Lightning Strikes Delay Shuttle Launch 50
Tisha_AH writes "The Space Shuttle has had its
launch delayed for inspection after several lightning strikes to the launch tower and/or shuttle. Several different technologies have been applied by NASA to divert the strike energy to ground potentials with Air Terminals (lightning rods), surge protectors or the often-disputed use of static dissipator brushes. One technology that appears promising is to cause a lightning strike (to a safe location) through the use of short pulsed ultraviolet lasers. Maybe in the future, once the technology matures, we may find widespread use of UV lasers to protect space launch vehicles, antenna towers or buildings."
Re: (Score:1)
None of the strikes hit the shuttle... (Score:4, Informative)
"None of the strikes hit the shuttle or its external tank and solid rocket boosters, but there were strikes to the lightning mast and water tower."
Re:None of the strikes hit the shuttle... (Score:4, Funny)
Awesome! Under the rules of homepathy that water is now imbued with lightning!
Somebody needs to get a distribution deal. With the markup we can finance that Mars mission way ahead of schedule.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Somehow.
Re:None of the strikes hit the shuttle... (Score:4, Funny)
So if I don't use any, does that mean that I can die from a massive overdose?
Re: (Score:2)
You'd better buy this sugar water just to be safe. A bargain at only $100!
Re: (Score:2)
I have prior art.
Regards,
Zeus.
Re: (Score:1)
there were strikes to the [...] water tower.
Could it be better that "electrolysis" than from urine [slashdot.org]?
Also in BBC (Score:5, Informative)
--
Nasa can't afford to many delays in there program, if there are to get the ISS finished before the Shuttle program shutdowns down in september next year. The launch is now rescheduled to Sunday.
--
Space Craft [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ Feed Distiller [feeddistiller.com]
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Spare U.S. The AgonY of Space Shuttle Failure (Score:1, Funny)
and just subcontract the work to theSoyuz engineers [energia.ru].
What's next on the list of delays: slow pizza delivery,
mice, North Korean botnets, or Bruno?
Yours In Socialism,
Kilgore Trout
Bad Summary (Score:2, Funny)
From TFA: None of the strikes hit the shuttle or its external tank and solid rocket boosters, but there were strikes to the lightning mast and water tower.
Sheesh... You'd think it was Microsoft article.
Like This (Score:5, Interesting)
I wonder if lasers could be used to divert lightning from commercial airliners in-flight? There was some speculation [nzherald.co.nz] it could have contributed to the recent Air France crash, though apparently it's not a leading theory.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Like This (Score:4, Informative)
the lasers work by ionizing the air between the cloud and the source of the laser, effectively creating a guide wire which the lightning then follows from the cloud to .. the source of the laser. which in the case of an airplane would pretty much have to be the airplane, so i'm not sure it's quite what you want.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Like This (Score:4, Informative)
i guess that's so.
although a little googling seems to indicate that airplanes are pretty well lightning-protected these days as it is.
Re: (Score:2)
but... (Score:1, Troll)
can we mount UV lasers on sharks?
power (Score:2, Interesting)
Maybe they'll use the short pulsed ultraviolet lasers to make sure lightning strikes the vicinity of vast capacitors to generate energy for a city.
Re: (Score:2)
that's an interesting idea.
seems like it should be testable with good old feet-on-carpet static electricity and some small cap's.
strike (Score:5, Informative)
I wonder... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Well, there are a few reasons for Florida.
First, if you want to launch a spacecraft into an equatorial orbit, it's best to launch it from the equator. The rotation of the earth will give you about an 850 MPH boost. This is one reason that things that launch from Florida travel east. The further north you travel, the less rotational energy you get. If you consider the continental US, you're pretty much looking at either Florida or the bottom part of Texas.
Second, ideally you want very little going on to
Re: (Score:1)
So why wasn't Hawaii used? It's the furthest southern state and there's lots of water before reaching California. I know why the Johnson Space Center came about...LBJ.
Re: (Score:1)
At the time this was decided, Hawaii wasn't a US State.
Re: (Score:2)
I'd imagine one obvious reason would be logistics--it's probably easier and quicker to transport rocket parts to Florida than it is to Hawaii.
Re: (Score:2)
You mean there's something that isn't made in China?
Re: (Score:1)
Video of the incident (Score:3, Interesting)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYHY_BVj1Xo [youtube.com]
I can't imagine the water tower being too complicated in electronics,open valve to get the water to the site to cool the concrete right?
Other electronics on shuttle though must be checked.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Better Idea (Score:4, Informative)
Launch sites are in the southernmost parts of the US in order to get some extra push from Earth's rotation. (The rotational velocity is the highest at the equator.) If there were sufficient access to shipping and industry, launch sites ought to be valuable in other countries along the equator...
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Better Idea (Score:4, Informative)
Which is why most European Space Agency missions are launched from French Guiana [arianespace.com].
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
What a tremendous pain in the ass. (Score:2)
Atlantis shuttle news -- Knob removed, window OK (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
They are not CW (continuous wave) lasers, they are pulsed with pulses in the microsecond range (just like the flash on a camera).. There is a power equation on the paper postulating that 200 pSec (picosecond) pulses at 50 MW (megawatts) are seen as optimal.
If my math is right (10 -12 is a picosecond) multiplied by pulse power 50,000,000 watts per pulse, then factoring in lasing efficiencies (for the sake of argument, lets assume that the laser is only 10% efficient). This comes out to around 1/10th of a wat