Synthetic DNA About To Yield New Life Forms 240
mlimber sends along a Washington Post story about the immanence of completely artificial life: "The cobbling together of life from synthetic DNA, scientists and philosophers agree, will be a watershed event, blurring the line between biological and artificial — and forcing a rethinking of what it means for a thing to be alive... Some experts are worried that a few maverick companies are already gaining monopoly control over the core 'operating system' for artificial life and are poised to become the Microsofts of synthetic biology. That could stifle competition, they say, and place enormous power in a few people's hands."
Re:Not completely artifical (Score:5, Interesting)
not jsut DNA (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Oh come on... (Score:3, Interesting)
Whoa (Score:3, Interesting)
If and when that ever happens, I don't think any of the readers of
And wouldn't it be ironic..... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Not completely artifical (Score:4, Interesting)
Testicles are among the least of our concerns... what SHOULD concern you, especially in a "SURVIVAL" related subject, is that man seems to have been meant to stay on Earth (until man gets over this particular problem.)
See, man is one of TWO mammalian species that requires an external source of vitamin C... otherwise we get scurvy... and eventually kick the bucket. Interesting that Earth's apex predator is range limited by something so simple as carrying a satchel of oranges or lemons on the ship... (okay, not all specimens of homo sapiens qualify for more than "monkey" classification, granted, and some are not capable of even surviving in society, nevermind without said crutch.)
However, a voyage to the stars, without a good supply of replenishable vitamin C would become a trip delimited by a few days/weeks past the day when the vitamin C runs out.
Pretty sad, when you think about it, every schmuck is looking at all these "big" problems, instead of looking at the fundamentals. Testicles and their placement on the body is nowhere nearly as bad as the fact that every single instance of homo sapiens in space would be cut short by the vitamin C supply. Ironic really, perhaps "intelligent design" might warrant a second look, unless of course, evolution and any supernatural forces others might attribute evolution to "realized" that man was a plague, and should be limited to Earth until it managed to kill itself off, whether by grey goo, killer designer virus, or just plain good ole' nuclear warfare.
If that isn't a vote for intelligent design or intelligent forces of evolution, I don't know what is
"Microsoft" of Artificial Life. (Score:3, Interesting)
-ellie
Manufactured life would leapfrog computer-based AI (Score:1, Interesting)
Imagine, we probably do not just wire frog or dog brains to robot bodies because of ethical concerns... but if the frog or dog or primate brain came from an artifical DNA starting point, one could argue that there is no ethical challenge.
And given that plasticity of brains, it would be easier to just wire organisms to robot bodies then to create a computer brain from scratch. (See research on speech and robotic/remote controls to paraplegics).
Of course, if there are no ethical limitations for using animals in this way now.... well... the pandora's box might well be opened now.
(I wonder if something like that might end up as an instructable?... Frog-brain controlled robotic model tanks.)
Re:Not completely artifical (Score:3, Interesting)
A 'perfectly designed' being, in this case, would be one that its perfectly suited to its environmental niche. It might be an ant (ant species are stable over deep time, so they must be doing *something* right), or a bacteria. It might not be terribly complex or intelligent. (Have you ever wondered if the hicks that surround might actually be more evolutionary fit than yourself? brr!) If organisms could get away from the kind of matter and energy we know of into some kind of strange omni-vector energy, which is in omni-superposition, then that *might* increase their fitness. But then they probably wouldn't need such mundane things as a metabolism. In which case, it might be an open question whether or not these 'organisms' are actually alive.
Perfection is not really obtainable. Bug fixes are, but this does not change the fact that there will always be one more bug. Perfection might not even be desirable - 'perfection' is relative to a particular environmental niche. Change the environment, change the niche, change what perfection means. Perfection (over-specialization) can get you killed.