Muscle Mice 116
SilasMortimer writes "Researchers from the University of Colorado at Boulder have accomplished that for which humankind has been desperate since the dawn of civilization: turning sad, injured regular mice into angry, beefed-up super-mice. Well, okay, there's no official word in the article about the rodents' emotional states, but certainly when stem cells were injected into mice with leg injuries, the muscle grew back... almost twice as big as it was before the injury [abstract, supplemental material (PDF)]. This has many exciting implications, from better healing after injuries to slowing down the aging process to a spike in the number of cases of Generalized Anxiety Disorder among cats. I, for one, refuse to perpetuate outdated memes. (But feel free to make up for the lack.)"
If these mice are bred with those given previously discovered treatments to make them smarter and fearless, we might be in trouble.
Clinical trials (Score:4, Funny)
Stem-cell-enhanced fingers may lead to first posts.
I'm going to write a science boook: (Score:3, Insightful)
"Machine-guns for Algernon"
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Embed this supplement in pizza, and you'll have a slashdot army!
Then, short circuit their "fear center" [slashdot.org] and we'll be sending muscle-bound, super-geeks on one-way-trips to Mars, [slashdot.org] by the thousands!
Re:"Machine-guns for Algernon" (Score:2)
Diary Entry:
"... But then I needed to gain pure knowledge of the destruction I had wrought, so I shall kiss the lead. Goodbye."
Really though fyngyrz, you touched on a hobby project of mine, let's call it the "Algernon curse", which in storylines means that we can't stand to see someone get a pure enhancement, so it always gets written with a deadly downside.
Bonus points if you can dig up the obscure episode of 6 Million Dollar Man with William Shatner on this exact theme.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
...the obscure episode of 6 Million Dollar Man with William Shatner on this exact theme.
Is that the one where Shatner is wearing the bigfoot costume and Steve runs around in an ice tunnel with aliens? [wikia.com]
Sorry, that was Andre the Giant, not Shatner. You mean this one [wikia.com].
Mighty Mouse (Score:1, Funny)
Finally!
Re: (Score:2)
an oldie (Score:2, Funny)
I for one welcome our new fearless super intelligent roid rage mice overlords
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
I figure this will turn HHGTTG into Scripture.
Viagra Spam (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Viagra Spam (Score:5, Funny)
When all you have is impotence...
Re: (Score:2)
It still brings to mind the thought, if they inject brain geared stems cells into the testicles of jock straps will they be able to think more clearly and that's with or with out an erection, the mind boggles, or in the case of jockstraps, instead of thinking giving them a headache it will trigger a braingasm.
Possible professional sports abuse? (Score:1)
Re:Possible professional sports abuse? (Score:4, Interesting)
I predict they won't even wait for this to be perfected.
Someone in a third world country is likely brewing up a batch of stem cells in their "lab" as we speak.
Maybe they will have it ready in time for London. Weight lifting, you were a sport once. Now it's just magic show where everyone wonders how they make the trick work.
Re: (Score:1)
Technically speaking, it should be fairly easy to customize muscle clumps in humans.
We just need a little more research in terms of how to deliberately injure muscle fibers before introducing the stem-cells.
Before long, we'll have muscles in shapes and sizes than are dreamt of in your philosophy. :)
Re: (Score:1)
*Gags!*
I can't believe I mucked up there.. :|
The last line should have read: "Before long, we'll have muscles in _more_ shapes and sizes than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
Don't ask what I was doing when I was supposed to be previewing. :P
Re: (Score:2)
Don't ask what I was doing when I was supposed to be previewing. :P
Building up your right forearm muscles since you had learned that they could now compensate with stem cell injections in the left?
Re: (Score:1)
Haha! Pretty close, but not close enough. I was choking on a mouthful of carbonated water. :)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
That's what exercise does. I damages the cells which are then repaired by the body's normal systems. I suspect stem cell treatment just speed this up.
Re: (Score:1)
The problem with this stem cell stuff, is that there needs to be enough damage to repair. Small damage from ripped muscles (through workouts) will have a small muscle increase. Big damage (perhaps surgically ripped), big increase. :)
Of course, it would still work on lightly ripped muscles, but the dosage would have to be over a long period of time. Surgical rips would be loads quicker and a smaller window of exposure.
