Methane Survey Reveals Mars Is Far From 'Dead' 171
astroengine writes "The first planet-wide studies of methane on Mars — incorporating billions of measurements made by NASA's Mars Global Surveyor spacecraft — shows gas concentrations peak in autumn and plummet in winter. Scientists have found significantly higher methane concentrations in the Tharsis, Elysium and Arabia Terrae regions. Tharsis and Elysium are home to Mars' most massive volcanoes and Arabia Terrae has large quantities of subterranean frozen water. This indicates the gas could be generated by geological or biological activity. 'It could be geology or biology, but it is not coming from another source. There is a seasonal pattern, so it could only be a local origin,' Sergio Fonti, with Italy's Universita del Salento, told Discovery News."
Good news (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I was hoping for a Farnsworth joke :(
Good news everyone, an overused joke is finally dieing!
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
That post was bad, and you should feel bad!
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
From TFA: "'It could be geology or biology, but it is not coming from another source. There is a seasonal pattern, so it could only be a local origin,' Sergio Fonti, with Italy's Universita del Salento, told Discovery News."
To paraphrase: "It is geology."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Fry did it. Whoop, whoop, whoop, whoop, whoop!
Re: (Score:2)
Someone will breathe life into it.
Re: (Score:2)
"dieing", lol.
It's a word. It refers to the processes of cutting with a die. It's the worst form of dying I could come up with on a moments notice.
Buggalo (Score:2)
I was hoping for a Farnsworth joke :(
No Farnsworth joke, but here's the obligatory Futurama [wikia.com] reference.
Re: (Score:2)
Mother, is that you?
I'd recognize that sound anywhere.
Prof Fartsworth
Re: (Score:2)
I'm glad they found this type of cyclic activity. The sooner we find complex life off-Earth the better.
It's not obvious to me why it's good for us to find complex off-Earth life. Unless it's a technology advanced species that can help us with our problems, I don't see any benefit to finding complex off-Earth life at all. What am I missing?
Re:Good news (Score:4, Insightful)
It would be another step back from the "we-are-the-sole-reason-for-the-universe's-existence" mindset. Reducing humanities self-centered leanings leaves some more room for a "we-are-a-part-of-the-universe" attitude that tends to promote a more responsible approach to resource management.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
It would be another step back from the "we-are-the-sole-reason-for-the-universe's-existence" mindset. Reducing humanities self-centered leanings leaves some more room for a "we-are-a-part-of-the-universe" attitude that tends to promote a more responsible approach to resource management.
I don't think that would have the impact your hoping for unless it was intelligent life that was more technologically advanced than us. Anything less would be treated just like Western civilization treated (and continues to t
Re: (Score:2)
Biblically, God made at least earth for humans. Not "white guys who claim to be Christian."
Just wanted to clear that up. I know there are plenty of people who distort and malign it, and I know established 'Christian' religions, who looked nothing like 'little Christs', have perverted it immensely (dark ages, etc)...
(to make that distortion even worse and stupider, most of the Bible takes place in the "East," not the West. Heh.)
Jesus was an Arab (Score:2)
Be sure to remind as many Christians and Rednecks as possible...
Also pull it out next time somebody says "towel head". Remind them that Baby Jesus was a towel head and they should be more respectful.
Re: (Score:2)
Jesus was an Arab
If he ever existed at all he actually would have been a Jew but since he never did exist the point is moot.
Re: (Score:2)
Uh ? There are historical records of Jesus existence. What make you say he never existed ? I'm not claiming the miracles did happen, just the fact that the man that we now call Jesus did exist. Some facts that I am pretty certain are accurate: ... what we would call a sect these days
- he was born of a woman about 2000 y/ago (give or take 30y)
- he preached and had some followers
- in Jerusalem he made some fuss about the temple fees
- it pissed local religious authorities who ca
Re: (Score:2)
Uh ? There are historical records of Jesus existence.
Please point me to one record that isn't in the bible or hasn't been proved a fraud.
Re: (Score:2)
I stand corrected,there is no evidence for the existence of Jesus that comes from the time of Jesus [wikipedia.org]. I though there were ancient records, but it seems the earliest ones are from many years after his alleged death, and then by christians.
