Virus-Like Particles May Mean Speedier Flu Vaccines 80
We've been talking a lot lately about flu vaccines. Now an anonymous reader sends us to a Technology Review piece on two human trials involving so-called virus-like particle vaccines, which promise to be much faster to churn out than traditional vaccines. (Here's a single-page version but without the useful illustration.) VLP vaccines use a protein shell, grown in either plant or insect cells, that look just like real viruses to the body's immune system but that contain no influenza RNA genetic material. A company called Medicago grows its VLPs in transgenic tobacco plants, while another called Novavax uses "immortalized" cells taken from caterpillars. Providing they pass safety muster, both techniques should be able to produce an influenza vaccine more quickly than current methods, using just the DNA of the virus.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Well, I, for one, welcome...
Sorry. Just couldn't do it.
Here are the problems with immortal caterpillars... If they behead eachother, do they gain in strength? Do they ever turn into moths/butterflies, or do they maintain immortality by staying in caterpillar form?
I mean seriously, you're a caterpillar, and you're immortal. Do you forsake immortality by spinning a chrysalis just so so you can have sex, live fo
Re: (Score:2)
I mean seriously, you're a caterpillar, and you're immortal
Trust me, Immortality isn't any fun when you live in a glass jar with small air holes punched in its lid...
Re: (Score:2)
Here are the problems with immortal caterpillars... If they behead eachother, do they gain in strength? Do they ever turn into moths/butterflies, or do they maintain immortality by staying in caterpillar form?
So... we're not talking about the bulldozers? [cat.com] Well consider ME dissapointed. My bulldozer breaks down WAY too much.
Re: (Score:2)
You guys are running around producing Immortal caterpillars and noone let me know? Bastards!
I can't wait for the final showdown where they fight with tiny little katanas and broadswords. It's going to be really tough on the little guys because it's hard to tell if you just cut off your opponent's head or only gave him a free Brazilian Butt Lift... There can be only one.
Mod parent up Funny. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Flu !DNA (Score:4, Insightful)
Sorry to nitpick, but influenza is an RNA virus, not a DNA virus.
I have no clue if this makes a difference in how quickly a vaccine could be made using this technique, but I just needed to get the "Friday Pedantry" out of the way.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
For standard flu vaccines, the speed of production depends on quite a few steps, some of which can be carried out in parallel (e.g. clinical trials can start before all batches are made), while others need to be done in series (e.g. bulk production can't start until growth conditions are optimised):
http://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/notes/h1n1_vaccine_20090806/en/index.html [who.int]
One advantage of the VLP approach is that you can produce the relevant proteins in standard biotech 'factory' organisms, which avoi
Re: (Score:1)
Just use some reverse transcriptase--it's super fast! I'd imagine that would add a trivial amount of time relative to processing time necessary to produce and collect these VLPs in sufficient quantities to bring a vaccine to market. Perhaps that's what you had in mind.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Although influenza is an RNA virus, researchers are probably generating a cDNA library of the flu structural proteins and using these DNA templates to transfect their cellular expression systems, resulting in the production of the virus-like particles. This may be the source of confusion in the summary above.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
While you're correct in your analysis of the statement, you're incorrect in regards to the technology. Yes, flu is an RNA virus but the manipulations of the genes that are expressed on the VLP - is all done with DNA. I'm guessing they clone the gene into their expression platform and the cell lines do all the work to put it together.
Now the big challenge is to prevent the patient from developing anit-vector immunity so that they can use the VLP delivery system again against different targets.
no vector in vaccine (Score:2)
Most(all?) viral enveloppes are self assembling and do not need to be hybridised with the vector on a protein level. You just have to make sure your env proteins are expressed trough the vector, so you end up with infected cells bursting with empty shells (as not viral content is produced). You could still have some vector particles in the raw yield, but you need to purify it anyway. Lastly, what negative effects would you expect from an immune reaction to either a plant or insect virus? On the contrary, mo
vaccine manufacturers caught with pants down (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
A new method of vaccine delivery? (Score:2)
A company called Medicago grows its VLPs in transgenic tobacco plants...
So tomorrow's vaccines can be administered by cigarette?
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
The tobacco industry must be just jizzing about this.
WARNING: The Surgeon General has determined that NOT smoking this pack of Joe Camel the Flu Slayer(TM) may be hazardous to your health.
I'm surprisde no one's done this before (Score:2)
since antibodies react to proteins or other structures and not the RNA/DNA. Maybe profits on vaccines aren't really there?
