Grow Your Own Heart Valves 180
A user writes "Medical researchers in Britain have succeeded in growing a heart valve from adult stem cells taken from bone marrow. The research is being reported in the journal of the Royal Society today. Growing a heart value from your own cells means that tissue rejection isn't an issue."
Re:Whole heart next? (Score:2, Insightful)
Tissue Rejection Not an Issue (Score:5, Insightful)
The problem with heart valves is that if you replace one with, say, a pig valve, it won't grow. For adults, this is not a problem, but for kids, it means they'll have to have a replacement in a few years as their heart literally grows out of the valve(s).
This new grow-your-own approach would probably be best for children. For adults, however, heart valve replacement is actually fairly routine and requires no anti-rejection drugs afterwards.
Re:Whole heart next? (Score:2, Insightful)
Caucauios optimisim (Score:2, Insightful)
Also I couldn't find a link to the paper by Dr. Yacoub which should have been here [royalsoc.ac.uk]
Re:php (Score:5, Insightful)
Thanks.
PS: The point of research is to find out how to do things. It was unlikely we would ever use embrionic stem cells as "standard" treatment but we could have learned a lot about how cells work much sooner.
Re:Whole heart next? (Score:3, Insightful)
No, there could be a miscarrage.
You are taking a life and converting it into property without giving that life a chance to decide.
We do the same thing to other living things all the time. We kill catapillers before they become butterflys.
How does harvesting an embryo not equate to slavery?
Because its a mass of cells, and not a human being? There's no brain, arms, legs, heart, anything. It cannot survive on its own either.
We Americans fought a war over this 150 years ago, and I find it amazing that, by changing the perception of "when life begins," some Americans think it's okay. I would have less problem with embryonic stem cells _if_ the embryo were not destroyed.
More than that; these embros live inside another human being, which has rights too. Unlike an embryo, that person can reason and decide what they want to do (or not do) with their own body, including whether or not another living being may survive in it.
I'm also suprised how many Americans think they can involve themselves into the personal affairs of others. Does it really affect YOU specifically in any way? I don't see how it could.
The promise of adult stem cells has yet to be fully explored, and I'm glad research is bearing fruit and receiving media attention. As you say, embryonic cells are potentially easier to deal with. Managing slaves is easier than working with a union; but which is more moral?
Don't equate a few human cells with slavery. You just look foolish.
Re:Whole heart next? (Score:1, Insightful)
Why, because you said so? What criteria are you using for what makes a human being a human being? For that matter, given that there is no widespread consensus on the issue of what "life" is, exactly, in any of the major fields of interest - biology, religion, psychology, philosophy - which is why it's an issue to begin with, upon what authority do you draw from to make such a final statement of "fact" meaningful? