EV71 Outbreak In China Sparks Fears For Olympics 199
OMNIpotusCOM writes "CNN is reporting an outbreak of Enterovirus 71 (or EV71), that has affected more than 3700 children and killed over 20, is creating concern for the visitors and athletes expected for the Beijing Olympics in August. The virus can cause 'poliolike paralysis,' according to the article."
Conspiracy comments in... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Conspiracy comments in... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Conspiracy comments in... (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
China to have spectacular cancer bloom in 20 yrs (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Fish that bioaccumulate fat-soluble toxins in their flesh.
Re: (Score:2)
Funny, I said the same thing last time I was in L.A.
Perspective Comments (Score:2, Insightful)
Killed 20 children. How many children are there in China? or Peking?
How many car accidents were there, or murders. Who cares, basically.
Nerd/News/Importance Factor Zero.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
According to the article ("Adults' well-developed immune systems usually can fend off the virus, but children are vulnerable to it, according to the CDC.") seems to only effect children...
Wouldn't consider it conspiracy worthy, but definitely propaganda ("icky don't go there - stay
Re: (Score:2)
I know you're new here but if you divide the number of people in a group by every one in the country that does not give you the possibility of some one joining that group.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Conspiracy comments in... (Score:5, Funny)
That's okay... (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
28 days later (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
Thanks (Score:2)
Bird Flu 2.0. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Anybody who found this comment excessively callous or crass, please see the number of pediatric influenza deaths in the United States on this page:
http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/index.htm [cdc.gov]
If you look at this chart:
http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/weeklyarchives2007-2008/IPD17.htm [cdc.gov]
you will see that it is not uncommon for their to be 15-20 child flu deaths in a two week period.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
When tourists return to their home contries... (Score:3, Insightful)
Sweet dreams.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry, that doesn't worry me one bit.
That's okay (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Consideration (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
See? I always told you Linux does not protect you from catching a virus!
Re: (Score:2)
Always China (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Always China (Score:5, Informative)
Perfect breeding ground for avian-to-human crossover viruses. And crossover evolution works a lot faster than regular evolution.
Re: (Score:2)
I didn't know that. When I get home, I'm going to download CrossOver, and speed up my email.
Heritic! (Score:2)
Everyone knows evolution is just a theory.
There must be some intelligent design at work to make the Chinese sick.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Here we go... (Score:1)
That's all this is. Next up: athletes refuse to compete as UN surgeons warn of the contagious nature of this bug and they don't want to leave them at home to watch their parents on TV from the other side of the planet...
What could go wrong (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
This has been a problem in very rural China. Likely there will be few tourists or Olympic travelers even remotely exposed.
possibly true to very low values of "deadly" - it's fairly mild in adults.
in rural villages, yes, this is a issue for those living there ...
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Your discounting of the deadliness of this virus is also not very reassuring. The percentage of deaths of those affected is high enough to cause me concern (perhaps even high
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
FUD stands for Fear Uncertainty and Doubt (Score:2)
Re:What could go wrong (Score:4, Insightful)
John Titor... (Score:3, Interesting)
Torino was the last (summer) olympics of human history.
But this is EV71's merit, not Tibet's merit!
Forget Olympics, ISCA is in China this year (Score:2)
Let's cancel the olympics (Score:5, Interesting)
No, seriously.
The Olympics exists for two purposes - to allow athletes to compete against others around the world for sport and to promote the idea of international competition taking the form of athletic events instead of warfare. To promote sport and to promote peace.
In the case of the former, per-sport international athletics associations can more than supplant the role.
In the case of the latter, no one can take a look at the bloody history of the 20th and early 21st centuries since the modern olympics were founded and believe that the Olympics has been terribly successful at promoting peace.
Instead, what ends up is that every two years (now that they're staggered) there's a massive orgy of corruption and controversy; and from time to time we have to put up with someone like China or Nazi Germany hosting - or sometimes the U.S. will boycott Moscow or Moscow will boycott the U.S...
I think it's time to get rid of the Olympics.