Re: (Score:2)
I'd be scared white if I was going to be nailed to a plank.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
western civilization is hardly the first civilization to cultivate this sort of attitude of genocidal disregard. nor, frankly, the most destructive or even most recent, as there are ongoing disputes of this nature currently raging.
citation? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gengis_khan [wikipedia.org], http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_invasion_of_India [wikipedia.org], http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_revolution [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Works great until you have price discontinuities caused when a resource runs out before a suitable replacement is developed. Price, as the only measurement of value, distorts one's perceptions towards short term goals, and encourages deferring expensive endeavors that have no perceived value.
An example of this would be the I-35 bridge collapse. "We don't need to replace this decaying, 46 year old bridge, it's working fine!"
The market has its place, but there are times when you need to put it aside and do th
Re: (Score:2)
"Externality". Look it up.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
It's not obvious to me why it's good for us to find complex off-Earth life. Unless it's a technology advanced species that can help us with our problems, I don't see any benefit to finding complex off-Earth life at all. What am I missing?
Hmm, here are a few reasons: The Vatican, Jerusalem, Mecca, the southern half of the United States, etc.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm glad they found this type of cyclic activity. The sooner we find complex life off-Earth the better.
Until you find out that the life is actually biological contaminants that hitched a ride on the Soviet Mars-2 probe. Here on Earth bacteria reproduce every 30 minutes or so (sometimes less) Imagine if the bacteria on Mars only reproduced at half that rate due to less than ideal conditions. 38 years, exponential growth rate.
Slow down their reproduction to just once an hour, you would have 2^333108 bacteri
Re: (Score:2)
Bacteria divide into two identical child/sister cells. They are effectively immortal with respect to age.
Re: (Score:2)
Why? What does "complex life off-Earth" imply?
OH COME ON (Score:2, Interesting)
Don't get me wrong, I like hearing about space updates. But it feels like there's been a ton of "there may be signs that may indicate signs of biological life from stuff we may or may not have overlooked before. Also? It might not be caused by a biological thing."
I want a "we found fucking life" article. Stop teasing me with this nonsense.
Re:OH COME ON (Score:5, Informative)
I think the unspoken belief in the scientific community is that it's pointing very heavily towards life on Mars, but the rule of thumb in science is "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence", and claims don't get much more extraordinary than the claim that life has been found on another world. Necessity and prudence require that the experts couch their language and manage expectations until we can gather that extraordinary evidence. Since there are other ways that the methane could be formed, in particular geological activity (which in its own way is pretty extraordinary considering Mars' lack of a magnetic field has long been seen as a sign that it is a geologically dead world, lacking a molten or semi-molten core), until incontrovertible evidence has been gathered there will always be the need to list alternative explanations, no matter how much they piss on the parade.
Quite frankly we're not going to know until we find some Martian life, and that's going to take a good deal of time. We're decades away from being able to gather direct evidence, unless we get very lucky.
Re: (Score:2)
I think probably the largest "thing" a Star Trek like real-life would have is not space travel, warp fields, transporters etc...
But sensors that can detect "life signs"
One can dream.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:OH COME ON (Score:4, Informative)
You start by not defining living systems as any specific type of chemistry, but rather certain activities; ie. metabolism, reproduction/replication, respiration, excretion. While the only systems we know of that do that from observation is carbon-based life on Earth, we can conceive of alternatives, whether simply using other forms of carbon chemistry, or even possible silicon-based life.
The risk, of course, of very generalized definitions is that you could catch chemical activity that isn't life, but I think the above tests would be close enough to be highly suggestive that the chemical interactions you're seeing are biotic in nature, regardless of the precise form the chemistry itself takes. I think we're sufficiently good enough of recognizing this things to not confuse even simply living systems with more mundane chemical processes like crystallization, oxidization, etc.
Re:OH COME ON (Score:4, Insightful)
I think it's pretty certain that there is life on Mars now [spacedaily.com], as NASA didn't take any extraordinary measures to eradicate all possible forms of life from the probes until 1995 and the Mars Orbiter. Earlier, a memo was issued [nih.gov], but not much was done. Up to 10^5 possibly surviving microbes were permissible on the earlier crafts, if I remember correctly.
