Paper On Conspiratorial Thinking Invokes Conspiratorial Thinking 371
Layzej writes "Last summer a paper investigating the link between conspiratorial thinking and the rejection of climate science provoked a response on blogs skeptical of the scientific consensus that appeared to illustrate the very cognitive processes at the center of the research. This generated data for a new paper titled 'Recursive fury: Conspiracist ideation in the blogosphere in response to research on conspiracist ideation (PDF).' The researchers reviewed the reactions for evidence of conspiratorial thinking, including the presumption of nefarious intent, perception of persecution, the tendency to detect meaning in random events, and the ability to interpret contrary evidence as evidence that the conspiracy is even greater in scope that was originally believed. Some of the hypotheses promoted to dismiss the findings of the original paper ultimately grew in scope to include actors beyond the authors, such as university executives, a media organization, and the Australian government. It is not clear whether the response to this paper will itself provide data for further research, or how far down this recursion could progress. I fear the answer may be 'all the way.'"
turtles (Score:5, Funny)
all the way down.
The turtles are behind it all in the end.
Yo dawg (Score:4, Funny)
I herd you like conspiration theories
Re:first (Score:5, Funny)
"from the elvis-lives-on-the-moon-with-hitler dept." - from the strapline of the title...
I was convinced beyond all doubt that Elvis was living with Diana in a guest house in Blackpool, but then again, I am a Brit, so I would think that...
Cue conspiracy theories... (Score:3, Funny)
In 3... 2... 1...
Wrong field (Score:2, Funny)
It took them less than a month to put a paper out. I'm in the wrong field. I could have graduated in half a year.
Re:Cue conspiracy theories... (Score:3, Funny)
Why would you say this ... unless you have inside knowledge!
Re:It is Psychology, Science! Fact! (Score:5, Funny)
"Cheese Makes you Fat!"
"Shows what you know! I'm in the CHEESEMAKING PARTY! Cheese will just give me a healthy glow!"
"I'm sorry Mr Ridebacher, you have lung cancer"
"No, that's unacceptable. You're interfering with my rights! Tell you what, why don't we compromise and say that I have a bad cold?"
Sneaky scientists (Score:5, Funny)
It's kinda like the way McAfee and Symantec have secret programmers who strategically release new viruses when business is slow.
Flamebait (Score:3, Funny)
Flamebait "study" provokes flames. News at eleven. I'm waiting for the next study showing the correlation climate alarmism and being a poo-poo head.
Re:My own conspiracy theory. (Score:5, Funny)
Leave out one key piece of information and it takes on a life of it's own, but there is nothing untrue about the above.
Conspiracies seem to live on the interpretation that those who believe them have a better understanding of the issue at hand than those in charge, or that they have all the relevant information, when they don't.
Nonsense. Even if you have all the evidence in plain view there can still be vast networks of shady dealings and huge cover-ups at work. Just look at the Kennedy Assassination!
Those bones matched royal DNA because they weren't from King Richard III, they were really from a current member of the royal family who has now been replaced with an evil doppleganger clone (made possible by recently discovered Nazi stem cell research and advanced eugenics). They just needed a convenient way to dismiss the evidence -- Oh, that body with royal DNA? Uh, oh, It's just the remains of King Richard! Which one? Why, the 3rd one! Now they've got an inside agent in the royal family... Hot on the heels of Kim Jong Un's replacement of Kim Jong Il, all while for the 1st time ever the USA presidency is held by a black man!?
Coincidence?! I Think Not!
Re:It is Psychology, Science! Fact! (Score:5, Funny)
Every time somebody tells me that, I have to give myself a time out in the bunker until I calm down.
Re:It is Psychology, Science! Fact! (Score:5, Funny)
While you're ad hominem stereotyping is no doubt amusing to you and your fellow neo Nazis
Talk about recursive!
Re:Yo dawg (Score:5, Funny)