Re: (Score:1)
Fuck professional sport abuse! I'm 70 years old and have a few very pressing needs of this technology myself, and one of them involves.....ahhh.......never mind, it'l come to me.....but I need it!
Re: (Score:1)
I'm guessing you have'nt tried lifting weights with whatever it is that will come to you. :)
You sure have a great sense of humor for a 70-year-old. I always thought 50's humor would'nt tickle me, but I stand wowed!
Re: (Score:2)
"According to a paper about the case just published in the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, the woman went into a decline soon after her treatment. Within three months she required dialysis, within a year one kidney had failed, and wit
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Unethical? Look at it the other way round; is it ethical to let a million people die an early death just so that one person who is already dying the same early death can live a little longer?
Personally I think taking calculated risks that could help all of them is worth it. The potential test subject and anyone else dying from lack of a potentially working treatment in the next ten years are already going to be dead by the time you've gone through all the "animal study and regulatory bickering".
It's easy to
Re: (Score:2)
Well, the issue is more that most of these people who are "dying" are no where near dead. It may take a year or more for them to die. Furthermore, many of these "advances" add only one or two months of survival to someone with a one year survival to begin with. If animal testing is skipped, you may well reduce the time that these people have and for what?
Also, many therapies such as say aspirin during myocardial infarction offer great benefit; however, a new medication that may be "better" than aspirin m
Re: (Score:2)
you may well reduce the time that these people have and for what?
If it's only giving an extra month then yes I don't see the point - but if it can give years to many people who otherwise would die before a new drug is available, then that's the sort of thing I consider worth testing. For example drugs that are aimed at curing something as widespread and damaging as AIDS would be well worth testing as soon as possible.
Yes a system like that could easily be abused, though people are already stupid enough to buy "fat pills" and the like..
Re: (Score:2)
Well, lets take your example - AIDS.
There are over a dozen medications on the market that very effectively control its symptoms and long term effects. This does come at a cost and is currently a lifelong intervention.
There very well be a drug that will one day cure this disease. The issue is - do you try it when there is currently an alternative? Perhaps two decades ago before AZT proved effective, this may have been true. Is it reasonable to float a possible cure to someone when there is known effective th
Re: (Score:2)
Now, this therapy looks rather dangerous and the media takes this and runs. You look bad. The drug looks bad.
Actually that's a really salient point with me after reading the history of how fat was demonised in the 1950s, and the world is still taking its time to realise that not all fats are bad for you, and they don't make you fat, etc. If people perceive some good substance as bad for 60 years, it will do a lot more harm than waiting 10 years for full testing and refining of a drug..
Re: (Score:2)
BTW, I do largely agree with what you are saying - I am just saying that the safeguards in place may not be as bad as public perception makes them out to be. There are many more unethical people that would drown out the good research and fair use - even in a field where it takes years of study and a multitude of tests to enter.
If you ever find yourself or a loved one in a situation that they have a disease that local docs can't figure out and they don't refer you out. You need to look into research progra
Re: (Score:2)
The problem is that you don't know how much time it is going to give you until after you do the testing, so arguing that skipping the testing to get the cure out faster because it might give you years of extended life is wishful thinking. It could also kill you in the next week. Without the testing all you will have is anecdotal evidence.
Re: (Score:2)
My reasoning wasn't that it would give one person years of extended life, my argument was that if it worked for that one person it could then potentially save hundreds of thousands. Not amazingly likely to happen very often of course, and as someone else pointed out, it could lead to demonising of a potentially workable drug..
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The worst that can happen is that it can kill you faster AND make your last days as agonizing as possible
I know this, and I wasn't suggesting they do no animal testing first, it makes perfect sense to at least try that (though our bodies can react differently to mice in many cases). My point is that for those that are going to die a slow agonizing death anyway, the option of 1) cure or 2) faster agonizing death seems like a good one. I'm not suggesting that people who have a little bit of a headache try going into Walmart and try eating washing up capsules.
Re: (Score:2)
"No evidence at all that the treatment had benefited the woman" is a lot different from "killed with stem cell treatments".
