How Does the Tiny Waterbear Survive In Outer Space? 119
DevotedSkeptic sends this excerpt from SmithsonianMag:
"The humble tardigrade, also known as a 'waterbear' or 'moss piglet,' is an aquatic eight-legged animal that typically grows no longer than one millimeter in length. Most tardigrades (there are more than 1,000 identified species) have a fairly humdrum existence, living out their days on a moist piece of moss or in the sediment at the bottom of a lake and feeding on bacteria or plant life. In 2007, a group of European researchers pushed the resilience of this extraordinary animal even further, exposing a sample of dehydrated tardigrades to the vacuum and solar radiation of outer space for 10 full days. When the specimens were returned to earth and rehydrated, 68 percent of those that were shielded from the radiation survived, and even a handful of those with no radiation protection came back to life and produced viable offspring. How do the little tardigrades survive such a harsh environment? Although amateur tardigrade enthusiast Mike Shaw recently made waves by postulating that the animals may be equipped to survive in outer space because they originally came from other planets, scientists are certain that the creatures developed their uncommon toughness here on earth."
Ummm.. (Score:1, Troll)
Shouldn't "amateur tardigrade enthusiast Mike Shaw" read "complete fucking moron Mike Shaw"?
Re: (Score:3)
Extreme Dehydration (Score:2)
Yes, I did read TFA - both of them
I was interested in the level of "dehydration" those creatures were being put through before were sent to space
TFA #1, from Smithsonian Magazine, only mentioned "dehydration", but it did provide a link to the cell magazine summary, where it is mentioned that the "waterbears" were put through "extreme dehydration"
Hmm....
How extreme is extreme dehydration?
To what I know, all living things, whether it be plants, microbes, animals, had to have H2O inside the cell structures (DN
Re: (Score:2)
Barking up the wrong tree. Analyze the DNA. If it codes for amino acids the same way as the rest of us the argument is over before it begins.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
why moron? it's not that far-fetched to postulate that some creatures here may have come from elsewhere..
Actually it is. I'm not a biologist (INAB?) but I think all species down here on Terra all interrelate in some way. We all have RNA/DNA, etc etc. No, I don't know enough to know what I'm talking about with authority, but our species are all adapted to our planet.
It's not impossible that
a) an outer-space species could exist
b) it would get here
c) it could live and thrive here
- but it is far-fetched.
Re: (Score:3)
Just those three stipulations alone don't make it that far fetched. Exogenesis, the hypothesis that all life on Earth originally comes from somewhere else, is legitimate. What would make the claim far-fetched is adding:
d) it would appear so similar to other life on Earth that biologists with morphological and molecular studies think they can place roughly where it fits in the phylogeny of all other life on Earth
e) it does not decend from the same root species as every other known species on Earth
Re: (Score:2)
But the fact that most of the species are killed with only 10 days exposure to space radiation makes it very, very, very unlikely.
10 days is a uselessly small exposure time when thinking of the amount of time needed to travel the vast distances between stars.
Re: (Score:2)
For those specific species yes, it would seem incredibly unlikely they caught a ride on an asteroid or somesuch. But for an ancestor a few hundred billion generations back? Who knows?
Re: (Score:3)
True. Bet's let's simplify that for you by reducing it to opposing hypothesis:
Your hypothesis is that an alien species incredibly hardy travelled through space to land on earth, managed to survive by competing with the existing lifeforms, but somehow slowly devolved into a microscopic eight legged bear.
Assumptions made: There is life in space, such life travels, it somehow found this particular tiny speck in the outer parts of the galaxy, it wasn't hardy enough to trump other life on earth, it is similar en
Re: (Score:2)
Your assumption is that life on Earth is the standard by which to measure all life. There is every bit the possibility that life on Earth is actually incredibly fragile and that the norm is "hardiness"...
I didn't read the article but you don't think it is possible that a cataclysm destroying a planet could send fragments containing this life form's ancestor hurtling into space? You're acting like it left of its own accord.
