Study: Deforestation Depletes Fish Stocks 69
Rambo Tribble (1273454) writes Adding to the well-known fish-killing effects deforestation has in increasing turbidity and temperature in streams, a study published in Nature Communications, (abstract, PDF access), demonstrates deforestation causes a depletion of nutrients in associated lake aquatic ecosystems and, as a consequence, impacted fish stocks. Lead author Andrew Tanentzap is quoted as saying, 'We found fish that had almost 70% of their biomass made from carbon that came from trees and leaves instead of aquatic food chain sources.' This has troubling implications, as 'It's estimated that freshwater fishes make up more than 6% of the world's annual animal protein supplies for humans ...' Additionally, this may have significance in regard to anadromous species, such as salmon, which help power ocean ecosystems. The BBC offers more approachable coverage.
Who would have thought? (Score:5, Insightful)
Who would have thought that destroying an ecosystem would have more than one bad effect?
Good thing we use less paper now (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:this has nothing to do with salmon (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Fresh Water vs. Ocean Water Fish (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Who would have thought? (Score:5, Insightful)
Who would have thought that destroying an ecosystem would have more than one bad effect?
More to the point, this is hardly a recent revelation.
People in my part of the U.S. were fighting deforestation (this is a logging region), based on studies that said it caused turbidity in streams, causing among other things nutrification and drastically reducing oxygen, which in turn killed the local aquatic life (which is a major sporting industry in this part of the U.S.).
And that was when I was, like, 12 years old. Which was a l-o-n-g time ago.
I'm not saying this paper didn't show something valid. But the suggestion made by OP, that this is all some kind of new revelation, is just a few decades late. Likely there was some fine point in the paper that reinforced what we already knew. But AFAIK, OP says nothing new at all.