Panoramic Picture Taken By China's Moon Lander 125
Taco Cowboy writes "Perhaps it's not much, but China has released a panoramic view of the moonscape where their lander has landed. They 'stitched' up some 60 photos taken by 3 cameras on the Chang'e 3 lander, taken from 3 different angles — Vertical, 15 degrees up, and 15 degrees down. From the picture, there is a significant sized crater is seen, several meters wide, off to the left of Yutu, the (jade rabbit) moon rover, and located only about 10 meters away from the Chang'e-3 lander."
It's 2013 (Score:5, Interesting)
And this is the best image quality their chosen on-board imaging device can deliver?
Re:It's 2013 (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:It's 2013 (Score:5, Funny)
Because it won't have signal up there, stupid.
Re: (Score:1)
There's a standard response to that. Know what it is?
Re: (Score:2)
I do, it's "hehe"
because it was kinda funny
Re: (Score:3)
They bolted it to the chassis wrong?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
It's a funny son, laugh.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:It's 2013 (Score:4, Informative)
Those are mostly operating below the Van Allen belts, aren't they? There's no such protection on the moon.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The Van Allen Belts deflect the worst of the radiation, without them the ISS would not be habitable for very long.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They could but an iPhone is very heavy so it would add something like $20,000 to the cost of the launch.
Every gram is critical.
Re:It's 2013 (Score:5, Funny)
Yup, I did the calculations and it would be very close to $20,000. The weight of the device would add ~$10 to the total cost of fuel required, plus $100 to buy the iPhone itself and $19,890 over 2 years for the contract to get an iPhone subsidised down to $100 in the first place.
Re:It's 2013 (Score:5, Funny)
You left out the roaming charges.
Re:It's 2013 (Score:5, Funny)
Those roaming charges are going to be....
astronomical.
-
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
They did, but they have no signal because the rover is holding it wrong.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Now that you mention it, it looks just like the picture quality from a Huawei or ZTE phone.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
looks like 3 NTSC cameras, or at best cellphone ones :/
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Try it, it looks sharper if you squint your eyes.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I don't see you delivering better images.
Re: (Score:1)
Is is when the entire china moon landing was a fake.
Re:artifact (Score:2)
So that's not a comet near the horizon on the right of the image?
darn
Re: (Score:2)
It's not really the camera, it's the transmission method. Looks like SSTV [wikipedia.org].
Focus (Score:2)
Water discovered on the Moon! (Score:5, Funny)
It's right there, on the lens, blurring everything!
no news story? (Score:1)
Is there news story you can link to? This is not news while there is no way of even checking if the summary matches the story.
Spacecraft just went to sleep (Score:5, Informative)
CCTV just announced [youtube.com] that the Sun has set at Mare Imbrium and the Chang'E lander and the Yutu rover both have gone to sleep for the night.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yep.
mickey (Score:1)
please return my mickey mouse webcam
NOT a Chinese released panorama (Score:5, Informative)
The image linked to is apparently from the Universe Today [universetoday.com]. As the linked article says :
That's why it's fuzzy. It's screen scraped from a TV.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
>That's why it's fuzzy. It's screen scraped from a TV.
Well, certainly doesn't look like any "TV" I have been watching for the last many years!
China- the 1950's called and would like their equipment back now, if you are done with it.
Re: (Score:3)
I imagine it was a std def broadcast.
Chang'E 3 has several cameras (as does the YuTu rover), following the MER standard of having "science," "navigation" and "hazard avoidance" cameras. One of the Lander camera pointing systems was designed in Hong Kong [phys.org]; I suspect that system made these images.
Note - some of the published images were high-def (16:9 ?) and were just aired as 4:3 on the TV broadcasts, making the lander (to me) look squished on screen and screen-shots.
Re: (Score:3)
Chang'E 3 has several cameras (as does the YuTu rover)
The rover's cameras cannot be used following an emergency injunction order from YouTube for trademark infringement. :-)
Re:NOT a Chinese released panorama (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Is this faked too? (Score:5, Funny)
Wow, the Gobi desert looks eerily familiar to the Nevada desert...
