Gates Foundation Makes Progress On Reinvented Toilets 167
Julie188 writes "Last summer the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation pledged to spend millions to reinvent the toilet. That investment has born fruit with teams from around the world coming up with many different ways to turn human waste into energy."
Upgraded toilets (Score:5, Funny)
... now come with a Start button. Blue loo of death, anyone?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Classy, Coward, real classy. "We had it just as bad", "It's their fault obviously". So you're saying slavery did nothing to get your precious USA ahead, nor did it do anything to keep Africa back? You're saying that endless western meddling has been nothing but positive and helpful to these "foreign countries on the other side of the world"? Just a coincidence that the countries with the most natural resources are the poorest, while folks in NY and London get filthy rich from stealing same?
I know, I know, d
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
"First World Problems", indeed.
Maybe you could employ an immigrant to wipe your ass for you. Do your bit to help the poor people.
Re: (Score:3)
It's true that "water saving" 3.5 gal per flush water closets are no longer sold, but the current standard is 1.6 gallons per flush (not 1 gallon as stated by the parent post). There are some ultra-low flow units being sold that are 1.28 gallons per flush, but almost none less than that.
A few years after 1.6 gpf was mandated in most codes, testing was done which found that many 3.5 gallon-per-flush water closets performed worse than most of the new 1.
Re: (Score:2)
Seems like newer toilets aren't as deep from seat to water level either. For me that's been a problem as well.
Plumbers in my city also install one of those water displacing bucket looking things in the tank. Probably a local thing but what a pain in the ass to have to uninstall some bureaucratic bucket. So I have even less water, but it feels good and right to pass the blame on to Al 'FAIL' Gore, so I guess I'll live.
Still kinda sucks to sit down and send willy for a dip in the cold on a strange toilet.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
1. Visit Japan
2. Find a supplier
3. Import modern toilets
4. Profit!
Seriously. The Japanese have toilets that automatically wash and blow-dry your ass, and sing to you while they do it.
Meanwhile, we here in the "civilized West" still shit in porcelain buckets.
Re: (Score:2)
What an Unfortunate Choice of Metaphor (Score:5, Funny)
The article says Gate's toilet efforts have "born fruit".
Yeuagh!
Were these fruit "Dingleberries"?
MS Windows: Human energy into waste. (Score:5, Funny)
Has to be said.
Re:MS Windows: Human energy into waste. (Score:5, Funny)
the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation pledged to spend millions to reinvent the toilet. That investment has born fruit
I'm not sure I want to know what kind of fruit a toilet has to bear.
Re: (Score:2)
Mushrooms?
I don't want to attack Bill Gates. (Score:3, Funny)
I don't want to say anything bad about Bill, but this sounds like a pretty shitty idea.
Re: (Score:3)
I would hate to think about all that money going down the crapper.
Re:I don't want to attack Bill Gates. (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
sure, but how many bombs has he dropped?
Re:I don't want to attack Bill Gates. (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
You mean, other than Windows Me?
..plus Vista
Re:I don't want to attack Bill Gates. (Score:5, Funny)
You mean, other than Windows Me?
..plus Vista
Come on guys, don't mock the guy just because his earlier public toilet initiatives were less effective.
Re: (Score:2)
Windows ME...was not a TOILET effort.
Windows ME...was SHIT
Re: (Score:2)
You mean, other than Windows Me?
..plus Vista
Don't forget the ribbon.
Re: (Score:2)
You mean, other than Windows Me?
Bob will get you for that.
Re: (Score:2)
You mean, other than Windows Me?
Bob will get you for that
Melinda Gates.
She was the one in charged of "Bob"
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
He is a wolf in sheepclothes and in bed with one of the most dangerous companies in the world, Monsanto.
No amount of good can make up for the criminal acts of that company.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
A good part of that money goes into ensuring that developing countries will never be able to produce drugs they need on their own. They get pre-made drugs, counting their worth at a few orders of magnitude above the manufacture cost, with a string attached: in order to receive free drugs, they need to pass laws forbidding domestic manufacture of said drugs, aka "respecting intellectual property".
Also, promoting Monsanto. Or, putting $50M into promoting male genital mutilation in Kenya while civilised peop
Re: (Score:2)
Or, putting $50M into promoting male genital mutilation in Kenya
You do realise that this "mutilation" greatly reduces the risk of STDs and that over half the men who are "mutilated" as adults report a greater satisfaction of sex after the surgery heals?
