SETI@home Project Responds To School Firing 295
SETIGuy writes "SETI@home Project Scientist Eric Korpela has responded to many of the allegations made by Higley Unified School District administrator Denise Birdwell regarding the difficulties caused by the installation of SETI@home, which led to the recent firing of the school's technology supervisor. One of the project's founders, David Gedye, takes issue with Dr. Birdwell's claim that 'an educational institution ... cannot support the search for E.T.' Meanwhile, the fired supervisor denies misusing school computers."
Law of unintended consquences. (Score:5, Funny)
Who knew leaving a bank of computers on 24/7 costs money?
It may be counterintuitive, but ... (Score:2, Insightful)
It doesn't. It saves money. Computer failures are much more likely as a result of regular power cycling than extended use, and the cost of parts replacement and down time far outweighs the cost of powering them regularly in low power mode.
Re: (Score:2)
Though in such a low powered mode they are unlikely to be running BOINC or anything else.
Re:Law of unintended consquences. (Score:4, Interesting)
Who knew leaving a bank of computers on 24/7 costs money?
Answer: The school administrators, who turned down a previous IT request to turn the machines off when not in use and impliment a power management policy some years prior to this incident.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
If it's anything like the schools I've been to then there's a LOT of wasted potential in those machines - they're always on ANYWAY.
I don't see how this was a firing matter unless there's more to the story than we're getting. An educational institution SHOULD be supportive of research. Granted I wouldn't have used Seti - something like Boinc has served me well in the past allowing for control over the projects I want my CPU time to go to - including seti.
Intelligent Life (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Intelligent Life (Score:4, Funny)
There *is* intelligent life in the classrooms.......but apparently not in the staff lounge.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
The people in the staff lounge are squeezing both intelligence and life out of the others pretty well.
Re: (Score:2)
You presume facts not in evidence. Might want to visit some of those classrooms first.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If they don't find any fairly quickly that dosn't give much hope for the faculty and students.
Ignorance in the comments from the Superintendent (Score:3, Insightful)
From TFA: '"Unfortunately it says a lot about people who are theoretically educating our children," said Dave Farber, distinguished career professor of computer science and public policy in the school of computer science at Carnegie Mellon.'
It seems that the folks who are in charge of education become further and further detached from technological advancement as time goes on. These are the same individuals who are given access to technology for use in the classrooms and barely use it for more than a glorified typewriter. Add to that those who refuse to utilize the technology either out of ignorance (don't know how to use it) or fear (refuse to know how to use it), you have a large number of classrooms with expensive space heaters.
Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende (Score:5, Interesting)
There's no ignorance in her remarks, she knows exactly what she is doing. I've worked at a school district in Arizona for the past 5 years and what is happening here is typical. A new superintendent comes in and wants to fill all the high paying jobs with cronies. This guy just didn't leave quietly so they trashed his reputation (they do that all the time). Arizona school districts are some of the most corrupt organizations that i've ever dealt with. BTW don't feel too sorry for him, he more than likely got his job the same way, its the way things are done here.
Re: (Score:2)
"There's no ignorance in her remarks, she knows exactly what she is doing."
I'm not too sure about that. All of the quotes sound like they came from an empty shirt who thinks she knows everything just because she has some paper and got to where she was not by achievement but who she knows. Similar to all the CxO's who run companies into the ground, escape with the golden parachute then land another cushy job to do the same thing over again.
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
people who couldn't pass math because they weren't able to figure out their calculator.
Or, alternatively, people who were given a calculator way too early and thus couldn't pass math because without one they couldn't say what 7*9 is.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende (Score:5, Funny)
Can you tell me what 17x16 is?
It's a multiplication, sir!
Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Can you tell me what 17x16 is?
Let me plug that into my computer here. *crunch crunch* Ah here's the answer: 42.
Re: (Score:2)
Let me plug that into my computer here. *crunch crunch* Ah here's the answer: 42.
