New Whale Species Unearthed In California Highway Dig 70
sciencehabit writes "Thanks to a highway-widening project in California's Laguna Canyon, scientists have identified several new species of early toothed baleen whales. The new fossils date to 17 to 19 million years ago, or the early-mid Miocene epoch, making them the youngest known toothed whales. Three of the fossils belong to the genus Morawanocetus, which is familiar to paleontologists studying whale fossils from Japan, but hadn't been seen before in California. These three, along with the fourth new species, which is of a different genus, represent the last known occurrence of aetiocetes, a family of mysticetes that coexisted with early baleen whales. Thus, they aren't ancestral to any of the living whales, but they could represent transitional steps on the way to today's whales."
Anyone else feel small in the presence of nature? (Score:5, Interesting)
Nature: creates universe, life, billions of years of different species, creatures of every conceivable size and type, vast oceans, huge forests, nicotine, sugar and alcohol.
Humans: internal combustion, digital computers, drone strikes and Minecraft.
It makes me feel tiny, insignificant and sort of helpless, and to think the same of my species.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Anyone else feel small in the presence of natur (Score:5, Insightful)
I think you're leaving out some of the good stuff. The moon landings and the Large Hadron Collider make me feel a bit better about what humans are able to achieve. And it's not as if we're done yet, either.
Re: (Score:2)
I think you're leaving out some of the good stuff. The moon landings and the Large Hadron Collider make me feel a bit better about what humans are able to achieve.
IMHO Bob Marley and Shakespeare are two out of many better examples ...
Re: (Score:1)
Only if you assume you are not made by nature. If you hadn't had your study of evolution replaced by fundamental Christian teachings, you would also know that humans, internal combustion, digital computers, drone strikes and Minecraft would be under nature as well.
Re:Anyone else feel small in the presence of natur (Score:4, Insightful)
If you hadn't had your study of evolution replaced by fundamental Christian teachings
Uh, no. Saying that humans have come up with internal combustion, digital computers, drone strikes, Minecraft, or anything else does not logically lead to "I believe in an Invisible Sky Daddy". On the other hand, dismissing human accomplishments as having come from "nature" does. You know, like how hand-egg players will thank their particular flavor of Invisible Sky Daddy for the skills to do what they did.
If you want to believe in an Invisible Sky Daddy, that's fine. But when you claim that the attribution of human accomplishments and advancements to humanity equates to a belief in an Invisible Sky Daddy, while the attribution of human accomplishments and advancements to "nature" does not? I don't know what to say to that, other than it feels like you are trying to be deliberately deceptive.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Grow some skin, god-lover, before you consider trying to grow some balls and live without a protective god to cover your sorry inco
Re: (Score:2)
At the pace humanity is going, we're going to surpass nature in the decades to come.
Re: (Score:3)
Um, you totally forgot beef jerky. Come on. You're better than this.
Whale jerky, like beef only better.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Anyone else feel small in the presence of natur (Score:4, Insightful)
Give me millions of years and I'll create all sorts of cool shit. Remember that "nature" has had aeons to do all this stuff, humans have had what, 100 000 years or less? Hardly the same time scale.
Re: (Score:2)
You may think of yourself as the cupcake, but some of us have an outsized ego.
Re: (Score:2)
I find that I feel small in the presence of cold nature.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Only the idiotic or evil despise the increasing of knowledge.
I suspect you probably belong in the first category.
What highway? (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
It's not uncommon for construction crews to willfully not see things of archeological and paleontological significance when working because it could cost them their jobs as the project stalls while archeology or paleontology takes place on the jobsite. The new federal courthouse in Phoenix was held up for many months because of the arec
Re: (Score:1)
I can attest to this type of scenario. As a hobbyist genealogist I've encountered records of burial grounds plowed over by highways or used as fill dirt for highways. Sometimes everyone looked the other way, sometimes the foreman stopped them halfway through when they realized what was going on.
