Space Station Toilets Poop Out 207
otter42 writes "The International Space Station's toilet has gone kaput. It seems that the system for separating solid and liquid waste has developed a fault. 'Solids' go where they're supposed to, but 'liquids' don't. The astronauts have bypassed the '"the troublesome hardware" for urine collection with a "special receptacle."' Something tells me they're glad the failure wasn't the other way around." Update: 05/28 21:54 GMT by T : According to a post on Engadget, the toilet's now been repaired.
In Soviet Russua . . . . (Score:5, Funny)
Re:In Soviet Russua . . . . (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:In Soviet Russua . . . . (Score:5, Funny)
It sounds almost heroic to use THAT toilet! Men, I'm going to drop a load at a depth in the ocean, GREATER THAN ANY MAN HAS BEFORE!
Almost (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Almost (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Almost (Score:5, Funny)
Re:In Soviet Russua . . . . (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Simply pumping the waste out to sea made it possible to track subs based on the resulting floaters.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Trash is handled this way - not bodily waste.
There isn't going to be any floaters - pumps make very efficient grinders.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
To quote Neal Stephenson: "ABANDON SHIT! ABANDON SHIT!"
In Space - or Undersea - No one Can Hear You Gag (Score:2)
Someone needs to bring down an ISS air sample for someone in NAVSEA [navy.mil] to evaluate for pungency.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
So basically they're peeing in Gatorade and Icy Tea bottles, and chucking them out the window trucker-style...!
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:In Soviet Russua . . . . (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Real Czechs spell it Rusko.
Re:In Soviet Russua . . . . (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
No prizes for guessing .... (Score:5, Funny)
A NASA status report noted that last week, while using the toilet system in the Russian-built service module, âoethe crew heard a loud noise and the fan stopped working.â The solid waste collector is functioning properly, but the system for collecting liquid waste was not.
Re: (Score:2)
Their mission... (Score:5, Funny)
Any jokes about the Captain's Log will be flushed out by the moderation system...
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Their mission... (Score:5, Funny)
I've always said it... (Score:2)
time to innovate (Score:5, Funny)
$.02 says the 'special receptacle' is a Nalgene bottle
Re:time to innovate (Score:5, Funny)
Regardless of what happens to a part of the human body that is exposed to a hard vaccum (explodes spectacularly as seen in Hollywood movies vs. just becoming freeze-dried really quickly), and attempts at this are a sure way to earn a Darwin award.
Re:time to innovate (Score:5, Interesting)
A human passes out in around 13 seconds when the air is drawn out of the lungs by the vacuum - and then dies in about five to ten minutes - due to - tada - lack of oxygen.
And hard vacuum is a very, very poor conductor, therefore there won't be any freezing anytime soon either. Sure, you grow cold, but that'll be over hours, not over seconds.
All of this is well documented by NASA, too.
Re: (Score:2)
Water evaporates at very, very low temperatures in a hard vacuum, and there's plenty of water in a human that can evaporate. Evaporation requires energy, so the temperature of the rest of the body will drop.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Piss on a sponge (or a towel or something similar), squeeze the sponge dry outside of the station, return it inside for reuse. You don't even get a cloud of ice crystals following the station, since Sun's radiation will v
Re:time to innovate (Score:5, Informative)
There you have it, you don't explode in space. Your skin is actually very air tight. I think the worst thing that could happen is your bladder would become inverted. Think about it. Ouch!
Re: (Score:2)
Ummm...the bends http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decompression_sickness [wikipedia.org], perhaps?
Re: (Score:2)
The same pressure differential exists between space and sea level (1 - 0 = 1 atm) as sea level and 33 feet under. (2 - 1 = 1 atm)
Of course, you require air and an exposure suit to live in both situations.
Re:time to innovate (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Something I have in common with NASA engineers... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Then again, if it was American, it sure would have a backup system. And let's be GLAD there's no backup, at least!
It's easy (Score:2)
* make sure both surfaces are clean (use a wire brush if needed)
* heat both surfaces to just the right temp
* allow the solder to wick up into the gap by capillary action
note: might be a good idea to use lead-free solder...
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
* make sure both surfaces are clean (use a wire brush if needed)
* heat both surfaces to just the right temp
* allow the solder to wick up into the gap by capillary action
note: might be a good idea to use lead-free solder...
Gee, if I have to do all that just to take a dump on the space station, I think I'll pass...