People can have chronic kidney disease without ever reaching kidney failure, so if she was worried enough about it that she was willing to risk getting some crazy treatment, it must have been pretty bad already. If someone who's going to die soon wants to risk their already poor health volunteering for a new untested treatment which may or may not cure them, I don't see any reason why t
Re: (Score:2)
I wish they had a few more details there. It's clear enough that the treatment didn't help and produced lesions. What isn't clear is that the kidney failure wasn't simply the unabated progression of her disease. What finally killed her was an infection, not the after-effects of the treatment.
It does show a need for caution and that stem cells aren't some sort of magic bullet.
Re:Possible professional sports abuse? (Score:4, Informative)
There is a scale, and of course steroids of course are on the extreme end of the spectrum, and have a lot of negative health effects. Other things, like blood doping, is mostly safe, but still carries risks and is hard to do by yourself, so it is kind of in the middle. Diet drugs are in the middle, but are legal. Protein is on the safe side. If this new technique ends up on the safe side, it will be legal. If it ends up on the unsafe side, it will be illegal. If it ends up in the middle, other random factors will end up determining what side it ends up on.
I don't have the knowledge to comment on whether it will be easy to detect or not.
Re: (Score:2)
As far as "damaging to health" goes, the dose makes the poison. There's natural variation in testosterone levels; how do you argue damaging to health, if the least-chemically-manly merely doses up to the same level as the most-chemically-manly in an event? The result is the same as a naturally-occurring level, but it was obtained by doping, therefore it's illegal.
You could credibly argue, also, that any level of testosterone is hazardous to your l
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So it's about the cheating, not the health risk.
See, for example, http: [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Outdated Meme (Score:2)
Damn. . . (Score:2)
(Because my right needs help catching up to my left)
The question must be asked (Score:2, Funny)
"So, what do you want to do tonight Muscles?"
"Same thing we do every night Pinky, PUMP SOME IRON!"
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Congratulations!
I was looking for the (I thought) inevitable Christine O'Donnell mice with human brains comment and you go with the much more subtle Paladino reference.
Extensive testing... (Score:4, Insightful)
I can only start to see how this could go wrong. From tumors to having a lung grown in the leg... I fear we might have face some interesting surprises during more extensive testing.
Re: (Score:2)
How many people do you know who've had cancer caused by the injection of stems cells done in a fashion that promote their growth?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
As will furniture and faces?
There is a little hurdle to clear.... (Score:2)
World records will be shattered.
Many more bones will also be shattered as well.
Tendons, ligaments, joints will be rupturing, snapping, popping.
They will sound like a bowl of Rice Krispies...SNAP! CRACKLE! POP!
Then there's the pesky cardiopulmonary support upgrades needed.
Obligatory car analogy:
In my misspent youth, I watched two guys install/hack an 1800 horsepower Allison V-1710 (V-12) form a decommissioned P-51 Mustang fighter, into a 1967 Ford Mustang.
To make a long story short, they ended up with a piece by failed piece custom drive-t
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
*disclaimer* Long reply warning, at request of P. (Score:2)
You are assuming too much, and doing too much 'reading between the lines'.
The pair I chronicled were successful semi-pro drag racers. They did not have Engineering degrees, formal or factory training, but had a proven track record for 'making cars go fast' to the drag racing community.
The purpose and focus of my posting the comment and car analogy was on topic for the 'Muscle Mouse' discussion, so I purposely did not go into long detail.
So, for YOUR narrow minded and OFFTOPIC comment reply, here goes:
The tw
Re: (Score:2)
Drag racing is a dangerous and exacting sport, pushing mechanical and material science to the hairy edge and beyond - I wish you well with it.
Assclown was a bit much though.
Re: (Score:2)
Assclown was a bit much though.
You're correct, and my apologies also.
I had left a lot of info out just to keep it short and ontopic. Sorry for the confusion.
Re: (Score:1)
In my misspent youth, I watched two guys install/hack an 1800 horsepower Allison V-1710 (V-12) form a decommissioned P-51 Mustang fighter, into a 1967 Ford Mustang.
An interesting endeavour, if somewhat foolhardy. I vaguely recall that "standard practice" back in the day was to put the V-12 on an industrial bandsaw and (sob) saw it in half to make a relatively lightweight 6 cylinder race car engine. I definitely recall seeing one such bandsaw with the two engine halves nearby. On a brighter note, I recently visited a facility in Florida and sat in a shop with what looked like 50+ Allisons, Merlins, and possibly other assorted V-12 engines lined up on the shelves, s
Re: (Score:2)
On a brighter note, I recently visited a facility in Florida and sat in a shop with what looked like 50+ Allisons, Merlins, and possibly other assorted V-12 engines lined up on the shelves, so at least someone is preserving and refurbishing them.
