DNA Project 'to Make UK World Genetic Research Leader' 65
mrspoonsi (2955715) writes A project aiming to revolutionise medicine by unlocking the secrets of DNA is under way in centres across England. Prime Minister David Cameron has said it "will see the UK lead the world in genetic research within years". The first genetic codes of people with cancer or rare diseases, out of a target of 100,000, have been sequenced. Experts believe it will lead to targeted therapies and could make chemotherapy "a thing of the past". Just one human genome contains more than three billion base pairs — the building blocks of DNA. Prof Jeremy Farrar, director of the Wellcome Trust, said: "I can see a future where genetics is going to come into every bit of medicine from cardiology to oncology to infectious diseases." "Twenty years from now there's going to be a plethora of those, we will have a series of mutations which academics and industry will have developed therapies for, which will be targeted at you and specific for that cancer." He said chemotherapy, which attacks all dividing cells in the body, would be replaced with such therapies. "We will look back in 20 years' time and think of blockbuster chemotherapy [as] a thing of the past and we'll think 'Gosh, what an era that was'." David Cameron has announced a series of investments across government, industry and charities totalling £300m ($500m).
Re: (Score:3)
The sun still doesn't set on the British Empire. The phrase was and remains literal: It spans enough timezones that it's always daytime on British soil somewhere
So long as we keep control of the Falklands, the observation remains accurate.
Re: The United Kingdom (Score:2)
The whole school system of Birmingham? I think you might be exaggerating slightly. It was a few schools and has been nipped in the bud. Don't bother posting any Daily Mail links please. I live in Birmingham. I also was allowed into Star City recently despite being an infidel just in case you feel like posting that load of old crap as well. Let me ask you a question Mr OMG BRITAIN IS A MUSLIM COUNTRY. What branch of Sharia Law would approve of the recent gay marriage law?
Re: (Score:2)
The UK could send the Wahhabi radicals you refer to back if it were to grow a spine, but the other religious radicals, the pitchfork-waving anti-GMO faithful who are all set to derail the program TFA refers to, are locally sourced.
Re: (Score:2)
We don't have to be 20 years in the future to look at right now and think what an awful thing chemo is.
The trouble is acting on that knowledge today...
Re: (Score:3)
What chemotherapy does is use toxic heavy metals to kill fast-dividing cells, in the hope that the fastest-dividing cells in your body are cancer cells. The problem is that the cells in your digestive system divide almost as fast, and are thus also killed off in the process. Chemo becomes a race to kill your cancer before you die of starvation.
First steps (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
It wouldn't help the individual patients, as the risk factors are pretty difficult to avoid in today's world.
It can help at the time of treatment. We are already sequencing not just the germline DNA of the patient, but also the damaged genome of the tumour tissue. If a specific gene is found to be mutated that can be targeted by an existing drug, then the treatment can be tailored to the individual case.
Re: (Score:2)
Not only is "each cancer is little different genetically" but the cells of any given cancer are not homogeneous copies - there is considerable heterogeneity, much more than in normal cells.
Re: (Score:2)
Why would people who favor independence for Northern Ireland be against new cancer treatments?
we can do much more (Score:1)
Biologists and chemists have become quite good at going from genes to treatments; meaning, if you know which gene causes a disease, in many cases, you can come up with a treatment. The holdup for cancer has been that, genetically, it's not one disease but thousands, many of which haven't been characterized. By identifying the genes responsible, people will be able to develop specific drugs and treatments, and many cancers will likely become treatable.
But correlating genetic and medical data will be useful f
Re: (Score:1)
There's a big difference between mapping the genomes of cancer patients and developing individualized treatments, akin to the difference between being able to read a novel and being the editor. As it is, we can't even understand most of the human genome, but I suppose this is a step in the right direction.
Bearing in mind Cameron is an oaf I wouldn't be surprised if it was being rolled out for either similar behind the scenes purpose not too far off what you state, or another tory get rich[er] quick scheme. After all a lot of the gov investment and involvement in fair bit of projects has been a shill reasons with high vested interest, shares and so on in such things being the driving force and even willingness to damage the stated aim if it means more money.
Re:DNA-targeted cures (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Canada has spent over a billion dollars on genomic research in the last seven years or so, this is an interesting project but he's a bit shy of 'world leader' status with this investment.
My god! (Score:2)
Please clone Princess Diana!
I'm so paranoid... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
You know with the fingerprint databases the US and others have, and this "new" (its already quite old, but does that matter, I was against it when it was introduced, so it is new) EU regulation that introduces fingerprints into passports, I don't know how much they should collect more... Giving my fingerprint to the government brings no use to me, but knowing my DNA uses me more than anyone else. I rather know my own DNA and have the risk of the government knowing it too, as not knowing it with the same ris
Re: (Score:1)
The genetic datases are very, very scary stuff.
So, Mr. "Schmidt", I see from your DNA that you are a Jew.....
And there's also the old "so, doctor, what blood type is the *milkman* if I'm not the father of this baby"? From Wikipedia:
A study in Michigan of 1417 white and 523 black children found non-paternity rates
Re:Also get the karyotypes please (Score:4, Insightful)
You can process genome sequencing data to get the same sort of information you'd get from a karyotype (translocations, missing or extra copies of chromosomes or particular cytobands, etc.), but at much higher resolution. Unlike a traditional karyotype it generally won't be derived from a single cell, though (which has advantages and disadvantages).
The one of very few decent things. (Score:1)
This is possibly one of the very few decent things he has actually done.
Admittedly only so he can get more votes. Do all the bad shit as early as possible, "hey look we fixed the economy", now do all the really nice things so everyone jumps on-board again.
It's not like old people care, they are the voters anyway. And half will likely have forgot.
Re: (Score:2)
what could possibly go wrong (Score:1)
oddly enough, there's actually already a project doing that .... they presented data at the World Congress on Human Genetics in Montreal several years ago.
See www.oxfordtoday.ox.ac.uk/features/what-makes-british
Political Hell (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Do you know the difference between genetic research and stem cell research? Very different fields. From your post, you sound pretty ignorant.
Re: (Score:3)
A lot more genetic research is being destroyed by liberals who rip up fields of test crops than by fundamentalists inveighing against stem cells.
UK leads in monitoring and DNA (Score:2)
The UK is extremely invasive and their people are OK with it. They DNA collect on their people as well as monitor them more than most nations. Their national health service provides them the cheapest means to access such info and statistics. Combine that with their monitoring system and you'll get the first serious genetic to behavior results.
free online ex back voodoo ritual at dr.obodo t (Score:1)