Occam's razor would actually lead one to think that because we have so little knowled
Re: (Score:2)
Sure. So let's avoid speculating on life on other planets. We know life on our planet exists, that it evolves, and that this particular little critter is on earth, and shares the same biological makeup as other life on the planet.
So the simplest explanation as you put it, still says we should assume it's terrestrial in origin. Anything else would require more assumptions, and less likely events.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, and as a bonus point, personally I'd make the assumption that tiny eight legged bears that scientists finds fascinating enough to pay to bring to fucking space for experiments have probably been researched quite a lot in every other possible way, and found to be quite in line with current understanding of what a terrestrial being is
Not only that, but I've seen talks by labs that do biology research on tardigrades. They're funded by the national institute of health (NIH) like many other basic research programs that use "lower" organisms. The idea is that with these simpler organisms, it's easier to do experiments on them and learn something about their genetics, cell biology, physiology, or evolution that will be applicable to us. If you find a gene and what it does in fruit flies, for example, that might be useful to human health b
Re: (Score:2)
I'm going to try to ignore the condescending tone and assume you are merely confused and not deliberately building up a straw man to attack.
Your hypothesis is that an alien species incredibly hardy travelled through space to land on earth, managed to survive by competing with the existing lifeforms, but somehow slowly devolved into a microscopic eight legged bear.
Well, it's not my hypothesis, I merely lend it some credence that you don't. Two mistakes here. First, you are adding the assumption that life already existed on Earth when the alien species arrives. Second, assuming you are using "devolve" to mean something like "the opposite of evolve" then you misunderstand evolution in general. Evolution is a slow process of change
Re: (Score:2)
Okay, you definitely got me on misuse of vocabulary with devolving, my bad. I won't bother making excuses for that, that's on me.
However much of your current argument falls entirely on the fact that the premise was that these critters in specific were not originated on earth. Not that all life on earth came from outside or not, that I agree entirely is a non-conclusive and bla bla, but it's a completely different argument. The argument made was that the hardiness of these critters indicated that they (or as
Re: (Score:2)
Fair enough, but that wasn't the argument I was making. And the post way up in this thread was where I was explaining what makes Shaw's hypothesis silly whereas the general hypothesis of exogenesis is not.
Specifically
a) an outer-space species could exist
b) it would get here
c) it could live and thrive here
Isn't all that unlikely given current data. What is unlikely is a, b, c, plus
d) it would appear so similar to other life on Earth that biologists with morphological and molecular studies think they can place roughly where it fits in the phylogeny of all other life on Earth
e) it does not decend from the same root species as every other known species on Earth
Re: (Score:2)
Fair point, a case of misunderstanding. Next time, you try to make clear when you decide to change what you're arguing about in the middle of a thread, and I promise I'll try to double check so I don't miss it.
Re: (Score:2)
Exogenesis, the hypothesis that all life on Earth originally comes from somewhere else, is legitimate.
Well, the hypothesis that the Area 51 greys are our decendants from ten million years in the future who came back in time is legit, too, but it's even more unlikely.
First, we have never found evidence of any life at all anywhere but here. Second, the odds of one of these creature's eggs, spores, or whatever landing on a planet that already harbors life is pretty damned remote, considering how empty space is
Re: (Score:1)
It is astronomically improbable that any animals / mini-bears / life known on Earth comes from somewhere else, unless we all were descended from some very early off-Earth starter version all life on earth some 1.5 Billion years or so ago when Earth atmosphere chemistry started changing. Like the Drake equation (but with much larger numbers), all life on this planet uses left handed DNA (%50), right handed sugar chemistry (%50), 4 nucleotides (AGCT - %??) encoding triplets (%??) (64 of them) that code for ju
Re: (Score:2)
Unless the species originally evolved on Mars when it was still a wet world, and then was ejected by meteorite impact to this world. Even NASA has postulated the possibility.
Re: (Score:2)
I really think it would need an infinite improbability drive
Re: (Score:3)
Even NASA has postulated the possibility....
