Bizarre Six-Tailed Asteroid Dumbfounds Scientists 134
coondoggie writes "Many images from deep space are so cool, weird and unusual it is hard to believe they are real sometimes. This is one of them. Astronomers looking deep into the asteroid belt through NASA's Hubble Space Telescope say they have spotted an asteroid, designated P/2013 P5, with six comet-like tails of dust radiating from it like spokes on a wheel or a spinning garden sprinkler."
Well, there's a simple explanation, really. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Well, there's a simple explanation, really. (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Well, there's a simple explanation, really. (Score:4, Funny)
It's powered by beans.
Re: (Score:1)
I'll fill your asshole with my baby gravy!
From deep space to someone's asshole in less than 5 posts.
Take that Kevin Bacon. You ain't shit.
Re:Well, there's a simple explanation, really. (Score:5, Funny)
You joke but, earlier today there was a story about Starship Troopers on Slashdot. I know that if I still lived in Buenos Aires, I'd give serious thought to getting out of town for a while...
Re: (Score:2)
Because you're worried some huge bugs will squirt blue plasma out of their ass through space and hit earth?
Re: (Score:2)
10 internet points to you for identifying the joke!
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I actually live in Buenos Aires and right now there's nothing to wor%&/.....................
CONNECTION ENDED
Re: (Score:2)
But will you still be on the grid with your mobile devices? :P
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
That was my first thought. Hmm. Every time they take a picture of this thing, it's got a jet going in a different direction.... I mean say we took a picture of a UFO way out in space... what would it look like at lowish resolution? a lump of something with jets coming out of it? Maybe. I guess the true test for that is if it's orbit is changing unexpectedly.
Because seriously, even putting aside the possibility of already having taken video/shots of UFOs in space, on the planet, etc., what would our first en
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Right.
It's gotta be the end-of-voyage garbage dump. When all the crap that piles up during the months of warp speed travel is ejected from the tubes, after, of course, recovering all the H2O for the hydroponics. Put a bit of a spin on the Waste Storage / Ejection Module so none of the stuff sticks to the hull, and carefully balance the release from the six different ejection ports so the ship's trim is unaffected, and this is exactly the pattern that we would see.
Are the results of the spectrographic stud
Re: (Score:2)
There's one thing that would differentiate between regular celestial body and an artificial celestial construct: Albedo.
(there are exceptions, YMMV, but largely it's a pretty accurate way of telling them apart)
Re: (Score:1)
They're thrusters.
Bah! What we are seeing here is obviously an alien mining operation.
Re: (Score:1)
Yes, it is thruster beams.
And yes it is an asteriod.
Is it the new nuclear deterrence?
I'm sure that someone will claim it has something to do with Nibiru. :)
Whohoo, It's a bird [boid]
Great stuff
give me that ol' time kook-ligion (Score:2)
Obviously it's the Ringmakers of Saturn doin' whatever they do.
Re: (Score:2)
It's a marketing gimmick for Planetary Annihilation (http://www.uberent.com/pa/).
Release day is going to be a smash!
Re: (Score:3)
You are more right than you know. There is an explaination that asteroids and comets have tails due to electric discharges as they move through voltage potentials in the solar system.
http://youtu.be/De9b8Z94nQk [youtu.be]
Re: (Score:2)
Is this more 'electric universe' foldorol? Good grief, I that that foolishness was finally dying out
Re: (Score:2)
When each new observation that baffles the experts is explained by another theory I pay attention.
And by "Dumbfounds" (Score:3)
... they mean it's something new scientists haven't seen before, and haven't figured out yet.
Kinda like the same way you meet someone you don't know, you are dumbfounded by them.
Re: (Score:2)
... they mean it's something new scientists haven't seen before, and haven't figured out yet.
Kinda like the same way you meet someone you don't know, you are dumbfounded by them.
Every now and then you need the weird exception, it's what helps establish the statistical mean.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
... they mean it's something new scientists haven't seen before, and haven't figured out yet.
Kinda like the same way you meet someone you don't know, you are dumbfounded by them.
Mainly if they are female...
Re: (Score:2)
... they mean it's something new scientists haven't seen before, and haven't figured out yet.
Kinda like the same way you meet someone you don't know, you are dumbfounded by them.
Visit the Midwest -- everyone there dumbfounds me.
It ain't no swastika. (Score:5, Interesting)
So I was looking for some spectacular six tailed swastika there, but, meh, some smokey trails.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:It ain't no swastika. (Score:5, Informative)
The swastika was an important symbol before Germany was a country.
Re: (Score:2)
Germany became a country in 1990.
Re: (Score:1)
You know what, motherfucker, you're the one who brought up Nazis by bringing up Godwin's shitloving law. YOU'RE THE FUCKING NAZI HERE!!!!! You fantasize about Nazis. You want it to happen. You want your sexual fantasies to be the topic of discussion. I bet you dress up in leather clothes and dream of a Nazi beating you with down and pounding you in the ass while you're on the ground.