Re: (Score:2)
Re:It's easy (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
well (Score:3, Funny)
Re:well (Score:5, Funny)
The good news (Score:5, Insightful)
The good news is that we're about to send another shuttle up, maybe they can throw some parts in.
But they only have one toilet up there? I mean, sure it's not a "Criticality One" component, but you'd think that would be a good candidate for redundancy.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:The good news (Score:5, Informative)
Re:The good news (Score:4, Funny)
How much did they cut off? And what part?
Re:The good news (Score:5, Informative)
Actually, in a small airtight container where the air cannot be exchanged easily (if at all), waste management is Criticality One, especially since there's no gravity and the waste is gas forming and full of micro-organisms.
Breathing powdered shit is dangerous.
Re: (Score:2)
Biological functions. (Score:2)
sure it's not a "Criticality One" component
No it is. Crapping and pissing are biological functions that are just as critical as eating, drinking, breathing and sleeping to keep someone alive.
You want your crew alive ? You have to make sure some life support system works. That includes fresh air and temperature control. But that also includes, food supplies, sleeping bags and toilets.
but you'd think that would be a good candidate for redundancy.
Yup. What will be the next news ? The only microwave oven / food rehydration appliance of the whole station died ?
Re: (Score:2)
Could be worse (Score:5, Funny)
Two systems? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
so what are they going to do? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Let me guess... (Score:3, Funny)
Let me guess... A two-liter Mountain Dew bottle which they'll later just throw out the window, right? Because I've soooo been there, man!
Re: (Score:2)
I trained as a Private Inquiries Agent (in a country/state that requires licensing to do that as a job). The "Mountain Dew Bottle" was covered pretty much in the first day of the six month course. It's required learning, and if you forget "empty bottle" when they ask you about required items for a surveillance operation, you won't be passing that test!
(although procedure is to keep it, then dispose of it correctly later - not throw it out the window)
not the fix for *everything* (Score:5, Funny)
Now watch, we'll read tomorrow about them making a new makeshift toilet with duct tape...
Re: (Score:2)
"Russian Built" (Score:5, Interesting)
The U.S. media treats the Russian space program like it were some bunch of morons building substandard machinery. But who did WE rely on to take us into space when our great space shuttle was reduced to bits and pieces? Who has a MUCH lower fatality rate and a MUCH higher rocket success rate?
Re:"Russian Built" (Score:5, Insightful)
All of those programs were run by a single country. ISS is the international space station. You don't know who contributed what part unless you identify it. People regularly identify Japanese, Russian and other contributions to ISS because it is appropriate, both good and bad.
Now, the Russians have had a string of bad luck the past few months - the computers on ISS (although that might have been induced by new solar panels, who knows who is truly to blame), the explosive bolts on the Soyuz causing non-nominal landings (and now word that the Soyuz docked to ISS, the emergency lifeboat, has the same hardware) and now this. I'm sure they aren't happy about it but it happens. America has had their strings of bad luck as well. How many Redstone rockets exploded on the pad (or within inches of it on ascent) before we ever got a monkey into suborbital space, much less a human?
Shit happens, but I think you are being overly sensitive.
Re: (Score:2)
One can be overly sensitive and correct at the same time. The two are not mutually exclusive.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:"Russian Built" (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Challenger and Columbia. I think that counts as two LOV accidents. Challenger was also a LOM, and Columbia was a partial LOM.
yikes... (Score:3, Insightful)
I can't help it. My first reaction (and I am sure other peoples too) was what if an astronaut gets diarrhhea or gastroenteritis? suddenly opening the window would really look like a viable escape strategy. "Apollo bags" seems like an acceptable (albeit ghastly) short term solution.
We may be rational, sensible people but scatological subjects will always affect us badly.
What I'd say to the astronauts... (Score:5, Funny)
"Special Receptacle"...? (Score:2)
Technical Term (Score:2)
The question is... (Score:3, Funny)
This could blow the budget for both the Moon and Mars!
Should'nt the title therefore be.. (Score:2)
New Rule On The ISS (Score:2)
ObSnark (Score:2)
Relevant situation (Score:5, Interesting)
Just like Futurama (Score:2)
It's easy... (Score:2)
We stopped using the Moonshine still and ... (Score:2)
I love reality (Score:2)
And remember. In space, no one can hear you fart.
Re:Special Recepticle? (Score:5, Funny)
hmmm (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)