Researchers Model Pluto's Atmosphere, Find 225 Mph Winds 77
MatthewVD writes "Pluto may have been downgraded to a dwarf planet, but researchers modeling its wisp of an atmosphere continue to find that it is a surprisingly complex world, particularly when it comes to weather patterns. Howling winds that sweep clockwise around the planet at up to 225 mph — though the atmosphere is so thin, it would only feel like 1 mph on Earth. The algorithms used to model the atmosphere will be helpful in studying far more complex atmospheres, like Earth's."
Gravity (Score:1)
You would still be blown all over the place because of the lack of gravity, it just takes a bit longer to accelerate to speed.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Gravity (Score:4, Funny)
We don't lack gravity, the Earth just has more...
THE DETAILS ARE NOT IMPORTANT [basicinstructions.net]
Re: (Score:2)
You saying we're fat?
Re:Gravity (Score:5, Informative)
You would still be blown all over the place because of the lack of gravity, it just takes a bit longer to accelerate to speed.
Its only about a 20th not zero.
To a ridiculously crude first approximation, if the force of the wind is equivalent to 1 MPH at earth STP, then factoring in gravity it would be like being in a 20 MPH wind on earth WRT to being tipped over. However you'd have the same inertia you have on earth, so there wouldn't be much tumbling around due to gusts.
Re: (Score:1)
Ah, I'd have thought that the gravitational field was even weaker.
Re:Models of models of models (Score:5, Insightful)
So, we're using the methodolgy that is insufficient to model the earth's atmosphere, to model an object that we cannot test directly, and claim it will help understand the complex systems?
Yeah, let's wait until we have all the variables in place before carrying a modeling experiment </rolls eyes>
I applaud
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backhanded_compliment [wikipedia.org]
the attempt at creating a more complete guess about the nature of a distant planet (full or dwarf), but without a way to test the predictions, this has very little use in refining the models.
Geee, I wonder what those scientists of old (not so old) were thinking when they formulated things like Relativity and Quantum Mechanics at a time when it was impossible test the predictions </more rolling eyes>
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Unless you've got a really good optometrist, I'd just roll rubber balls.
Re: (Score:2)
Geee, I wonder what those scientists of old (not so old) were thinking when they formulated things like Relativity and Quantum Mechanics at a time when it was impossible test the predictions </more rolling eyes>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle [wikipedia.org]
Ok, let's try again. Gee I wonder what Heisenberg was thinking when he formulated that principle, he had no way to test it. Moreover, what the scientists preceding this were thinking when they were formulating and building quantum theory?
Re: (Score:2)
Do you realize how stupid it makes you look when you try to make a statement by linking to a WIkipedia article?
Exactly what a backhanded compliment is is not contentious as it's pop culture, so a tertiary source is fine.
Would you do something like that face-to-face? Would you get out your smartphone and look up the article really fast and shove it in their face as a rebuttal?
If I said, "Have you ever heard of a backhanded compliment" face to face, a person can answer, "no, as a matter of fact I haven't."
In a forum like /., it makes more sense to account for the fact (which they remind us of at every conceivable opportunity) that some people aren't familiar with American pop culture since you can't respond right away.
Or the GP just did it to be sarcastic, which would fit
Re: (Score:2)
Do you realize how stupid it makes you look when you try to make a statement by linking to a WIkipedia article?
Because that link to that specific topic is completely devoid of truth. Screw it and deem it unworthy in an elementary-school level generalizing fashion!!(10+1) Web nazis of the world, unite!!!
Would you do something like that face-to-face?
I'm not sure how you could link to a web page face to face. I thought that you needed a computer with internet access to link.
Oh wait, you are trying e-bravado, e-macho posturing. Oh I see, let me reply to you then. I could say yes, but how you would know if I say the truth. I could say no, but why would that matte
Re: (Score:1)
But more importantly is the World Bank's comment that
'Models are useful even when their results are not entirely correct because they facilitate communication' World Bank HEF Techniccal Report 1, June 2010 [worldbank.org]
because as you can see, the model is generating discussion. If the model is wrong, it is still the first step towards making a better model.
Not even a real planet! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I can't tell if you're parodying peoples' unfounded concerns over what the reclassification of Pluto would mean or not. It's Poe's Law for Pluto.
Re: (Score:2)
Two birds with one stone (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
The windfarms were planned for, but not yet built, a couple of miles OFF THE COAST of Cape Cod, so those "vacant lots" would be a little damp, and the McMansions would have to float.
But other than that, your post... no wait, you're still an idiot.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Sedna, Quaor and Eris are all well beyond Pluto's orbit.
