Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Biotech Technology

'Lab On a Chip' Made From Paper and Tape 66

An anonymous reader writes "Researchers at Harvard University have developed a microfluidic device using ordinary paper and tape. Squares of paper are layered and connected with adhesive tape, channeling liquid horizontally and vertically in a very small area. Each square of paper has been treated with photoresist material, which creates channels that funnel liquid into tiny wells containing certain proteins or antibodies. The fluid interacts with that area of the paper and turns the well a certain color. It can, for example, detect varying concentrations of glucose. Lead researcher George Whitesides says such paper 'lab on a chip' tests may lead to a cost-effective, portable, and accurate method for diagnosing diseases in countries lacking reliable health care. The research appears in the current issue of the Proceedings of the National Academies of Science."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

'Lab On a Chip' Made From Paper and Tape

Comments Filter:
  • by astrodoom ( 1396409 ) on Tuesday December 09, 2008 @12:14PM (#26048315)
    So they're the ones who have been stealing all the paper and tape from the supply cabinet!
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 09, 2008 @12:14PM (#26048325)
    Millions in grant money and this is what they come up with? Paper and tape?
    • Re:grants are nice (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 09, 2008 @12:40PM (#26048623)

      Millions in grant money and they came up with "a cost-effective, portable, and accurate method for diagnosing diseases in countries lacking reliable health care."

      I don't care if it's made of dogshit and orange peel, if it saves lives then it's money well spent. Just because something's not made of high-tech materials doesn't mean it can't be innovative or useful. In fact low-tech often means cheap and widely available, so it can be a good thing.

      Check out the pot it pot refrigerator for a innovative low-tech solution that is changing peoples' lives for the better right now.

    • by Graff ( 532189 )

      I think we can see their real purpose described in the linked article [technologyreview.com]:

      Whitesides holds up his group's latest development: a square slightly thicker than the other samples, covered in a grid of yellow, greed, red, and blue dots.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 09, 2008 @12:15PM (#26048331)

    Instead of regular tape, you could use duct tape.

    • Instead of regular tape, you could use duct tape.

      But for US military field operations they will use military spec cellophane tape that will only cost $42,876.52 per 10 ft. roll.

  • by shawb ( 16347 ) on Tuesday December 09, 2008 @12:19PM (#26048391)
    In my experience, "ordinary paper" is generally not the same thing as "treated with photoresist material, which creates channels that funnel liquid into tiny wells containing certain proteins or antibodies."

    I'd be willing to hazard a guess that it's not the paper or tape that will be making up the bulk of the testing device's price.
    • by jellomizer ( 103300 ) on Tuesday December 09, 2008 @12:23PM (#26048445)

      My computer is made from Rocks. All they needed to is Heat and cool mix with different rock add some water and other chemicals and mix some more Heat and cool some more and finally I have a computer made from rocks.

      • Obligatory XKCD http://www.xkcd.com/505/ [xkcd.com]
        • by Threni ( 635302 )

          > GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social expe

          Your expe has a bug.

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by theelectron ( 973857 )
      Ok, so they taped a bunch of test strips together. Does that really warrant the 'lab on a [micro]chip' title? I mean, it's a (somewhat) great (if not new) idea to tape a bunch of different test strips together to consolidate tests onto one device, but is it a reusable microchip like they are attempting with the current of 'lab on a microchip' projects?
  • He's back! (Score:4, Funny)

    by Barradrewda ( 1016610 ) on Tuesday December 09, 2008 @12:24PM (#26048459)
    So that's where Macgyver went! I always new he could do better than the Phoenix foundation. I hear he's also developing a paperclip hypodermic.
  • by mfnickster ( 182520 ) on Tuesday December 09, 2008 @12:25PM (#26048463)

    "...such paper "lab on a chip" tests may lead to a cost-effective, portable, and accurate method for diagnosing diseases in countries lacking reliable health care."

    How about a cost-effective, portable, and accurate method in countries where we're used to overpaying for the NON-cost-effective methods?

    • by toppavak ( 943659 ) on Tuesday December 09, 2008 @02:48PM (#26050243)

      Don't hold your breath. While the chip itself might be cheap to manufacture, its going to run into the same problems that have plagued immunochromatographic diagnostic technologies for years:

      1. Antibodies are extremely expensive relative to other reagents that can be used (acid fast staining for mycobacteria, nucleic acid stains for plasmodia and other parasites, etc).
      2. Its impossible to get a measure of the "confidence" of a measurement using this type of technology, so verifying results requires performing a completely different diagnostic test. But if you have no idea which tests gave confident results and which did not, how do you know which results to verify?
      3. Cell-phone cameras are useless for quantitative analysis, especially ones that would need high dynamic range and high accuracy
      4. Quality control and assurance is a bitch. Ask any epidemiologist that has experience working with malaria RDTs in the field. Some of them last 6 months, some last 1 month on the shelf.
      5. In high-burden areas for certain diseases, using a disposable test methodology becomes extremely cost-ineffective.

      While this might be interesting for things like simple urine tests or blood sugar tests, diagnosing infectious diseases represents a massive challenge for technologies like this. There's a reason we still use century-old microscopy-based technologies for diagnosing things like active TB and malaria even though they suck. I don't blame the researchers, they do good work and aren't focused on building a real product. Its the journalists that somehow make the leap between "we can detect glucose" and "revolutionary diagnostic technology."

      And yes, IAABME.

  • That's because it's an Alexander the Great detector!
  • by kasparov ( 105041 ) * on Tuesday December 09, 2008 @12:30PM (#26048529)

    ... microfluidic Shrinky-dinks [rsc.org]! All you need is a laser printer, shrinky dinks, and a toaster oven. :-)

    • What do you need the toaster oven for? Just have the laser printer run at 1 page per min rather than 25, and the fuser will take care of shrinking the sugstrate...

  • Cool but (Score:4, Insightful)

    by EmbeddedJanitor ( 597831 ) on Tuesday December 09, 2008 @12:46PM (#26048699)
    Oooh, 3D and all, but is it really any advance over test strips?

    The third world has been using test strips fine for the last n years. These 3D paper things don't seem to really be any easier to use or really cheaper to make.

    Just because they're made from paper and tape does not mean they can be made in a mud hut. The critical part is treating the carrier with the reactants still requires a clean lab environment.

  • Spinning resist on paper works well. However, as the paper is flexed (after deposition) the resist begins to crack. It might be better to use cardboard. Incidentally, this process would not have worked well in the past. Typical resist thickness was 0.2-2um. The roughness of paper is around 0.5-3um (depending on the paper). Now, many people are using thick resist (as molds for electoplating for example). These resist can be 10-20, 20-60, 40-80 micron and thicker. Some SU-8's can be 100-800um thick (a 4" wafe
  • Probably McCoy gave them a visit.

  • paper and tape, that's all!

    oh, and a bit of toxic light sensitive polymer that costs a few hundred dollars per liter and needs to be processed in a clean room...

    Sarcasm aside, using paper to both drive the capillary action and do some basic separation in a microfluidic style device is a pretty neat idea. Sometimes researchers are so caught up in the cutting edge stuff that they forget the old methods which just work. Harvard professors aren't always turning to cheap pregnancy tests for inspiration. The p

Keep up the good work! But please don't ask me to help.

Working...