Re: (Score:3)
Or that studio out in Roswell where they shot the landings...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Those are Ralph McQuarrie mat-paintings you insensitive clod!
Clearly this has been Photoshopped. (Score:5, Funny)
And I'm sure China didn't pay for the license.
Re: (Score:3)
Oh, they likely paid for one license..... and it is owned by the people :)
Huh (Score:1, Insightful)
China's moon landing is a lot of ho hum, the real story here is they felt good about dropping the billions to go where we have already been (for no real purpose) while multitudes in their country starve and die.
The entire mission was a hood ornament for some politicians cock.
Re:Huh (Score:4, Interesting)
do you have any source for your claim that "multitudes" "starve and die", or did you make that nonsense up? Here's a fact for you, hunger rate in U.S. much higher than China
Re: (Score:1)
Yeah, and I'm a Chinese jet pilot. They don't report real numbers, have vast problems with getting clean water and their nation has a serious problem with once fertile farmland turning to desert. If they had to drill a hole through a mountain to divert water flow just to feed a small army back in the empire building days, what makes you think I'm going to believe with so many more people that problem has just evaporated like their rivers?
Re: (Score:2)
bullshit, you are native english speaking AC writing nonsense. you are not chinese
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I do, it's called Google.
Re: (Score:2)
please provide link to the stories of those dying of starvation and malnutrition in China
that's one problem they have solved
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
USA Hunger is a totally different measurement from world hunger and 3rd world hunger. It is literately based on asking kids the question, "In the last 12 months* where you hungry at any time?? " Now, just so everyone is clear hungry in the USA means that feeling you get when you've eaten everyday at 6pm and now your stomach rumbles because it's 6:15pm. It's caused by your body starting the digestive process and not actually getting food. Also the more you spike your blood sugar up and down the more of this
Re: (Score:2)
have I known the U.S. government to tell the truth when it looks bad?
you're funny
Re: (Score:1)
I get your point, but it is all about expectations and selfishness. China is clearly a place of Haves and Have Nots, and the gap between then is far greater than in the U.S., even Americans below the poverty line have more than even the average Chinese, or as much. But the Chinese have lower expectations for one another. The nation could do OK with the disparities, with only a tiny elite getting most of the rewards to the economic and social system.
America suffers from the opposite problem. It has advert
Re: (Score:2)
do you have any source for your claim that "multitudes" "starve and die", or did you make that nonsense up?
Yup, saw it on Wikipedia. Millions starved as recently as ... 1961.
Re: Huh (Score:2)
Are you sure you know what China is? While they care less for human rights than other countries, it is one of the biggest economies in the world, and nearly all other economies are dependent on them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Read a book.
Re: (Score:1)
i can tell, you know China *so well* and you appear to know America even better. (sarcasm)
Re:Huh (Score:5, Insightful)
Chang'e-1, -2 and -3 **COMBINED** have cost about a billion dollars, or less than a dollar per Chinese citizen. The first two were orbiters/mappers, the third is the lander, all three have been complete successes so far. That war in Iraq that (IIRC) you were so enthusiastic about a few years ago? Cost of that is over $3,500 per US citizen. It was an utter failure.
Even if this was just propaganda I think the Chinese have gotten the better deal.
Re: (Score:3)
And, Chang'E 2 then went on and flew by [planetary.org] Asteroid (4179) Toutatis, as a bonus, for a tiny fraction of the cost of a new spacecraft launch.
Scheduling that a few months in advance with a spacecraft that was not intended for deep space puts China up in the first ranks of spacefaring nations IMHO.
such a shame (Score:1)
such a shame to see all those comments making fun of China when we should be happy about their huge accomplishment!
It's a fake! (Score:1)
There are no stars! ... and the shadows are wrong somehow! ... and the wave pattern proves something something something! ... and ... and ... there is no Moon!
Did they use the same studio (Score:1)
where NASA faked the moon landing?