When I was stationed in Thailand in the USAF, one of my buddies got jungle rot on his foreskin, and the treatment was "mutilation". Poor guy had to carry around amyl nitrate "poppers" for six weeks until it healed in case he got an erection.
I was glad I'd be
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like the US government.
KISS Principle (Score:5, Insightful)
To provide greater benefit the machine should be able to be manufactured without specialized tools and be able to be built with universally available, preferably recyclable or re-purposed materials. If people can make a living out of making and servicing these toilets then the sanitary and economic (from the created industry) benefit will spread quickly and independently without requiring the oversight of a foreign NGO.
Re: (Score:2)
They just use a small amount of enriched uranium to aid in tracking where each unit is at all times. Geiger counters are cheaper than RFID readers and more reliable.
Re: (Score:1)
There are some products that realize a good idea, but look around: new, better products come along with high-tech and feature rich functionality often realized by new materials, more software, state-of-the-art electronics and so on. And that is what brings an economy forward. Examples: Direct Manufactoring (http://dmrc.uni-paderborn.de/en/about-dmrc/?cHash=3be59309b4fe2e5a416267b052bcf74f), Molded interconnect devi
Re: (Score:2)
Sooner or later, more and more "advanced" products that depend on advanced production systems will eventually lead to a "technology crash." Consider that up until the semiconductor era, most manufactured devices could be replicated, customized, modified, and even produced in small quantities by an experienced, knowledgeable, and determined hobbyist working out of his garage. Even more complicated manufactured goods could still be completely fabricated by a relatively small group of workers operating from
Make the plumbing out of sunlight and sand. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
If people can make a living out of making and servicing these toilets then the sanitary and economic (from the created industry) benefit will spread quickly and independently without requiring the oversight of a foreign NGO.
This is the same argument Negroponte made for the OLPC laptop.
1.84 million distributed.
24,000 to Asia.
360,000 to Uruguay
870,000 to Peru.
One Laptop per Child [wikipedia.org]
Crucial (Score:5, Insightful)
Anyone who thinks this is a silly idea needs to spend two weeks in a city without modern plumbing.
Re: (Score:3)
Yep.. they go out on Friday and are collected on Sunday, dead handy for the Friday night party crowd and much better than having desperate and partied-out people pissing in doorways.
Behind those doorways is a city with sufficient toilets backed by a infrastructure that, although aging, still works and is being improved [groupa.nl].
Must be missing something... (Score:5, Insightful)
Why reinvent the toilet when we already have perfectly functional, no-energy (or very low energy) composting toilet [wikipedia.org] and urine diversion [wikipedia.org] options? What is it about these options that does not meet the criteria?
Re:Must be missing something... (Score:4, Insightful)
Why reinvent the toilet when we already have perfectly functional, no-energy (or very low energy) composting toilet and urine diversion options? What is it about these options that does not meet the criteria?
Somebody influential won't make a profit.
Re:Must be missing something... (Score:4, Funny)
You mean somebody effluential won't make a profit
Re: (Score:2)
Who influential stands to make a profit from this? Not Bill Gates. So who are you talking about?
Re: (Score:2)
Who influential stands to make a profit from this? Not Bill Gates. So who are you talking about?
Err.. well, definately "Not Bill Gates".. He made his money through software monopolies not sewage monopolies, so I guess they are talking about, you know, other people.. ie the ones who want to maintain their monopoly on the provision of sewage infrastructure. In this case Bill is behaving as a good guy and deserves credit.
Re: (Score:1)
Was going to say the same thing - these don't sound like viable options for low tech third world situations.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
FTA:
Come up with a toilet alternative that doesn't need plumbed water, a sewer system, electricity and will cost 5 cents or less per user daily to build and maintain.
This are the requirements, and the toilet you mention seems to fulfill them easily. The main objection may be capacity, as composting is a fairly slow process so you need a relatively large volume, especially when there are many users using it for their daily needs, and not a remote-highway-stop type of service.
Actually solutions mentioned in the article include microwaves, mechanical rollers and other powered parts. This needs electricity. The cost is also going to be an issue, though the microwaves pr
Re: (Score:2)
5cents or less is easy - if you don't count any cost for work hours for maintaining. if you do then moving the shit around becomes pretty expensive.
actually the real problems rise probably from it having to be practical in a high density african ghetto.