...of single celled organisims hitching a ride from Mars to Earth. We are talking about a complex multi-celled creature here, it's a very different proposition. I find the whole "panspermia" argument pointless, the Earth is made of the same stuff the rest of the solar system is made of, sure organic chemicals, large chunks of ice and maybe even single celled creatures rained down on the early Earth from space, that stuff just made the Earth a bit bigger, it was fundementally no different to the existing mat
Re: (Score:2)
I think all species down here on Terra all interrelate in some way
Without studying life on other planets we can't rule out the possibility that species there also interrelate with our species.
Re: (Score:3)
It's extremely far fetched to hypothesize that any life form that shares our genetic code does not share a common ancestor with us.
Re: (Score:2)
It would be like insisting your niece, even after genetic tests shows her affinity to you, is not your niece at all and is in fact not even human.
Re: (Score:2)
Ugh! Why do you keep insisting that the Earth is not the centre of the universe, Copernicus! It has been proven by both God and Science that Everything revolves around God's pinnacle of creation!
Re: (Score:2)
Because Tardigrades, genetically and morphologically, fall into the twin nested hierarchy of life on Earth; just like bananas, hyenas, humans, etc. If Tardigrades are from space, then everything is from space.
I'll repeat, the guy is a fucking retard.
Because (Score:2)
Isn't it obvious? (Score:2)
Eight-legged bear. (Score:3)
Yuh-huh.
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds almost like a ManBearPig to me.
In best Homer Simpson voice... (Score:1)
SpiderBear, SpiderBear. Does whatever a SpiderBear does!
Sounds like my mother-in-law. (Score:5, Funny)
We Hug in Peace? (Score:5, Funny)
Although amateur tardigrade enthusiast Mike Shaw recently made waves by postulating that the animals may be equipped to survive in outer space because they originally came from other planets ...
Tardigrade Captain: Okay over there, bring the ship down in that clearing, it looks like there's some specimens there on that asphalt path. ... apparently dead organic material ... ... ... but sir, this colony may be lacking light speed travel but our sensors show a plethora of cultural phenomena -- aggregates of which exist right here in this very metropolis! ...
*the Tardigrade craft lands in Time Square and the well armed two meter tall Tardigrades disembark*
Tardigrade Captain: Oh, for the love of Ursa Major! How ugly these specimens turned out! Look at that one!
*the Tardigrade captain gestures toward an Earth female with her jaw agape*
Tardigrade Captain: Ewww, what is this on top of them?
*the Tardigrade captain reaches for the girls hair with his second set of appendages while the first set rubs saliva down his mouth onto his chest and his tertiary set scratches himself*
Tardigrade Officer: *runs a device over the woman* Some sort of fibrous material sir
*the Tardigrade captain withdraws his appendages in terror*
Tardigrade Captain: Oh for fuck's sake, another experiment ruined. Gross. GROSS. All of them just gross as all hell! Alright, everybody back on the ship, you know the drill, take off and nuke 'er from orbit
Tardigrade Officer: But
Tardigrade Captain: You know Jerry, it's always something with you, isn't it? 'Mew mew mew, this civilization has eliminated all evil. Blah blah blah this civilization is one million years old, isn't that worth something?' Now this is the 174th failed experiment we've checked up on and I
*just then an advertisement for Here Comes Honey Boo Boo [youtube.com] blares across the Times Square display -- the stupefied Tardigrades watch*
Tardigrade Officer: I'll push the button this time.
Re: (Score:2)
Funniest thing I've read today. Thanks. :-)
Re: (Score:1)
I don't watch TV anymore, and watching that reminded me precisely why.
One thing to keep in mind... think about a person of average intelligence (not talking IQ, just general intelligence) and then realize that if that's the average, half of them are worse than that.
And next time you post a link to something like that, please include a warning. Something along the lines of NSFB (not safe for brain) would work.
Disclaimer: Please disregard any spelling or grammatical errors... my brain is still recovering from
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't watch TV anymore, and watching that reminded me precisely why.
Wait. You don't watch TV anymore, but you watched that?
