First Superheavy Element Found In Nature 296
KentuckyFC writes "The first naturally occurring superheavy element has been found. An international team of scientists found several nuclei of unbibium in a sample of the naturally occurring heavy metal thorium. Unbibium has an atomic number of 122 and an atomic weight of 292. In general, very heavy elements tend to be unstable but scientists have long predicted that even heavier nuclei would be stable. The group that found unbibium in thorium say it has a half life in excess of 100 million years and an abundance of about 10^(-12) relative to thorium, which itself is about as abundant as lead." I'd also like it known that my spell checker did not know 'unbibium' before today, but it is now one word closer to encompassing all human knowledge.
Re:stargate ref (Score:5, Insightful)
It's important, but I'd hardly call it one of the greatest discoveries made. It just confirms what we've suspected all along--There are stable elements past Uranium. There's a very narrow set of conditions that can synthesize them, and we haven't had alot of luck in the labs, but now that we know nature's managed it, we can possibly devise new experiments better aimed at sucessfuly generating these heavier elements.
As far as how it got there naturally--presumably the same way all the naturally occuring heavy elements came to be--Supernovae billions of years ago.
Re:How are these elements formed? (Score:5, Insightful)
Or at least, that's my best guess.
Re:Where they found it? (Score:5, Insightful)
Ah, how I remember passing the days on the bountiful thorium fields of my youth, before they paved them over with asphalt. How will the youth of today grow up to be responsible adults without the healthy, life-giving exposure to thorium [wikipedia.org] we all used to get? Good times, good times.
(It never ceases to amaze me how rationality just goes flying out the window, even here, when any subject even remotely related to radiation comes up. I understand why, but it still amazes me.)
126 is supposed to be the stable superheavy (Score:5, Insightful)
Here's some links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unbihexium [wikipedia.org]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_of_stability [wikipedia.org]
http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/84/i10/8410notw9.html [acs.org]
Re:names (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Very doubtful (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Just Unbibium? (Score:2, Insightful)
But aside that it does boil down to what other experts in the field have to say. I've done mass spec using instruments that go down to 1 ppm (on good days :-)). The limitation on how good the results are (if you can tell one molecular formula from another by examining the mass results) depends an awful lot on stability of the instrument (which depends a bit on the environment) and the calibrants used. Their instrument is out of my league :-).I'd hate to see the hoops that have to be jumped through required to keep an instrument like that working properly. If their paper doesn't pan out, I'll bet that will be the sticking point (assuming this is not another Pons/Fleishman type of error. :-) )
I'll believe it once it gets off the arXiv and into a peer-reviewed journal.
Seconded!