Hundreds of Thousands Turn Out For People's Climate March In New York City 200
mdsolar writes with an update on the People's Climate March. More than 400,000 people turned out for the People's Climate March in New York City on Sunday, just days before many of the world's leaders are expected to debate environmental action at the United Nations climate summit. Early reports from event organizers are hailing the turnout as the largest climate march in history, far bigger than the Forward on Climate rally held in Washington, D.C., last year. High-profile environmentalists including Bill McKibben, Leonardo DiCaprio, Jane Goodall and Vandana Shiva marched alongside policymakers such as Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.). U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and former Vice President Al Gore were also there, and more than 550 buses carried in people from around the country.
Largest Climate march in history (Score:2, Flamebait)
I guess people couldn't afford to march during past droughts
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Mass hype was harder back then.
Now you just create a facebook page, fill it will fact-stripped alarmist language with several "Last call! we're all going to burn in this life if nothing is done! Like and share" and get big enviro pick it up and you'll have it disseminated globally soon enough, with several hundreds or thousands of environmentally minded people jetting in form all over the place to participate in your political-religious activist parade.
Re:Largest Climate march in history (Score:4, Interesting)
Mass hype was harder back then.
It's not just mass hype. People with completely unrelated causes march with their own banners. I didn't get a chance to walk through this protest, but I lived in New York City when all of those supposed "anti-war" protests were taking place. Sure, there were genuine anti-war protestors there - but you wouldn't believe how much of the mass was some random cause trying to get some sympathetic eyeballs. Animal rights, global warming, anti-corporation... you name it. Some of the pictures I've seen indicate the same thing happening here. I saw a group of people marching in white coats with a huge banner saying "HEALTHCARE IS A RIGHT" and a teeny tiny sign being held by one member saying "Global Warming affects Healthcare". LOL, wha?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
People with completely unrelated causes march with their own banners.
That is the "Professional Left" (a term used by former Obama press secretary Robert Gibbs) in action. The ProLeft seeks out anyone at all who is angry or can be convinced to be angry about anything, no matter how fringe, unreasonable or wack-o. The ProLeft then effectively makes that person or group an offer that amounts to "Do what we tell you to do. Protest where and when we tell you to protest. Say what we tell you to say about everything, not just about your particular grievance, and you will be rew
Re: (Score:3)
You could change "Professional Left" to "Professional Right" and a few other words in your little pile of straw men and it would be just about as applicable.
Re: (Score:2)
Except there is no "Professional Right".
LOL. It sounds to me like your ideology just makes you blind to them. BTW, ACORN went out of business 6 years ago so you can remove it from your list.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
No way there is any impact on healthcare. that's just fucking nuts. lol!!!!!!
No, I was LOL'ing at the teeny tiny little sign that was ostensibly the purpose of the march while having a HUGE banner for the cause they really care about.. If they were marching as "Doctors Against Climate Change" or something, it wouldn't have been funny.
Here's the specific image I am referring to:
http://tinypic.com/r/2mqu44o/8 [tinypic.com]
Re:Largest Climate march in history (Score:4, Informative)
They filled NY with garbage. [nypost.com] and I'm not talking about themselves. Note that a bunch of A-listers flew in on private jets too.
I bet that only 1 in 4 knew why they were actually marching. The rest were there for the party.
Re:Largest Climate march in history (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
It is the very definition of bourgeoisie [slashdot.org]... I hope somebody totals up all the carbon they put out getting there, all so nicely dressed, with their pretty signs. A media created event if there ever was one..
Re: (Score:3)
Slashdot: Can we have a new downmod category, perhaps called "Burn The Witch!" It would indicate severe disagreement with the comment and would be a way of avoiding overuse of the Troll mod.
Re: (Score:2)
I drove out that way, Id say realistically I saw somewhere in the neighborhood of a sold out yankees game.
Re:Largest Climate march in history (Score:4, Insightful)
"Big enviro"? You mean the total sum of all non-carbon based energy industries, technology companies and carbon credits markets?
Show me your math.
What a Waste of Fossil Fuels (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:What a Waste of Fossil Fuels (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, too true
But data transmission energy is such a small consumption by comparison and since power plant energy production is lost if its not used: 400,000 people watching a youtube video might affect google's bottom-line (if they have one of those), but energy-wise the difference hardly registers at the utility level.
