Geophysicists Discover How Rocks Produce Magnetic Pulses 72
KentuckyFC (1144503) writes "Since the 1960s, geophysicists have known that some earthquakes are preceded by ultra-low frequency magnetic pulses that increase in number until the quake takes place. But this process has always puzzled them: how can rocks produce magnetic pulses? Now a group of researchers has worked out what's going on. They say that rocks under pressure can become semiconductors that produce magnetic pulses under certain circumstances.
When igneous rocks form in the presence of water, they contain peroxy bonds with OH groups. Under great temperature and pressure, these bonds break down creating electron-holes pairs. The electrons become trapped at the site of the broken bonds but the holes are free to move through the crystal structure. The natural diffusion of these holes through the rock creates p and n regions just like those in doped semiconductors. And the boundary between these regions behaves like the p-n junction in a diode, allowing current to flow in one direction but not the other. At least not until the potential difference reaches a certain value when the boundary breaks down allowing a sudden increase in current. It is this sudden increase that generates a magnetic field. And the sheer scale of this process over a volume of hundreds of cubic meters ensures that these magnetic pulses have an extremely low frequency that can be detected on the surface. The new theory points to the possibility of predicting imminent earthquakes by triangulating the position of rocks under pressure by searching for the magnetic pulses they produce (although significantly more work needs to be done to characterize the process before then)."
When igneous rocks form in the presence of water, they contain peroxy bonds with OH groups. Under great temperature and pressure, these bonds break down creating electron-holes pairs. The electrons become trapped at the site of the broken bonds but the holes are free to move through the crystal structure. The natural diffusion of these holes through the rock creates p and n regions just like those in doped semiconductors. And the boundary between these regions behaves like the p-n junction in a diode, allowing current to flow in one direction but not the other. At least not until the potential difference reaches a certain value when the boundary breaks down allowing a sudden increase in current. It is this sudden increase that generates a magnetic field. And the sheer scale of this process over a volume of hundreds of cubic meters ensures that these magnetic pulses have an extremely low frequency that can be detected on the surface. The new theory points to the possibility of predicting imminent earthquakes by triangulating the position of rocks under pressure by searching for the magnetic pulses they produce (although significantly more work needs to be done to characterize the process before then)."
How far can the Magnetic Pulses propagate ? (Score:1)
Let's say it's a huge earthquake, something along the line of the 8.something earthquake that shook Fukushima, causing tsunami and untimately got that nuke plant to melt ...
In a big quake like that, how _far_ can the magnetic pulse propagate ?
10 miles ? 100 ? 1000 ?
Has anyone got any info ?
Well.. (Score:1)
Science, bitches.
So... (Score:1)
piezo effect? With magnetism, electricity can't be far behind. I wonder if that can't start underground coal fires.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
FTFWiki:
Some fires along coal seams are natural occurrences. Some coals may self-ignite at temperatures as low as 40 C (104 F) for brown coal in the right conditions of moisture and grain size. The fire usually begins a few decimeters inside the coal at a depth in which the permeability of the coal allows the inflow of air but in which the ventilation does not remove the heat which is generated.
Nothing to do with piezo though.
Re: (Score:2)
FTFWiki:
Some fires along coal seams are natural occurrences. Some coals may self-ignite at temperatures as low as 40 C (104 F) for brown coal in the right conditions of moisture and grain size.
The fire usually begins a few decimeters inside the coal at a depth in which the permeability of the coal allows the inflow of air but in which the ventilation does not remove the heat which is generated.
Nothing to do with piezo though.
if you consider "less than a meter under the surface" to be underground, then yeah I guess it could happen less than a meter under the surface.
Re: (Score:2)
piezo effect? With magnetism, electricity can't be far behind. I wonder if that can't start underground coal fires.
Probably more like lightning preceeding earthquakes:
https://www.google.com/search?... [google.com]
Re: (Score:3)
Both are forms of energy density.
Rock and magnets - how do they work? (Score:5, Funny)
It's a cover up (Score:3)
those pulses are clearly a MUTO mating call.
Animals? (Score:5, Interesting)
Given that lots of animals are sensitive to magnetic fields, this would also seem to explain them reacting prior to earthquakes.
Re:Animals? (Score:5, Insightful)
...given that they really do react in advance to earthquakes. That lore has been in the "everybody knows" class for millennia, but the observations have an unpleasant habit of being reported after the quake. If my house started shaking right now, I could certainly think of something goofy our Jack Russell Terrorist did an hour ago.
IIRC, Caltech set up a hotline in the 1980's for people to report anomalous animal behavior, and got a null result...the line would start ringing after the tremor, and there was usually an excuse involving not being near the phone. Perhaps it's time for another try, now that we all have cellphones.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Jack Russell Terrorist? Has it threatened to commit acts of jihad against the neighborhood cats?
Re: (Score:2)
No, in his only furball with a cat the cat was definitely the aggressor. However, he's hell on prairie dogs.
Re: (Score:2)
No, in his only furball with a cat the cat was definitely the aggressor. However, he's hell on prairie dogs.
I'm loving your auto-correct. LOL.
Re: (Score:2)
Are you commenting on "Jack Russell Terrorist" or "furball"? Both of them are common terms and can be googled...no auto-correct involved.
Re:Animals? (Score:4, Insightful)
a hotline in the 1980's for people to report anomalous animal behavior
The problem is that anomalous is such a vague word. I'm not going to call the University every time my cat does something a bit odd.
Re: (Score:1)
If your cat does something odd so frequently that you wouldn't call in as requested, then we can't use odd cat behavior as a predictor of anything.
