Math Models Predicted Global Uprisings 265
retroworks writes "Just over a year ago, complex systems theorists at the New England Complex Systems Institute warned that if food prices continued to climb, so too would the likelihood that there would be riots across the globe. Sure enough, we're seeing them now. The paper's author, Yaneer Bar-Yam, charted the rise in the FAO food price index—a measure the UN uses to map the cost of food over time—and found that whenever it rose above 210, riots broke out worldwide. It happened in 2008 after the economic collapse, and again in 2011, when a Tunisian street vendor who could no longer feed his family set himself on fire in protest."
Hindsight? (Score:5, Insightful)
Is that with hindsight or without?
How many "models" are going unreported because they didn't work out too well?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Its worse then that, their little graph only shows a handful of riots that they want to be on their.
I dont see any riots that do not meet their own agenda on it, hell the french riot a few times every year, I see none of the Australian riots I know of.
Total BS
Re:Hindsight? (Score:4, Insightful)
I dont see any riots that do not meet their own agenda on it
Or, they're simply trying to demonstrate that lack of food security causes riots, not that all riots are caused by lack of food security.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think the intent was to provide for all riots, just ones that met their criteriA when the fao index climbed above 210.
In essence, they are saying when X happens, Y follows. Not that all of Y is created by X. In a car anology, it would be like a new person shows up in New York City. We know when people cross the George Wahongton bridge in their car fro. West to east, they end up in NYC. But we also know they can fly in and enter from other routes by car too.so while X is true for Y, but Y is not limi
Re:Hindsight? (Score:5, Insightful)
Racists much?
Currently there are massive riots in The Ukraine, Venezuela, Thailand; signs of growing civil unrest in central Europe - reports of riots in Brazil; All countries of course known for their muslim leadership...
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Occupy wall street was a protest against the rich in the little country known as USA.
A typical muslim country is it ? Not really.
Well, it's at least a land full of religious conservatives who don't drink tea but rather push it into the river.
There are many people who read and think too much about ancient obsolete books and think they have all the answers.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Occupy was peaceful though, at least until the cops started attacking the protesters. Unfortunately it seems that the only way to create real change is to riot now, as governments have made damn sure peaceful protest is ignored.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Occupy wall street was a protest against the rich in the little country known as USA.
I thought it was an exercise in irony, especially since the median income of the protestors is undoubtedly higher than mine, and I consider myself upper middle class.
Re: (Score:2)
Muslims aren't a race , Einstein.
Re: (Score:2)
Racists much?
When did Islam become a race?
Re:Hindsight? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Hindsight? (Score:5, Informative)
Islam is a religion not a race. Hence the term Muslim, which means a follower of Islam, is not a racial term. "Muzzies" would however fall under the definition of bigotry though. Which is similar but not quite the same as racism.
Re: (Score:3)
Islam is a religion not a race. Hence the term Muslim, which means a follower of Islam, is not a racial term.
It's not quite that simple in practice. In Lebanon the main communities are Sunnis, Shiites, Christians and Druze. Each community includes many non-religious people and some who would describe themselves as atheists. But if you were born into the Sunni community, then your family is Sunni, the militia defending you is Sunni, and the militias attacking you are probably Shiite or Christian. That's your identity, regardless what you think about theological issues. It may not be a "race", but it's certainly an
Re: (Score:3)
Nah, this is just /.
Kinda remind you of slam dancing in the pit, back in the 80s/90s.But with fewer skinheads.
Re: (Score:2)
Its probably just gas.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah...why should an abbreviation of a word with no other alteration be considered offensive? Cf. "Jap", "homo"...oh, it's because of *how* we say the word, not the word itself? But apparently my habit of shortening people's names down to 1 or 2 syllables is bigoted.
Re: (Score:2)
LOL, never heard that one, sounds like a toy from Mattel. "Muzzies, just wind them up and watch them cuddle".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And Islam does have racial connotations in that battles involving Islam are often divided along racial divisions as well.
Except wherever the population exhibits either no such divisions (or, conversely, the picture is so variegated that no 1:1 matching of finely distinguished races/ethnicities and religious affiliations exist), like the clashes between the Muslim Indians and the Hindu Indians, right? And Indonesians seem to be largely the same case.
Re: (Score:2)
Apparently a simple comment can cause quite a stir.
I'm very well aware that religion is not a race, however, when you have a bigot like the one I replied to, his world view is splitting races along religious lines.
And apparently everyone seems to miss my point - Civil unrest, riots and probably civil war in case of The Ukraine are happening around the globe right now - and spot on predictions for said events.