Now if you had 400,000 people charging their Prius to go to an environmentalist convention, that might be a little different.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Sometimes to get your point across you have to temporarily sacrifice your principles short term for a massive improvement in gain long term.
An environmentalist burning 1 barrel of oil in fuel to do the necessary travelling to raise awareness of and put a stop to thousands of barrels of oil in spillage in a part of the Niger Delta isn't ironic, it's a net gain in their cause to the tune of thousands of barrels of oil no longer being spilt and the rational thing to do.
I'd like to think it's just that you're n
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Really? I thought my argumentum ad absurdum was rather pithy.
On most other subjects when people engage in an activity that contradicts their beliefs they are labeled hypocrites. But I understand from your explanation that environmentalism is a special brand of religion whose dalliances must be overlooked for the greater good, an outlook the mature understand; only a child would dare say the emperor has no clothes.
Re: (Score:3)
But I understand from your explanation that environmentalism is a special brand of religion whose dalliances must be overlooked for the greater good...
Well, no, but if you can show me the true Scotsman organizations of your world that somehow achieve their goals without stepping over the line into hyperbole and "active fundraising" I'm sure I can poke holes in those, too. You're just being a pedantic douche at this point.
Re: (Score:3)
I guess it depends whose doing the calling. Sure a child minded simpleton who believes the whole world is black and white might call it hypocrisy, but most intelligent minded people with an understanding of how the world actually works call it what it is more reasonably defined as- pragmatism.
Again, you're free to try and offer counterexamples, but you won't find any because whether it's Stallman having to use a computer with a proprietary BIOS to push his FOSS philosophy because he's sometimes had little o
Re: (Score:2)
Ghandi had no power during WWII.
His principle of non violence had to take a backseat when West and East India (Pakistan and Bangladesh) wanted independence.
With scientists like Leonardo DiCaprio behind it (Score:5, Funny)
How could I *NOT* accept it as established science?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:With scientists like Leonardo DiCaprio behind i (Score:5, Informative)
Re:With scientists like Leonardo DiCaprio behind i (Score:4, Interesting)
Whether the climate is changing is settled, because it always changes. Whether human activity is a factor is settled, because it does. So far so good. Unfortunately, however, the effect of that activity on future climate is not at all settled, and that's unfortunate because it's the question that actually matters.
Opposite Goals (Score:4, Interesting)
Here's the thing. Whether it's happening... whether it's human caused or not... LET'S STOP POLLUTION FOR IT'S OWN SAKE.
I totally agree.
But all of the Alarmists don't care at all about pollution, they only care about CO2 - which is not pollution, and stopping that does pretty much nothing in terms of stopping real pollution.
When you all get back to caring about the environment and not making people at alternative energy companies (or carbon exchanges) rich please get back to us so we can start trying to protect the environment again.
Decisions (Score:2)
I wonder how many on that 400.000 group, if offered a choice between ten thousand bucks or eliminating their entire personal carbon foot print, would chose the former.
I wonder how many would know how much it would cost to eliminate their entire personal carbon footprint.
Re: (Score:3)
But I was always told it was okay to leave nothing but footprints!
Re: (Score:3)
Sasquatch? Is that you?
Joel Hodgson from MST3K was there too! (Score:2, Informative)
How dare you list all of that b-list trash, when the creator and original star of Mystery Science Theater was there!?! THAT'S a celebrity!
Re:Joel Hodgson from MST3K was there too! (Score:4, Insightful)
business as usual (Score:3, Insightful)
March all ya want, business will go on, fuels burned, industry will churn. Only thing you can vote with here is your wallet. Marching does nothing, protesting does nothing, STOP BUYING THINGS YOU DON'T NEED IF YOU CARE ABOUT THE CLIMATE.
Start by not buying the bus ticket next time to a complete waste of time, effort and energy.
kthxbye
"Marching does nothing" (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:"Marching does nothing" (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
build smaller, more efficient homes.
drive smaller, more efficient cars.
walk more.
eat less.
simple stuff.
but people feel entitled.
I went (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What exactly is it you want from big business? I find it odd that a protest over the enviroment is focused on big business as if it was the evil being protested. Have we been mislead or is there some inside baseball the rest of us should know about?
Re: (Score:2)
Nice little rant there but it fails to address anything i said or asked.
Now if you think your politicians are not representing you, vote them out and vote ones that will in. If you find that not possible, then it is likely that outside your little circle, you are in the minority. No worries, it just means you will have to convince others to side with you.
