SpaceX Wins FAA Permission To Build a Spaceport In Texas 80
Jason Koebler writes SpaceX just got approval from the Federal Aviation Administration to build a 56.5-acre spaceport along the Gulf of Mexico on the Texas-Mexico border—a huge step toward actually making the spaceport a reality. Wednesday, the FAA, which handles all commercial space launch permitting in the United States, issued what's known as a "Record of Decision" that suggests the agency would allow the company to launch 10 Falcon 9 rockets and two Falcon Heavy rockets per year out of the spaceport, through at least 2025.
Re: (Score:2)
People from Maine sure write funny.
Spaceport along the Gulf of Mexico (Score:2)
Spaceport along the Gulf of Mexico on the Texas-Mexico border...
Rockets with Taco Bell sponsorships?
Re: (Score:2)
Why didn't I think of that.... penal colony for illegal immigrants involving long term imprisonment and hard labor.
Instead of returning them home, send them on a one-way trip to mars or the moon.
Re: (Score:2)
Does a private prison company gaining sentience and posting on Slashdot count as AI, some kind of group mind or just a regular evil overlord?
This might start giving them ideas. (Score:2)
Burrito-fueled rockets to get illegals in across the border.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Solidly in the U.S.
Lots of Taco Bells.
Re:Taco Bell Rockets.... (Score:2)
Pizza Hut did it back in 2000.
http://www.spacedaily.com/images/proton-pizza-bg.jpg
Re: (Score:3)
Taco Smell is a Yum foods brand. Owned by the Japanese.
Yum Foods brands are universally the worst in their class. Yum brands: Kentucky Fried Rat, Taco Hell, A&W, Booger King, Pizza Hut and Arby's. Nothing that can be fairly called 'food' served at any of them.
I used to occasionally eat a taco bell taco. Didn't think it was good, but it was a childhood memory/comfort food in a weird way. Then I fed my dogs a couple of cans of Old Roy brand beef canned dog food and immediately headed for Taco Bell. W
Re:Say what? (Score:5, Funny)
We are required by law to deport illegal aliens to their point of origin.
Further information on this subject is classified.
Re: (Score:1)
better map link (Score:5, Informative)
If you can't read the scaled-down map reproduced from the report in the linked blog post, you can either look on p. 54 of the PDF, or else here's the site on OpenStreetMap [openstreetmap.org]. It appears it's not just that they're being given permission for the launches, but also that they're being given use of the land: the approved launch site is Texas state-owned land in Boca Chica State Park, which they'll be allowed to construct a facility on, and use for a certain number of days/year.
Re: (Score:3)
Now it's just 5 years of environmental studies, lawsuits and billion dollar "mitigation" measures.
Re: (Score:1)
It's Texas. They'll be breaking ground next month.
Re: (Score:2)
Midland (Tx) is awaiting FAA Spaceport approval after shoveling some ED money and incentives at SpaceX...
There will be no intentional delay. They're on it, doggone it.
Re: (Score:2)
It's Texas, they broke ground three weeks ago.
FAA? Never heard of 'em.
Why a new one? (Score:2)
Isn't there one near the Mexico border in NM that already exists?
Re: (Score:1)
South Padre Island is much farther south than the Spaceport in NM, which gives a significant velocity boost and thus less fuel to get into orbit. It also means launching over ocean which has less liability concerns than launching over land (even if it's mostly open desert). I don't know of anyone who has any plans to use the Spaceport for orbital launches, just straight up & down sub-orbital flights and testing.
Re: (Score:2)
Now THAT sounds like an awesome movie.
turbo-skeet shooting Texas style (Score:1)
Hope their hull is bulletproof. (Score:5, Interesting)
The area that they want to build (actually have been building for a while now) is flooded during spring break with high school and university kids. It's cheap, beach, and poorly patrolled. If you work for them, you'll have to live in Brownsville and deal with the beach crap for 6 weeks a year.
I really cannot think of a less desirable location to build this "space port".
Re: (Score:2)
They can buy Mexico.
Angering the gueros is bad for business.
Re:Hope their hull is bulletproof. (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Hope their hull is bulletproof. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Do you REALLY think they just drew the name Brownsville out of a hat? And then decided to locate there? WTF? You're talking about it like it's some kind of voluntary choice. Please tell me you're not that stupid.
Look at a map of America. Brownsville is at the southern tip. Being as far south as possible as advantageous for putting satellites into orbit. Why do you think Cape Canaveral is located where it is?
Re: (Score:1)
I really cannot think of a less desirable location to build this "space port".
Mos Eisley
Re: (Score:2)
Another geek who never actually went to spring break and gets his information from movies.
Spring break beaches typically have terrible ratios. Sausage fest of drunken frat boys, puking all over themselves.
Re: (Score:2)
So you're saying I didn't really miss out on anything by not going South for spring break? Good to know.
Re: (Score:2)
Unless you like drinking till you puke all over yourself you didn't miss anything.
Why only 12 rockets per year? (Score:2)
That seems completely arbitrary.
Re: (Score:2)
Probably some haphazard environmental impact study. But once SpaceX has the foot in the door and a need to launch more, it probably can be arranged to higher limits. If they can lay pipelines through a Alaskan wildlife preserve, they can launch more rockets from a national park in Texas.
Re: (Score:2)
They are building a spaceport in the middle of a national park! Either it is a nature preserve or it is not one. Although I don't count myself to the environmentalist camp, but I see the ideas behind national parks. But in many cases the environmental impact studies are educated guess at best. The 12 rockets limit seems fairly arbitrary and more along the lines of projected SpaceX use of the facility and less on the environmental impact tolerances.
Re: (Score:2)
That seems completely arbitrary.
It'll put a dampener on their July the 4th celebrations - oh sorry March 2nd - it's Texas.
Mexico (Score:1)
Did they bother to get Mexico's permission to operate this spaceport so close to the Mexican border?
Re: (Score:3)
Borders are binary and there are already treaties/conventions in place regarding airspace.
For example, Spain would love to close Gebralter's airport. But the rules only let them be a huge pain in the ass.
In other words, why should we?
Re: (Score:2)
huh... (Score:2)
But I don't know much about the requirements for spaceports.
Re: (Score:2)
Name your spaceport (Score:5, Funny)
I vote Mos Eisley.
After all, where else would one find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy, outside of Washington that is...
Re: (Score:2)
oh the hubris! Does the rest of the Galaxy know about this? Are they ready?
They're boycotting it because it doesn't sign up to the Andromeda and District port worker's labor union.
I heared you're opening a spaceport... (Score:2)
If you're looking for astronauts just let me know.
I might consider it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
here's an astronomical whooooosh for you, sir
2 Elon Musk posts in 1 day? (Score:2)
Shall we declare a national holiday? Parades?
Only 56.5 acres? (Score:2)
(For the more cosmopolitan of us, Washington Square Park is just under ten acres.)
.
Re: (Score:2)
Only 56.5 acres on land, but 395 million acres downrange [wolframalpha.com].
Re: (Score:2)
Thing is, the plan is to bring the first stage back in and land it on the launch pad. That makes the 395 million acres less relevant.
Re: (Score:2)
Not the launch pad. If launching from Texas they will land the first stage somewhere in the neighborhood of Florida.