Two Dogs To Present Paper At WSEAS Conference 12
An anonymous reader writes "In reality, it's yet another randomly-generated paper that got into a conference with no meaningful criteria for peer review. In the world of humor, two dogs may be up for tenure soon."
Actual pdf link (Score:2)
For those of us that don't like dredging around the website for the actual "top 30%" "peer reviewed" paper, here is the link:
http://www.cs.ucr.edu/~marek/Charlie_Zola_Paper/paper2.pdf [ucr.edu]
Re: (Score:2)
The best part is the list of authors in the references ;^)
Re: (Score:2)
I find it hard to believe that those are completely randomly generated : "Anvil: Construction of context-free grammar." sounds to me very much like the sort of technique that could turn a "dictionary" (for a subject) and a source of random noise into this sort of paper.
"Byzantine fault tolerance." is a lovely phrase ; I'll have to find a use for it. And I simply refuse to believe that "TANENBAUM , A." came out of the program randomly (but part of the d
Possible financial motivation? (Score:2)
but this "Letter of Acceptance" is not authentic (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
This "letter of acceptance" is not real (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Counterfeit, fradulent and misleading web site (Score:1)
Chrobak's page and emails are entirely fake. (Score:1)