UCSD To Test Safety of Spinal Stem Cell Injection 43
An anonymous reader writes Researchers at the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine have launched a clinical trial to investigate the safety of neural stem cell transplantation in patients with chronic spinal cord injuries. This Phase I clinical trial is recruiting eight patients for the 5-year study. Pre-clinical studies of these cells by Ciacci and Martin Marsala, MD, at the UC San Diego School of Medicine, showed that these grafted neural stem cells improved motor function in spinal cord injured rats with minimal side effects indicating that human clinical trials are now warranted.
Worst that could happen? (Score:5, Insightful)
Beyond this treatment actually sickening and/or killing the patient, what is the worst that could happen, from a safety point of view? I know that's in-part the point of the study, but many of those individuals that are this badly injured (or worse, no motion below the neck would probably gladly trade the risk of death for getting their bodies to work again.
Re: (Score:2)
Primum non nocere.
Re: (Score:3)
Nullum est periculum mercedem non.
Re: (Score:2)
Festinare nocet, nocet et cunctatio saepe, tempore quaeque suo qui facit, ille sapit.
Re: (Score:2)
Romanes Enut Domus.
Re: (Score:2)
fellate mea pullus
also Romanes eunt domus
Re: Worst that could happen? (Score:1)
Death. Rejection of the stem cells. Chronic central nervous system pain they might not have had prior. (My brother in law participated in a similar trial for ALS earlier this year, and I read the informed consent doc.) It's a tough decision about whether to participate or not -- hats off to those subjects who are willing to.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Was your question, "Beyond something bad happening to them, what bad things could happen to them?!?"
It's a difficult question. Risk what little motor control you have left (fingers you say?) in a gamble to get some more (or all) back.
I'd roll the dice, but I'm not sure everyone would.
Rolling....1....fumble!
Re: (Score:2)
Ah. The elephant in the room that I obviously ignored too.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Agree.
If I was in that situation, I would think exactly the same way. Seriously, is death worse than not being able to move?
Re: (Score:3)
Worst that can happen? Well, since this is basically a roll of the dice as to what happens?
Pain originates as nervous system signals. Wouldn't it be great to permanently switch the pain centers to on in these quadriplegics with no recovery of motor function? And someone else already brought up cancer.
Don't ask, "Well, how can it possibly get worse?" Because it can always get worse.
Re:Worst that could happen? (Score:5, Informative)
I'm guessing you don't have a spinal cord injury, because if you did then you'd be happy with just about anything that could improve it. Since in a lot of cases, those pain centres are already "on." I'm still debating on getting a baclofen pump, that dumps the crap right into my spinal fluid. I already passed on the spinal fusion, since the failure rate and chance of being a paraplegic or parapligic was 53%
As for worse? Well death is always a possibility too, but we're already heading down that road. The only question is when you get there and how.
Re:Worst that could happen? (Score:5, Insightful)
Recommended music during the operation (Score:4, Funny)
Spinal Tap
Re: (Score:2)
Fingers crossed (Score:2)
Another Trade Vanishes (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That super expensive Hep C medicine has shown that you can have an overpriced miracle cure and make a ton of money.
What they demonstrated is that by overpricing a miracle cure you can effectively limit its use and keep it from lowering the the infection rates, thereby safeguarding the drugs future profits, all while making insane amounts of profit.
Re: (Score:2)
Right. Because the US fee-for-service medicine model is the only one on the planet and furthermore, US pharmaceutical firms and scientists are the only ones who could possibly do breakthrough level science.
Expand your horizons. There is a large, very sophisticated world out there.
Re: (Score:2)
Would that be the islet transplants? Because sure they do work, the only problem is about 70% of the people end up back on some dosage insulin because the body starts killing them again. The worst cases they're right back to the beginning 10 years down the road. There's still some fine tuning to fix it, my sister was offered to be in the very first round of clinical trials at sick kids london(Ontario) that was just about 20 years ago now, she opted for the clinical trials of the insulin pump though and I
Upbeat about this trial (Score:5, Informative)
Should be pointed out... (Score:1)