Re:Two birds with one stoned (Score:2)
It's not a planet so you can't get any grants or loans for those windmills. ;)
You see Pluto is not a planet because of consensus among scientists that it's not a planet. I've yet to see solid proof it's not a planet and there is a dearth of peer reviewed articles which show it's not a planet. It is also very difficult to get these consensual scientists to release the raw data that lead to their consensual conclusion that Pluto is not a planet.
I say we rid ourselves of these consensual scientists so that Plu
Only good for testing the model (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
This should be fairly easy to do.
In theory, but not in practice, because in our very best images of Pluto the entire thing is only a few pixels wide, making the edge of the atmosphere visible over the limbs very-very-very-sub-pixel. It's also an extremely thin atmosphere that will be virtually undetectable compared to the body of the planet, and 400 mph relative speed is a tiny amount of ref shift to detect in such a low-amplitude signal.
So it's certainly possible, but I wouldn't expect this hypothesis to be confirmed very soon. Maybe JW
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
LOL, I can't believe I forgot about New Horizons.
Re: (Score:3)
Think about getting a little closer [jhuapl.edu]
Re: (Score:2)
It won't be too long before any atmosphere just freezes solid and falls to the surface. Then, for a very long time (longer than most of our remaining lifetimes I think), this whole issue will be moot.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
So what you're saying is the whole thing is overblown?
Re: (Score:3)
Or maybe predictions without precise data can produce valuable data. Nah, it's gotta be the first one
Re: (Score:2)
METAL (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Hmm, rocky outcroppings, howling winds... throw in a horde of pillaging vikings and a volcano or two, and you've got the perfect setting for a heavy metal music video!
Just in time for Season 4 [diefordethklok.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Too fast (Score:1)
Those winds would be much faster than the surface orbital velocity of Pluto, something is not right here.
Re: (Score:1)
The surface orbital velocity of Pluto is 1900 mph (850 m/s).
Re: (Score:2)
You're right, I forgot a few zeroes.
Waiting for verifiction - (Score:2)
Pluto Closest Approach In:
1168 Days
20 Hours
07 Min
41 Sec
Then you'll have your answer.
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/newhorizons/main/index.html [nasa.gov]
Re:Waiting for verifiction - roxy (Score:1)
It makes me a little crazy that they didn't make this mission an orbiter. No more flybys! Time for us to grow up. Orbiters, landers, and rovers should be the new norm.
Re: (Score:3)
To orbit such a small body that far away, you either have to approach much more slowly (meaning it wouldn't get there in your lifetime), or you have to bring a TON of fuel with you, and hope you can slow down enough to be caught by Pluto's meek gravity, with near pin-point accuracy of orbital insertion.
They choose to get there fast. The fly-by will be very fast, the encounter time very short, and they had to plan a lot so that pictures wouldn't be blurry, but at least we'll see results sooner than 50 years
225 MPH winds? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Yeah, just imagine the wind chill index...
What would that be, 3 Kelvin?
A good first step on an interesting road (Score:2)
The model is two-dimensional (latitude and height), so it does not model three-dimensional complexities. Still, it's the first work of a fascinating subject -- all the more fascinating because Pluto is moving away from the Sun, and its atmosphere is due to freeze solid in a few years. Adding that complicating feature to the atmospheric models should keep a generation of graduate students employed.
Erosion? (Score:1)
With winds that high, and no gravity, you'd think the surface would erode to nothing and dissipate into space. I call BS.
Re: (Score:2)
and no gravity
What makes you think Pluto has no gravity?
Re: (Score:2)
So what exactly is the escape velocity of Pluto? Anyone know?
Re: (Score:2)
So what exactly is the escape velocity of Pluto? Anyone know?
1229m/s according to wikipedia.
Howling winds (Score:2)
Howling winds that sweep clockwise around the planet at up to 225 mph — though the atmosphere is so thin, it would only feel like 1 mph hour on Earth.
I have a feeling you wouldn't hear much of anything if the atmosphere was so thin that you could barely feel a "225 mph wind"
It have to be said (Score:2)
That blows.
Re: (Score:2)
Pluto has nothing on Uranus.
Revelation (Score:1)
Air in a gnat's fart all the air on Pluto (Score:2)
Wind speeds are meaningless at the density of atmosphere on Pluto (or even Neptune, for that matter).
Airspeeds could be thousands of miles an hour, and there would still be no appreciable effect of friction. Indeed, that is part of the reason airspeeds are so fast to begin with.
You ever owned a windy dog? (Score:1)
People can't even predict weather on earth (Score:2)