Identical Twins Not Identical After All 159
Hugh Pickens writes "Contrary to previous beliefs, identical twins are not genetically identical. Researchers studied 19 pairs of monozygotic, or identical, twins and found differences in copy number variation in DNA which occurs when a set of coding letters in DNA are missing, or when extra copies of segments of DNA are produced. In most cases, variation in the number of copies likely has no impact on health or development but in others, it may be one factor in the likelihood of developing a disease (pdf). "Those differences may point the way to better understanding of genetic diseases when we study so-called discordant monozygotic twins....a pair of twins where one twin has a disorder and the other does not," says Carl Bruder, Ph.D. "If twin A develops Parkinson's and twin B does not, the region of their genome where they show differences is a target for further investigation to discover the basic genetic underpinnings of the disease.""
Disease gene hunting (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Wonder how this affects... (Score:5, Insightful)
It doesn't have too much effect, really. MZ twins are similar on a trait because of genes that they share (traditionally, all of them) and environment they share (growing up in the same house, etc.) They are different on a trait due to environmental factors they don't share (such as going to different colleges) and error (measurement error in assessing the trait, random noise, etc.)
DZ (fraternal) twins are similar on a trait due to the genes they share (on average, 50%, same as any other full siblings) and the environment they share. They are different on a trait due to the genes they don't share (on average 50%), environment they don't share, and error.
These results say that the assumption that MZ twins share 100% of their genes is wrong. The real question is how wrong? Do MZ twins share 99.99% of their genes? Is that 0.01% difference right in the middle of some gene that has a large effect on the trait you're studying? For most of these new discoveries, it doesn't make any difference at all. Differences in silent mutations between twins isn't going to change scientists' conclusions that height is highly heritable (meaning: most of the difference in height between two people is due to the fact that they have different genes).
Copying introduces errors (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Wonder how this affects... (Score:5, Insightful)
If identical twins are much MORE similar in intelligence compared to non-identical twins, we can conclude that there is a high likelihood that the difference is genetic.
Identical twins should not normally have more similar nutrition (in pregnancy or thereafter) than nonidentical ones.
Re:Copying introduces errors (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I cannot believe it (Score:3, Insightful)
(Note, 18 is only the age of consent in the USA, they would have been perfectly legal earlier in other countries)
Dear women of slashdot (ha) quit trying to be a size -1.
possibly many causes (Score:3, Insightful)
These are the two of the most classic examples of differences between genes, but there are other mechanisms that exist. For retrograde viruses can insert themselves into genes.
Not to say their theory of CNV is wrong, just that other mechanisms have already been known.
Re:Cloning (Score:3, Insightful)
gene expression a product of epigentics, duh (Score:1, Insightful)