So do you have anything to say about what i actually asked?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Thank you for caring. Seriously.
I've made my peace with future generations about my apathy. In part that's because I have no children, and don't want them; in fact, a (tiny) part of the reason I have none is that I don't want the burden of the fact that I don't believe I can contribute to a fix to this problem.
I am sorry, future generations, but the enemy was too big to move. Most of the world understood, but crucial people in crucial positions were happy to leave you a worse world, and let you deal with it
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Caught in it... (Score:2)
Yikes! We ran into that by accident yesterday... The terminal point of the march was right by the north-most exit from the High Line park at 34th Street that just opened yesterday, too, which I wanted to check out.
It was insane! And we had to walk a few blocks opposite the direction of the march to get home... I thought we'd get trampled before we found a cross street (41st Street) that wasn't so jam packed we could get off the main route.
Being short, I didn't get many good photos from it as most of th
400,000? (Score:3)
AM New York is reporting tens of thousands.
Re: (Score:3)
j/k i saw that too. not sure how they could be so different.
When the people who say it's a crisis.... (Score:4, Insightful)
"F*ck the poor people who want to stay warm, or get to a job. They should die off anyway, the earth is overpopulated!"
Re: (Score:2)
So if AAAAALLLLL GOOOOORRRRRE! took a wrecking ball to his mansion, composted the shards and retired to a hippie commune, you might change your mind?
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not buying any beach front property in the near future regardless.
Re: (Score:2)
About Al Gore? Perhaps. Then he would be a non-hypocritical idiot.
Not just the NYC (Score:2)
The same day, people were also marching at 2808 other official events in 166 countries. (http://peoplesclimate.org/)
So there is quite a lot more than ~400'000 people.
In our march in Stockholm, Sweden we endured pouring rain, hail and thunder ...
Not like China India US create all Global Warming (Score:2)
It's not like, since 2010, that China, India, and the US are responsible for creating all the increased climate change gasses for Global Warming.
Oh.
Wait.
It is.
Just end the fossil fuels subsidies and tax exemptions and cheap land and sea leases and the entire system will fix itself. This is why Adam Smith, the Father of Capitalism (and a Scot), warned against the anti-capitalist Mercantalists.
Climate has got the 1% attention... (Score:2)
Hypos in NYC (Score:2)
Arithmetic Denialism (Score:2)
I marched (Score:2)
I marched. I took the subway to get there, not a private jet. I know exactly what I was protesting. I didn't see any celebrities, just a lot of people.
I also left early, and had the eerie experience of walking two blocks to Broadway, where life was going on as normal. There was no indication that less than half a mile away there were hundreds of thousands of protestors. It was amazing.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Obviously, you don't understand how science works:
Record hot summer = Evidence of global warming
Record cold winter = Well, that's just weather, pay it no mind.
Extreme weather events = Evidence of global warming
Lack of extreme weather events = Well, that's just weather, pay it no mind.
Ice melting in Antarctica = Evidence of global warming
Record ice in arctic = Well, that's just weather, pay it no mind.
IT'S SCIENCE, PEOPLE!
Re:Just in time for another record cold winter (Score:5, Informative)
I know I shouldn't feed the trolls, however, ...
Obviously, you don't understand how science works:
Record hot summer = Evidence of global warming
As part of a trend of record hot summers, for sure. Individually? Not unless the record heat is so extraordinary that it falls outside of what would be possible without global warming.
Record cold winter = Well, that's just weather, pay it no mind.
A record cold winter would be evidence against global warming if it was part of trend, or it was so cold that it fell out of what should be possible with global warming. Having said that, globally this past winter had the 3rd warmest december, the 4th warmest January and the 21st warmest February, none of which exactly qualify as "record cold" on the global scale.
Extreme weather events = Evidence of global warming
Again it's the trends in extreme weather events more than the individual events that matter with certain exceptions where the events themselves fall out of what would be possible without global warming.
Lack of extreme weather events = Well, that's just weather, pay it no mind.
Again, it the trends, not individual weather on any specific year that matters
Ice melting in Antarctica = Evidence of global warming
Record ice in arctic = Well, that's just weather, pay it no mind.
I think you might have your north and south mixed up. We're near the record low for Arctic ice extent, and at record highs in Antarctic ice extent. Both of which are expected as part of global warming.
IT'S SCIENCE, PEOPLE!