Why?
Re: (Score:2)
I think that you are mixing up "average" and "median." I suspect that they are close in this case, but I would not be surprised if the median were somewhat below the average.
Water bear? Seriously? (Score:3)
This brings a new meaning to the old Royal Guardsmen song 'Bears':
[third verse]
While swimming in your pool try not loose your cool
And be drown-ded... by a Water-Bear!
Citation: http://lyrics.wikia.com/The_Royal_Guardsmen:Bears [wikia.com]
Better Title (Score:3, Interesting)
"Scientists believe Water Bears from space have made habitat on earth."
Re: (Score:3)
Random dude believes Water Bears from space have made habitat on earth."
FTFY
Seems kind of obvious (Score:5, Funny)
Being dragged out of your home and subjected to solar radiation and a vacuum?
I expect they live only for revenge.
Re:Seems kind of obvious (Score:5, Interesting)
I hear you. And most worrisome is that we may have endowed them with super powers by exposing them to cosmic radiation in outer space!
- "What's the status on those wriggly buggers?"
- "Tardigrades? Well, sir, against all odds and expectations, some of them managed to survive. They're even breeding!"
- "Really? Even the ones exposed to cosmic radiation?"
- "Even the ones exposed to cosmic radiation, yes."
- "Wow! They're even more resilient than we thought!"
- "You could even say, indestructible..."
- "Amazing."
- "Sir, what should we do with them now?"
- "We bring them back to Earth and watch them breed and see what happens from there...
- "Aye! Aye! What could possibly go wrong?"
Re: (Score:2)
Jokes aside, usually God gives His creatures either very good protection (high birth rate - rabbits, mimicry - chameleons, tough exoskeleton - turtles) or very good weapons (speed, claws, teeth, muscles)
So nothing will possibly go wrong. We will have small tough animals locked up in their ecological niche.
OK, now what? (Score:4, Funny)
Now that we know they can survive in extreme environments, what do we do with 'em? I suppose they could dump a few payloads of them on Mars or Venus and wait a few million years while evolution takes it's course....
Re: (Score:2)
Whats this evolution you speak of? Everyone knows that you should pray for god to create life on mars and then it will happen, DUH!
Re: (Score:1)
Zinger, that. If you can't throw spit off the truck, then what's the upside?
These little buggers will just evolve into a new dietary choice for the Martians, who will then thank us profusely. I mean, right now, they can eat rust, and ... uh... rust. Limited menu. They'll love us. Might even stop them from shooting back at our rover when it does the laser science thing.
I say, launch 'em!
Re: (Score:2)
Good luck with that. When the tough get going, they hibernate (well, not quite hibernation, but close enough). In order for things to happen, the conditions eventually have to improve. I suspect that they would just hibernate on Mars indefinitely.
Comment removed (Score:3)
Apologies to Isaac Watts and Lewis Carroll (Score:3, Informative)
Survive in Outer Space
By dehydrating all the while
And wrinkling its face!
How bravely she can abide
Extremes of cold and heat
Take it all in stride so gallantly
With its graceful, nimble feet!
In works of art or science free
And open source, no fool
She teaches children how to code[1]
Because Waterbear is cool.
So cute, so humble, so robust
Waterbear is da boss
But all she really wants from life
Is a comfy home of moss.
[1] Shameless plug: http://waterbearlang.com/ [waterbearlang.com]
Classic (Score:4, Funny)
Courageous and caring
Faithful and friendly
With stories to share
Taaaaaardibears!
Re: (Score:2)
Well played, worthy adversary. Well played.
Re: (Score:2)
given its eight-leggedness, I would venture that it's a bug in the arachnid sense.
It's obvious. (Score:3)
A Tardigrade is a retrograde TARDIS and everyone knows that a TARDIS can handle outer space.
Re: (Score:1)
That was truly reTarded, no grade for you :-)
Tardigrade? Oh you and your metric system! (Score:2)
What's the equivalent in ye olde inches?