Firefly (Score:4, Interesting)
...good for them!
Hugin (Score:3, Informative)
They should have used Hugin [sourceforge.net], an open source GUI based on Panotools, for stitching that panorama, it could have dealt with the uneven light levels caused by falloff of the CCD, and made a much, MUCH nicer panorama out of it.
They need to visit the Vignetting [panotools.org] page to learn how to fix things.
Re: (Score:2)
We don't know how terrible the source images were. The curves at the bottom suggest there were only three input images, so the stripes may have been present in the individual images, and aren't the result of poor stitching.
Meh (Score:1)
Well done them and everything - I mean, I've not managed to put a probe on the moon - but when the USians are getting this [nasa.gov] back from Mars, I'd be pretty underwhelmed with my achievement if I were the Chinese.
Re: (Score:2)
I just wish our government would want to get some better pictures and send a probe up just to one-up China. It would make for better news than yet another government shutdown, doomsday counter until a budget default, or yet another celebrity having affluenza and ending up in rehab.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Nice idea, but the Libertarians won't allow it. After all, they can't "prove" that the government is a failure until they first make it fail.
Re: (Score:2)
Since when do the Libertarians have any say about what goes on?
Re: (Score:2)
Since the Kochs, Olins, Waltons, and their ilk managed to buy control of Congress.
The Moon: A Ridiculous Liberal Myth (Score:4, Funny)
It amazes me that so many allegedly "educated" people have fallen so quickly and so hard for a fraudulent fabrication of such laughable proportions. The very idea that a gigantic ball of rock happens to orbit our planet, showing itself in neat, four-week cycles -- with the same side facing us all the time -- is ludicrous. Furthermore, it is an insult to common sense and a damnable affront to intellectual honesty and integrity. That people actually believe it is evidence that the liberals have wrested the last vestiges of control of our public school system from decent, God-fearing Americans (as if any further evidence was needed! Daddy's Roommate? God Almighty!)
Documentaries such as Enemy of the State have accurately portrayed the elaborate, byzantine network of surveillance satellites that the liberals have sent into space to spy on law-abiding Americans. Equipped with technology developed by Handgun Control, Inc., these satellites have the ability to detect firearms from hundreds of kilometers up. That's right, neighbors .. the next time you're out in the backyard exercising your Second Amendment rights, the liberals will see it! These satellites are sensitive enough to tell the difference between a Colt .45 and a .38 Special! And when they detect you with a firearm, their computers cross-reference the address to figure out your name, and then an enormous database housed at Berkeley is updated with information about you.
Of course, this all works fine during the day, but what about at night? Even the liberals can't control the rotation of the Earth to prevent nightfall from setting in (only Joshua was able to ask for that particular favor!) That's where the "moon" comes in. Powered by nuclear reactors, the "moon" is nothing more than an enormous balloon, emitting trillions of candlepower of gun-revealing light. Piloted by key members of the liberal community, the "moon" is strategically moved across the country, pointing out those who dare to make use of their God-given rights at night!
Yes, I know this probably sounds paranoid and preposterous, but consider this. Despite what the revisionist historians tell you, there is no mention of the "moon" anywhere in literature or historical documents -- anywhere -- before 1950. That is when it was initially launched. When President Josef Kennedy, at the State of the Union address, proclaimed "We choose to go to the moon", he may as well have said "We choose to go to the weather balloon." The subsequent faking of a "moon" landing on national TV was the first step in a long history of the erosion of our constitutional rights by leftists in this country. No longer can we hide from our government when the sun goes down.
Re: (Score:2)
Original. [imgur.com]
are we sure (Score:1)
lack of PR & photo skills in scientific commun (Score:2)
Still it is people who pay for these flights. I am sure it is doable to shoot good JPG files on Mars or Lune. And instead we get blurry low resolution images.
I read that an engineer had to buy a photo camera for Mars rover with his own money. Otherwise we would not see any pictures at all.
I think the best photo &
Proof (Score:1)
Does this look like a sound-stage in Dong-bu to anyone else?