It actually is, whether or not you resort to derision and mockery.
Re:Just in time for another record cold winter (Score:5, Insightful)
Again, it the trends, not individual weather on any specific year that matters
Except that after every single warm snap or hurricane the same people who were smugly reminding us that "weather is not climate" are busy pointing to the event as "evidence" of AGW, which it is not. Distributions are evidence, events are not, because the science shows that the AGW/no-AGW distributions substantially overlap in our current situation, particularly with regard to extreme weather events.
So only a person who does not understand science and statistics would ever suggest that any single event or small handful of events is worth mentioning as evidence either way. And yet Warmists are always out in force after any given extremum telling us it "proves" AGW.
Don't get me wrong: AGW is real, although there are some pretty well-proven techniques for reducing it (notably carbon taxes, which also have the benefit of reducing corporate and income taxes, so you'd have to be some anti-capitalist nut-job to oppose them). But anyone who ever opens their mouth to point at a single event as if it was somehow worth the bother of discussing is an anti-science wing-nut, and adds only heat, not light, to the discussion.
Re: (Score:3)
Actually, I've yet to see that come from anyone that's actually in the field of climate science. Don't conflate internet commenters and assorted science writers with people that are actually studying the climate. Every time a big climate event happened, I saw a lot of hedging from climate scientists who were consistently pointing out that one event is impossible to extrapolate from.
If you'd care to provide an example of someone actually in research and not someone that you should probably be ignoring, I'd b
Re: (Score:2)
"Actually, I've yet to see that come from anyone that's actually in the field of climate science."
Convenient Narrow Definition. I've yet to hear ANYONE that's actually in that field say anything.
Let me know when the AGW enthusiasts/scientists start correcting their spokesmen (like Al Gore, and various celebrities ) when they say stupid shit. I won't hold my breath.
Re: (Score:2)
Except Liberals making fun of Democrats. Or haven't you noticed? I wonder if you say the same thing every time someone makes fun of Sarah Palin? Nahhh
Re: (Score:2)
Alas. This is honestly something that I see very rarely, but it's worth noting that
a) other climate scientists disagreed with her claim, because at the time it was untrue; and
b) it *happened* to be true in the end (in the sense that climate change DOES seem to be responsible for the weird path of the jet stream). But that doesn't let her off the hook for saying it before there was actually peer reviewed research on the matter to back her up.
onion article (Score:2)
I can see this as the basis for an Onion article...
"400,000 people turn out for people's climate march, promptly kill themselves in bid to reduce impact of over population on climate"
Re:Just in time for another record cold winter (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
No trends to be scared of ! (Score:3, Insightful)
Sorry, the "trends" do not support your alarmism.
The trend in temperature is flat for the past 13-22 years depending on which temperature series you look at. And that does not account for the blatant "adjustments" to make to past appear cooler (GISS we are looking at you here !).
The best temperature measurement (USCRN -Google that ) with pristine rural sites, no adjustments, triple redundant aspirated platinum sensors, since inception 10 years ago, shows NO warming at all, confirming the temperature plate
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
hey look, it's a guy who doesnt undertsand science, and misquotes what people say in order to tell them theyre wrong.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Obviously, you don't understand how science works:
Record hot summer = Evidence of global warming
That's a record hot after NOAA has adjusted the past temperatures downward.
There are records, and then there are records.
NOAA's "hottest month ever" based on oceans (Score:2)
Re:Just in time for another record cold winter (Score:4, Informative)
It's climate change because some morons look out the window, see that it's cold today and decide that global warming must be fake.
While the global climate is warming, the effect locally at any given time may not be warming. It sometimes causes more extreme weather, including cold. Hence, climate change.
Re:Just in time for another record cold winter (Score:5, Informative)
Yes, and I'm sure you're next post will be that nobody on the face of the earth has ever EVAR claimed that:
1. Hurricane Katrina
2. "Superstorm"* Sandy
3. The smelt-made California Drought
4. 2011 Japanese Tsunami **
5. Back to back record years for agriculture in the midwest in 2013-2014 ***
were caused by global warming!!
* So named because it wasn't even strong enough to count as a real hurricane... while stronger storms have been known to hit NYC in the 19th and early 20th centuries!
** Yes, earthquakes are now caused by Global Warming. Get with the politcally correct program you denialist scum.
*** No wait, that's not post-apocalyptic bad sounding. Two consecutive years of weather patterns over an entire geographic region is just an insignificant random weather event...
