How Will the Constellations Change In 50K Years? 69
astroengine writes "The stars are not static points in the sky; they move over time. That means the constellations are shifting too. With the help of NASA astronomer Robert Hurt, five famous constellations are visualized 50,000 years in the future."
That's pretty cool (Score:5, Interesting)
In 50,000 years, humans will probably not even be on Earth anymore. Either we will have annihilated ourselves, or we will have migrated to other worlds. In 6,000 years we have gone from the dawn of history to a worldwide information network and space travel. In 9 times that time, we should be much further along!
What would those constellations look like from our new homes near other star systems?
Makes me wonder about ancient times (Score:3, Interesting)
Not so much what the constellations looked like, when they were first dreamed up, but more what the fuck they were smoking?
I can't draw stick figures (even XKCD), and yet I can easily tell that none of the constellations look like what they're supposed to.
... and Celestia (Score:3, Interesting)
And if someone wants to know what the constellations look like from 5k light years away today (or in 50k years), please run Celestia (http://www.shatters.net/celestia/)
Bonus -- modpacks allow real time simulation of spacecraft from Star Wreck to Blake's 7 and from Red Dwarf via Battlestar Galactica to Star Wars.
Everyone's chance to make the Kessel run in under 12 parsecs.
Betelguese (Score:5, Interesting)
A more interesting change to Orion would be Betelguese going supernova [wikipedia.org] (and that event becoming visible on Earth) in the next 50,000 years.
Betelgeuse is already old for its size class and will explode relatively soon compared to its age. At the current distance of Betelgeuse from the Earth, such a supernova explosion would be the brightest recorded; outshining the Moon in the night sky and becoming easily visible in broad daylight.
But will the stars be Right during the next 50K y? (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Makes me wonder about ancient times (Score:2, Interesting)
The empire that was centered in Konstantinopolis was ruled by emperors in direct succession to the ancient Roman emperors and the name of the state remained Imperium Romanum until it's very end in 1461 (fall of Trebizond). Their neighbors called them Romans as well (Rom, in turkish and so forth). Greek had been de facto language of the eastern part of the Roman empire during its whole existence so it's not suprising that use of latin lessened in administrative tasks during the centuries as the western parts of the empire were lost. This ofcourse gave good fuel to papal propaganda of "Greek empire".
It wasn't the barbarians, but the Crusaders who by sacking Constantinople during the 4th Crusade, dealt the Roman Empire the blow from which it never recovered. Constantinople finally fell to Turks in 1453.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byzantine_empire [wikipedia.org]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Crusade [wikipedia.org]
When it comes to Greek civilization and culture, it's still alive and kicking. So don't call it dead yet.