A Virus that Attacks Brain Cancer 131
Ponca City, We Love You writes "In the past few years, scientists have looked to viruses as potential allies in fighting cancer. Now researchers at Yale University have found a virus in the same family as rabies that effectively kills an aggressive form of human brain cancer in mice. Using time-lapse laser imaging, the team watched vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) rapidly home in on brain tumors, selectively killing cancerous cells in its path, while leaving healthy tissue intact. 'A metastasizing tumor is fairly mobile, and a surgeon's knife can't get out all of the cells,' says Anthony Van den Pol, lead researcher and professor of neurosurgery and neurobiology at Yale. 'A virus might be able to do that, because as a virus kills a tumor cell, it could also replicate, and you could end up with a therapy that's self-amplifying.' It's not yet clear why VSV is such an effective tumor killer, although Van den Pol has several theories. One possible explanation may involve a tumor's weak vascular system. Vessels that supply blood to tumors tend to be leaky, allowing a virus traveling through the bloodstream to cross an otherwise impermeable barrier into the brain, directly into a tumor."
Re:Cure (potentially) worse than the disease? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:is this an "I am Legend" promo? (Score:3, Interesting)
Human cells in mice? (Score:3, Interesting)
If this does end up working, the procedure would have a substantial problem. It would need to be performed on an immuno-suppressed people or else the virus is 'stamped out' before it has a chance to mount an effective attack on the cancer.
Yet another cancer treatment... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Cure (potentially) worse than the disease? (Score:5, Interesting)
As it stands, if you get a glioblastoma, you're dead. It may take a year, but more likely you have a lot less, and it won't be quality time either, it will be a quick trip down the road toward being a non-responsive vegetable.
So if the cure kills you, no big deal. Your chances are pretty non-existent either way. Most cancer "cures" are really just a test to see if your normal healthy cells are able to take more punishment than the cancer cells. With a GBF, you're just prolonging the process.
Re:Cure (potentially) worse than the disease? (Score:1, Interesting)
This explains why the deadliest viruses mutate in hospitals, where it's full of various chemicals that attempt to keep the environment clean (i.e. kill them).
If the therapy doesn't include forcefully attempting to eradicate the virus, but instead let it peacefully co-exist with the healthy part of the body, then it'll be completely harmless and the probability it'll mutate into something horrible are worse than hitting a few million bucks from the lottery.
780 days too late... (Score:5, Interesting)
I believe that 6,000 to 12,000 people are diagnosed with this every year and the death rate for GBM is 100% with an average LE of only 4 - 18 months with successful treatment. All joking aside, anything that can help is welcome.
This is not the first virus found that can kill cancer. The "Reovirus" (commonly found in human respiratory and enteric tracts) also seems to work pretty well. See the following: Curing Cancer? Patrick Lee's Path to the Reovirus Treatment [uwaterloo.ca] and Reovirus to target cancer [bbc.co.uk]
other cancer-killing virii (Score:2, Interesting)
One of the exciting prospects is systemic treatment, in which cancer-killing virii are released throughout the bloodstream. The cancer-killing virii will 'run into' cancerous cells - even metastatic ones, and destroy them. This is currently in clinical trial with Oncolytics.
For further reading:
http://www.oncolyticsbiotech.com/tech.html [oncolyticsbiotech.com]
http://www.medigene.de/englisch/ProjektHSV.php [medigene.de]
DISCLOSURE: I am invested in both of these companies.
Re:is this an "I am Legend" promo? (Score:2, Interesting)
You use about the same procedures for someone who has a severely infectious disease as one who has a suppressed immune system.
Evolutionarily speaking (Score:3, Interesting)
This development makes me wonder whether we already have other natural, benign viruses helping us out.
Re:Cure (potentially) worse than the disease? (Score:3, Interesting)
So yes, this is great news.
However, haven't we heard this before working on the same tumor, only with a modified cold/flu virus? I seem to remember very similar research a few years back touting the same success but what has happened with that lately?