Good for them! Those were amazing engines, especially the Merlins.
I had the good fortune(as a car nut) to grow up in Southern Maryland and saw some incredible stuff at Budd's Creek dragstrip. 'Jungle Jim' Liberman (with Jungle Pam--HAWT!!!), the 'Green Monster jet car, the 'Draggin' Wagon', 'Big Daddy' Don Garlits racing his dragster against a US Navy fighter launched from a steam catapult on the deck of an aircraft carrier, and other fun stuff was happening all the time.*sigh*
As a side note, I saw in HotRo
For all the humor... (Score:2)
For all the humor in the title, there's hopefully just as much promise.
My doctor recently told me that my twenty-something year old skeleton is basically aged like a geriatric's. The implications long term are not good. If they can make stem cells grow bone and muscle, I might not spend my fifties fighting infections in a wheelchair. It's bad enough not being able to ride a bike before I'm 30.
Re: (Score:2)
That sounds awful. I hope they do make significant advances in stem cell research so that you and others can get the treatment you deserve. That being said, might I suggest you consider a career as a supervillain [imdb.com]? I hear the pay is very nice and you get a cool lair.
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks for the support. Right now it's not clear if it will stop where it is or get worse. Still, it sucks to have osteopenia when you're young.
I only found out because I got a slipped disc in my neck. My doctor asked what I did to mess things up so bad, and the answer was 'nothing at all', which triggered all sorts of tests to find out if I had nutritional or hormonal deficiencies, or even cancer. So far it looks like None of the Above, which is a good thing, I think.
Re: (Score:2)
A friend, because of congenital circulatory problems that should have killed her as a child, is now wandering around (and riding a bike) with 40% of the CV capacity of a middle-aged woman. She gets winded sometimes. You think, some of those performance-enhancing drugs, can't we use them f
Re: (Score:2)
I can still ride, but bumpy roads or jumping a curb puts me out of commission for two days. So does sprinting to catch up with my dog, or playing with the doggie pull-toy.
I just hope whatever caused my body to lose bone mass has stopped, there's no way to tell except for checking on it every few years.
Re: (Score:2)
While she's not as bad off as you are, her physical problem is such that it might prevent her from a career in her chosen field: microbiology, ironically or coincidentally, depending on how you look at it. And currently there is no form of therapy that will improve it. The current best hope is to retard its onslaught.
My point is t
Re: (Score:1)
Both my children have Duchenne muscular dystrophy, so these kind of advances have a lot of promise for people with degeratvie muscle conditions.
Re: (Score:2)
Oo! When the first "Tetsuo from Akira incident" happens, I want video.
The Incredible Hulk - new & improved. (Score:1)
Here comes the New Incredible Hulk. No need for gamma rays, nor anger feed to turn into a green monster. Gone the urge to get new large clothes after each transformation..
The New Hulk version 2.0 doesn't turn green. He has gone through several stem cells injections, he stays big, and doesn't need anger management classes... But it will be still quite unwise to piss him off
They must have dosed the cheese! (Score:2)
Biker mice from Mars! (Score:1)
Reversing the polarity... (Score:2)
I guess it could put a new meaning into the question: "Are you a man or a MOUSE?"
"Here I come to save the day!" (Score:1)
That means that Mighty Mouse is on the way.
cant wait to get some... (Score:1)
How long before they bottle this up and sell it to the public?
Make up for lack (Score:1)
Cool for the mice, (Score:2)
the cure for the anxious cats was discovered long ago, it has something to do with giving them cheezebugers,,,
Very useful information (Score:1)
Pinky and the Brain! (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
No pain, no gain! (Score:2)
Notice that the growth only occurs if the muscle was injured. This implies that there's a valid biological mechanism inspiring the body builders' slogan "No pain, no gain!"
How much you want to bet... (Score:2)
obligational (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps we've been wasting a lot of time and money with unnecessary research.
Re: (Score:2)
It seems more ethically clean and if it worked, it