

Elusive Dark Matter May Be Detected With GPS Satellites 67
An anonymous reader writes: Two researchers say time disparities identified through the network of satellites that make up our modern GPS infrastructure can help detect dark matter. In a paper in the online version of the scientific journal Nature Physics, they write that dark matter may be organized as a large gas-like collection of topological defects, or energy cracks. "We propose to detect the defects, the dark matter, as they sweep through us with a network of sensitive atomic clocks. The idea is, where the clocks go out of synchronization, we would know that dark matter, the topological defect, has passed by."
Another reader adds this article about research into dark energy:
The particles of the standard model, some type of dark matter and dark energy, and the four fundamental forces. That's all there is, right? But that might not be the case at all. Dark energy may not simply be the energy inherent to space itself, but rather a dynamical property that emerges from the Universe: a sort of fifth force. This is speculation that's been around for over a decade, but there hasn't been a way to test it until now. If this is the case, it may be accessible and testable by simply using presently existing vacuum chamber technology
Re: (Score:1)
We're not politically correct here, to a person, but that's where it's headed.
Re: (Score:1)
It depends...
Are you going to make me work for less/no money, burn a cross in my yard if I act uppity, or shoot me if I get within 3 ft of you or behave 'aggressively'?
Re: (Score:1)
Welcome to Merica
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
If y'all don't mind, 4Chan is downstairs.
Re: (Score:1)
iif you'd been born with the courage to post merely pseudo-anonymously
I don't have an account because I don't want or need one.
Nope, the reason is because you can't think of a funky pseudonym. Even if you could you're not allowed to be here except as an AC because you are an asshole!
Does that make me a coward ?
No, but it does make you a dick.
Only in the mind of a fool like you.
Who's more the fool, the fool or the fool who follows the fool. It's a legitimate question from obi wan considering you admit to actually 'choosing' to be an anonymous coward on slashdot. So don't whine because a legitimate user of the site calls you out for what you are. We've sustained your right to anonymous free speec
Re:I see why the boson is a "God Particle" (Score:4, Insightful)
There is ample observational evidence of dark matter in the form of its gravitational effects. We just don't know what it is. It could be 'ordinary' baryonic matter or something entirely new. It isn't a matter of faith. Pun intended.
Re:I see why the boson is a "God Particle" (Score:5, Insightful)
It can't be "ordinary baryonic matter": we know it doesn't interact with photons even at extreme energy densities, and we also know it doesn't move at or near the speed of light. Both are clear from the CMBR data.
Re:I see why the boson is a "God Particle" (Score:4, Insightful)
tt can be baryonic matter, if it is encapsulated in some fashion. I believe your two conditions refer to BBN (not a particularly extreme energy density, BTW) and the Lyman Alpha constraints on Warm Dark Matter (which means it had to drop out of the radiation fluid v ~ c / sqrt(3) pretty early).
Both of these are fulfilled by, e.g., quark nugget dark matter [arxiv.org] (these would form well before BBN and drop out of the radiation fluid well before needed to fulfill the WDM constraints), as maybe also the recently proposed "macros [yahoo.com]".
Re: (Score:3)
can be baryonic matter, if it is encapsulated in some fashion.
In which case it would hardly qualify as ordinary baryonic matter...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
"Quark nuggets" are ordinary?
Well, I guess that would be technically correct (the best kind of correct!) if true, since 85% of matter is whatever dark matter is. Our matter is the weird stuff.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Don't we have to have faith that the scientists aren't cherry-picking chunks of data that give them (almost) the significance they want?
Remember Feynman, in "Cargo Cult Science", describing how experimenters replicating Millikan's famous experiment found ways to fudge their data to match his flawed results? Didn't they have faith he was right?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
CERN said the evidence is five sigma or so for a particle more or less where the Higgs was expected (or perhaps about halfway between where two competing theories expected it), but some now doubt whether the particle CERN found is actually the Higgs. See this recent reassessment: http://sdu.dk/en/Om_SDU/Fakult... [sdu.dk]
Re: (Score:2)
But I've been accused of worse.
Re: (Score:2)
more like the god damned particle...
my non-physicist brain wants to stuff dark matter into the role of 'barely detectable multiverse'.
I find stuff like this online and find myself wondering if it is all hooey
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~... [columbia.edu]
How long until we can start to describe the pieces and parts of adjacent universes?
Re:I see why the boson is a "God Particle" (Score:5, Informative)
The fundamental problem with the "standard model" is that it's based on gravity.
Actually the one thing that the Standard Model is absolutely NOT based on is gravity. Gravity being so weak and have an long range actually is responsible for the structures at the largest scales of the Universe which is precisely where we see Dark Matter. The reason for this is that EM is so much stronger that it will force charge cancellation to a large high degree on smaller distance scales: if there is a charge imbalance opposite charges will be rapidly dragged in to create a balance. This cancels EM out at larger distance scales since the charges balance leaving only gravity (the strong and weak nuclear forces being short range [~nucleus] due to their physics).
Re: (Score:2)
Unless the universe has a modest net charge. You'd get localized charge cancellation, but even the slightest charge imbalance would have profound effects on an interstellar scale. Even a charge imbalance far too small to detect in any ordinary, solar system contained instrumentation would have enormous effects in the long-term history of the universe.
It is something to think about.
Re: (Score:2)
The Real Reason (Score:5, Funny)
Whoosh! (Score:2)
Not the Ether (Score:2)
wrong wrong wrong (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The sensitivity in measuring one effect is no guarantee it will measure any other effect.
As far as I know neither of the Voyagers is fitted with an atomic clock so this measurement method does not work on it.
According to the article dark energy signatures would be evident in slight time shifts. Slight as in in the range of "billionth of a second". Light travels 30 cm (1 foot) in that time.
According to the article GPS satellites can measure those. They just don't check if there is a pattern to them. That pat
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
A GPS satellite being off by half a millisecond would be horrible, about 150km off, so I can't really believe that leap-milliseconds would work.
Apples and oranges. (Score:2)
Ok, here's one for you - Voyager is a cheap ass grade school optical microscope. The GPS constellation is a scanning tunneling microscope. Which would you choose to look at atomic level features?
Seriously, you're comparing apples to the thing least like apples that you can imagine. For starters they're looking at different effects, Voyager's effects manifested as variations in trajectory, while they're looking
Explain it like I'm five (Score:2)
This is not a good description. I've no idea what a topological defect or energy crack is.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
If you put two bar magnets next to each other, they tend to flip each other around so that they point in the same direction.
Wow. Where I come from, if I put two bar magnets together they flip around until they point in the opposite direction, with N joining S. But then again, I'm Australian: things are different in the Northern Hemisphere.
Re: (Score:2)
There's got to be at least a novelty toy hidden in this idea.
Re: (Score:2)
Fine. You haven't finished your dinner. Sit down and eat your vegetables, or 20 years from now you'll have high triglycerides and hate me for being a bad parent.
Oh, wait,
Would you like some candy? I have candy. I'm not saying I would give you candy, but I do have candy.