It's a shame, as the planet can never be uncontaminated and studied as a truly lifeless planet.
Re:OH COME ON (Score:5, Insightful)
If life is responsible for the seasonal methane fluctuations, I doubt very much that it could be explained by anything hitching a ride on our spacecraft.
Re:OH COME ON (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
OTOH, the whole natural selection thing comes into play since otherwise, in 15 years, they'd weight a lot more than Mars itself. I'd give a number, but didn't have a calculator handy that could handle 2^(15*365.25*24*2), which is how many descendants a single bacter
Re: (Score:2)
It took a lot longer to first oxygenate the Earth. Much oxygen was tied up in things like iron before there was any free in the atmosphere. IIRC it was millions of years.
I think that you're remembering that it only takes 2000 years to replace the oxygen in the atmosphere now that all the oxygen sinks are full.
Re: (Score:2)
It was likely quicker than you think [wikipedia.org].
Re: (Score:2)
The Wikipedia article agrees with me, the second paragraph,
Photosynthesis was producing oxygen both before and after the GOE. The difference was that before the GOE, organic matter and dissolved iron chemically captured any free oxygen. The GOE was the point when these minerals became saturated and could not capture any more oxygen. The excess free oxygen started to accumulate in the atmosphere.
Note that oxygen was being produced before the GOE. At that it says that the first oxygen producing organism may have appeared 3500 million years ago, which is about 1100 million years before the GOE.
The discussion is about how quick Earth originating lifeforms could alter the Martian atmosphere. Based on the Earths history it is not instant because first all the oxygen sinks have to saturated.
Also re the 2000 years oxygen
Without a draw-down, oxygen could accumulate very rapidly: for example, at today's rates of photosynthesis (which are admittedly much greater than those in the plant-free Precambrian), modern atmospheric O2 levels could be produced in around 2,000 years.[4]
Note that is at today's rat
Re: (Score:2)
Even if all current life on Mars were there solely because of our probes I think it goes to show just how hardy life is. Not only did it survive the vacuum of space, but it's been able to not only survive a few decades on Mars but thrive. That being the case, it's rational to assume that we will find life elsewhere in the universe.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Panspermia, or actually, exogenesis ftw!
Actually, I suppose this would be "homogenesis". Sweet!
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Ignoring the factual errors in your description... Tardigrades [wikipedia.org] seem to fit those requirements quite nicely:
- Survive temperatures from -273C to +151C
- Survive decades without water
- Survive radiation doses thousands of times higher than what would kill other organisms
- Survive when exposed to the vacuum of space
=Smidge=
Re: (Score:2)
Not to mention radiation resistant bacteria [wikipedia.org].
The biggest problem with our contamination is that Mars is pretty much the only chance we had to study a sterile planet to better understand how life could develop on Earth. If it's not sterile anymore, we've pretty much blown it, unless we in the future can find a safe way to study Venus. (Mercury and the large Jovian moons are still way too small and different.)
And the sad thing is that at least part of the reason why we didn't hypersterilize our probes was th
Re: (Score:2)
Quite frankly we're not going to know until we find some Martian life, and that's going to take a good deal of time. We're decades away from being able to gather direct evidence, unless we get very lucky.
First we'd need to figure out where to look for them in the first place. Just speculating here but if there were subterranean pockets of liquid water and the methane is bubbling up through porous rock into the atmosphere, getting down there to find proof would be very, very difficult. But if it's lichen clinging to rocks and we just weren't looking in the right spot, that would be easier to find.
Re: (Score:2)
We can make educated guesses. The surface of Mars, even disregarding low temperatures, is very hostile, with little atmosphere and no magnetic field, it receives a lot more harmful radiation than the surface of Earth does. That radiation makes life on the surface less probable, though maybe not impossible, but it seems more likely that you would find life beneath the surface.