Re: (Score:2)
It's become way too political, and it never was supposed to be. The main reason China was even chosen was politics, to show that they were 'coming out' into the world as a good citizen.
Re:Let's cancel the olympics (Score:4, Interesting)
The Olympic torch run started out like a dog marking its territory.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Olympics: An intermittent event which is used by highly evolved nations pretending they honour the value of each other's citizen, which lasts for a couple of weeks separated by long periods of the subjugation, dehumanisation, and murder of those same citizens. Not to be confused with treaties or peace accords, which lack the same level of athleticism.
Don't overrate the olympics (Score:2)
Wrong. The Olympics now exists for only one purpose -- a venue for the advertisers. Don't overrate it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Amen to that. It used to be that olympic athletes held "amateur status," -- they weren't allowed to accept any form of payment for their sport. Jim Thorpe [wikipedia.org] had his medals stripped because he got paid to play baseball in the *minor leagues*, which barely paid to put food on his table.
Overcompetition killed the olympics. The Olympics used to basically be, "Bob
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I agree. And curse the fsckers that built the Colosseum. What a waste of money that must have been.
Seriously though, I'm not too keen on speed skating myself but I acknowledge the level of commitment and achievement. Imagine doing 50 Mph. On a bike. And then reconsider.
You need top drawer stuff to push the limits. (How much money would you spend on a PC that has the best cost/performance ratio? Now build a system that is 10% fa
Re:Let's cancel the olympics (Score:4, Insightful)
Let's not throw away money. But OTOH, let's NOT die "sad but rich".
The only problem with this logic is that you want to compel under threat of force individuals to contribute to the building of Colosseums. That's what taxes are - they're not some kind of charity. Choose not to pay them and you'll see the not-so-nice side very quickly.
I'm not some kind of anti-tax nut - taxes are certainly essential to run the primary functions of government which are essential. I'm not entirely opposed to some aspects of social justice as well within reason. However, when you're talking about building sports megacomplexes why not let those who make the money spend the money? Just have the International Olympic Organization fund the construction of the facilities they use (or choose to use existing facilities). They can recoup those costs through ticket sales and television rights. They'll need to regulate their spending so that they break even.
As soon as you make the organization that runs the olympics pay for the olympics you'll start to see them question whether we need events that nobody actually watches, and whether the facilities REALLY need to be built to a given standard. You'll also see them asking questions like - why do all the events have to be held at the same time in the same place? Why not just host them all over the place at various times durning the year and just use existing facilities?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I thought it was for-sheep.
(And to make my post at least slightly useful, it's forefathers. )
Disease Take Out (Score:2, Funny)
Journalist Makes Baseless Speculation, News At 11 (Score:5, Informative)
From Wikipedia, Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease [wikipedia.org] the disease that results from this virus:
And outbreaks in April alone:
Now I'm not saying it's of absolutely no concern, but it's not as if there's some massive killer disease rampaging through China. The average adult has nothing to worry about, and even in children the effects are rather mild with appropriate medical care. This will burn itself out well before the Olympics, and in a year no one will remember it; use some common sense here. If you want to avoid the Olympics (or encourage others to do so) there are much better reasons than this.
Re:Journalist Makes Baseless Speculation, News At (Score:5, Informative)
Try harder, read the whole sentence on CNN, and make sure that your source doesn't end up proving you wrong.
Enterovirus 71 (EV71) [wikipedia.org]Enterovirus 71 (EV71)infection may be asymptomatic or may cause diarrhea, rashes, and hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD). However, EV71 also has the potential to cause severe neurological disease. To date, little is known about the molecular mechanisms of host response to EV71 infection. It is stated in [4] that: "EV71 infection led to increases in the level of mRNAs encoding chemokines, proteins involved in protein degradation, complement proteins, and proapoptotis proteins."
