Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space Technology

Finnish Electric Solar Sail Nears Implementation 66

eldavojohn writes "A recent meeting held by the Finnish Meteorological Institute has resulted in plans to build an electric solar sail that will circle the Earth, gaining speed to test its acceleration. The purpose? 'A flight out of the solar system to measure the gas, dust, plasma and magnetic field in the undisturbed interstellar space would perhaps be the "flagship" thing to do,' said Pekka Janhunen, a researcher developing the sail at the FMI. The details and papers of this project (over two years in the making) are also available. I certainly hope it will show more success than the launch of the similar U.S.-Russian venture and its subsequent complete failure."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Finnish Electric Solar Sail Nears Implementation

Comments Filter:
  • by dreamchaser ( 49529 ) on Wednesday April 23, 2008 @01:54PM (#23174718) Homepage Journal
    This isn't really using the pressure of the solar wind for propulsion; rather it generates power from it which it then uses for propulsion. Neat idea.
    • by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Wednesday April 23, 2008 @01:59PM (#23174766)
      Comment removed based on user account deletion
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        by brunes69 ( 86786 )
        The Bussard collectors on Star Trek ships (the red lights at the end of the warp nacelles) function as pseudo ramjets. They collect the material used for the fusion generators that power the impulse engines.

        http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Bussard_collector [memory-alpha.org]
      • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 23, 2008 @02:49PM (#23175272)
        No - a Bussard ramjet is supposed to use a magnetic field as a kind of funnel to collect hydrogen from the not-quite-vacuum and then use that as fuel conventionally. The problem is that until it's moving VERY fast, the magnetic field would have to extend out a hell of a distance to collect enough fuel to power the magnetic field. This concept might work once some other means of propulsion has gotten you up to high enough speed - but I think it's a non-starter for craft that are starting off from a standing start.

        The device in TFA is truly a solar sail - it works because like charges repel each other. So if you charge up the wires with the same polarity as the solar wind - you get a pressure exerted. It's cheaper than the big sheet of shiny mylar film that we normally think of for solar sails because you only need the support wires - not the sail itself. However, the conventional solar sail needs no power whatever - where this one has to use solar panels to keep the wires charged up. Hence, this one is pretty much useless for interstellar travel.
        • by Anonymous Coward
          I doubt any solar sail, no matter the design, is going to take you much further than the termination shock, let alone between stars.
          • I'm confused. Why wouldn't it take you between stars? Does the termination shock rob you of all your gained velocity or do you mean once you hit the termination shock you won't gain any more speed from that point forward? I don't see why teh termination shock would have that much impact.
            • by Chrontius ( 654879 ) on Wednesday April 23, 2008 @05:50PM (#23176980)
              The solar system is in the middle of something called the "local bubble" - this region was created by an ancient supernova, and is defined by low-density interstellar medium. Also, the ram field generates drag - consider that this is going to look a lot like a giant parachute of magnetic force in front of the ship, that's not very aerodynamic. The drag and the thrust for a conventional Bussard fusion ramjet limit top speed to about 12-14% of lightspeed, which is just about as doable using a conventional fusion rocket design without the ram field. Also, the minimum operating speed of a ramjet is 1-6% of c.

              A proton-proton fusion drive has an exhaust velocity of 12% c, so a proton-proton fusion Bussard Ramjet would have a maximum speed of 12% c. You may remember that a spacecraft with a mass ratio that equals e (that is, 2.71828...) will have a total deltaV is exactly equal to the exhaust velocity. So if a conventional fusion rocket with a mass ratio of 3 or more has a better deltaV than a Bussard Ramjet, what's the point of using a ramjet?
              Some good reading for you over at Atomic Rocket Ship. [projectrho.com]
          • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

            I doubt any solar sail, no matter the design, is going to take you much further than the termination shock, let alone between stars.

            Do you mean that once having achieved the velocity it can from the flux-rich area near our star, it will simply stop? I doubt that gravity at termination shock is going to be enough to slow it down much. Remember that it will have felt that very minor push for quite a few years by then. A few grams thrust isn't very much, but that much continuous per second x60x60x24x365 x however many years it takes to get there, it's likely to be travelling at quite a clip by the time it reaches that point. It will

      • by curmudgeous ( 710771 ) on Wednesday April 23, 2008 @03:05PM (#23175436)
        No, the Bussard Ramjet is supposed to use magnetic fields to channel interstellar hydrogen down to a constriction point where it is burned in a fusion reactor. The concept doesn't work at low speeds so you would have to use stored hydrogen as fuel until the speed gets high enough for the magnetic scoop to be effective.
        • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

          by meringuoid ( 568297 )
          The concept doesn't work at low speeds so you would have to use stored hydrogen as fuel until the speed gets high enough for the magnetic scoop to be effective.

