Why NASA Launched Millions of Tiny Copper Wires In Orbit 86
coondoggie writes "Imagine 500 million short copper wires — no longer than the tip of your index finger — floating in space creating what amounts to an antenna belt that could be used to send messages and conduct other space communications research. That would describe the 1960s era Project Space Needles or Project West Ford as it was sometimes called that NASA and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology last undertook in 1963 which saw the blasting of millions of those copper hairs into space. NASA's Orbital Debris Program Office this month did a 'Where are they now' look at those copper wires and said that after 50 years, some of them indeed still make up a small amount of orbital debris."
dup (Score:5, Informative)
http://slashdot.org/story/13/08/13/2022222/cold-war-plan-tried-to-put-a-copper-ring-around-the-earth [slashdot.org]
Comment removed (Score:4, Informative)
Re:dup (Score:5, Funny)
Today must be Alzheimer's Day, the previous story was a dupe, too.
Copper may play key role in Alzheimer's disease
August 19, 2013|By Melissa Healy
Copper, including trace amounts in water that passes through copper pipes like these, appears to cause a cascade of events that feeds the progression of Alzheimer's disease, a new study says.
New research finds that copper in amounts readily found in our drinking water, the foods we eat and the vitamin supplements we take likely plays a key role in initiating and fueling the abnormal protein build-up and brain inflammation that are hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease.
link:http://articles.latimes.com/2013/aug/19/science/la-sci-copper-alzheimers-disease-20130819
Re:dup (Score:5, Funny)
Today must be AIzheimer's Day, the previous story was a dupe, too.
Re:dup (Score:5, Funny)
French toast please.
Re: (Score:1)
Today must be AIzheimer's Day, the previous story was a dupe, too.
AIzheimer's Day wasn't last month? Or is it the AIzheimer's?
http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/13/10/24/000204/researchers-tout-electricity-storage-tech-that-could-recharge-devices-in-minutes [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Today must be AIzheimer's Day, the previous comment was a dupe, too.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Earlier today, the OP was heard saying "I know I have Alzheimer's, but hey, at least I don't have Alzheimer's!"
Re: (Score:3)
Yes! This post regarding an article published yesterday, citing a NASA report from octobre 2013, most totally be a dup from august 2013.
If you are so clever, I bet you are clever enough not to read something that doesn't fit your personal interests or something you've already read about, maybe in some other context. But maybe you should read this article and the report cited to see how far this is from a dup.
But I suggest you skip the Journalistic touch and jump direct to the NASA report. I found it quite i
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, it's totally a dupe from August 13 - because the October report contains nothing substantially new. Project West Ford hits the Slashdot front pages about three or four times a year, with nothing new each time.
More junk. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
So, NASA spends millions every year monitoring debris (more commonly knows as space crap) and are worried that even a flake of paint can damage a space station because of its speed, and they deliberately put debris (crap) into space. Well done NASA.
Do what I say not what I do.
Re: (Score:2)
"Do what I say not what I do."
More like don't make the mistakes I did... This was in 1961.
Re:More junk. (Score:5, Insightful)
Past tense. They put the copper in space 50 years ago.There's nothing hypocritical about it. The situation has changed. Attitudes have cahnged
Re: (Score:1)
But by all means, let's still rag on the Chinese space program for polluting our orbits. Only we should be able to do that.
Re: (Score:2)
But by all means, let's still rag on the Chinese space program for polluting our orbits.
Once again, the moral equivalence excuse gets trotted out. Let's note the obvious differences. First, our knowledge of the danger of space debris has advanced considerably in the last 50 years. The Chinese anti-satellite weapon test in question was done only six years ago and, unlike a later US anti-satellite test the next year, was done at an altitude guaranteed to generate a lot of long term orbital debris. They have no excuse for why they endangered everyone else's property in orbit.
Second, it was a t
Re: (Score:2)
It makes sense if you think about it. Slashdot is a US centric site. So be it praise or criticism, it focuses on the US
No. If you were to really think about it, then it wouldn't make sense - as I noted earlier.
Slashdot is also a site for nerds. Nerds are usually concerned with efficiency and productivity. One nasty habit of efficient and productive people is being self critical, and look at what other people are doing well/better. Identifying those things helps you improve your own efficiency and productivity
Which is what I was doing. You can thank me later.
Re: (Score:2)
You're critical of people being critical of the US.
And I had good reason for doing so. Very misguided criticism just gets in the way of well placed criticism.
Re: (Score:2)
Why you did it doesn't matter. It doesn't change what you did.
Look back at your original post [slashdot.org]. No indication that criticism of the US is the only sort of criticism that applies. I think this is just another case of shifting goal posts. By the terms of that post, my "why" matters because it fits what you were describing as "criticism".
I was criticizing the original poster because their criticism was just plain wrong, and because because it indicated that they held a deeply erroneous idea in their skull which would (contrary to your assertion about the non-zero sum n
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Have the altitudes changed though?
Re: (Score:2)
Well, most of the copper has deorbited by now.But as the article says, not all.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Because they're trying to fool the competition. It won't help though , she's dead innit.
Anyway, NASA is also allowed to look at their faraway past with the attitudes of today without being hypocrites.
Re: (Score:3)
That was in 1961.... Back when people tested hydrogen bombs on the surface of the earth, in space, and under water, drove cars that had no real emission controls, and dumped chemicals into the water without restriction. AKA we have learned better since then....