You're the Nazi here. You're a Nazi sympathizer and you dream of gay sex with Nazis. You try to cover it up with cries of "Godwin's Law." Just admit that you lust for Nazi dicks in your ass and be done with it.
So, You're saying he is Max Mosley?
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds more like it would need to be a plus sign and rotating. While approaching end-on. And really, really big and traveling really, really slowly, apparently.
Fox Comet! (Score:3, Funny)
Space Kitsune!
Off to earn it's last three tails.
Re: (Score:2)
As a six-tailed kitsune, I approve of this asteroid!
Why is being called an asteroid? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Called both in the article, it was thought it was a comet (icy body outgassing because of sun) but then:
"As an inner-belt asteroid and probable Flora family member, the object is likely to be highly metamorphosed and unlikely to contain ice. The protracted period of dust release appears inconsistent with an impact origin, but may be compatible with a body that is losing mass through a rotational instability. "
Asteroids are minor planets of three main types: stony, metallic or carbon-rich
It's Gamelon!!!! (Score:1)
Science. (Score:2)
Asteroids do not have tails. Fusion powered spaceships or comets do though....
better science (Score:5, Informative)
comets are icy and have tails when close to sun due to outgassing.
Asteroids (minor planets that are stony, metallic, or carbon compound based) can have tails for various reasons, some covered in the article.
Re:Science. (Score:4, Insightful)
So is it accelerating or decelerating consistently?
And if so is it heading towards us?
We'll have to get a team of older movie stars (like Bruce Willis, Clint Eastwood, John Travolta and William Shatner) to intercept it
Re: (Score:2)
...
We'll have to get a team of older movie stars (like Bruce Willis, Clint Eastwood, John Travolta and William Shatner) to intercept it
William Shatner is flattered, but respectfully suggests you find someone more qualified. [youtu.be]
Warning: Video I linked has brief female nudity (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Asteroids do not have tails. Fusion powered spaceships or comets do though....
For the World Is Hollow and I Have Touched the Sky [wikipedia.org]
How to detect a really bad science writer... (Score:5, Insightful)
Why do so many of these stories have things like "dumbfounded" or "baffled" in the title? Are these scientists just standing there, exclaiming to everyone who will listen - "I'm just so gosh-darn BAFFLED!" Not from any scientist I've met - but it's always reported as such, as if unknowns weren't a crucial element of the whole, you know, SCIENTIFIC PROCESS.
Yeesh.
Ryan Fenton
Re:How to detect a really bad science writer... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
I much prefer when they say "WTF is this shit?!"
In my experience when a scientist or an engineer says "Interesting!" it is generally a good idea to step back or GTFO, it never turns out well.
Re: (Score:1)
I prefer, "Fascinating."
Re:How to detect a really bad science writer... (Score:5, Funny)
Try this one weird trick to understand....
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:How to detect a really bad science writer... (Score:4, Informative)
Well, in this case it's a direct quote from the lead investigator.
And while I'm not sure a scientist would say "I'm just so gosh-darn BAFFLED!" I have heard them say, "Beats the hell outta me." I guess "Scientists baffled by new sighting" is a more accurate headline than "Scientists get the hell beaten out of them by new sighting."
Re: (Score:2)
Re:And... (Score:5, Insightful)
this is not just knowledge for knowledge's sake. this is part of efforts to observe planetoids and asteroids to determine if there's risk of collision with Earth [minorplanetcenter.net], determining feasibility of mining asteroids for resources [wikipedia.org], or even plain and simple adding to data sets observing how planetoids and asteroids interact with space
a lot of basic science isn't about finding groundbreaking stuff all the time. in fact, if you're doing research only looking for the "groundbreaking stuff", you're doing science wrong. much of science is straight observation. and it is USEFUL.
I love science for science's sake (Score:2)
You present a good defense of the need to track this...
But what about just because it's good to figure things out?!?!
Curiosity drives our evolution now...at least it seems that way...I'm not saying we give out a $10 billion NSA grant to find out what these 'tails' are (my guess is that all comets have multiple tails, this one just imaged right and was of the right type for us to see)...
I'm saying, from a philosophical standpoint, science for science sake is a good human endeavor
Re: (Score:2)
a lot of basic science isn't about finding groundbreaking stuff all the time
In this case, however, it is literally about groundbreaking stuff.
Re:And... (Score:4, Interesting)
What do you want? Something engraved in stone tablets? Gold Tablets? Carefully painted in whole wheat linguini?
Anything not coming directly from your deity of choice is going to be a rationalization. Get used to it.
Re: (Score:3)
Just saying it doesn't make it true.