Nobody writes jokes in base 230.
Re: (Score:2)
Let me plug that into my computer here. *crunch crunch* Ah here's the answer: 42.
Nobody writes jokes in base 230.
But there are people who don't get D. Adams references. BTW: There is no integer base such that 42 = 272 decimal.
Re: (Score:2)
Can you tell me what 17x16 is?
Imperial or SI?
Re: (Score:2)
272. It's about breaking up a problem into small parts, a very useful skill.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende (Score:5, Insightful)
This sad truth will continue to occur until intelligent, capable people begin to devote their lives toward the education of our children. Unless that happens, the majority of our public educators will forever be the people who couldn't pass math because they weren't able to figure out their calculator.
Bullshit, my wife is a teacher here in NC. Been teaching for 7 years now and she makes under 35k a year and spends 60+ hours a week at school. She loves teaching but has had to go back to graduate school in order to escape the bullshit pay, no planing period, no assistant and the ridicules paper work. Why don't you go become a fucking teacher and take care of 20 to 30 children with little to no help from anyone for less than what you could make at Wendy's flipping burgers...
You want good teachers? Fucking pay them. Not the text book companies or all the other leeches.. Pay the fucking teachers.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
This sad truth will continue to occur until intelligent, capable people begin to devote their lives toward the education of our children.
She loves teaching but has had to go back to graduate school in order to escape the bullshit pay... You want good teachers? Fucking pay them.
My impression is that, even if you go back to grad school, you're still not going to be paid anywhere near what you'd get paid if you went and got a job in industry with that same masters or PhD. As long as our society expects bright people to suck it up if they want to teach, we're not going to get as many of them to teach as we'd like.
Of course, I still don't understand why we require teachers to have a bachelors or masters degree to teach grade school, or why schools need so damn many administrators and
Re: (Score:2)
My impression is that, even if you go back to grad school, you're still not going to be paid anywhere near what you'd get paid if you went and got a job in industry with that same masters or PhD.
She has a degree in Psychology as well as her K-6 teaching license and national board certification. She will triple her pay by leaving teaching public school and have time to live a life outside of the classroom...
Anyone thinking of becoming a teacher.. don't... it's not worth it, no one cares about the children regardless of what you might have heard...
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
I love the part in "It's a Wonderful Life" when you sucker punch George Bailey and Martini kicks you out of his bar. You were totally believable.
Re:Ignorance in the comments from the Superintende (Score:5, Funny)
I'd love to, but none of the schools around here have courses in fucking for me to teach.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe if they werent always ridiculing the paperwork...
Yup I'm a horrible speller... Product of our wonderful U.S. public education system!
Ignorance and stupidity abound... (Score:3, Informative)
How the fsck do people not know about this program or not consider it research? My wife (not a technically adept person) has run this program for years and in schools, too. Ask the guy to uninstall it if it costs to much in a recession (he had approval of the previous administration to run it though!). Don't fire him because you're stupid.
Re:Ignorance and stupidity abound... (Score:4, Insightful)
Agreed. Have they thought how much it'll cost to replace him? He's been there 10+ years, he built the network they're on, he knows everything there is to know about the system, how do you replace that? They're probably going to hire whoever pretends to know what they're doing the most and get nothing done. How do you know the next guy won't do something far worse? This is a witch hunt that will end up costing the school district hundreds of thousands of dollars and a lot of embarrassment.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
The entire hiring and firing for teachers and school employees is extremely messed up, at least in California. According to some of the comments in this story, it's just as bad in Arizona.
Turning a bad thing into a good thing... (Score:2, Insightful)
Pseudoscience (Score:3, Interesting)
Not everyone believes SETI is real science - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SETI#Criticism [wikipedia.org]
Devil's advocate (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I think SETI@home is great and all, but it sounds like the school board didn't authorize this person to install the software on the machines in question.