I for one hate wood wc's.
Re: (Score:2)
It specifically states "to build and maintain" so maintenance is included. Disposal of the waste presumably not, though.
Re: (Score:2)
I think the smell issue may be implied as has to be solved too.
And those existing waterless urinals then still need some kind of liquid (I guess an oil), so won't be suitable for this use. It all indicates how hard the problem really is, and why no-one yet has found a good solution.
This is what I came here to say (Score:2)
Many kinds of composting toilet exist, you have to get slightly fancier for those intended for use in the city, but it's no big deal.
For those in the country, if you need one with more capacity, you just make the vault taller, so that's easy as can be.
For those WAY out in the country, you can dig holes and shit in them via an outhouse, then plant trees in the holes when they're about full. Plant a food tree; it won't start producing in less than a year anyway, and your crap will be dirt by then.
Cities can
Re: (Score:3)
I own several composting toilets. I am looking forward to something far better.
If you want to "flush" to the composting location then you need an ultra-low water head. This is problematic for many reasons. If you don't want a flush then you need to rely on gravity and need a vent fan to keep the bad air out of the house. This is problematic too.
If the compost gets too dry, the process slows, and you end up with fungus that attracts fungus flies. If the compost gets too wet, well ewww.... you have to clean o
Re: (Score:3)
It is especially difficult to run a system with guests. Imagine spending 10 minutes explaining how to use the toilet. What can go in, what can't, how to flush, what is that stuff down there...
You still get guests? Wow :)
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks for answering the question from a point of knowledge. Some of these are less likely to be an issue in tropical Kenya where 'winter' low temperatures are above 13 Celsius (55F). Any toilet system is going to require some maintenance though, just as western flush toilets do (it is just removed from sight). When your options are no sanitation, and some sanitation that requires a bit of effort, perhaps the impediments are not so great.
Re: (Score:2)
The same way they do this now. With the difference that then they have something like a toilet to begin with.
This is too obvious surely... (Score:1)
Another way to make money out of a piece of crap! ;)
Well... (Score:2)
The hate (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Meanwhile, Ellison builds boats.
Re: (Score:2)
So some does what is determined to be illegal and predatory business; to effective levy an economic rent on you and me. He then pretty well buys off the justice system so the prosecution settles for him paying his debt to society largely with more copies of his own shovelware given to schools and government, that costs him next to nothing to produce and actually if anything further secure his companies dominant position.
He becomes amazingly rich at least partly at the expense of everyone who has ever gone
Re: (Score:2)
Gates was talked into being a philanthropist by his father -- an IBM lawyer. My thought is it's just PR. It isn't like he can't afford it or something.
Me, I have far more respect for the waitress who throws a ten dollar bill in the Salvation Army bucket. That ten bucks actually means something to her, what Gates spends doesn't affect his life or lifestyle at all.
Create a reputation, live with it. (Score:3)
We in Latin America are very familiar with this behaviour.
People that got the upper hand in business by all kind of dubious means start all kind of charitable work and sponsoring of the arts.
It is called a PR exercise.
One can't deny that these exercises can have benefits, sometimes immense ones, but they can't rewrite history or palliate the pain and anger of the people who suffered previous bad behaviour.
What would impress me is if Bill would use his quite reasonable leverage to undo some of the damage his
Re: (Score:3)
Re:The hate (Score:5, Insightful)
If I'm reading you correctly, you'd rather see him widen the wealth gap between the U.S. hyper-rich and the 3rd world ? The funny thing about wealth gaps is they tend to trigger acts of extreme violence to rebalance the equation. It is FAR more beneficial to humankind, to help the 3rd world deal with some of their most basic problems. Who's to say, maybe in 30 years from now, an African that was given access to education, sanitation and employment might discover a (realistic) cure for AIDS.
I'd go as far as saying that there is not much hope left for the U.S., because its control structures are far beyond repair, its human capital bottlenecked by the very pursuit of wealth. Throwing more money into a broken hyperpower only makes the rich richer. Throwing money into a 3rd world nation has the potential to bring sweeping changes.
Ultimately, it's about inching toward a unified world view. To think or act otherwise is notihng more than racism and elitism.
