Study: Male Facial Development Evolved To Take Punches 190
First time accepted submitter Joe_NoOne (48818) writes "A new theory suggests that our male ancestors evolved beefy facial features as a defense against fist fights. The bones most commonly broken in human punch-ups also gained the most strength in early hominin evolution. They are also the bones that show most divergence between males and females. From the article: 'Fossil records show that the australopiths, immediate predecessors of the human genus Homo, had strikingly robust facial structures. For many years, this extra strength was seen as an adaptation to a tough diet including nuts, seeds and grasses. But more recent findings, examining the wear pattern and carbon isotopes in australopith teeth, have cast some doubt on this "feeding hypothesis". "In fact, [the australopith] boisei, the 'nutcracker man', was probably eating fruit," said Prof David Carrier, the new theory's lead author and an evolutionary biologist at the University of Utah. Instead of diet, Prof Carrier and his co-author, physician Dr Michael Morgan, propose that violent competition demanded the development of these facial fortifications: what they call the "protective buttressing hypothesis".'"
Oh bugger... (Score:5, Funny)
Of course I read this after my sandwich was late.
Sorry, sweetie...
Re:topic is sexist (Score:3, Funny)
true equality would be them getting punched in the face.
Re:Limits of incremental change or other constrain (Score:5, Funny)
I realize that you evolve with the genome you have, not the genome you might want or wish to have at a later time;
Say that again and I'll punch you ;-) ........ or should that be [;=))]
Re:Sexual selection by the opposite sex. (Score:5, Funny)
No such luck in King's Landing (Score:4, Funny)
If only the Red Viper had a more punch-resistant face, eh?