The man was not some local school tech with a screwdiver or rogue physics teacher - he was the technology supervisor for the school district. If minutia like what software to run is something that the school board must micro-manage, then his job is a no-op. So, either the board is seriously dysfunctional to the point of needing to be disbanded and reorganized with brand new people, or he had plenty of authority to decide all on his own.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
seriously dysfunctional to the point of needing to be disbanded and reorganized with brand new people
This. School boards are little fiefdoms, filled with people who desperately want to be important. The school board for the school I worked for was just like this. There was a conference that some students were going to go to. The teacher for the subject couldn't make it, but since it was on a saturday, and not a contract work day or event, it wasn't a big deal. The school board disagreed, and ordered him to write a letter of apology to the students who went. Yes, he had to apologize for not doing something
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Slashdot being the motherlode of deluded malcontents, though, perhaps I should not be surprised.
Slashdot being the motherload of randian ubermen living in their mom's basements with fascist delusions of grandeur, though, perhaps I should not be surprised at your ridiculously authoritarian framing of the issue.
The thing I always liked about SETI (Score:3, Insightful)
Don't focus on it being "searching for aliens", focus on it being "distributed computing".
Re:The thing I always liked about SETI (Score:4, Informative)
And the first time any administrator champions his school's or school system's use of distributed computing, his boss (school board, taxpayers) will say:
"Great! Good for us. Now, exactly how much are we spending on this, who is overseeing it, who authorized it, and where are these funds being allocated in the budget?"
And that administrator will not have any answers because no one authorized it and they're dead-ass broke. Then someone would get fired. They can't afford to spend some unknown amount of money on supporting SETI.
Why say more? (Score:3, Informative)
Q. Do I need permission from my employer to run SETI@home on computers at work?
A. Yes! Of course! We've been saying that for 10 years, and despite what some bloggers have said, Niesluchowski wasn't the first person to lose his job over this. The first time was many years ago.
This should have been the beginning and end of the Q&A. Regardless of the relative merits of SETI@Home or what it does or doesn't do to a computer or network, the bottom line is pretty simple: Install unauthorized software on computers that aren't yours and you get spanked.
Still waiting (Score:2)
I am yet still waiting to hear a response from the EFF on this matter.
Seems like the good Dr. overreacted a bit. (Score:2)
Sure, Niesluchowski screwed up by installing the Seti@Home software on the district's computers without permission. I would expect that his lawyer is now going over the district's AUP with a fine-toothed comb to see if there was an actual policy violation to justify his firing. A reprimand should have been the first step; firing should have been the final step. I'd tell the guy to take the software off all the systems on his own time before I'd fire him. I'm betting that there must have been some long-term
After a decade, its the bosses fault. Bogus. (Score:5, Insightful)
Religious angle (Score:2)
Is it possible this guy was fired for trying to help prove something that would offend the religious beliefs of the supervisor - who may believe that we are alone in the universe because we were specially created by god?
'an educational institution ... cannot support the search for E.T
Is this in the same vein as "An educational institution cannot support the teaching of evolution" ?
Sounds like misuse to me (Score:2)
I think he should have gotten permission. He could have argued that BOINC (not just S@H) can do
Re:Idle computer resources (Score:5, Informative)
Unfortunately in the world of reality, the difference between Idle and Used CPU is at the very least money. My computer idles at ~180W use. When it's at 100% CPU, it's closer to 450W use.
If that CPU time is being used, it has to be paid for.
Re:Idle computer resources (Score:5, Funny)
If that CPU time is being used, it has to be paid for.
We've come so far since the 60's mainframe days.
Re: (Score:2)
What CPU could you possibly be using that it's consuming 270 watts? Do you have a 24" HSF combo to cool that, too?
Re: (Score:2)
SETI can use your graphics card as well...