          In Niven's setting, starships leaving Sol used light sails to get up to ramscoop speeds. Not being patient enough just to ride sunlight, they built huge lasers in the outer solar system to give them a little extra kick. When one day the kzinti arrived to raid the defenceless, unarmed, peaceful human race, these lasers were... repurposed.

          Of course

      • by vorlich ( 972710 )
        God.
    • Could this lead to a reliable manned mission to Mars, or for that matter elsewhere in space? If these sails are indeed more efficient than fuel, could that displaced weight be replaced with life support (e.g. nutrition, H2O, O2)?
    • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 23, 2008 @02:20PM (#23174996)
      It does use the momentum of the solar wind like any other solar sail; the difference to the other attempts is that this one uses an electric field around wires rather than a big physical surface to "catch" the solar wind particles. It'll be less efficient per surface area than a membrane sail, but allows the surface area to be astonishingly large relative to the mass of the spacecraft (compare the weight of a mile-long wire to a square mile of plastic sail) so it may still have a huge advantage.
      • Re: (Score:1, Insightful)

        by Anonymous Coward
        At least someone read the article and demonstrated a basic understanding of what's being done before they commented on it.
      • by barakn ( 641218 )
        Mod Parent Down. Solar Sails get their momentum from the photons in sunlight, not from solar wind particles.
      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        by Anonymous Coward
        Correction: As someone pointed out, the membrane type sails gather momentum from photons rather than ionized solar wind particles. The point still stands that the Finnish sail is a momentum-gathering device that requires no reaction mass. (Unlike a solar-electric ion drive or whatever the GP was thinking about)

        The low volume and speed of solar wind particles in comparison to sunlight does limit the performance. For example, you obviously can't go any faster than the solar wind, approx 500km/s near Earth. Th
        • by Rakishi ( 759894 )
          You don't need to be limited by the velocity near Earth, such a probe could I believe drop as close to the sun as it wants to before accelerating back out.
      • compare the weight of a mile-long wire to a square mile of plastic sail

        Well, compare the weight of 3.5 miles of wire to a square mile of plastic sail. A one-mile wire won't give you a square mile of virtual surface area.

        Still, it's obviously much lighter.

    • by Cedric Tsui ( 890887 ) on Wednesday April 23, 2008 @02:24PM (#23175026)
      I agree with AC.
      The tendrils are not for power generation.

      The craft generates electricity using the solar panels which powers an electron gun. The electron gun gets rid of electrons allowing the entire spacecraft (solar sail tendrils included) to become positively charged and then catch the solar wind for propulsion.

      The electron gun can also provide a tiny amount of thrust. A very tiny amount of thrust.
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by Thelasko ( 1196535 )

      This isn't really using the pressure of the solar wind for propulsion; rather it generates power from it which it then uses for propulsion. Neat idea.
      That's not how I read the article. I read it as by charging a bunch of wires it increases the effective area of the solar sail. Therefore there is no need to make an entire physical sail.
    • Unusual design.

      Most solar sail ideas are based on photons hitting a reflective surface.

      Solar wind is variable in terms of concentration and speed, which is why it tends to get downplayed a bit. You know at any distance from the sun roughly the amount of energy you will have available, it really is not that variable.
    • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward
      The traditional solar sail uses the radiation pressure from the Sun. When the solar photons are absorbed by the sheet, the spacecraft gains momentum.

      The electric sail uses the dynamic pressure of the solar wind (proton and electron flow from the sun). The momentum of the solar wind is mainly in the protons, since electrons are ~1800x lighter. The electric sail uses charged wires (tethers) to create electrical sheet, which deflects the protons and the craft gains momentum.
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by Arancaytar ( 966377 )
      I guess it's much more efficient this way - Randall Munroe [xkcd.com] explained that a normal reflection sail only harvests a fraction of the photon's energy. The solar panel does not reflect the photon perfectly (unlike a mirror surface), so it picks up more of the photon's energy.
  • Meta Tag? (Score:4, Funny)

    by clonan ( 64380 ) on Wednesday April 23, 2008 @01:55PM (#23174728)
    For the article I am not sure it applies...