Now, a not-particularly unusually strong hurricane that happens to hit a low-lying city that's in the middle of a region where you expect to see hurricanes over a 12 hour period... THAT'S CLIMATE CHANGE YOU DENIALIST SCUM!
Re: (Score:3)
On the contrary, Sandy was a category 2 hurricane when it made landfall on Cuba [noaa.gov]. Moreover, it still had hurricane-force winds when it made landfall in New Jersey [noaa.gov]; the only reason it wasn't called a "hurricane" was that it was post-tropical [wikipedia.org]. In other words, it was as severe as a hurricane, but a different kind of storm.
Re: (Score:2)
~~
Re: (Score:2)
I guess I should have linked the New Jersey landfall [noaa.gov] update instead of the "Sandy becomes post-tropical" update. The landfall update claims sustained winds of 80 mph, which is well within the category 1 hurricane [wikipedia.org] range.
Re: (Score:2)
They also tend to forget that while it's cold where they are, it's hot where other people are. The winter may have seemed extra cold in North America last year, but they've had to add extra colours to the heat maps in Australia in the last couple of years to indicate just how blisteringly hot its getting now.
Climate is global, folks. Your local weather is not representative of what people around the world are experiencing.
Re: (Score:2)
If it's all global, why does ice melting in the arctic count as evidence of GW, but ice *expanding* in Antarctica not count as counter-evidence?
Re: (Score:2)
If it's all global, why does ice melting in the arctic count as evidence of GW, but ice *expanding* in Antarctica not count as counter-evidence?
Because a simple analysis like that is seldom adequate. Scientists who have looked at the increase in Antarctic sea ice have found several reasons that combine to cause the increase. First the circumpolar winds have grown stronger apparently because of the ozone hole over Antarctica. That pushes the existing sea ice around more opening polynyas that subsequently refreeze increasing the ice area. Second global warming causes the ice sitting on the continent to melt and also increased precipitation which
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
You'd also be complaining if they labeled it warming or cooling. It's fighting climate science by being a grammar nazi.
Just say "I don't care what happens to the world after I'm gone" if you don't, but stop playing word-games to justify your believes.
Re: (Score:2)
Frank Luntz (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I'm assuming you're referring to Oklahoma in the 1930's, right?
What, there have been "droughts for years" before now? How can that be???
Extremes not as extreme (Score:2)
but the extremes get a lot more extreme
The opposite is true, we've had fewer very large storms, less destructive weather of all kinds across the globe.
Gaia is pissed off you are trying to make her dance like a monkey for your own agenda and is sitting ion her hands.
Re:irony (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes, that's why they had local events in other cities.
But I think it's kind of dumb to think that in a city with tens or hundreds of thousands of cars idling daily in traffic for the past 70 years, that 500 busses making a single trip is going to have a more negative impact than if leaders don't hear some kind of voice for change.
Re: (Score:2)
But I think it's kind of dumb to think that in a city with tens or hundreds of thousands of cars idling daily in traffic for the past 70 years, that 500 busses making a single trip is going to have a more negative impact than if leaders don't hear some kind of voice for change.
The criticism also assumes that those 500 buses wouldn't have been doing anything else at the time.
Re:irony (Score:5, Informative)
no, that's an extremely efficient way to travel compared to individual cars. Did you know a diesel bus can get over 150 passenger miles / gallon compared to 49 for jet?
Re: (Score:2)
Boeing 747-400 is 91 passenger miles per gallon. Not as good as a bus though.
Re: (Score:2)
Airplanes travel in almost a straight line.
Re: (Score:2)
Division by 0 error. Stopped in east St Louis.
Re: (Score:2)
That's still not enough watts to go back in time to prevent all this mess.
Re: (Score:3)
But those were GOOD buses, carrying environmental activists to a protest, as opposed to those BAD buses, which carry Silicon Valley nerds to work.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I have yet to find any creditable explanation to why all the sudden the oceans are a sink and not before. I mean seriously, if something didn't all the sudden cause it to soak up heat, then all previous temp records would have been impacted by it too making the suggestion of the oceans being a sink for the current warming (or lack thereof) somewhat moot.
But say that out loud and you will ..lol. As if it really matters any more. This isn't about science or the environment any more. It was politicized from ne
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
hmm.. I'm convinced more than ever now.