Re:Idle computer resources (Score:4, Informative)
Unfortunately in the world of reality, the difference between Idle and Used CPU is at the very least money. My computer idles at ~180W use. When it's at 100% CPU, it's closer to 450W use.
If that CPU time is being used, it has to be paid for.
most consumer CPUs idle at ~40 watts and cap out around 95 watts under max theoretical load. That 450 watt PEAK power output is for system max load which never happens.
Re: (Score:2)
A computer with dual quad core Xeons could easily draw 450w+ under load.
Re:Idle computer resources (Score:4, Insightful)
Unfortunately in the world of reality, the difference between Idle and Used CPU is at the very least money. My computer idles at ~180W use. When it's at 100% CPU, it's closer to 450W use.
If that CPU time is being used, it has to be paid for.
Well unless its summer time (when schools are closed) and the school is far enough north you could just think of these PCs running SETI@home as electric heaters. 100% of the energy they use is being turned to heat, so some/all (depending on the schools regular heating system) of the cost of running SETI@home can be subtracted from the heating costs.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
That's my justification for running SETI/Folding@Home. I only run them in the winter, and I almost never have to turn on the heat in my apartment.
Please, no, stop this old silliness! (Score:4, Informative)
Unless the school is (a) being heated with electricity and (b) not having to *cool* its computer labs, this is untrue.
Electrical resistance heating is a terrible waste of high-grade energy.
If you *were* to want to heat with electricity, a heat-pump would give you two or three times the heat for the same electrical input. (And thus $$$, CO2 emissions, etc.)
Rgds
Damon
Re:Idle computer resources (Score:4, Informative)
Unfortunately in the world of reality, the difference between Idle and Used CPU is at the very least money. My computer idles at ~180W use. When it's at 100% CPU, it's closer to 450W use.
If that CPU time is being used, it has to be paid for.
Well unless its summer time (when schools are closed) and the school is far enough north you could just think of these PCs running SETI@home as electric heaters. 100% of the energy they use is being turned to heat, so some/all (depending on the schools regular heating system) of the cost of running SETI@home can be subtracted from the heating costs.
Unfortunately, waste heat comes at 1:1 efficiency, while most buildings are heated with 4:1 or better heat-pumps, so, while the waste heat is offsetting some of the heating costs, that only forgives about 25% of the cost.
If you're paying to cool the building, then the waste heat makes things much worse...
Re:Idle computer resources (Score:5, Informative)
What the hell are you talking about? How can something use the same amount of power, but emit different amounts of heat under different circumstances? Unless it has a *very* large capacitor or some other form of energy storage, or it emits radiation (light, etc), every watt used comes out as heat.
If it is getting hotter, it means it is using more power.
Re: (Score:2)
Not to detract from your comment (or how wrong the comment you responded to was), but if every watt used came out as heat, then the computer would not function. In other words if all the electricity going into the CPU was being converted to heat, then nothing would be left over for the CPU to process data.
The heat being released by the CPU is a byproduct of certain inefficiencies in silicon chip design, which can be reduced by some technologies but can't be eliminated. In fact the heat being released by oth
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Nope, all energy in the universe is eventually converted to heat. In case of your CPU, computations are just an intermediate step of that conversion. By making the silicon more efficient you are just reducing the rate at which electricity is converted to heat inside your particular computer.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Electricity and Heat are two very different things
True, but I'd have to say that electricity, and your understanding of electricity, are also two very different things.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I think the GP was intending humor, but although power literally is heat, and electric heating is by definition 100% efficient at the socket (P=IV=I^2*R), the amount of heat you produce between the socket prongs has no correlation to what the utility charges for it. As a simple thought experiment, imagine placing a small bit of superconductor between the rails just after the meter. The heat you produce locally may be negligible (or zero for an ideal superconductor)*, but look at that sucker spin.