It's all guesswork, of course, but it's quite possible that extant life on Mars may have long ago migrated deep below the surface, w
Re: (Score:2)
I think the unspoken belief in the scientific community is that it's pointing very heavily towards life on Mars
Doubtful. Until they rule out serpentinitization processes [wikipedia.org], there's a simpler explanation than "life did it".
Mars is breathing methane. (Score:2)
"Mars is sterile" is extraordinary (Score:2)
I think the unspoken belief in the scientific community is that it's pointing very heavily towards life on Mars, but the rule of thumb in science is "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence", and claims don't get much more extraordinary than the claim that life has been found on another world
Mars had a wet, warm history, there is liquid water even on its surface (albeit in small quantities), it had sufficient time to evolve life (more than the appearance of life on earth took), and it also had a
Re: (Score:2)
The announcement you seek may not be framed in time with the boundaries of yours, or any our our lives. It's not a Hollywood theatrical preview with a release date known by studio executives. It's science, and perhaps one day that answer may come, or never. And it may come in an answer you do not desire.
There's no cat that we know of waiting to be released from its proverbial bag.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This seems like a "Please don't nerf NASA, we're on the verge of finding shit" kind of press release. As much as the prospect of expanding our cosmic knowledge is alluring to me, I think right now the world has some far more pressing matters to resolve down here, before we start infecting other planets with the disease that is modern society.
Re: (Score:2)
Throu
Ahh, the great infallible jeebus (Score:2)
What a guy!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
How vain of God to create a species just so he could say "Hey, look what I did, isn't it cool?"
How vain of humans to think they were created for this reason.
Yeah, we're special. But so's every other living creature. We're no better.
Re: (Score:2)
Well done, NASA PR department!
In other news... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
That is still better than them grokking us. At least according to Michael Valentine Smith and he is probably the ultimate authority on that.
Re: (Score:2)
Please, his name was Valentine Michael Smith...
Re: (Score:2)
Underground methane? (Score:2)
The Irregular Webcomic guy has the answer:
http://www.irregularwebcomic.net/393.html [irregularwebcomic.net]
Just in Time! (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Nice way to narrow it down. (Score:4, Insightful)
FTFA: 'It could be geology or biology, but it is not coming from another source.'
Another source like what? Comets hitting the planet? Isn't geology pretty freaking broad for a category?
That's like looking at a rock on the Earth and saying "Well, we are pretty sure that it either formed here on earth, or it is a meteorite."
Re:Nice way to narrow it down. (Score:4, Interesting)
Both are big deals - Mars isn't believed to be geologically active, and life would be a massively interesting find for obvious reasons.
The seasonality rules out explanations like cosmic rays generating methane.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Both are big deals - Mars isn't believed to be geologically active, and life would be a massively interesting find for obvious reasons.
The seasonality rules out explanations like cosmic rays generating methane.
That's a fair response. I just thought it was fairly broad since I subconsciously eliminated the cosmic ray option since they did mention seasonality.
Ignoring the biological aspect for a moment. Geological just seems so damned broad as to incorporate pretty much everything on a planet. If it were a
Seasonal meteorite showers, anyone? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
And that would cause massive releases of methane how, exactly?
Re: (Score:2)
I always hate when people say things like "it's not X" without an explicit non-existence proof.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Another source would include the possibility of freeze/thaw cycles. There is also another method suggested last year involving radiolytic H2reacting in a non-bioligic manner with CO2 dissolved in water. That process would be neither biological nor geological. There are other atmospheric/radiological possibilities too (such as UV interacting with the atmosphere).
Yet another method is one you throw out sarcastically. Last year, as I recall, there was a hypothesis put forth that meteorites released methane as
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I suspect Martian air loses methane quickly mostly because it is broken down by UV radiation from the Sun. Mars doesn't have a protective ozone layer like Earth.
CDIC a side (Score:2)
In further news Saturn's climate and chemical activity is also influenced by seasons.
Using a hydrocarbon as a measuring stick for the presence of life is not a very good indicator. Venus has oceans of the crap sloshing around. doesn't imply life.
