NASA Names Gavin Schmidt Director of the Goddard Institute For Space Studies 41
First time accepted submitter Graculus (3653645) writes "NASA has named Gavin A. Schmidt to head the agency's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York, a leading Earth climate research laboratory. Currently deputy director of the institute, Schmidt steps into the position left vacant after the retirement of long-time director James E. Hansen and becomes only the third person to hold the post."
National Atmospheric Science Administration (Score:3)
Climate modelers belong in NOAA.
Re: (Score:3)
Before even debating which agency should be involved, why is the "Goddard Institute for Space Studies" a climate research facility? With a name like that, shouldn't it be studying, well, space?
It's "space studies" because the studies are done (in many cases) from space.
We don't study "space" at NASA - we study stars, planets, galaxies, the universe as a whole, the Sun, and, yes, the Earth - all from space.
That's why the Hubble Space Telescope is a "space" telescope. Not because it looks at "space" but because the telescope itself is in space.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Why are taxpayers funding this? (Score:4, Insightful)
If climate science is really worthwhile
You mean our atmosphere, the thing that keeps us alive and will hopefully continue to do so in the future as long as we don't fuck it up? That thing? Yeah, totally not worth the sliver of NASA's small budget.
Re: (Score:1)
You mean our atmosphere, the thing that keeps us alive and will hopefully continue to do so in the future as long as we don't fuck it up? That thing? Yeah, totally not worth the sliver of NASA's small budget.
I, for one, celebrate Hansen's stepping down. Maybe for a change we will get responsible science as opposed to Hansen's zealotry.
Re: (Score:3)
Good luck, Gavin Schmidt is one of the primary architects of the GISS Model-E, one of the preeminent climate models in the world.
Re: (Score:1)
In what sense is "one of the primary architects of GISS Model E" not doing "responsible science"?
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, so we're not to use models any more.
That'll make getting into an airplane more exciting in the future.
As for being "correct", Schmidt himself said: "Models are not right or wrong. They are always wrong. They are always approximations. The question you have to ask is whether a model tells more information than you would have had otherwise. If it does, it is skillful."
Re: (Score:2)
As for being "correct", Schmidt himself said: "Models are not right or wrong. They are always wrong. They are always approximations. The question you have to ask is whether a model tells more information than you would have had otherwise. If it does, it is skillful."
And this is EXACTLY why the models are bullshit. Because they have not been JUST consistently wrong, but consistently HUGELY wrong [judithcurry.com].
I actually DO give credit to the models as being "guesses". But if we are to accept them as science, they are terrible guesses. If you have ever read Asimov's The Relativity of Wrong [tufts.edu], and actually looked at how weel the models have reflected reality (or, more properly, failed to do so), you could only conclude that we are going back to the Stone Age in our understanding of wh
What the science shows (Score:2)
Well, could trust a blog, or check the peer reviewed science?
What are the predictions of climate models, should we believe them, and are they falsifiable? Probably the most iconic and influential result arising from climate models is the prediction that, dependent on the rate of increase of CO2 emissions, global and annual mean temperature will rise by around 2–4C over the 21st century. We argue that this result is indeed credible, as are the supplementary predictions that the land will on average w
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I certainly didn't mean to imply that Schimdt is not doing responsible science, just that JQP's hope is a pipe dream. I have tremendous respect for Dr. Schmidt. He gave a TED talk recently on The emergent patters of climate change [ted.com] that covers the study of climate from the smallest scale up to the big picture.
You can't understand climate change in pieces, says climate scientist Gavin Schmidt. It's the whole, or it's nothing. In this illuminating talk, he explains how he studies the big picture of climate change with mesmerizing models that illustrate the endlessly complex interactions of small-scale environmental events.
Re: (Score:2)
The fact that a purported scientist is resorting to TED to make his point is a tribute to "climate change" propaganda.
Back to the ivory tower with you poindexter! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That's one way to look at it. You could also say the TED talk is outreach, bringing science to the public.
Re: (Score:2)
He uses their own data to show how they manipulate the truth. At his own personal cost, on his own time.
In particular, the "adjustments" GISS makes to temperature data is under very serious question.
Re: (Score:2)
Muslim outreach (Score:1)
Has he been properly briefed, that the main mission of NASA is muslim outreach?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/... [huffingtonpost.com]
That's a direct quote, by the way:
"..."When I became the NASA administrator -- or before I became the NASA administrator -- he charged me with three things. One was he wanted me to help re-inspire children to want to get into science and math, he wanted me to expand our international relationships, and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and eng
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Or spelling Nazis (grammar).
Here is his TED talk (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)