Enclaimer:
Re:Idle computer resources (Score:5, Informative)
This is slashdot, news for nerds. Nerds don't buy computers from Best Buy. Real nerds don't ever even shop for anything at Best Buy. Best Buy is where wannabe nerds go so they can pay higher than advertised prices on products that the salespersons know little about, but they still know more than the wannabe nerds. I could go on, but I think you get the picture, and the rest of the people reading this already knew these facts.
Re:Idle computer resources (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Idle computer resources (Score:4, Interesting)
With BOINC , you can easily set the amount of system resources that will be used , so you don't have to use 100% is the systems resources.
The point is , it's the schools money , and so it's their choice what they do with it .
Personally , i think this is a great opportunity for schools :
- the distributed computing project benefits from it , so they might make mention of the school on there sites . ...
- it has some educational value : students will be interested in it , it can be discussed at classes , etc
But in the end , it's their call.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
This was the technology supervisor. So you're right, "it's their call," and I believe this guy is arguing that he was the "they." It appears now that some other committee is, retroactively, trying to decide otherwise.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
"Real" nerds buy their computers... off the shelf and then quickly head off to using their computer to develop, write, model, proof, design, etc. things that are actually interesting and/or difficult.
The days are so far long gone when building your own box was a qualification for being a nerd (somewhat sadly, but only somewhat.) Now it is a qualification for being a factory worker, producing cheaply assembled and cheaply purchased commodities.
Re: (Score:2)
It only truly mattered back when you needed to do that kind of thing to get a PC running Linux.
Re:Idle computer resources (Score:5, Insightful)
No, you can't beat Best Buy's prices (on sale in-store items or HP machines). What you can beat is the components. By doing it yourself, you get to pick everything, so instead of having just one decent component in a heap of crap, you can have all moderate components that match up in capabilities. No point in having a 3 ghz quad-core machine with 8 GiBs of RAM if it's old, slow ram on a 400 mhz bus. And no sneaky 1 GiB of video ram on an integrated chipset that's robbing from the 8 slow system GiBs.
Instead everything will match up with no bottlenecks for your intended application, and a quiet power supply, but in a flimsy, but adequate case with sharp corners that's a little too big aesthetically.
But you're not going to save money. Get that idea out of your head.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
No they are not.
I do work for others at about $55 / hour. Just spend the time I did on researching the unlockable Sempron/ ACC vs Athlon II 240/245/'e" version vs an Celeron E3200/core2 duo HT/VT/x64 and the boards that support the various options [ firewire, esata/sata raid, 4x240 pins slots ddr2 [ i have a lot of it , thank you ] took hours. Frys sale on this, Amazon sale on that, NewEgg sale on .. wait there is a combo deal but it only uses ddr3 . - how much more will I spend vs my own
Re: (Score:2)
Component research is a sunk cost (Score:2)
Researching components is a sunk cost - unless you want to get mismatched components and pay too much for them in your pre-built computer of choice. The other thing doing your own component research will do is allow you to optimize your computer for low power, silence, speed, reliability and price. Do I want to spend the next 4-6 years putting up with a loud, slow, expensive to run and unreliable machine? I'll spend many
Re: (Score:2)
Don't forget about having to pay for the OS (assuming you want to actually play games on the machine). There's no way you can beat the cheap pre-built systems.
The top-end "gamer" systems on the other hand normally sell for double what you could build an equivalent system for, even including OS.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Idle computer resources (Score:5, Informative)
That's not completely true. A computer that is idle uses less power than one at 100% cpu utilization. So it is costing the school more money for their electricity. It could also lessen the life of the computer. A computer that is shutdown at night would likely last longer than one crunching numbers every night.
Re:Idle computer resources (Score:5, Insightful)
It could also lessen the life of the computer. A computer that is shutdown at night would likely last longer than one crunching numbers every night.
This is completely false and has been proven with reams of empirical data. Keeping a computer running 24/7 give a longer useful lifetime than shutting a computer down every night. It's a lot easier on the machine to keep it running and warm with a constant feed of power than it is to subject it to cold starts and sudden jolts of electricity... all of which drastically shorten the lifespan of many parts inside the computer.