Re: (Score:2)
Ask again in 200 years. Then we'll know if understanding asteroids proved useful. It takes a long time for basic research and pushing the boundaries of human understanding to pay off, but some of it eventually does. You know, like the electron, or semiconducting, or liquid crystals, or imaginary numbers. All of that stuff was ivory tower academic fluff at one point. The whole value of "out there" research is that it is in areas that we don't fully understand yet, and therefore have no idea how useful t
Re: (Score:2)
None of which were discovered through by a government program like NASA (Cambridge Univ., Bell Labs, antiquity, respectively). Thanks for supporting my point.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You said that much more politely than I was going to do.
Obviously the Basestar Kara Thrace saw (Score:2)
Here's the real story (Score:1, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
He used a SpaceX ship to fly to the comet.
Obviously untrue. What does Chuck Norris need with a spaceship?
Re: (Score:1)
Oh no. Not them again. (Score:2)
Enough with the probing already!
Seems they didn't all go beyond the rim (Score:3)
http://static2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100114214048/babylon5/images/a/a4/FirstoneShip_04.png [nocookie.net]
Why tails not spirals? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Solar wind perhaps?
What's interesting is that they think it's spinning very fast.
P/2013 P5 has been ejecting dust periodically for at least five months. Astronomers believe it is possible the asteroid's rotation rate increased to the point where its surface started flying apart.
Re: (Score:2)
The angle of any spiralling will depend on how fast it's spinning and how fast the jets are, so any spiralling just might not be perceivable in the images.
Re: (Score:3)
If it was spinning so fast you could not see the spiralling, then you would not have separate tails either. They would all blend together into one big blurred tail. I think it is electrical arc machining due to difference in voltage potential in the object and it's location in space. Electric Universe theory keeps popping up everytime I see these new discoveries in space.
I especially loved the article linked from that one about the "X" shaped asteroid. They say it must have been a collision with an oddly sh
Re: (Score:2)
I think it is electrical arc machining due to difference in voltage potential in the object and it's location in space.
I think you're making shit up because you want to make yourself feel superior. I'm also pretty sure you don't work at the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research.
What, in the image, do you see that leads you to believe that there is more to this than a leaking asteroid?
Electric Universe theory keeps popping up everytime I see these new discoveries in space.
No, you keep seeing it because it's your pet theory - I say "theory," I mean "buzzword" - that you probably just love to trot out at any opportunity so people can see how awesome you must be because you know the truth.
If it was spinning so fast you could not see the spiralling
I was suggesting
It's obvious (Score:1)
Aliens! (Score:1)
Alien Asteroid Mining. Either that, or the Fithp from the Niven & Pournelle book "Footfall", preparing a dinosaur killer to soften up the Earth.
OMG (Score:1)
Allready six-tails!
Thats dangerous Naruto, come back!
FSM (Score:2)
Did anyone clean the lens? (Score:2)
Possible astroid belt origin? (Score:1)
P/2013 P5 has been ejecting dust periodically for at least five months. Astronomers believe it is possible the asteroid's rotation rate increased to the point where its surface started flying apart.
All they said was, "At least five months". If we worked backwards, how big would this asteroid have been, hundreds, thousands, or even millions of years ago?
First quantum asteroid found (Score:1)
Down with the astronomers, they are destroying the asteroid.
Gaia spoke (Score:2)
What is this? (Score:3, Informative)
I clicked the link and it's just an image of two guys sitting in a car. What is this about? Why do you waste our time like this? I don't think it was very nice.
Thank you for reading this complaint.
mod up^ (Score:3)
I like how an AC took the time to politely chastise a logged-in griefer posting sub-moronic Reddit type shit...
Good on you, AC...and I'd give a +1 informative for sparing any of us the clickbait and telling us what it links to
Re: (Score:2)
I can see what you're saying here:
Re: (Score:3)
This has a few more: Found: A never-before-seen asteroid with six comet-like tails - latimes.com [latimes.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Go lick a socket.
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly. I'm not suggesting everything the EU folks say is true but something like this does make a good case for thei theory in asteroids and comets. I wonder how elliptical the orbit is. That looks a lot like a plasma discharge.
Re: (Score:2)
You've never seen images of a plasma discharge then? The two look nothing alike, and don't even radiate/reflect the same frequencies of light! That's not even "grasping at straws" ridiculous, it's just plain dumb.
Re: (Score:2)
Depends on the plasma. http://www.universetoday.com/21826/swift-detects-x-ray-emissions-from-comets/ [universetoday.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Now **that's** grasping at straws. Much better. BTW, x-rays are not visible to optical telescopes like Hubble.
Re: (Score:3)
Educated guess? I think it's safe to assume that since it's been observed for awhile that this particular asteroid is between a few months old and 4.6 billion years old. [space.com] Presumably the paper when published will validate the 200,000 year thought. Maybe somebody was playing pool with planets 200,000 years ago and we're just now finding out about it?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Pool God! King of the Cues! Prince of the Planet-Potters!
Re: (Score:2)
They've linked it (I think mainly by orbit) to other debris and to meteorites which they've presumably dated in other ways.