Re: (Score:2)
And geologists like me, with an interest in archaeology, keep our eyes peeled.
Re: (Score:2)
And FTFA :
So ... either your construction company has factored these costs into it's tender, and is complying with the law, OR they haven't factored these costs in (or haven't paid insurance), so their bid is either incomplete, or incompetent. In either case, tough on the construction company.
Which
Re:But they only respond to vibration, right? (Score:5, Funny)
There are more of them. I can feel them moving around underfoot at times when I visit California.
Re: (Score:1)
I bet it killed itself after causing the world's first stock market crash.
The article is unclear on this part (Score:5, Funny)
Was there, or was there not, a bowl of petunias found anywhere near the whale's carcass?
Re: (Score:1)
Not again
New Whale Species Unearthed (Score:1)
Is it OK?
fossils (Score:1)
wtf headline. I was hoping they found a live whale under the street. Guess it'll be just another day...
The New Species of Whale Eats sharks (Score:1)
Transitional fossils? (Score:2)
There goes another one of ID's already weak arguments against evolution...
Re:Transitional fossils? (Score:4, Interesting)
Even before this find, whales are one of the most well documented transitions from one "kind" to another "kind" (as the creationist idiots like to call them).
Not really surprising to know that hippos and cows are the whale's closest living land relatives.
And this is totally supported by both fossil evidence and DNA evidence.
Re: (Score:3)
There goes another one of ID's already weak arguments against evolution...
With creationists and IDiots, it's like this: You have two species. "Find us a transitional fossil," they ask you. You find it. "Great job", they say, "now you have to find two more transitional fossils."
#sorrynotsorry (Score:1)
Neat!
Wait a minute. Has anyone seen Oprah lately?
YOU CAN'T CUT BACK ON FUNDING! (Score:1)
SEE?! BIGGER BUDGET = MORE SCIENTIFIC BREAKTHROUGHS! CUT FUNDING AND YOU CUT SCIENCE! SCIENCE! YOU'LL REGRET THIS!
- Transportation Advisor
.
.
.
Filler cuz caps lock is evil. yaddayaddayaddayaddayaddayaddayaddayaddayaddayaddayaddayaddayaddayaddayadda
When is an ancestor not an ancestor? (Score:4, Insightful)
The summary says
Thus, they aren't ancestral to any of the living whales, but they could represent transitional steps on the way to today's whales.
If they're not ancestors, in what sense do they represent transitional steps? Are the two not synonymous?
Re: (Score:2)
I am not expert, but it is possible that the current find is the ancestor of a whale that was transitional to modern day whales. So modern day whales and these current discoveries shared a common ancestor so it helps us further understand what lead to modern forms.
Maybe imagine it as the end of twig that came off of a larger branch and modern day whales are somewhere further down the larger branch. It would help to know what came off the larger branch earlier in the process.
Re: (Score:2)
I am not expert, but it is possible that the current find is the ancestor of a whale that was transitional to modern day whales.
Did you mean "descendant"?
No doubt ... (Score:1)
Sad (Score:1)
Did they discover (Score:2)
Save the whales (Score:1)
The Miocene of Southern California, was Cetaceans (Score:1)
I live in Northern California and have a geology degree. The article was informative, but it is just shy of giving the useful information from the refereed source, the lithology and formation of the Middle Miocene unit in Leguna Canyon from which the evidently considerable number of fossils comes from. I.d have to find some other source to get the geologic setting for that site.
This is interesting for the geology of California was quite different than it is now. The San Andreas system was just being form
Re: (Score:2)
The article is a summary, as far as I can tell, of a symposium discussion involving a number of specialists in whale palaeontology. http://aaas.confex.com/aaas/2013/webprogram/Session5818.html [confex.com] has the list of speakers, including ... just links to abstracts. http://aaas.confex.com/aaas/2013/webprogram/Paper9513.html [confex.com]
I guess you'll need to contact the authors directly to get (advance) copy of the paper(s)
Greenpeace (Score:1)