Add to the fact that even if a CPU had a certain number of "hours" in a pool that it could be used before it failed - the number would be so big as to be rendered completely irrelevant by the fact that the computer would be so obsolete and useless by the time the CPU failed that it would have been long discarded anyway. Even if you lessen a CPU with a 15 year lifespan by 30% by keeping it running, do you really think you're going to be using a 10.5 year old computer? In this day and age it's possible but highly unlikely.
Re: (Score:2)
It could also lessen the life of the computer. A computer that is shutdown at night would likely last longer than one crunching numbers every night.
This is completely false and has been proven with reams of empirical data. Keeping a computer running 24/7 give a longer useful lifetime than shutting a computer down every night.
But is this longer lifetime including or excluding the nighttime? How much do the power costs weigh into the prize of a new computer?
Re:Idle computer resources (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I've worked in cluster computing for quite some time (though I don't admin them anymore, still work in an HPC shopt). Know when you get lots of nodes on a cluster failing? When you power it down. Some percentage won't come back up. Same with disk arrays.
We dread electrical work in the building.
Seriously, power cycling computers is bad for them.
Re:Idle computer resources (Score:5, Funny)
Very true. A computer fan spinning at 100% 24/7 is far more likely to suffer a early death due to dust and hair, as you can see from these photos:
Dust in computer [savel.org]
What can happen to the Computers of Pet Owners; with Dirty Pictures [examiner.com]
Computer Killers – Pet Hair, Dust and Cigarette Smoke [technibble.com]
If the computer is shutdown or in low power the fan isn't spinning so it's not sucking in dust and dirt.... or bugs [cookingwithlinux.com]
Re: (Score:2)
If you're replacing fans 3 x more often (due to 3 x higher usage than normal), it's going to cost more.
Re: (Score:2)
They also tend to be non smoking areas where any pets are not free to roam at will.
Aren't we missing the point? (Score:5, Interesting)
Yes, I know, and you want a pony. But we're better than that, aren't we? We have to be.
Maybe we should start by teaching a bit of history, starting with the Reformation and the Rennaisence.
We have had personal computers and the internet for about a decade now. A decade. We have utterly no clue how that's going to affect civilisation in the future. But do we want to look back and say "Yes, for the longest time there we could have had it all, but nobody wanted it" ?
Re: (Score:2)
Aren't educational establishments supposed to be doing research, as a part of their fundamental reason for being?
The computers were in schools, not educational establishments. Their job is to keep kids out of the way so their parents can go to work.
Re: (Score:2)
> A computer that is shutdown at night would likely last longer
> than one crunching numbers every night.
Citation, please, otherwise this is just idle speculation.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
This depends entirely on what "resources" we are talking about.
Memory, I'd wholeheartedly agree with you, as unused memory is wasted memory, but that's mainly because your system RAM will consume the same amount of power regardless of whether or not it's holding anything of value. One or multiple sticks of zeroed pages is still data that has to be stored, after all, so you might as well fill it with something (standby pages, or "disk cache" if you prefer).
CPU? That's entirely based around your willingness t
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
"Writing off" an expense is only a relevant concept if you are a tax paying institution, which public schools are not. The extra electricity for this is a pure out of pocket expense for the school, however minor.
On my computer, which idles at 130 watts, running seti@home increases power draw to ~180 watts, according to the lil kill-a-watt meter I got from Think Geek. I have a quad core intel 9450 ( i think). I can't imagine the school computers are going to be any worse than that. So, 50 watts an hour,
Re: (Score:2)
"A school is if anything worse because it's public funds."
If it is a K-12 institution, then yes, they are very strict on this. If it is a university, many wouldn't care and burn money like crazy. There are certain government research grants for universities that require you to deplete them in a certain period of time or you will lose the remaining funds.