"Enterovirus 71 (EV71), one of the major causative agents for hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD), is sometimes associated with severe central nervous system diseases. In 1997, in Malaysia and Japan, and in 1998 in Taiwan, there were HFMD epidemics involving sudden deaths among young children, and EV71 was isolated from the HFMD patients, including the fatal cases. The nucleotide sequences of each EV71 isolate were determined and compared by phylogenetical analysis. EV71 strains from previously reported epidemics belonged to genotype A-1, while those from recent epidemics could be divided into two genotypes, A-2 and B
Re: (Score:2)
You see? Everyone take note. THAT is the way you downplay the article. That answered everything in a very tidy way. Thank you.
Masaq, in your opinion, how alarming are these numbers and can we expect them to increase? The article was vague on a timeframe for the 3700 cases in one village - so it could have been festering for quite some time - but what's your take on the death toll (percentage-wise) and the general number of cases?
Re:Journalist Makes Baseless Speculation, News At (Score:2)
HFMD usually affects infants and children, and is quite common. It is highly contagious and is spread through direct contact with the mucus, saliva, or feces of an infected person. It typically occurs in small epidemics in nursery schools or kindergartens, usually during the summer and autumn months. The usual incubation period is 3-7 days. It is extremely uncommon in adults, however still a possibility. Most adults have strong enough immune systems to utterly defeat the virus...
Damn. That sounds like a virus that I would have invented. I hate kids. Although I think I would have introduced some Marburg and Lassa (Ebola Zaire used to be so cool until they invented that damn vaccine) traits into the mix as well. It's not deadly enough. Is there some way that I can improve the virulence? I realize that there aren't many virologists on slashdot but you never know.
Pleconaril (Score:2)
That being said, this particular virus really isn't a danger to healthy adults, mostly to children and the immuno-suppressed.
Why China (Score:2)
What? People, what's with the bad jokes? (Score:2)
Either the SA crowd has left the building or they grew up...
so, does China LIKE being world-stage-center now? (Score:2)
well, yah, sure, we'll see for ourselves, then how you've grown.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Should I be scared ... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Should I be scared ... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Care to show your math? Looks like rather egregious misuse of units to me.
Kopiok implied that I was incorrect, and that getting in a car is not 100 or 1000 times safer than a 0.5% chance of death. I supposed that driving is merely 100x safer: a 0.005% chance of death (probability = 0.00005). Suppose a person takes this chance 2.5 times per day, 365 days, for ten years:
0.00005 * 2.5 * 365 * 10 = 0.45625 = 45%
If this were true, most Americans wouldn't live to be 40, they would die in car accidents. I claim that this percentage is dramatically wrong, and that driving is much, much
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Should I be scared ... (Score:5, Informative)
The calculation above doesn't take into account the fact that to die in a car crash on your second day (e.g. 5th drive), implies you already didn't die on the first day, so the actual chance of that is p*(1-p)^4, where p = 0.005% or whatever.
A quick spreadsheet exercise projecting this for 9125 drives (10 years @ 2.5 drives per day) shows the probability of death during the 10 years is 36.6%.
Another way to approach the problem that doesn't need either a spreadsheet or a geometric progression trick is to say that the probability of dying in this way during the 10 years is (1 - probability of not dying in that time). The probability of doing all that driving and surviving is (1 - p)^(9125), which = 63.4% when p = 0.005. (1 - 63.4%) = 36.6% giving the same answer as above.
However this doesn't change the fact that piojo's argument is 100% correct that the chance of death per drive must average lower than 0.0005%, as the 36% per 10 years rate is way too high.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Driving 9125 times with a 0.005% chance of death each time, the probability of living is
0.99995^9125 = 0.63
So, you've got a 37% chance of dying. This is obviously still not the correct percentage. If we say that there is only a 0.0005% chance of dying, the calculation yields a 4.4% chance of death. Still too much. So, even though I suck at math, driving is more than 1000x safer than an activity which causes 0.5% death.
And you'
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I agree it'd be pretty limited in use, but why couldn't such a chance be calculated? Something like "These 100 people took 100000 arbitrary car trips over a 365 day period an
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:news for nerds... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
not washing hands or having the access to soap and fresh running water is how these things become an epidemic.
cholera, rhinovirus, and this enterovirus all spread that way.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)