Re: (Score:2)
I think you missed the point.
No, you missed the point that I'm not going to call Caltech every time my cat does something a bit weird. Neither are most other people.
ask Bill S. Preston, Esq. about Station. (Score:2)
And TT Brown [thomastownsendbrown.com] had done some interesting research into geologic piezoelectricy, although Wikipedia [wikipedia.org] only talks about his anti gravity research.
Re: (Score:3)
When your dog starts pooping east-west it is time to take earthquake precautions
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/ru... [pbs.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
It's hard to believe that would be enough pressure.
Re: (Score:2)
I remember reading a story of an "exodus" of fish from the region around New Orleans 3 days before the Katrina disaster. People said you could almost walk across without getting wet for stepping on all the fish. I figured "uh oh, something bad's gonna happen." And even though the storm wasn't tremendously huge -- it created a lot of choking debris and run off that could have hurt the fish. So it seems some kind of early warning was helping them.
Of course the people and weather specialists were warned with t
Re: (Score:2)
You'd have to be pretty gullible to believe it was humans that were responsible and not the Nordics.
Re: (Score:2)
Come on, don't you know anything about conspiracy theories?
I'm not RTFA... (Score:2)
Why is it that the holes can move but the electrons can't? I thought holes were just places where electrons could be but aren't, so moving holes implies movement of electrons.
Re: (Score:3)
Why is it that the holes can move but the electrons can't? I thought holes were just places where electrons could be but aren't, so moving holes implies movement of electrons.
Your description of "holes" is accurate. Understand that this term is used do describe how semi-conductors work and it really means "positive charged area" in some material. "Holes" is just easier to say than "a place where an electron could be but is not" or "Positively charged area".
Re: (Score:1)
Semiconductors are materials, where the conduction band (CB) is within 1-2 eV of the upper edge of the valence band (VB). The moderate distance in energy allows some electrons to be thermally activated, at ambient temperatures, from the VB to the CB. In semiconductors, when an electron makes a transition from the VB to the CB, a "hole" is created in the VB and a highly mobile electron is injected into the VB. Thereby an electron-hole pair is generated. Minerals are materials, where the CB is typically more
Re: (Score:2)
A P-type semiconductor (P for positive) doesn't have enough electrons to go around. So, you get places where electrons aren't, but would like to be (holes).
In either case, you don't really have electrons moving around - you have charge moving around. Think of a tube, where you insert one ball at the end, and a ball pops out the o
Some rocks under p != All rocks under p (Score:3)
The new theory points to the possibility of predicting imminent earthquakes by triangulating the position of rocks under pressure by searching for the magnetic pulses they produce (although significantly more work needs to be done to characterize the process before then)."
But that will only find certain types of igneous rocks formed underwater peroxy bonds under pressure. Not all rocks under pressure. Still if this type of rock is prevalent enough in a region, it could be useful.
Also geologists have been calculating rocks under stress using so many methods and observation. The problem is the slippage and failure occur unpredictably. The stress can be estimated. The strain may be observed. At least the surface strain. But the ultimate (or failing) strength of the rock layers is largely unknown.
Re: (Score:1)
Use in electronics (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I saw a live demo of this at NASA, was interesting (Score:2)
Friedemann Freund is a man with a lot of ideas.. At Yuri's night at the NASA Ames campus, he demonstrated this magnetic pulse-from-rock by using a dense column of rock and a hydrolic press. He had a saucer sized capactive sensor that was tied to a small microcontroller for remote-sensing/field usage that could detect the change in the electric feild near the rock column as it was compressed. He mentioned that he'd instrumented a fault line. He mentioned that the current released was strong enough to ion
Re: (Score:3)
Except all studies seem to indicate that animals do NOT act any differently before an earthquake. It's all seems to be post hoc, ergo propter hoc reasoning.
Re: (Score:2)
Animals freaking out beforehand everywhere is unlikely , however standing right above a fault-line where a sudden discharge of energy may be a different story.
Quite clever (Score:4, Funny)
Tip your wait staff.
Would hav ebeen more impressive if (Score:2)
The pluses would have been more impressive if they decreased in number at some point with anti-pulses. I'm guessing they meant frequency instead of number.
Really big P-N junctions? LEDs? (Score:2)
This summary made me think of LEDs and earthquake lights. Even if there is light generation, though, I can't imagine that it would be very intense. And then there's the whole "buried under meters of rock" issue.
I don't trust this, indeed. (Score:4, Informative)
First, there are way too much self references: take for example the first sentence "Rocks, especially igneous rocks, behave as semiconduc- tors under certain conditions". They connect this sentence to four papers previously published by one of the authors (Freund). Nobody else in the scientific world ever verified that rocks are semiconductors ?!? This does not make a good start for the topic they are going to discuss.
The authors claim that it is more than 50 years that the boundary between earthquakes and VLF emission has been established. Unfortunately this is not true: if it were, seismic network would be composed of radio receivers, they are way cheaper than seismometers. The existence of a connection between VLF emission and earthquakes is still an open question, and there are no conclusive proofs supporting it.
What we know is that earthquakes are usually not associated to a simultaneous VLF emission, so a theory explaining how earthquake precursors can trigger a VLF emissions should also justify why earthquakes have no VLF emission as well.
Figure 1 of TFA is a masterpiece of deception: please look at the value range in the graphs showing the computed and measured events: do you still think that the numerical predictions estimated by the authors and the field measurements can be defined "similar" ?!? They only share the same shape, when drawn on very different time and amplitude ranges!
Summing up, I am afraid that this paper isn't going to be of any help with earthquake prediction...the next, please!
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)