My point of the post was that it's not just the middle east having the darndest of time keeping thei
Re: (Score:2)
uhm your heart was in the right place, but Judeans from Judea became the Jews. Unless you are Jewish to begin with, straining as hard as you can will not make you a Jew. You can convert, but will probably hear Goy jokes whispered wherever you go. Its a Raceligion.
Re: (Score:2)
Last time I checked it was a religious choice
Well, except for the part where they kill you if you believe but then leave (apostasy [wikipedia.org])...and they're not too hot on people who believe the wrong branch (Sunni vs. Shia) or people who choose other religions, either.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm taking the "racists mush?" question to have been answered with "yes" when you go name a people "muzzies".
The point was, you're claiming Muslim rioting as a counterpoint, but even if its accepted that those riots are a part of this this trend of rioting spoken of-- they don't fit even your pattern, they *aren't* a counterpoint simply because you state it. Naming them to counter the argument is just racist handwaving at best: oh, well the Muslims (er, muzzies) are rioting, so clearly there's no pattern be
Re: (Score:2)
What race is Islam?
The line is blurred. Jews consider themselves a race, but Judaism is also a religion. When people talk about Muslim countries they mainly mean middle eastern ones run by Arabs or Asians (and don't confuse Asians with Orientals).
Re: (Score:2)
The term "Oriental" originally meant "of the East" (as compared to Europe, obviously). What do you say it means?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:3)
It's pretty obvious you're using "muslim" to mean "middle-eastern." Being "technically correct" doesn't really matter in casual conversation. You're a dick either way - we're just debating how to describe what *kind* of dick you are at this point.
Re: (Score:2)
Drought (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, if you check reliable media outlets, a week after events, they usually do a better job of determining the source of the frustration. The protestors usually say something like: "U.S. is in our country replacing our interests with theirs, that's why I lost my job and my son is imprisoned for...what? No, I don't even get T.V. I've never heard of that movie."
There may be "triggers" that cause various groups to encourage protests to get started, but to motivate thousands of people to protest in areas where
Re: (Score:2)
Food prices, politics, religion, losing the World Cup. The model should state "people riot when they don't get what they want". And then there's this 'Global Uprisings' thing. Different populations have different sensitivities to prices on various commodities. India might experience food riots. In the USA, we didn't 'riot' until the bond yields paid to the trust fund babies dropped after the banking crash. I have a difficult time calling that global.
Re:Hindsight? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Well the popular "hampster uprising" has not happened, but a lot of the doomsayers are still holding out for it to happen. It has become one of the most desirable outcomes.
Who wouldn't want a cute fuzzy wuzzy supreme leader?
Re: (Score:2)
That's how one should work with models. Create lots of them, throw away the ones that didn't work, test the ones that work again and again to confirm that it wasn't just by chance.
We are at the second step here, and have a model to pay attention now.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, they are paraded around. Its one of the main reasons we have them. It stabilizes the pricesof food so we don't have massive swings downward which would cause farmers to lose their farms and then massive swings upwards from the resulting shortages.
In the long run, the slight increase in food costs are strategic in that it allows enough standing production and reserve capacity that the midwest can flood, the south can drought, the west can catch fire, and your food bill doesn't end up costing more t
Re: (Score:3)
Foundation (Score:2)
hari seldon did that first with psychohistory I seem to recall..
Re:Foundation and Empire (Score:3)
But even he was unable to forsee the Mule.
Re: Foundation and Empire (Score:2)
That is the problem with random mutations. They are unpredictable, both in when they will appear and in how they will affect society.
Re: (Score:2)
But even [Seldon] was unable to forsee the Mule.
Dunno -- my vote is still that the Mule was another leftover positronic-brain-based robot with a (bad pun alert!) chip on his shoulder.
Seldon probably correctly assumed that all such robots had been lost or destroyed millennia earlier.
Your masters will learn to tune the system (Score:5, Insightful)
What worries me about this sort of knowledge, is that it could make it possible for political leaders to keep the masses working their asses off just above the breadline. But they can avoid pushing it so far that they get the kind of political activism that might result in regime change.
Re:Your masters will learn to tune the system (Score:5, Informative)
it could ???
"Bread and circuses" is a 2000 years old expression.
Re: (Score:2)
You mean to say it's a 2000 year old *system*, not just an expression.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"make it possible for industrial leaders and bankers to keep the masses working their asses off just above the breadline."
FTFY
Re: (Score:2)
The problem with these uprisings, particularly in Ukraine and Venezuela, is that they're not fueled by food prices. I don't know the fine details about the Ukrainian case but I've been reading quite a lot about Venezuela. And I happen to live in Argentina so I see a lot of parallels between the Venezuelan case and the Argentinian (Venezuela is a little window to the future for us Argentinians).
