Russians Find "New Bacteria" In Lake Vostok 147
tverbeek writes "Russian scientists believe they have found a new type of bacteria in the sub-glacial Lake Vostok. From the article: 'The samples obtained from the underground lake in May 2012 contained a bacteria which bore no resemblance to existing types, said Sergei Bulat of the genetics laboratory at the Saint Petersburg Institute of Nuclear Physics.
"After putting aside all possible elements of contamination, DNA was found that did not coincide with any of the well-known types in the global database," he said. "We are calling this life form unclassified and unidentified," he added.'"
SCIENCE! (Score:2)
FUCK YES!
Re: (Score:3)
Re:SCIENCE! (Score:5, Funny)
It's poetry in motion
She turned her tender eyes to me
As deep as any ocean
As sweet as any harmony
Re:SCIENCE! (Score:5, Funny)
Burma shave.
Re:SCIENCE! (Score:5, Funny)
We are calling this life form unclassified and unidentified," he added.'"
shittiest name ever!
Re:SCIENCE! (Score:4, Funny)
We are calling this life form unclassified and unidentified," he added.'"
shittiest name ever!
Could be worse. Could be 'Odo'.
Re:SCIENCE! (Score:5, Insightful)
Just dress it up in Latin -
Inexploratus incognitus
Sounds much more erudite.
Re: (Score:2)
So it should become something like 'additionem dixit'
Myanmar-Shave (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
FUCK YES!
HOW DOES IT WORK?!?
I think he told you in his post.
Re: (Score:2)
uh-oh. (Score:2, Funny)
this is bad, I just know it.
Re:uh-oh. (Score:5, Funny)
It's fine, they're not Norwegian [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
I didn't get nervous until I re-read the summary and noticed that the Russians seem to have categorized their genetics research program under Nuclear Physics.
Re: (Score:2)
More like Nuclear Chemistry if you ask me. Where else is the Chromosomal DNA found?
Re:uh-oh. (Score:5, Informative)
More like Nuclear Chemistry if you ask me. Where else is the Chromosomal DNA found?
Thank God I, Mr. Pedantic, got here just in time, to ruin your joke with unsolicited facts: bacteria do not have a cell nucleus.
Re: (Score:2)
I said chromosomal DNA, which implies a nucleated cell, ie a eukaryote, in order to make my bad pun work.
I'm much worse than a pedant, I'm a punner, and nobody likes those.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm much worse than a pedant, I'm a punner, and nobody likes those.
Its true, British stock speculators are the worst.
Re:uh-oh. (Score:4, Funny)
In other news, Madagascar has shut down all ports.
in soviet russia we bacteria you (Score:1)
in soviet russia we bacteria you
Re:in soviet russia we bacteria you (Score:4, Informative)
I think you meant to say, "In Soviet Russia, bacteria finds you!"
Re: (Score:2)
"In Soviet Russia, we infect bacteria"
"life form unclassified" (Score:4, Interesting)
I love living in a world where the regular headlines sound like the start of a decent sci fi adventure.
Now let's just hope this puppy doesn't get out of the lab and become a sci-fi/horror. Two hundred years from now it could be on the History Channel as "Zombie Plagues from the Past".
Re:"life form unclassified" (Score:5, Funny)
If in two hundred years we still have the history channel then we have need for a zombie plague.
Re:"life form unclassified" (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I mean, I know it's more extreme than, say, eucalyptus trees in California or rabbits in Australia, but to write off the possibility completely seems like an exaggerated response.
I was going to be more glib in my response, but your sig impli
Re:"life form unclassified" (Score:5, Informative)
Based on circumstantial evidence (another species found nearby), the bacterium is a thermophile that depends on geothermal heat for warmth. Because of the way thermophiles evolve, it is pretty much certain that the proteins in this species are non-functional at colder temperatures; the samples collected were either dead or in a deep state of antifreeze-clogged hibernation.
It's also 700 million years (or more!) behind on immune defences, which means it's vulnerable to everything from the toxins that all plants constantly secret all the time to the macrophages in our blood. The immune game is a Red Queen scenario [wikipedia.org]—either a pathogen is at the forefront of innovation, or it's susceptible to the most basic form of detection.
The only environment this could possibly intrude upon is one comparable to its own—maybe a heat vent in another frozen lake. Even if it wasn't a thermophile, it would be dead meat on the surface because of bacteriophages (viruses). To add insult to injury, as far as we know this bacterium has no competitors and is not part of a community, making it highly unlikely that it has any competition or any defences.