Re: (Score:1)
no, we pollute more now, including radioacitve pollution. your rosey view of the world is cute though
Re: (Score:2)
Sources? I would say that you are massively incorrect on that.
Do you have sources outside of CO2 and of course I am talking about the US and per capita.
Re: (Score:1)
human race as a whole
Re: (Score:3)
I don't know where you live, but in the US your comment would be simply wrong.
Having grown up in the LA basin in the 70's, and going back there on a regular basis now, I can safely say that there is significantly less air pollution now than there was then. Open dumping of toxic chemicals in places like the Stringfellow Acid Pits (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stringfellow_Acid_Pits) is no longer tolerated. Rivers are no longer used as open cesspools or convenient dumps for industrial chemical processes. L
Re: (Score:1)
was speaking of planet earth as a whole
Re: (Score:2)
No we don't. Pollution used to be much worse. The Cuyahoga river hasn't caught fire in decades. Back in the 60's, pollution like that was rampant.
The EPA was created in 1970 by Richard Nixon, and things have improved much since. Yes, before Reagan, the Republican party actually had pretty thoughtful stances on many topics, hard as that may be to believe.
Re: (Score:1)
yes the human race does. most the human race does not live in the USA
the USA is 6.6% of the planet's land mass, and 4.5% of the population.
Re: (Score:2)
And ~20% of the world's energy.
But I was replying on a U.S. based site, to an article about a U.S. based agency.
Re: (Score:1)
if we only talk about USA, what happens when we include our share of China's pollution that comes from making the exports to USA?
Re:dup (Score:4, Interesting)
Back in the day, a story wasn't a story until it hit slashdot at least three times, a trupe.
I still remember seeing a story duped on the front page just a couple of posts between the two, like the "editors" didn't even look at the site.
Re: (Score:1)
In my day, dupes happened within hours of the original posting, not months. Boo.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Back in the day, a story wasn't a story until it hit slashdot at least three times, a trupe.
Surely it's a "tripe"...
Re: (Score:1)
This will continue until there is a ring of dupes that circles the Earth...
Look up "Window" from WWII RAF tactics (Score:5, Interesting)
The RAF screwed up Nazi radar with "Window", which is the precursor of the NASA Project West Ford:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Window_(codename) [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:1)
I'm pretty sure he meant the Royal Air Force, not the Rote Armee Fraktion.
Re: (Score:2)
"The RAF came like 20 years after the nazis"
Actually the RAF was around before the NAZIs
It was formed in 1918, and Adolf didn't start the National Socialist Party until the 1920s
Re: (Score:3)
Except that West Ford was designed to aid communication, not inhibit it.
Re:Look up "Window" from WWII RAF tactics (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
They called it West Ford since they thought that the original project name Can we just throw crap out the window of a spaceship, was too long, and maybe not easy to classify as Top Secret
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Convert to fractions of a whatever if you so care...
Re: (Score:2)
1.8 cm x 0.00178cm
Or 8 1/3 GHz and quite narrowband.
Re: (Score:3)
Well, it's not meant to be exact, is it? Unless you were planning on building your own device on the basis of a Slashdot summary?
Re: (Score:2)
Look at your finger. The part between the last knuckle and the end is the tip. The distance between those two points is its length, That gives you an order of magnitude estimate of the size of these particles.
Do me a favour, never go into engineering. The art of approximation is dying and the last thing we need is people who can't make even ballpark guesses by themselves.
Re: lenght of index finger tip ... (Score:1)
I've been reading the news and i just want to know how many football fields is that?
Or how many can I put inside a football stadium?
Failing that, I would like to know if you place them end to end , how many times will it encircle the earth?
Re: (Score:3)
I've been reading the news and i just want to know how many football fields is that?
Or how many can I put inside a football stadium?
As many as ping pong balls you can fit inside the Library of Congress.
Failing that, I would like to know if you place them end to end , how many times will it encircle the earth?
Exactly once. Any more than that and you wouldn't be placing them end to end but parallel to each other.
Re: (Score:2)
very exact measurement ... NOT!
You're right, how about 1.00 index finger tips?
Re: (Score:2)
very exact measurement ... NOT!
It's 1 microfootballfield, or 1/700th of a London bus.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No. There is a fringe case for when you're using things that aren't normally 'real' words, ergo this is not really a case of grocer's apostrophe:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostrophe#Use_in_forming_certain_plurals [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
No. There is a fringe case for when you're using things that aren't normally 'real' words, ergo this is not really a case of grocer's apostrophe:
Actually, this is the scenario here. I debated back and forth on the apostrophe for a while, and decided to go with it for the following reasons: To me, 60s looked too much like 60 seconds, especially in my pre-morning-coffee state. Additionally, I was matching the style used by the parent post (and I notice nobody's jumping on the apostrophe misuse there). Further, I was hoping it would enhance the difference between 60s and '60s. Normally, I would not put it in.
Re: (Score:2)
I noticed it also displayed internal consistency with your two uses of "1960's" in your post, which is good.
Hopefully... (Score:1)
all those idiots stealing copper will try to go after these.
First Contact (Score:2)
Plus it attracted much unwanted attention from the copper-blooded species of the planet Chia 357.
Just another cover-up (Score:2)