Basically, Chavez got to power through a coup in the 90s. Since then, Venezuela has been going downhill. Like all "
Chavez was elected, he didn't gain power in a coup (Score:5, Informative)
He attempted a coup in 1992, but that failed.
He gained the presidency though legitimate elections in 1998.
Though he certainly wasn't very committed to democracy while in power.
Re: (Score:2)
"Just above breadline" is also known as "living wage", and is a bleeding heart liberal position, verging on outright communism. Why do you hate freedom so much, comrade?
I wouldn't worry about it too much. There are plenty o
Interesting (Score:2)
I've read a lot of those old "doomsaying" articles and in general they're interesting. But the Malthusians have been preaching the same apocalypses for a long time now and they've generally failed to come true.
I agree resource scarcity is essentially at the root of most of our problems, and over at http://www.dictatorshandbook.n... [dictatorshandbook.net] the discussion basically revolves around the idea that religious wars are a proxy for resource grabs, while bad governments either prevent more violence or promote it to achieve
Re: (Score:2)
I've read a lot of those old "doomsaying" articles and in general they're interesting. But the Malthusians have been preaching the same apocalypses for a long time now and they've generally failed to come true.
Except this guy predicted riots which then did not fail to come true. So uh, what does that have to do with this?
Predicted two years ago, it works. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Predicted two years ago, it works. (Score:4, Interesting)
Getting it right is easy. Not getting it wrong is hard. What is the false positive rate for this model? How many uprisings did it miss?
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day...
My formula (Score:3)
AngryPeople + BadGovernment = Uprising
Re: (Score:2)
No, there must be something else in the mix. Or do we just get no reports about the riots all over the US?
Re: (Score:2)
Well there is a lot more to it than that... Angry people must also have little to nothing to lose. That's where the tyrants and their greedy supporters always seem to screw up. They need to maintain a minimum level of "something to lose" to maintain control over their subjects. But the greed of the supporters is unlimited and that's a problem of the leadership to help them understand...which they inevitably fail to do.
So [Tyrant] [Supporters] [Subjects]
The Tyrant-Supporter relationship is pretty tricky
No shit, Sherlock! (Score:2)
Do we really need complex systems theorists to tell us that "if food prices continued to climb, so too would the likelihood that there would be riots across the globe"?!?
Okay then, where do I apply for D.O.T.O.M.O.O. (Department of the Obvious Made Obviously Obvious)?
RT.
Just as much (Score:5, Insightful)
Racist much? Maybe not. Islamaphobic much, though?
If you mean hating an ideology that wants to subdue or kill all others then I suppose I am just as islamaphobic as the allies in WWII were naziphobic.
Re:Just as much (Score:4, Insightful)
Actually, most Muslims are by no means radical. Quite a few are pissed at the radical asshats who give the whole bunch a bad name. And bluntly, most of the "radicals" don't give a shit about Islam actually. They just noticed that this is how they get us to listen. Just say "I'm gonna bomb your $place" and suddenly the "Westener" shuts up and listens. They found out that this works. Not only that, but that we start apologizing for "insulting" them. So anything we do or say is suddenly an insult.
Fuck it!
If you don't wanna see caricatures of your prophet, you can do what I did because I didn't like "2 girls 1 cup". I simply didn't look. Yes, whoever looks at it is a sicko, or for you, dear Islamist, a heretic but guess what, it's none of your business. I will not apologize for not being like you want me to be. Why? Because in my country where I live I can be the way I want to be! If I come to some country where the Islam is considered the state religion, I will of course heed the laws there and yes, that means that I will certainly not show around caricatures of your Prophet, because that's not allowed there. No problem. Your country, your rules.
But my country, my rules! And it's gonna be a very cold day in HELL before I let some radical, religious idiot rule my country.
(which is, btw, also a reason why I'd rather not move to the US)
Re: (Score:2)
The rational response was not to hate Nazism per se, but the things that made it vicious. Xenophobia and scapegoating are high on that list. Once you are committed against xenophobia and ultra-nationalism in general, it automatically follows that you're committed against Nazism in particular.
Likewise it makes no sense for you to fear Islam per se, but rather the vicious things you associate with Islam.
If you knew more about Islam, you would see that those things are not universal in people who consider them
Re: (Score:2)
I call BS. For a decade I've lived in a predominantly Muslim area of Brooklyn, NY and not once has anyone tried to subdue or kill me.
There have been nights where something wonky happened in another neighborhood and I breathed a sigh of relief when I got back here and felt safe again.
Re: (Score:2)
If you mean hating an ideology that wants to subdue or kill all others ....