Re: (Score:2)
Why are we focusing on the USA?
Oh, I see. Maybe it's because there is no free market, just crony capitalism?
Ad hominems are no substitute for hard data.
Re: (Score:2)
If I'm reading you correctly, you'd rather see him widen the wealth gap between the U.S. hyper-rich and the 3rd world ? The funny thing about wealth gaps is they tend to trigger acts of extreme violence to rebalance the equation.
Not necessarily. Many of the modern acts of terrorism are by people relatively well off with time on their hands. When was the last time a poor, African country threatened the security of the United States?
Re: (Score:2)
Sooo.... can I invoke Godwin's law here ?
What I'm saying is that refusing to help those in need and abroad, in favour of concentrating wealth and power locally, is akin to racism. It's not an attack, it's a statement. I really don't see how that has anything to do with Bu$hitler. They planted racist ideologies to further their grossly tyrannical agendas. That's the opposite of what I'm saying.
Re: (Score:1)
Multiple issues with this:
1) motivation: his wife is doing this to improve his image. So, he is simply following what other industrial criminals did. So, no, I am not that impressed.
2) a number of his attempts are insane. For starters, he wants to wipe out a species of mosquitoes. Yet, it is finally becoming apparent in science that virus give us our leaps in evolution. As such, mosquitoes transmit these virus.; wanting to stop hurricanes in the atlantic due to economic issues. All the while he ignores that the hurricanes serves as a pump to bring up nutrients from much lower in the oceans to the surface.
3) for all his spending of money, it has been tied back to MS.
4) he is a huge drain on the western economy and IP. even now he is looking to take american nuke tech and transfer to china.
5) the man misses doing any real things: building up space infrastructure; building up maglev or other high-speed rail in America.
Sorry, but not impressed by him.
I'm not Bills biggest fan, but I am impressed by his projects. With respect to
1) Even Scrooge was only converted late in life
2) mosquitoes are the worlds biggest people killer. Obviously some approaches to solving the problem have issues. Malaria has been around for ages and all it seems to have given some people is sickle cells
3) his money has to come from somewhere
4) Bill was not really the patent troll that Microsoft seems to becoming. I don't think that Microsoft was really active in the patents field w
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Steve also thought that license plates were for the little people and that all those blue parking spots were the peons paying homage to their God Steve with really good parking.
The frictionless toilet bowl... (Score:1)
... please Uncle Bill, hear our desperate plea. Save us from the brown streaks.
Does It Clean Your Asshole? (Score:4, Interesting)
I'd love to see some demographics on countries sorted by asshole cleanliness. I'm guessing that just like education and health care, the USA would be solidly in the middle of the pack. I suspect that Japan probably would have the most-clean assholes in the world, just based on their high end toilet technology. I'm not sure I want to speculate on the dirty end of the scale so as not to risk diplomatic incident.
Re: (Score:1)
If poo touched your hand, would you be content to wipe it off with paper? So why do we tolerate it with our assholes?
Perhaps it is because you tend to not pick up food with your asshole and then put it in your mouth, or (and more likely imho) because we can't smell it.
Re:Does It Clean Your Asshole? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
I'd love to see some demographics on countries sorted by asshole cleanliness.
Google for the magazine "Viz and "The Bottom Inspectors" . . . the Office of Bottom Inspectors are responsible for this in the UK:
if your bottom is pimpled
or flabby and dimpled
if your cleft hair is not winnet free
if inadequate wiping
has caused gusset striping
then your bottom belongs to me
your bottom belongs to me
Re: (Score:2)
Dude, you have a funny way of putting this hygiene problem so I'll answer :) This happens to be a problem that I've thought about sporadically!
In our country, Turkey, we use both toilet paper and water to clean our assholes. Because traditionally, in the ala turca toilet they used water. So we ended up adding a small water pipe to the ala franca closet.
But I have never seen a Japanese toilet. Is it possible that they use a water jet, and then a robotic asshole cleaning wipe with nanotech disinfectants, a la
Re:Does It Clean Your Asshole? (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Search for 'Washlet Syndrome' [wikipedia.org]. There is a price to pay for everything, including being extra clean.
