Alzheimer's Treatment Mooted 79
aminorex writes "Enbrel (etanercept) has been immediately, markedly, and consistently effective in all Alzheimer's patients, according to a report in Science Daily. The original research article is available online at the Journal of Neuroinflammation web site. "We can see cognitive and behavioral improvement in a patient with established dementia within minutes of therapeutic intervention" comments one Journal editor."
"All Alzheimer's patients" may be over-optimistic, but according to the article, though the research it concerns has been heavily focused on a single patient, "many other patients with mild to severe Alzheimer's received the treatment and all have shown sustained and marked improvement."
Bad Title (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
actually, they do (Score:5, Informative)
1. To bring up as a subject for discussion or debate.
2. Of no practical importance; irrelevant.
Very obnoxious word that way.
Re:actually, they do (Score:4, Funny)
Seeing how effecient and successful the UN runs, I think perhaps you could read that as "To bring up as a subject for discussion or debate is of no practical importance and irrelevant".
Glad we cleared that up.
Re:actually, they do (Score:4, Informative)
The verb "[to] moot [something]" is to raise an issue for the specific purpose of displaying it to be unimportant; this is the sense in which the article uses the word. Mooting something is an active and target-specific process whose intent is to weed out irrelevancies. If you have done either 1 or 2, but not the other, you have not mooted something. There is only one meaning, and it is not internally inconsistant at all.
Meaning number two is also the way the past tense adjective is spelled/pronounced. However, it is common in English to have an action and its result adjective be the same, despite that the result adjective represents only the end state of the action: I shot him, he was shot; what you've suggested is to point out that shot has two meanings, one to engage in the act of shooting someone, and also two, to be in the state representing having been hit by a bullet. The verb and its past tense correlated adjective are simply frequently structured thusly.
It's interesting, though, that this divide should seem apparent.
Re: (Score:1)
I'm confused about what you mean here.
What is a past tense correlated adjective? The past participle is nomally the one used as an adjective (e.g. The man was beaten -> The beaten man).
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks,
Re: (Score:2)
What he meant was "w00ted!".
How about a study with n1? (Score:5, Insightful)
The hype on the article compared to what is shown is shocking. Even if the compound is a silver bullet that instantly and completely reverses Alzheimer's, you'd never know it from a paper like this. So this is an essentially useless bit of PR.
Re:How about a study with n1? (Score:5, Interesting)
As with the miraculous improvement in solar power efficiency in the next story, I'd love for this to work out but am not holding my breath.
Re:How about a study with n1? (Score:5, Informative)
I know it's wrong to read the article, but to work on Alzheimer's, the drug was injected into the spine. This is definitely an off-label use. Most likely, it doesn't cross the blood brain barrier. If this works, it might be possible to make a similar drug which can cross it.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
While an injection to the spine may not seem ideal for patients, it would prove beneficial as there almost certainly would be many competitors to foll
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
They could always re-patent some new delivery method, maybe a better diluent.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
As for this drug, hell, who knows.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Drug usage by large numbers of patients means we have a lot of literature on side effects and dosage levels of course.
So it's not bad that many people use it.
But I too agree that I don't buy the hype that it's the best thing since sliced bagels
Results of a few minutes of work (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
How would censoring a potential Alzheimer's cure (and one that makes sense based on fairly well-established theory) on the basis of the methodology used to conduct the research improve the scenario?
If the research doesn't hold up, the community will figure it out. Now that the cat is essentially out of the bag, people are going to perform their own experiments to confirm or refute these claims. Even if this particular treatment doesn't work, the paper still contains the germs of ideas required to produce
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
The problem with publications that have n=1 and consist of anecdotal observations is that they are highly unreliable. Since most "negative result" papers never get published, allowing unreliable anecdotes to be published leaves a trail of debris in the literature--you see various promising-sounding papers with no follow-up. You can surmise that the claims were pr
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Log term effects? (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
potential risks of etanercept, including infection, cytopenias, possible increased risk of lymphoma and demyelinating disease, death, eye inflammation, and congestive heart failure;
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Do the math.
I think a 75 year old diagnosed with alzheimer's wouldn't blink at taking a chance on that. Coming down with cancer at 115 is not going to impact him much. He'll probably have died 15-25 years prior.
And I think even a 35 year old diagnosed with alzheimer's would probably take that chance. Choosing cancer in your 70s vs severe dementia by 40... its not a call I'd find ha
Re:Log term effects? (Score:4, Informative)
I think a 75 year old diagnosed with alzheimer's wouldn't blink at taking a chance on that. Coming down with cancer at 115 is not going to impact him much. He'll probably have died 15-25 years prior.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
"I still don't know what sarcasm is, but whatever it is, it must be stopped!"
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, let's see. Since Alzheimer's is predominantly a disease that effects the elderly, I think you'll find quite a few of them willing to take risks like that.
Re: (Score:2)
Do we really want to put people on new drugs like this? What if in 40 years all these people come down with some kind of cancer?
Is there a single person with Alzheimer's Disease and a life expectancy > 40 years? Somehow I think that's an acceptable risk.
It's funny. Laugh.
Oh yeah, cancer, Alzheimer's... it's a hoot!
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
No.
