Cosmic Microwave Background: Google Earth Style 36
iDuck writes "Damien George, of Cambridge University, has created a 3D visualization of the latest data from the Planck mission. Using WebGL, it lets you spin and zoom a 3D model of the Cosmic Microwave Background, and select different wavelength bands."
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
Re: (Score:2)
In which of the infinite number of universes and realities does God not exist?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Unenlightened pseudonymous coward here.
You should just let the AC have his local-multiverse-bubble God. After all, it's a pretty weaksauce deity --- certainly not "uncreated; creator of all things, seen and unseen" --- that depends on the parameter configuration in a region of a larger multiverse for existence (omnipotence hardly means being ruled by the laws of physics). And, in a causally-disconnected universe from this one, hardly capable of much harm.
The only God to worry about (or not worry, as your ca
Re: (Score:2)
So in an infinite number of universes under an infinite number of realities ... not one has a God?
Interesting. God is not only unlikely. He is impossible under any reality imaginable or otherwise.
Some take their faith in a complete lack of God a little to far.
I find Atheists as dull and lacking in any ability at critical thought as those who think every word of the bible should be taken literally and that prayer fixes everything.
I think that an omnipotent, omnipresent God would leak from one reality to another. So if one reality has a God then all would.
Microwave (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
It's funny how the Cosmic Microwave Background looks like the inside of our work microwave.
There was a big bang in your microwave?
Projected wrong? (Score:3)
Shouldn't it be like a star atlas, projected as if we're standing on the earth, looking out, vs. how it appears now; as a globe?
Re:Projected wrong? (Score:5, Insightful)
Especially for something that you can't see with your naked eyes, what makes a projection "wrong"? Do you also complain whenever you see a Mercator projection (or other sphere-projected-to-a-rectangle) map? The external spherical projection makes it easy to visualize large-angular-field structures along with small, which are awkward to view from "inside" (without really strong/funky perspective distortion).
Re: (Score:2)
While I don't have a problem with this current map, I do get a bit worked up whenever I see a Mercator projection map of the Earth, simply because I know Greenland is not really bigger than Australia (in fact it's a little over 1/4 the size).
And don't get me started on Antarctica.
Re: (Score:2)
You can do either one, the former (star atlas) is just easier to display and work with, especially in 2 dimensions. Technically, however, the CMB is a map of the temperature of the surface of a sphere, so a globe is a better representation of the reality.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Sort of. It's the edge of the actually visible universe: it's light from the moment (well, it wasn't a moment exactly, but it was nearly instantaneous on the scale of the universe) when photons stopped being scattered by matter, and started free-flowing (this is known as the "surface of last scattering"). Since some points were slightly hotter than others, they produced slightly different distribution of photon energies. Black body radiation (which is what the background radiation is) follows a well-defined
Lithium (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
God removed it. He needed it for his laptop's battery.
Re: (Score:2)
Site doesn't load.
Probably because it's a Mac Mini on a slow microwave link.
Re: (Score:2)
Like looking at the bottom of a swimming pool... (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Answer that question and you'll get an invite to Stockholm.
Re: (Score:2)
+ and - keys work for me.
Re: (Score:1)
Pretty awesome (Score:1)
An exceedingly rare valid use of scripting (Score:1)
Bonus, it's not full of script-kiddie spyware that permeates 99.99% of websites these days!
One gripe is the broken zooming direction. When gripping a sheet of paper to pull it closer one pulls back toward oneself. Touchscreen actions are done in this fashion.
But instead, the scrollwheel action has been made more like dragging a slider of where you are on a larger sheet ... except there is no slider - ruining the effect.