43,000-Year-Old Woolly Mammoth Remains Offer Strong Chance of Cloning 187
EwanPalmer sends a followup to a story from last year about a team of Siberian scientists who recovered an ancient wooly mammoth carcass. It was originally believed to be about 10,000 years old, but subsequent tests showed the animal died over 43,000 years ago. The scientists have been surprised by how well preserved the soft tissues were. They say it's in better shape than a human body buried for six months. "The tissue cut clearly shows blood vessels with strong walls. Inside the vessels there is haemolysed blood, where for the first time we have found erythrocytes. Muscle and adipose tissues are well preserved." The mammoth's intestines contain vegetation from its last meal, and they have the liver as well. The scientists are optimistic that they'll be able to find high quality DNA from the mammoth, and perhaps even living cells. They now say there's a "high chance" that data would allow them to clone the mammoth.
"LONG extinct"? Hah. (Score:5, Insightful)
A few thousand years isn't "long".
Compared to the other changes humans wreak over decades, bringing back mammoths would barely cause a ripple.
"Contain these creatures forever and ever"? We already extinguished them once, without even the help of gunpowder. If you're looking for things to worry about, you can do much better than this.
Seems logical (Score:3, Insightful)
We can't keep elephants and rhinos alive, so let's clone us some mammoths...
The end game (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:"LONG extinct"? Hah. (Score:4, Insightful)
If mammoths were wiped out by climate change, then resurrecting the species in a modern climate would be bringing it into an environment that it was not evolved to handle.
Not only does that seem rather pointless, but it also strikes me as arguably sounding like animal cruelty. I'd suggest that the scientific discoveries we might make by doing this may be heavily outweighed by the ethical considerations involved.
This matter really feels one of those times when scientists should be reminding themselves that just because we *CAN* do something does not necessarily mean that we *SHOULD*.
Re:"LONG extinct"? Hah. (Score:2, Insightful)
Me and a couple of grad students at the applied time-travel facility.