The average person with Probable Alzheimer's Disease status (there is no such thing as certain, until we take your brain and slice it and stain it, actually) has a life expectancy, even if they got early onset AD at around age 40, of at most 20 years.
Related research (Score:1)
Re:Log term effects? (Score:4)
Alzheimer's and growing old (Score:5, Interesting)
My paternal grandmother died before Alzheimer's was well recognized, but in retrospect it's pretty likely to be the cause of her condition. My grandfather, having seen his wife forget who he was, was always far more afraid of going down that same path than he was of his own approaching end - and I can easily see his point.
The worst part about growing old isn't physical frailty... it's the slow breakdown of cognitive power. Of course, as a 33-year-old I can say this with absolute authority. The worst part of *that* is that it doesn't wait to start until you're old, either. I'm sure most of you have noticed changes over the years, and not all of them good.
Here's a question that's been on my mind lately. How would most of you rate changes to how your mind has worked over the years? Have you noticed your reflexes aren't what they were when you were a teenager? Looking at any older writings of yours, have you ever had the feeling that your imagination may have grown more refined, but also lost some of it's raw power at some point? Regardless of the cognitive rewards of time and experience, are there any earlier capabilities that you feel you may have lost some grip on, or even noticed more clearly in younger coworkers or relatives than you used to?
In my case, for example, I've noticed that in a video game, I just don't react to unexpected situations quite as fast or well as I used to. I remember charging into a room in Doom, blasting everything I saw and dodging almost every shot - whereas lately I tend to get hit more often - I don't do the duck-and-dodge like I did in my teens and early 20's. On the other hand, I'm much more calculating in every move I make, and find it easier to manipulate computer opponents than it used to be - even with all the advances in AI. I don't have the raw speed and reaction time that I used to, but the intellectual component comes more readily and with virtually no effort compared to before.
What do you younger guys think of the minds of older coworkers? What about any of you in your 30's and 40's, in dealing with people younger or older than you on an intellectual level? And of the most interest to me, how do you geezers (I know there's some who come here - maybe even a handful) relate to us 30-somethings? Do we seem like slightly inexperienced versions of your peers? Or do we seem like idiot children with fast reflexes but weak comprehension?
Re: (Score:2)
Otherwise, dismissing a post for mentioning a popular shared experience would be much like me dismissing your comment for, say, not using com
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
What you don't use, you lose. I dare say that just as physical fitness, which used t
Only really seeing one effect, but it's a big one. (Score:2)
As for reflexes, they've slowed a bit but not as much as I'd feared they would back when I was a teenager. I can still pull off the occasional double-jump-then-headshot-in-midair-while-maneuvering-around-the-incoming-rocket maneuver, but it's less common
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3)
Regarding the very sudden disappearance of your sex drive, I think you should explore the cause, because it may be an early warning about far more serious problems building up without you noticing.
I think the suddenness indicates that it very likely it's due to (possibly unnoticed) severe stress. In that case the stress
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I'm sure circumstances vary widely, but my experience is just the opposite. In the last few years my wife and I have lost all four of our parents: hers to heart disease and Parkinson's, mine to heart disease and Alzheimer's. None of them is a picnic, but from what I saw, Parkinson's was a much harder road then the others. The initial dia
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, the other way around (Score:2)
One thing I've eventually recognized, and struck me as very interesting, is that your own impression of how much you know doesn't depend on age, as such. If you were to plot Y = how much you think you know, vs X = how much you actually know, it would look pretty much like a Gauss curve, with a very early peek.
When you're first learning a new domain, be it programming or playing the guitar or playing Go, at first your own
So that's how it works eh? In minutes? (Score:1, Interesting)
It's hard to believe that a degenerative disease can be corrected almost instantly. They talked about the connection between different cells and the multiple connections to those cells with other cells that give people the ability to put ideas together. They said that whe
Just In Time for Terry! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
http://somethingpositive.net/sp12232007.shtml [somethingpositive.net]
(Hopefully this will be the start of a good treatement to all those afflicted by this disease)
I'm pumping this (Score:2)
Amgen and Wyeth jointly market Enbrel. Given the size of the aging boomer population, I expect this to make a huge amount of money. Therefore, I'm planning to put my liquid investment funds into
Re: (Score:2)
The submitter's work is done (Score:1)
I would take this with a grain of HCl (Score:2, Insightful)
The problem mostly is that we're still dealing with symptoms and not with the underlying mechanistic fault that causes AD.
For example, we're investigating various drugs that remove plaque in the brain, but the problem arises that we don't have anything that actually corrects the mechanism which creates the plaque in the first place. And most of the treatments are moderately risky so far.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
By the way, don't use dihydroxide, it's poison!
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Anything that helps with symptoms for said patients is probably a good thing, even if it doesn't "cure" the underlying problem.
One hopes that the drug is useful for Dementia for AD, DS, and other related problems - even if it doesn't cure someone, if it can keep them more functional and less demented, the risk might be far less than the reward.
One patient? Competing interests? (Score:3, Informative)
Pardon me while I await the large sample, randomized controlled double-blind study by authors with no competing interests to confirm these findings.
Hello, my name is timothy. (Score:2)
I, for one, am quite relieved. (Score:2)
Pittsburgh Compound (Score:2)