    Where is the fly-me-to-the-outer-system-to-collect-dust-and-gas tag?
  • ... or they be Finnished for sure... maybe be flemished, too.
  • So it's a 10 mile across array in an orbit that crosses the altitude of most other satellites, and it crosses the path of the bulk of those satellites at the low point in its orbit when it's moving the fastest. Um. NOTHING COULD POSSIBLY GO WRONG, COULD IT??? They should put it at the Earth-Moon L4 or L5 liberation point instead - no traffic, ample unobstructed solar wind most of the month, and close communications with Earth. That's where a responsible group would put it.
    • by barakn ( 641218 )
      The diameter doesn't matter nearly so much as the cross section.
      • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

        by Kentercat ( 1278186 )
        True, but it won't rotate edge-on without a stablization system that can pitch a spun-out array of wires once every orbit, at a variable rate (since in a non-circular orbit the velocity will change radically depending on the position in orbit at a given moment). It's meant to be a solar sail, so it will be oriented to the sun regardless of orbital position. Even if it were edge-on, it would still be 10 miles across. And even if the array consists of thin wires, anything this size can take out satellites,
        • by Magada ( 741361 )
          Oh so that's where they got the tech. I was wondering.
          • "The tech" is actually pretty widespread. It's just putting weights at the end of lines and spinning them. A lot of satellites will be spun up for stablity, fired into higher orbits, and then de-spun using weights on lines that extend like this and slow the rotation rate like a skater extending their arms to slow a spin. I think it's a great, great idea to build it, just put it somewhere else to test it. It's not designed for LEO anyway, and as electrified tether experiments have shown, the Earth's magn
    • by FinestLittleSpace ( 719663 ) * on Wednesday April 23, 2008 @03:26PM (#23175654)
      You better go call up the scientists! I bet they didn't think about this!
  • by blind biker ( 1066130 ) on Wednesday April 23, 2008 @02:45PM (#23175242) Journal
    I have known Finland and Finns for almost 10 years - though I don't know the specifics of this project, I have a strong faith in the finnish high-tech (did you know atomic layer deposition was developed in Finland? And then there's Nokia, and a lot of nanotech research, and their contribution to the ESA and...) plus Finns are quite pedantic, and I mean this in the best possible way. Part of Nokia's success is definitely down to this scholarly approach to technological projects.
    • by Fear the Clam ( 230933 ) on Wednesday April 23, 2008 @04:02PM (#23176046)
      I have known Finland and Finns for almost 10 years - though I don't know the specifics of this project, I have a strong faith in the finnish high-tech (did you know atomic layer deposition was developed in Finland? And then there's Nokia, and a lot of nanotech research, and their contribution to the ESA and...) plus Finns are quite pedantic, and I mean this in the best possible way. Part of Nokia's success is definitely down to this scholarly approach to technological projects.

      In other words, look at the bowl cut on that guy in the article. With hair like that he's got to be sporting some major brainage.
    • If you do, the solar sail will have a control panel with buttons that are too small for adult fingers. It will have useless "design" that will make it harder to use. And after a year, you will have to trade up to a new solar sail because the old one will be obsolete and kids will laugh at you for using it.
  • by Kim0 ( 106623 ) on Wednesday April 23, 2008 @02:51PM (#23175294)
    This should make the solar sail about 100 times lighter,
    and therefore faster:

    http://kim.oyhus.no/Solar_sail.html [oyhus.no]

    Kim Øyhus, the inventor.
  • by Saberwind ( 50430 ) on Wednesday April 23, 2008 @03:02PM (#23175388)
    ...solar sail that will circle the Earth...

    That's one big sail.
  • So, it's not Finnished yet??
  • Here is a video of the speech by the Swedish Ambassador to the Nordic Council. It's not only wind in sails. or is it? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2ez11LkUwM [youtube.com]
  • They have to name the first spacecraft using this sail Perkele 1. Or maybe Vittu 1. (local joke)
  • Last time they came with up that screwy kid!
    What's it this time?
    Screw them, the Finns!

    -- Bill, Ball And MafiAA
  • This will be way too far down on the comments and way too late if it gains any merit for being modded up, but if this project is successful at least as far as launching and accelerates up to a decent speed, then I would think this could also serve well for garbage collection. We could use a large solar sail made of carbon nanotubes strong enough to handle the impacts of the space debris and speed up the craft to the relative speed of most of the debris and attempt to redirect a lot of it into our atmospher

Ocean: A body of water occupying about two-thirds of a world made for man -- who has no gills. -- Ambrose Bierce

Working...