to be scientific jewel other nations envied is underfunded so much, that some developing nations have better staffed and equipped reasearch facilities. And better transfer of results
Mirror available (Score:2)
Site has been mirrored (and is updating).
Available at: http://newton.cranialthunder.c... [cranialthunder.com]
I hope this helps. Seems like a waste to let it just disappear.
Re: (Score:2)
That's nice, but I really don't understand the uproar. The quality of some answers is very poor, and the average quality of both answers and questions seems to be, well, nothing to write home about either.
The real cause... (Score:4, Informative)
Excised from the original reporting was this little snippet:
Representatives for NEWTON indicated that there were a number of reasons for the shut down of the program. When pressed to provide examples, the group sighed in unison before saying, "ELI5."
ELI5 is shorthand for the "Explain Like I'm 5" meme that has spread across the Internet in recent years. "We just can't compete with that," said one of the lead scientists in the program, referring to ELI5. "It used to be that we'd answer stupid questions from children because it encouraged the burgeoning scientists, mathematicians, and engineers to pursue their interests further, but with ELI5 teaching scientifically illiterate adults that it's okay for them to voice their stupid questions too, we simply can't keep up. We're spread too thin."
When asked where individuals seeking answers should go for help, one researcher derisively suggested, "The ELI5 subreddit." Asked what they planned to do with their newfound free time, the group cast a few despondent looks towards one another before collectively breaking down in tears as they wept for humanity.
Public Domain (Score:5, Informative)
Being work of the federal government, the site's content is not subject to copyright and is in the public domain. Anyone who wants can legally mirror the existing content. I'm making a copy as we speak.
Re: (Score:2)
It most certainly is copyrightable and IS unless specifically stated to be public domain, you just have additional rights as a citizen of the US because it was government work. It most certainly is NOT public domain to anyone not a US citizen, ever. The end result is that MANY but NOT ALL things the government does can be used freely by US citizens, but that doesn't make it public domain. You can't, for instance, legally transfer government work to a non-US citizen as that person/government/whatever does
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.copyright.gov/title... [copyright.gov]
"Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government"
http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/... [anl.gov]
"NEWTON Ask A Scientist program is not copyrighted formally."
Anybody else smell a GOP orc? (Score:1)
possible real reason (Score:1)
Our teacher told me that the real reason for shutting down NEWTON is that there's really no single right answer to many of the questions asked. In addition many old answers are no longer valid or highly contested. NEWTON is no longer offering enlightenment and is becoming source of contention among many in our congregation.
"Plastics back into their original form..." (Score:2)
"Plastics back into their original form..."
Holy crap! Dinosaurs!
Gee, and no suggestion of the obvious reason (Score:3)
Congress cutting funding for non-military basic science.
ObDisclosure: I work for a federal contractor, civilian sector, doing that, and we keep seeing budget cuts. So do other folks I know who work in the civilian sector, so I have direct evidence of my suggestion. I can also email friends who have friends who work there.
mark "but the Free Market really, really wants F-35's, they're *so* much more important than space, or
biomedical research, or basic physics...."
Archive.org (Score:1)
Just remember which date to click on.
https://web.archive.org/web/20... [archive.org]
Re:Budget Cuts (Score:5, Informative)
Please don't. I'm already archiving the entire site into archive.org right now, and don't want their load to increase to the point they were try to prevent the archiving operation.
Re: (Score:2)
Not worth the trouble. Load is low because my script makes 1 http get request per second. If *everyone* is trying to mirror, it could be a problem depending on the hardware running the site. I'd much rather just finish up under the radar and get it into archive.org without any headaches.
Re: (Score:3)
So I think what you're saying is that you have too much to do.
Re: (Score:3)
Always.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Many thanks! (Score:2)
Nvr mind. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Using the WayBackMacine to archive the site is risky. Recognize that one line added to the robots.txt at any point in the future can render all the content inaccessible (at least) and possibly cause it to be deleted.
I am quite surprised IBM, Microsoft, Google or one of the other big organizations has not picked this up.
Re: (Score:2)