It certainly isn't impossible to find stuff that implies that in the Koran. However, it isn't impossible to find stuff that implies that in The Bible either. Cherry-pick a verse here or there, and it can look pretty bad. It misses the point of the religion completely to do that, but I've seen it done.
So out of curiosity, do you hate Christianity too, or are you just being selective about which religion you apply those standards to?
For any Christian reading the parent and thinking perhaps its fine to throw
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
Dang straight! (Score:2)
The Bread Price (Score:2)
The so called bread price was always a key trigger for uprisings. If the price climbed faster than the actual income of the people, hunger was unavoidable. And of course people tend to become violent when they have suddenly not enough to eat.
I call BS... (Score:5, Insightful)
In 2006, the food index was only 127. Yet, there were 15 large scale riots, 9 large scale strikes, 6 wars, of which at least 2 new wars in 2006, and countless other conflicts not mentioned on the wikipedia page about conflicts in 2006. And I just picked a random year.
Conflicts (general): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C... [wikipedia.org]
Strikes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C... [wikipedia.org]
Riots: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C... [wikipedia.org]
Food index: http://www.fao.org/worldfoodsi... [fao.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed.
While I suspect that yes, food costs and shortages certainly make such uprisings more likely (hungry people tend to get a little crabby and short tempered) the causality of this is highly suspect.
I'd suspect that yes, at extreme values, hunger can drive civil issues. Otherwise it's more of an aggravating factor, as the uprisings around the world in 2013 were - at least as far as the news covered them - largely political and opportunistic. Note in particular the sort of 'infectious' pattern, where o
Re: (Score:3)
Indeed. With a world as large and complex as we have, there are virtually always conflicts that can be cited as happening at any given time. Being able to point out that some happened when a particular trigger condition was met does not in an of itself even demonstrate correlation, let alone causation.
Math Model? Seriously? (Score:2)
We need a model to tell us that food shortages increase the risk of uprisings? How about one that tells us the probability of riots when the temperature increases. Sounds like someone got funding, and produced a study proving the obvious.
And, I may be completely off base since I didn't read TFA.
Food riots when food prices go up! (Score:2)
Shocking! Who would have ever guessed before the advent of complicated math models that food riots tend to occur when food prices go up !
Next up, complicated fluid dynamics models that show that when it rains, you may get wet.
Food Or Fuel? (Score:2)
Except...food prices are not up? (Score:2)
The FAO food price index doesn't appear to be especially "up" right now:
http://www.fao.org/worldfoodsi... [fao.org]
So how does this model work again?
Re: (Score:2)
The lord giveth... (Score:4, Interesting)
Meanwhile, here in Norway the VAT for food items was reduced from 25% down to half. The consumers didn't notice because the shops just pocketed the difference and pretended nothing had happened.
Everything is not always the govt's fault.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What did anyone expect? That some business owner simply forgo profit?
The price of a good is not dependent on its production cost. The price of a good is only dependent on how much you can ask to net the highest profit. The only time the production cost comes into play is when the asking price drops below the production cost, then it simply will not be produced anymore. Else it doesn't matter jack how much it costs to make it, the price will ALWAYS be what someone is willing to pay.
Re: (Score:2)
the price will ALWAYS be what someone is willing to pay.
Of course in abstract that might seem true, but that's not how it works. There is price elasticity, market segmentation, and opportunity cost of redeploying your investment elsewhere....
In a group of people, there are individuals willing to pay a range of prices for range of items, it behooves you to set the price to minimize the opportunity cost of your choices.
The big lever in a non-command economy is the market segmentation approach: identify alternate profitable price points and offer them variants to m
Re: (Score:3)
Looks like there wasn't enough competition on the market.
Let me guess, the tax was reduced by a complex procedure that applied to some business and not others, and was too expensive for small business to follow anyway. Am I right?
Re: (Score:2)
Why is this modded troll?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
At what cost? Loss of wild habitats, sterile monocultures , pesticide poisoning of what little wildlife is left, fertilizer runoff causing o2 depletion in the rivers, soil erosion due to constant tilling, huge CO2 footprint due to fossil fuels required to produce agrichemicals and machinery to work the land and so on and on and on.
The methods of 300 years ago had survived for millenia. The way we've abused the planet in the last century we'll do well to be able to maintain this production for the next 100
Re: (Score:2)
At what cost? Loss of wild habitats, sterile monocultures , pesticide poisoning of what little wildlife is left, fertilizer runoff causing o2 depletion in the rivers, soil erosion due to constant tilling, huge CO2 footprint due to fossil fuels required to produce agrichemicals and machinery to work the land and so on and on and on.
