Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Medicine Science

Maryland Team Completes Most Extensive Face Transplant Yet 36

An anonymous reader writes "A 37-year-old man injured in a 1997 gun incident has been given a new face, teeth, tongue and jaw in what doctors say is the most extensive face transplant ever performed. The transplant was performed at the University of Maryland Medical Center. The first full face transplant was performed in France in 2005, on a woman who was mauled by her dog. In a review of the first 17 cases since then, it was found that the overall survival rate after face transplant was 88%, with only two deaths."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Maryland Team Completes Most Extensive Face Transplant Yet

Comments Filter:
  • Sample size (Score:4, Insightful)

    by SJHillman ( 1966756 ) on Thursday March 29, 2012 @08:57AM (#39508749)

    Although 15 out of 17 successes is pretty hopeful, it's a pretty small sample size to be giving statistics (88% survival rate). If the next one they do results in a death, then it drops to 83%... a fairly big change for adding a single case.

    • by Thanshin ( 1188877 ) on Thursday March 29, 2012 @09:10AM (#39508879)

      If the next one they do results in a death, then it drops to 83%... a fairly big change for adding a single case.

      I think they're aware of that, and they'll make a special effort to not kill the next patient.

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        If the next one they do results in a death, then it drops to 83%... a fairly big change for adding a single case.

        I think they're aware of that, and they'll make a special effort to not kill the next patient.

        But if they don't kill the next one, their survival rate only goes up to 89%. So they gain 1 percentage point if they succeed, but lose 5 if they fail? With those lopsided odds, it seems the logical choice is not to risk it.

        • by Anonymous Coward

          I'm not sure why, but million_monkeys sounds very apropos.

    • From TFA:

      This was the 23rd face transplant carried out since doctors began performing the procedure seven years ago.

      So there's 6 cases that have not yet been reviewed. I wonder why they were excluded from the sample... Too soon after transplant to review?

  • About the dog (Score:5, Informative)

    by mawe ( 1247174 ) on Thursday March 29, 2012 @09:06AM (#39508831) Homepage

    Just wanted to add the little detail that the dog that was involved in the 2005 incident didn't attack the woman. Out of context this sounds like a horror movie.

    The woman's been unconscious on the ground and the animal seemed to be trying to wake her up. More can be read on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isabelle_Dinoire [wikipedia.org]

  • A guy who shot his own face off is a deserving recipient of hundreds of surgeon-hours of reconstructive effort, right?

    That's great news: I presume that it means that we've already fixed every birth defect in every innocent infant, yes?

    • by psmears ( 629712 ) on Thursday March 29, 2012 @09:19AM (#39508989)

      A guy who shot his own face off is a deserving recipient of hundreds of surgeon-hours of reconstructive effort, right?

      That's great news: I presume that it means that we've already fixed every birth defect in every innocent infant, yes?

      So... you're saying that experimental surgical procedures should only be carried out on certified-100%-deserving angels?

    • Don't be so negativistic. If I've understood it correctly this surgery is still half-experimental, so it pays back in knowledge? Besides, how many people do you think would volunteer for having a dead persons face plastered over their own? Even seeing the "before" pics it's still ghoulish.
    • He shot himself, not someone else. And he could consent to the surgery.
    • Regardless of one's enthusiasm, and preferred metrics, for winnowing the innocent sufferers from the deserving ones, risky, experimental surgery isn't exactly altruistic.

      For ethical reasons, of course, it is considered good taste to restrict it to consenting patients, and if it works you don't generally see the surgical team frowning seriously about the moral hazard of helping people who deserve to suffer; but the point is research. With an 88% survival rate and the complications likely to follow from th
    • by spads ( 1095039 )
      Better he should have shot your face off, then for the doctors to replace it with your ass. Heck, I'd want a gander at that!

      You saying no one (yourself included) has ever made a mistake?
  • that read it as "Expensive" at first?

  • by coinreturn ( 617535 ) on Thursday March 29, 2012 @11:44AM (#39511705)
    Can we abbreviate face transplant to faceplant?
  • Scary cellphone pics (Score:4, Interesting)

    by GlobalEcho ( 26240 ) on Thursday March 29, 2012 @12:19PM (#39512215)
    I had dinner last week with my brother-in-law (who repairs hands, e.g. by replacing a patient's mangled fingers with some of their toes) and one of his mentors, who happens to have done one of the successful face transplants. When guys like these ask if you want to see the pictures on their cellphones, it is best to refuse. Trust me on this.

This restaurant was advertising breakfast any time. So I ordered french toast in the renaissance. - Steven Wright, comedian

Working...