Gene retention is like lactose tolerance—if you don't use it, you'll lose it. For animals, this typically takes a few thousand years. For bacteria it happens much more quickly. They're very simple organisms, and they're very good at adapting, but only if they've had time to adjust to their new setting. In this case, every single one of its (probably several thousand) genes has spent millions of years being fine-tuned for the most boring environment possible. It has absolutely no hope.
Re:"life form unclassified" (Score:5, Interesting)
700 million years (or more!)
Uhm, where did you get that figure? 700 million years is two supercontinent cycles [wikipedia.org] ago - Antarctica was slightly north of the equator then. The antarctic ice cap didn't even start to form until the end of the Eocene. According to wikipedia, lake Vostok [wikipedia.org] may have been isolated for the past 15 to 25 million years.
Re:"life form unclassified" (Score:4, Informative)
If you scrutinize the article, Sergei Bulat is quoted as saying the organism has less than 86% "DNA similarity" to other species. Taken at face value, this means that the entire genome of the bacterium is less than 86% similar, which (a) requires isolating it first and months of work, and (b) would not be impressive at all, since Escherichia coli genomes have much higher variety.
He then goes on to say that 90% is the threshold beyond which a species is considered completely unknown. This is an appropriate figure to give when discussing the evolution of one particular gene called the 16S ribosomal RNA, which is very important to cellular function and changes very slowly. It's also a standard test to use in the analysis of bacterial communities, and one of the core tools in metagenomics, because it's very unique to species and hence an excellent fingerprint. If you need citations to back up this claim, I can give you oceans of them. This is my actual day job.
So how divergent is 100 – 86 = 14%? This article [pnas.org] references a standard 1% every 50 million years. 14 * 50 = 700 million years. This figure is quite possibly too low in this case, since evolution has a non-linear effect on sequences—eventually mutations flip multiple times, and so large numbers of changes get masked. This rate of change can be sped to 2% every 50 million years if the environment is exceptionally rich and predator-free, like inside certain cells in insects—but that's largely because the host cell is available to a degree to provide nutrients, so proper ribosomal function isn't as important.
This doesn't mean necessarily that this species has been completely isolated the whole time, just that we haven't found any surviving links. If it previously existed in a cave system, for example, that entire community could have been wiped out when Antarctica froze, leaving behind only a stub of organisms that were sheltered by the heat (and food chain) emanating from the thermal vent. Cave ecosystems often contain numerous species that have adapted so tightly to their niche that they are unable to survive outside.
That being said, this expedition has already made crap up for publicity stunts [guardian.co.uk]. As this hasn't been published in any journals yet and was instead released to the press first, it's entirely possible that no such species exists. Nevertheless, the claim of 14% divergence will be interpreted by other experts as more than half a billion years.
Re: (Score:2)
If not phages then something else. Protists. Nematodes. If it's really been isolated for this long, it probably has a really slow doubling time; that may be bad enough that predation could overwhelm it.
That being said, though, evolutionary pressure is still key. Viruses are host-specific because the hosts keep changing; an older bacterium is more likely to have exploitable sugar moieties on its surface.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
At least admit that it is a good setup for a scifi novel.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:"life form unclassified" (Score:4, Funny)
other hobbies include: taking over a host organisms brain stem and seeking out anything that moves and doesn't smell dead. Ability to sustain motor control after death of cells.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
You mean 1,000,000,000 years ago? That's when multicellular life was prolific, after a couple of billion years being much simpler.
You do know Antarctica was part of the super-continent the dinosaurs inhabited eh? Its also only been frozen for around 25 million years too.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
or there are other undiscovered relatives in other thermal vents elsewhere
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I still say zombie apocalypse.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Great for studying evolution, irrelevant to Michael Chrichton
Wow, it *is* exotic if Chrichton can't phobiize it.
Re: (Score:2)
>That's hyperbole, I'm afraid. It's a bacterium, just a very distant cousin.
I know. Which is still very cool. Sometimes you just want it to be something extra, extra cool; like a bacterium-like organism that got there from some ancient Martian meteorite and thrived there. Even better would be some spawn of Cthulhu that escaped the Mountains of Madness and hid beneath the ice. Me, I keep looking for a fossil bryophyte with a branching sporophyte.
Re: (Score:3)
Archaeans and obligate parasites are as close as it gets. Archaeans are ancient and only found in bizarre environments (like acid mines, where the pH is below zero) because they were driven out by their more successful offspring, vowing one day to retake the crown and reclaim Earth for themselves. (Not really, but it sounds good.) Obligate parasites like Cryptosporidium have wildly strange genomes, spending millions of years festering in the flesh of others, finding new ways to ditch seemingly-vital functio
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
its hobbies most likely consist of "feeding on geothermal heat" and "being adapted to an extremely stable, homogeneous environment
As a stable, homogenous environment, and a source of heat, I find this worrying.
