Virtual Visits To Doctors Spreading

tresho writes to tell us that virtual doctors visits seem to be on the rise. A new service, most recently deployed in Texas, from "NowClinic" is allowing doctors to make virtual house calls and prescribe anything short of controlled substances. "For $45, anyone in Texas can use NowClinic, whether or not they are insured, by visiting NowClinic.com. Doctors hold 10-minute appointments and can file prescriptions, except for controlled substances. Eventually they will be able to view patients’ medical histories if they are available. The introduction of NowClinic will be the first time that online care has been available nationwide, regardless of insurance coverage."

Re:Slashvertisement

[Brian Gordon]

Right, there's already a good free alternative: Yahoo Answers

Re:Slashvertisement

[Anonymous Coward]

How is Babby formed?

How girl get pregnant?

(captcha : excavate)

Re:Slashvertisement

[Liquidrage]

Can you show me where the "Prescribe Meds" button on Yahoo Answers is?

Re:Lawsuits galore?

[natehoy]

As a patient, and it pains me deeply to say this... I'd have to agree with a lawyer.

There. I said it. I agree with a lawyer on something. I'm going to hell now.

But seriously, we use our insurance company's "dial-a-nurse" service and it works well if you have some idea of what is wrong with you and just want some "best practices" advice, like "I have either a cold or the flu, can you help me determine which it is, and what symptoms I would indicate that I should see my doctor as opposed to drinking plenty of fluids and staying home?"

I can see a service like this being useful for other minor ailments that are relatively easy to diagnose based on clear symptoms, but that require medications that need a prescription. I'd hope that any doctor who was concerned about it being "maybe this or maybe that" wouldn't just take a guess (or render a medical opinion beyond their training) and hide behind some special immunity from lawsuit. But that doesn't mean I'd want to extend that immunity. If you're unsure of your diagnosis because you can't get enough information, the correct answer would be "I cannot help you, proceed to an in-person clinic in your area, this will be a no-charge courtesy call, 'kthanksbye!"

I'm not saying that a service like this would be useless, but if a good relatively confident diagnosis is not practical, the answer is to refer the patient to an in-person diagnosis, NOT to protect the doctor from indemnity if they made a diagnosis based on insufficient data because the tools they chose to use couldn't give them the data they needed.

Of course, that argument also leads down the slippery slope of requiring an MRI for a splinter removal as a lawsuit-prevention device, but any doctor who chooses to use "telediagnosis" should be aware of the limits of the technology and adjust their confidence in their diagnosis accordingly.

Comment removed

[account_deleted]

Comment removed based on user account deletion

Re:I am a med student, and I am horrified

[alrudd1287]

dude- whatever. if this stuff is actually needed, the person over the net will say GO TO A DOCTOR. This sounds like a GREAT idea from a cost-savings perspective, which is the only one that matters here. Often, patients go in for an appointment with a drug in mind that they just need a script for. Like if i have poison ivy, i need steroids because in the past the topical stuff hasn't worked. If I don't get it the first time then i'll have to go in a 2nd time... costing me or my insurance something like 150$ each. clearly an online person could save alot of money here

Comment removed

[account_deleted]

Comment removed based on user account deletion

Re:Nationwide, for anyone in Texas?

[EvanED]

Hell, I remember when Dell was ranked at the top of customer service ratings in PC magazines.

Re:Nationwide, for anyone in Texas?

[NoKaOi]

You remember PC magazines? Is that what they had before web sites? You must be old.