And how exactly does it contradict simple fact that food availability does not go down?
The methods of 300 years ago had survived for millenia. The way we've abused the planet in the last century we'll do well to be able to maintain this production for the next 100 years, never mind 1000.
Oh yes, lament about 'good old days' and abuse of planet while using your computer, living in nice apartment, driving a car and enjoying modern medicine. We are quite adaptable species, when environment changes we will ad
Re: (Score:2)
"while using your computer, living in nice apartment, driving a car and enjoying modern medicin"
Sure, I use modern tech , but I use public transport and I don't have 10 kids. There's something called sustainability.
"We are quite adaptable species, when environment changes we will adapt again."
Oh dear, is the old hand waving "it'll be alright in the end, we don't need to worry or change" argument really all you've got?
Re: (Score:2)
"while using your computer, living in nice apartment, driving a car and enjoying modern medicin"
Sure, I use modern tech , but I use public transport and I don't have 10 kids. There's something called sustainability.
Ooh, you use public transport so it is all right. That minuscule reduction in somehow balances all resources spent to to build your house, your computer and million other modern conveniences that you have no problem accepting. But that's all right, you use public transport so this make your life 'sustainable' and gives you right to bitch about how *others* abuse the planet.
"We are quite adaptable species, when environment changes we will adapt again."
Oh dear, is the old hand waving "it'll be alright in the end, we don't need to worry or change" argument really all you've got?
We will change when we need to change. I see it as better argument than your pathetic hypocrisy.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Spot on. But some expect some self hating bleading heart to mod you down anytime soon.
Re:Callous knobhead (Score:5, Interesting)
But it's ok to bail out banks that can't keep their act together and invest sensibly, right?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Check the list, not all of them are third world countries.
Why is that list at all relevant? He hasn't even shown correlation between being on the list and some sort of sensitivity to food prices.
the same economic system.
So everyone has both Greece's huge black market economy and Sweden's relatively enlightened socialist policies? Or is it something like a lot of people buy food with money?
Re: (Score:3)
Wait, your insurance covers birth control but not viagra?
What magical country is that that is run by women instead of old, impotent assholes?
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know if that country exists - but my insurance covers either, provided you have a doctor's prescription.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
>Sadly people like you are part of the problem. But keep your head in the sand if it makes you feel better.
People like me ? And what pray-tell kind of people, am I ?
You know exactly fuckall about me.
You don't know if I'm married or single. You don't know if I have children. You don't know if I'm monogamous, polyamorous, a swinger. You don't know which gender I identify with, what my sexual orientation is, whether I'm religious and if so what religion.
You don't know if I like anal sex, giving or receivin
Re: (Score:2)
>Well going by that whining self righteous queenie rant you're obviously fairly young, early 20s, maybe teens and probably gay.
You got every single one of your guesses wrong.
I am in my mid-thirties, married, polyamorous and bisexual and my wife is currently pregnant.
> quite clear that you're the sort who think people have no responsibility for the amount of children they have if they can't get free birth control
Nope, I didn't say that - I do however have the capacity to do math and say that if poor pe
Re: (Score:2)
because people who spend their entire income on a place to live and a meal don't have anything to spare on your ideas and abstinence doesn't EXIST in the real world.
It's a hell of a lot cheaper to buy condoms than it is to raise another child...
Re: (Score:2)
>In other words you're a cheating gay man in denial - plenty of gay men get married and have kids and plenty of men like to dress up their cheating as some kind of acceptable lifestyle. Even Elton John was married to a woman once btw.
Judgemental and moralistic - but no, I don't cheat. There are no lies or secrets in our household. I have my boyfriends and girlfriends - and so does my equally bisexual wife. It's part of what we have in common. I love watching her eat pussy, she loves watching me suck cock
Re: (Score:2)
"Lillith held up a mirror to life, and chopped off all the bits of life that didn't fit".
I'm getting bored with this, you're also not the first person who has come up with this bigoted crap that bisexual men don't exist. You're not only judgemental, bigoted and reprehensible in every possible way - you are, like every other person like you I've known - an ignorant idiot as well.
Thank you for the incredible sense of superiority you've made me feel. I would almost imagine you're hitting on me - except for the
Re: (Score:2)
Why don't you educate yourself instead: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B... [wikipedia.org]
The tripe that bisexual people don't exist at all is one of the most common forms of biphobia. I know it may be hard for you to wrap your head around but I am genuinely attracted to people *regardless* of their physical sex.
Indeed I more commonly identify as sapiosexual - I am attracted to minds and intellect, not to physical appearance or shape.
Your simple-minded heterosexist view of the world is offensive but that isn't what I hate a