Here is what we do. get a bunch of people with a terminal disease that gives them 20 years or so of life left. Or the entire viewing audience of Jersey Shore. Put them on a 1 way rocket to Mars with a crap load of Cheetoes and snack foods. Throw in Lohan as a playth
Re: (Score:2)
Throw in Lohan as a plaything, she's too cracked out to even notice these days...
She'll notice when she runs out of crack
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, because there aren't _any_ engineers, scientists, or biologists who would take a one-way-trip to Mars.
Re: (Score:2)
Are these the kinds of people we want to be ambassadors to Earth? Any alien race who came across them would be compelled to destroy the Earth in order to prevent our stupidity from spreading.
Re: (Score:2)
Using a hydrocarbon as a measuring stick for the presence of life is not a very good indicator. Venus has oceans of the crap sloshing around. doesn't imply life.
Venus? I think you meant Titan.
Re: (Score:2)
No, these kind of things never turn out well. in every sci-fi movie always the exiles return for vengeance. Frankly the idea of Empress Lohan I of Mars or Praise be to Snookie day is too sc
Converging on a solution! (Score:2)
It could be geology or biology,
Oh, well, that narrows it down.
In other news, physicists said that before the Big Bang there was either something or nothing. Oh, wait, bad example. :-) Ah, I tease you, physicists! Give us a smile.
No Uranus jokes?? (Score:2, Insightful)
I can't believe an article about space, biology, and methane has no comments about Uranus. Slashdot has let me down again.
Re: (Score:2)
You might say this website is slowing spiraling down a deep, smelly hole.
Re: (Score:2)
Every HGTTG/Futurama fan knows it will have been renamed to Urektum in 2620, so the jokes are no longer funny.
Biological vs Geological (Score:3, Insightful)
Actually, 'biological' should be 'current biological'.
Grab a sample of Martian methane and check its distribution of carbon isotopes. Carbon sequestered thousands or millions of years ago should have different ratios from atmospheric sources (the principle of carbon dating). Current biological activity should reflect the ratios of the existing carbon sources.
Of course, if underground life is munching on 'old' carbon, its farts will look old as well. Just as old as CH4 sequestered a long time ago and leaking to the surface only now.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This planet isn't dead. (Score:2)
Methane, eh ? (Score:2)
Re:Time to mine it! (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Off the top of my head, outgassing as ice melts during spring and summer, either by release of methane trapped below the ice or possibly in the ice.
Re: (Score:2)
I stopped eating meat and dairy and this problem went away.
Re: (Score:2)
I stopped eating meat and dairy and this problem went away.
Gooood for yooouuuuuu! Do you enjoy the smell of your farts now as well?
Re: (Score:2)
I stopped eating meat and dairy and this problem went away.
I started eating Onions, Cabbage, and Beans and now my house is being tapped for biofuels!
Re: (Score:2)
If they find life, how can they be sure it didn't originate from Earth? I mean, bacteria could have traveled along with the mars rover as free-riders, and may by now have multiplied into billions.
Let's suppose there is life on Mars. We can get a pretty good idea of whether or not it's related to life forms on Earth by examining it and seeing how close it is to organisms here. If it has DNA, we could sequence it.
For instance, suppose it looks a lot like terrestrial bacteria, it has DNA, and its genetic code is nearly identical to or very similar to specific terrestrial bacteria. Then yes, it probably came over as contamination.
Suppose it uses DNA, but it doesn't remotely resemble any living bact
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Maybe. Let's say it resembles a bacterium on Earth except for the fact that the one on Mars has organelles or other internal structural features that take a very long time to develop that are absent from the one on Earth (or vice versa). You can then say with some certainty that it wasn't contamination during the Space Age. If further samples indicated that the variation in DNA was so great that the most recent common ancestor to all of them was a few million years ago at the earliest, it's old enough to ca
Re: (Score:2)
If they use the same one, it would be sort of like finding that your extraterrestial radio transmission was encoded in ASCII.
As you implied with your hitchhiker comment, Mars is a stone's throw away from Earth, literally. I'm willing to bet that any "native" life we find on Mars will share a common root with Earth life, although their most recent common ancestor may have been, oh, 4 billion years ago.
Either that or life (of some kind) is damned near ubiquitous in the universe.
Re: (Score:2)