Re: (Score:2)
At least, 'investors' think so, resulting in rising stock prices [timesonline.co.uk].
CC.
Re:I'm surprisde no one's done this before (Score:4, Insightful)
Or, alternatively, they've been trying for a long time without success. FTFA:
But don't roll up your sleeve just yet. Sounds a lot like holographic storage, Duke Nukem Forever, better batteries, flying cars, jet packs, sensible women.
Re: (Score:1)
The outer shell is the primary approach the body uses to recognize viruses. As far as I know, it's the only way other than filtering out small particles in general, which can be tricky and metabolically expensive because legitimate stuff can also be that size.
Re:I wonder... (Score:4, Informative)
The flu at least is an RNA virus, but the function of the genetic material is for the replication of the virus after it has infected a cell. When it is not actively infecting a cell the DNA/RNA is completely dormant within the viral coat, thus the debate over whether viruses are alive or not. There is no metabolic activity in the absense of a host cell to infect.
The shell or viral coat is primarily what the immune system recognizes when fighting a viral infection. That is why killed vaccines work. They don't work as well as modified live vaccines (generally) because you don't get the first couple of generations of viral replication (at a slower rate than the wildtype virus) that trigger a much stronger immune response. Viral RNA can also trigger immune response, but the RNA needs to be processed by an antigen presenting cell such as an infected cell or a phagocyte.
It actually works the same way with certain bacteria. Researchers will frequently inject LPS (lipopolysaccharide) into animals to simulate a bacterial infection, because bacteria have LPS on their surfaces and their are immune systems designed to recognize this ubiquitious bacterial component.
I'm not sure about separate shells, but I do know that many (all?) viruses have several different proteins involved in making the shell, and that changes in which proteins are present will change the antigenic profile of the virus.
A better modified live virus (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I am a Biologist, please allow me to answer:
Yes the DNA or RNA has a function: to make more virus. immune reactions work on anything the immune system recognises, and because the immune system is built with protein, it is mostly protein it recognises. Naked DNA or RNA in the bloodstream is quickly mopped up, so you do not need specific immunity.
Vaccination does not trigger an immediate response if you have never seen the antigen before (and if you have, the vaccination is needless and poses a risk). It take
Bonk bonk on the head (Score:4, Funny)
I explained traditional vaccines like this to my kids: "What they do is get some of bad viruses, we'll call them little monsters. So they clone these monsters (kids learn what cloning is from cartoons) and then bonk them in the head to make them all dizzy. Then they send these dizzy monsters into the village, which is your body. The villagers see the monsters and beat the Cheerios out of them, and then kick them out of the city. They also learn to recognize the monsters. So when the real monsters come, the ones that are not dizzy, the villagers know how to recognize them because they look just like the dizzy ones. That's how they know to find the monsters and kick them out."
Kid: "But daddy, why don't they just put up a Wanted poster?"
Me: "Uh, go ask your mom."
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Are you a Nintendo game designer, by any chance?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Funnny, but what the kid asks uis actually closer to how a vaccine works.
A dizzy monster might recover and go rampaging through the village. The flu vaccine is not a live virrus and as such it is like putting a wanted poster up.
Re: (Score:1)
Zombie monsters with lobotomies? Hey, stop messin' up my analogies with exceptions and bug reports! I bet you were a boring kid ;-)
Re: (Score:2)
The flu vaccine can cause the flu. A wanted poster cannot rob a house.
Re: (Score:2)
No it can't, the flu vaccine contains virusses that are dead.
(Dead really isn't a good way to describe it since a virus isn't alive in the first place)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_attenuated_influenza_vaccine#Risks [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The nasal spray version of the vaccine does contain live virus, but "attenuated" so that it can only reproduce in the lining of the nose.
Re: (Score:2)
The lining of the nose (and the upper airways) is where the flu can only reproduce anyway, so that statement is not very comforting. 'Contains no virus' is much safer than contains attenuated virus.
Re: (Score:2)
FluMist [drugs.com]
Important information about FluMist
FluMist is a "live virus" vaccine. Influenza virus vaccine is also available in an injectable form, which is a "killed virus" vaccine. This medication guide addresses only the nasal spray form of this vaccine.
For at least 21 days after receiving FluMist, avoid close contact with anyone who has a weak immune system caused by disease (such as cancer, HIV, or AIDS), or by certain medicines such as steroids, cancer chemotherapy, or radiation treatment. A person with a w
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
They do put up wanted posters. They're known as major histocompatibility complexes!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_histocompatibility_complex [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
You'll have to order my book series: "Educational Guides for Dysfunctional Families".