Re: (Score:1)
Tardigrad. There are 2.16 Imperial Tardigrads in a metric Tardigrade.
Of course there is a disparity between Imperial and US "English" measurements, as there are actually 2.58 English Tardigrads in a metric Tardigrade.
Radiation in Outer Space? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
So let me get this straight...
When you put these super resilient creatures in space with no protection from radiation most of them die.
But if you send comparatively weak men to the moon where they're exposed to the exact same radiation they all survive and none died soon after from cancer?
Makes sense...
You missed the bit with "no protection from radiation". The space suit isn't just there to keep air inside it.
made me wonder about these things... (Score:2)
...as I was dropping them in liquid nitrogen at college and watching in amazement as they shrugged off the frost and carried on
"Outer" Space (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
You got the date wrong, it was 2002!
How does the water bear survive in space? (Score:1)
Re:How does the water bear survive in space? (Score:5, Insightful)
While this does sound funny at first, I find it intriguing. Who knows?
While we probably can't know for certain, we can look around and notice no planet nearby that could have supported life that complex with the possible exception of mars.
Then we can look at the fact that only 68% survived a mere 10 days after being specially treated to do so.
Then we can speculate about the amount of time it might take for a blasted out chunk of mars to find its way to earth. Hundreds of years is my guess. Millions if it came from further.
We can further speculate what percentage would survive the journey and then survive a fiery entry into Earth's atmosphere.
Then we can set aside ALL of that speculation until there is ANY evidence of life on Mars more advanced than an accidental amino acid.
The inescapable preponderance of evidence is that it originated here. And simply because it can survive an odd experiment is no reason to speculate extraterrestrial origin.
Occam, guys, Occam.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Is it so hard to imagine that these things could have been formed on another planet, or even a non-planetary celestial object such as an asteroid, which then traveled near earth while carrying these critters,before breaking apart causing fragments to land on earth?
To the contrary. It's too easy to come up with such theories. It's a bit like getting pregnant. You can do it easily enough, but are you willing to take responsibility for the result?
Re: (Score:2)
It's possible to imagine that. It's also possible to imagine a magical bearded man camed and planted them, and Noah saved them on a boat. It's possible to imagine an alien species with the same sort of DNA as us, and same mitochondria.
It's just one FUCK of a lot more likely that they evolved here on earth!!
Re: (Score:1)
Re:How does the water bear survive in space? (Score:4, Funny)
Occam, guys, Occam
Mod +1 for random reference to The Critic.
Re: (Score:2)
How do we know that through their evolution they didn't lose their ability to last even longer out there than they do now?
Re: (Score:2)
How do we know humans didn't lose their second head when they hitchhiked here from Betelgeuse?
OCCAM!
Re: (Score:1)
It's a serious question. Remember how once upon a time we could eat raw meat?
Re: (Score:3)
You mean in the same way we still can? There are entire fad diets out there based on cooking being bad for you. The only reason we live better on cooked meat is that it kills parasites and lets us store the food longer without spoiling.
Cooking makes it much much easier for your body to extract energy and nutreants from the food.
Re: (Score:1)
Please take something for that cough
Re: (Score:2)
I can suspend my disbelief for Star Trek etc that all these other alien races would breathe 79% nitrogen, 20% oxygen, and some trace CO2, would be humanoid, and could all speak English. When they started talking about aliens having DNA sequences, that was really questionable. But I could ignore it for the episode.
Trying to pretend it's possibly real though for real
Re: (Score:2)
It's quite possible that any alien we found out there uses the same sequence of DNA -> RNA -> proteins we use, they may also use the same amino-acids. We use those things because they were available, we probably didn't have much choice.
Now, the semantics of DNA chains will quite certainly change.
Re: (Score:3)
There's no reason that I can see why ATG would always have to translate into a methionine and the start of translation, for example. If aliens followed the central dogma (DNA--> RNA --> amino acids) there's an equal chance
Re: (Score:2)
Wisdom of Crowds (Score:2)
In the end, you folks got it right.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
RIP Anonymous Cowards - our days are numbered!