(Yes, I know that, jokes aside, it wouldn't last an hour against a modern immune system.)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It didn't stop X-Files writers!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Those hobbies are more exciting than mine. :-/
I grow my life forms, unclassifed, in my toilet bowl.
I have to kill them off and start over every time I have company.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I love living in a world where the regular headlines sound like the start of a decent sci fi adventure.
Now let's just hope this puppy doesn't get out of the lab and become a sci-fi/horror. Two hundred years from now it could be on the History Channel as "Zombie Plagues from the Past".
Indeed. If it escapes, it might colonize every pitch dark, ice cold and almost sterile lake in the immediate area!!!
Re: (Score:2)
Two hundred years from now it could be on the History Channel as "Zombie Plagues from the Past".
At least that would mean that in two hundred years, the History Channel will have gone back to showing actual history again.
Re: (Score:2)
I love living in a world where the regular headlines sound like the start of a decent sci fi adventure.
Now let's just hope this puppy doesn't get out of the lab and become a sci-fi/horror. Two hundred years from now it could be on the History Channel as "Zombie Plagues from the Past".
The paranoid sci-fi freak in me likes the idea. But the logical, rational part of me understands that the environment it evolved to live in is a good bit colder than the human body.
Maybe it chills the human body down, and dissipates the resulting negentropy by animating it.
It might actually be really old! (Score:2, Funny)
Anyways, let us see what happens to the crew before allow them to go home
Hope this doesn't go the way of arsenic life (Score:2)
Re:Hope this doesn't go the way of arsenic life (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know how this stuff works so can only stupidly speculate that it will be interesting to try to follow the mutations this wee beastie underwent to let it survive in its current home, and that it somehow could be interesting if not useful when comparing that to some of its closer cousins on our side of the lake.
Might there be clues that let us make more robust some of our helpful bacteria? Or even clues to help combat some of the 'super-bugs' that are really scary in their resistance to anti-biotics,
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
SAMANTHA!
IT'S PAST YOUR BEDTIME..
GET OFF THE COMPUTER NOW!
Filler to get past the stupid lameness filter, of course I'm yelling; it's a joke, for Christ's sake
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I truly appreciate the posts you made on this thread, I do.
But your homework is not going to dissappear, it will just become URGENT.
Take a break and get cracking!
I'm over 50, but still trying to complete a degree on telematics in the next year, so I know; homework sucks but if you don't get your nose in the grinder, it doesn't get done. Even if you know more about the subject that your professors, you still need to turn in good homework or they'll fail you.
Keep posting to enlighten us, poor ignorant souls,
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If you've got to go to Antarctica then it is far war, aina?
Good luck with the homework, and all the rest.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Life form unclassified? For pete's sake... (Score:4, Funny)
Make sure that nobody on the team that goes down there to further investigate is wearing a red shirt!
Nuke it from orbit. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think that's what all those meteors have been trying to do. That is, unless they are bringing in the bacteria.
Re: (Score:2)
Or, you know, expose it to tempratures and conditions that are really atypical for underground, freezing lakes...
IOW, nuke it?
The last radio report from the camp...... (Score:2)
It's believed the new bacteria could have unknown affects on the human body.
RUT ROH (Score:2)
Russian Science (Score:3)
Oh, what the trek! (Score:2, Funny)
"It's life, Jim, but not as we know it."
Things are really rockin' in Russia these days (Score:2)
Meteors, Lakes, Bacteria.
Now all we need is the Intelligent Designer of it all.
Yebatsya!
I for one ... (Score:2)
... welcome our new overlords!
Re: (Score:2)
So is this a 4th domain of life? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Since the 3 current ones are Eukaryotes, Bacteria, and Archea.
If the trend continues, it will have a two-syllable name.
copper wire (Score:2)
Finally.... (Score:2)
Russians are the first to start confirming reports that there is new DNA that is not our own on this planet....
they chose to bring it forth this way, but will eventually lead to actual confirmation of life from outer space and that they have arrived/landed....probably through a ship at the bottom of the lake.
Or I might have just finished watching x files marathon...take your pick.
In other news... (Score:2)
A team of Russian scientists suddenly went missing near Lake Vostok. The only clues left behind was a mysterious slime that covered their labs.
Sounds like another bad SyFy movie in the making.
Call Kurt Russell, AKA MacReady (Score:2)
He's down for this.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Re:this is unimpressive (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
The worst (?) part is that I didn't get any funny moderations.
No, the *worst* part is that it's now "Score:5, Informative".
Re: (Score:2)