Re: (Score:2)
For the lazy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toilets_in_Japan#Washlet_Syndrome [wikipedia.org]
Re:Does It Clean Your Asshole? (Score:5, Funny)
I don't touch my food with my asshole.
Nor do I touch door handles and other things that other people will touch with my asshole.
Nor do I "shake assholes" with people.
Re: (Score:2)
I love Bill Gates (Score:2)
Hey, Slashdot poster: I love Bill Gates: I just wish people would stop taking the piss out of him.
This is highly overrated (Score:3, Insightful)
In the developed world, we have plumbing throughout, so the flush sends it to a central area. Now, how useful is that? 2 words: Joules Biotech. They are using genetically modified cyanobacteria, to kick out ethanol and diesel fuel. So, why is this special? Because this uses our sewage as feedstock. IOW, it turns crap into fuel. OTOH, the ideas being pushed here, require loads of energy to try and get rid of crap.
Then you have the undeveloped world. Basically, we are talking, no plumbing. So, what matters most to them? Soap and a water bowl. Yes. For the vast majority of the world, they use their left hand to wipe their ass(which is why you do not use your left hand in nearly all parts of the world). We could help the undeveloped world by simply getting them resources such as soap to kill the bacteria that are on their hands, esp. the left one. For those of you that think that this is funny, keep in mind that the single highest killer of babies in 3rd world nations is diarrhea. Much of that is from the parents or siblings having dirty hands.
Tree Bog (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Salt Water? (Score:3)
The whole idea behind these toilets is that water is scarce and the region is poor -- that's only half-true. If you want to get down to serious, cheap answers, fund plumbing of salt water in from the ocean -- it won't be useful for drinking without some prior preparation, but the toilets, if properly made, need not be an advanced technology to function. Plus if one goes through the trouble of piping in sea water, perhaps it would open up more inland areas to the possibility of desalination plants? The demand would be limited to simply drinking water and bathing, since the toilets would be "first priority" and not need to have a constant source of fresh water like the former two. The only issue I could really see here is a requirement for redundant plumbing, in areas where having too much plumbing must seem like...well, a pipe dream.
Re:Salt Water? (Score:4, Interesting)
I did find this little gem.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_supply_in_Hong_Kong#Seawater_flushing [wikipedia.org]
"In 1960 legislation was introduced to promote seawater flushing on a larger scale, followed by substantial investments in a separate network although the system was unpopular due to the need to build a separate plumbing network in each house. Seawater initially was sold, but from 1972 on it was provided for free and the costs of the system were recovered through the drinking water tariff. In 1991, about 65% of Hong Kong's households used seawater for flushing. By 1999, this percentage had increased to 79%"
Re: (Score:2)
One advantage here is that, whereas in Hong Kong, an entire new network had to be developed under an older one, in areas with no substantial plumbing, the entire process could be done in one shot.
Re: (Score:3)
The reason for the two-way seawater was to continuously recirculate it to avoid freezing. And since sea-water is less prone to freezing than clear water, it was also a bonus. It wasn't actually sea-water but the even saltier (a
Re: (Score:2)
having too much plumbing must seem like...well, a pipe dream.
I see what you did there.
It's actually a secret plan.... (Score:2)
They are desperate to find some way to recycle the brown Zunes.
-- Terry
Folks, you gotta think outside the box here... (Score:2)
Common Microsoft Fascination? (Score:3)
Years ago it was the iLoo (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ILoo) I wonder what Microsoft's fascination is with crap?
don't laugh: toilets are important (Score:2)
Does the new toilet involve three seashells? (Score:2)
Anyone up for a game of Angry Turds? (Score:2)
...it would be like the "iPad of sanitation," he said.
There's an app for that.
Embrace and Extend (Score:2)
I suppose it might be useful for log dumps...
Twitter from the Shitter? (Score:3)
I guess you might be able to "Share" your lavatory adventures too.
Photoshop fail (Score:2)
I pulled up the article, started reading, that picture was NOT originally of Bill Gates.
time for a change of terms? (Score:2)
Does this mean we should now say, "I got to go take a Gates?"
Re: (Score:2)
The reinvented toilet can be part of the solution to that problem.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Stupid fucking troll.
Bill Gates retired as CEO of Microsoft to go run his charity. Steve Jobs was CEO of Apple almost up to the end.
Guess you've never bothered to see what countries Microsoft's hardware is made in, huh?