Umbrella? (Score:1)
Is this how the Umbrella corp got their start in creating a Zombie virus?
Hopefully these researchers have created a decent underground lab, with flooded rooms, insane computers, dogs ready to be zombiefied, lots of corridors, exotic weapons with ammo dropped in numerous random places, and other useful stuff. If I was building a virus lab, I'd definately need to have all this available in case someone needs to sneak in and blow it up.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
because steam looks cool on camera.
Re: (Score:2)
Why do space craft in movies use steam heat?
Space craft have heat exchangers on there fission reactor coolant pipes. It's a cheap way to heat your ship and provides a good home for alien parasites.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes but that just creates a corrosion problem waiting to happen. Not to mention a major safety hazard, a pressurized steam
Just don't have your space craft built by the lowest bidder and make sure they use only non corrosive piping.
With the proper safety valves and controls steam is perfectly safe. Why waste power making heat when you could be using it for your ion drive or shielding...
Now if you wanna make a war ship on the other hand yes you might wanna think about it more carefully...
Re: (Score:1)
Al least they have moved away from steering by using a wheel from a boat. Newer ones use two levers that you have to operate in opposition (lift one up while you pull the other down).
Using steam doesn't seem so dumb after looking at their steering options, but I kinda wonder how hard it is to shovel coal into the boilers while under zero G's.
Re: (Score:2)
I kinda wonder how hard it is to shovel coal into the boilers while under zero G's.
My race doesn't use coal to power our ships... we use the souls of human children and they are very easy to handle or so merlock the soul smith tells me...
Re: (Score:1)
Of course facts don't matter when fear mongering trumps reason.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Serious side effects from vaccination are on the order of one in a million or less, serious disease from the flu is on the order of one in thousand or more.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I could have modded you down, but since there is no -1 Wrong moderation, I decided to correct you instead. When you use a vaccine, you ARE relying on your immune system. All vaccines do is help create an immune response in a manner usually safer than the disease. I say usually because vaccines aren't supposed to eliminate all the risk. That's impossible; all reward has risk. Would you rather have, for example, a 1/50,000 chance of getting hurt by the flu, or a 1/1,000,000 chance of getting hurt by the
Re: (Score:2)
i just dont trust this latest batch that has and is being rushed to market over the H1N1, i will take my chances without this vaccine.
Re: (Score:2)
i am aware of how vaccines work
i just dont trust this latest batch that has and is being rushed to market over the H1N1, i will take my chances without this vaccine.
This "latest batch" has been almost six months in the making, which is roughly the same length of time it takes to develop the seasonal flu vaccine each year. Flu already requires a new vaccine every year: different strains require different vaccines, and every new year brings one or more new strains of flu, and this year's swine flu vaccine is no different from the vaccine for any other strain of flu in that respect. When a new strain arises, scientists don't have to throw away all their knowledge about
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, after all it is just a different flu. However, the statistics who dies from it suggest that a strong immune system is an extra risk, the deaths are not in the age categories you would expect with a normal flu.
But your decision seems to be based on scary stories, and fear is not a good advisor in general and neither is stubbornness. Your call, Darwin may take care of you...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
i have been a father of two boys.
When did you ever stop being?
Virus-like Vaccine (Score:1)
No? (Score:2)
No, i did not watch this 'I am legend' thing you talk about. What is it, a painting or something?
Sure! (Score:2)
You will off course have those 'good rna' sequences ready and are willing to be the first test subject? Why not?
BTW: those empty particle may very well not contain the actual proteins needed for infection, as only the H&N proteins offer enough protection. So any rna inside the particle will never be injected.
EC101 (Score:2)
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1130
CC.
They're not the only ones... (Score:2, Informative)
http://www.masshightech.com/blog/2009/09/25/antigen-express-synthetic-h1n1-flu-vaccine-in-the-works/ [masshightech.com]
Patents? (Score:1)
production in insect cells has advantages (Score:3, Interesting)
One great advantage in using insect cell lines is that they do not require serum to grow, which is both costly and open to the risk of transmitting zoonotic pathogens. Insect cells can also be more robust than mammalian cells in large scale fermentation conditions.
Nice to see this here (Score:2)
I've done some IT contracting work for Medicago for a few years, they're a local enterprise, and I know the people behind the technology and I know their installations quite well. It's quite impressive, and I know they're now set on human testing after years of work and animal tests. Glad to see them getting some attention. I think this kind of technology is the future of medicine production.
Where's the WCPGW? tag? (Score:1)
Release under the GPL (Score:1)