3D Crystal Grown On a DNA Lattice 61
An anonymous reader suggests an article over at ScienceDaily about the achievement of the holy grail of nanoscience: "[R]esearchers at the US Department of Energy's Brookhaven National Laboratory have for the first time used DNA to guide the creation of three-dimensional, ordered, crystalline structures of nanoparticles. The ability to engineer such 3-D structures is essential to producing functional materials that take advantage of the unique properties that may exist at the nanoscale — for example, enhanced magnetism, improved catalytic activity, or new optical properties."
Re:I, for one.... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Can someone please help me get those visuals out of my head? Ah, Vodka! (moj podrugoj Ruski; if that's correct Russian..)
Re: (Score:1)
See more here at the:
The Emancipation of Humanity from the Machinery of Economy via...
The Inevitable Robotic Wageless Economy http://teaminfinity.com/ [teaminfinity.com]
Bad Zoot! Naughty Zoot! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
wow! (Score:2, Funny)
Why not? (Score:2, Insightful)
Synthehol anyone?
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Why not? (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's a journalistic convention (Score:5, Informative)
In this case, the full quote would be:
"In an achievement some see as the "holy grail" of nanoscience, researchers..."
The summary dropped the introductory phrase, which makes the quote:
"researchers..."
But if the quote is used where it is, the first letter should be capitalized to make it grammatically correct. Hence, the capital is added, but it's put in square brackets to put you on notice that this is not precisely a direct quote.
Another common use of the convention is when you quote something that contains a pronoun, and you need to put the proper nouns in to make sense of it:
"Joe Slashdot couldn't care less. He hated journalists anyway."
To quote only the second sentence, you'd write:
"[Joe] hated journalists anyway."
Because if you leave it as "he" your audience wouldn't know who the heck "he" is.
Re: (Score:2)
The machines work for me, not vice versa.
Re: (Score:2)
"According to one reader, there has 'never, ever, ever been' correct grammar or punctuation on Slashdot."
Thank you for your sane answer to the original question, nevertheless, if I ever, ever got mod points I'd mod you up. Although you appear to be conflating "journalism" and "stuff posted on Slashdot", which might be the source of the initial confusion...
Re: (Score:2)
I was responding to the AC who said I need to work on my coding. I assume he meant "coding" as in "programming," and was referring to the well-known fact that if you nest the same type of quotes in a shell command, which is tempting when writing complex commands, the shell can't tell the difference between the next level of open quote and a close quote, so you will typically get something quite different from what you intended.
Alth
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, you know. Major crooks are always careful to obey the speed limit and file their tax returns on time. The biggest con-men always shine their shoes, wear a tie, and speak politely. Some sort of law o' nature.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"Nazi" means anything they don't like. And clear, level-headed, informative responses to pathetic attempts at humor are definitely not liked!
Re: (Score:2)
The other example could also be written as "Joe...hated journalists anyway." or as "He [Joe] hated journalists anyway." Note the need for the added [s] and [sic] - it should be 'suggests an'. Geez, kdawson, did
Re: (Score:1)
a brief explanation of what this is all about (Score:2, Funny)
Intel and AMD spends billions of dollars to print 'tiny' lines. It's actually the *most* expensive and difficult part of the manufacturing process. Scientists now are trying to exploit the tiniest, most precise printing process that nature does routinely. By 'piggy backing' on DNA molecules, scientists/engineers can put materials where they want. Gold is not too interesting since it's just a conductor. But it's a start.
Moreover, with the advances in organic
Re: (Score:1)
Wow (Score:1)
The circle is complete (Score:4, Insightful)
cool but, (Score:2)
it sounds cool, but it doesn't sound like they know what to expect. they are guessing
Re: (Score:1)
So yes, they are guessing. Wildly.
Sigh....it's a tool. (Score:2)
Holy grail? (Score:3, Insightful)
A 3D crystal might be cool and could help lead to that but I wouldn't describing it as the 'holy grail' is a bit much
Re: (Score:2)
As for printing an actual holy grail, we still lack a proper physics for miraculous objects, so that will still require work.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
If you can fabricate stuff on subatomic levels, there are no barriers to what you can manufacture. Need some atoms of certain element? Just construct it from the subatomic particles which are all the same and abundantly available.
Re: (Score:2)
That's... not even remotely realistic. The whole Engines of Creation dream was to manufacture things at the molecular level, atom by atom. But you'd still need the right atoms. Carbon is abundant and cheap, for instance, so a lot of stuff would get made out of diamond. What you p
Re: (Score:1)
invisible military armor (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Cool? (Score:1)
My PHD (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Step by step (Score:2)
1. Cover nanoparticles in DNA.
2. Generate DNA so nanoparticles know how to assemble.
3. Mix and heat.
4. ?????????
5. Profit!!
The REAL holy grail of nanotech. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
How many "holy grails of nanoscience are there?" (Score:1)
PICK ONE DAMN "HOLY GRAIL" AND STICK WITH IT. -- Note to all nanoscientists
It reminds me of that scene from last crusade.
I guess it might not be researcher's fault. Lord knows there's plenty of "holy grails"
Re: (Score:1)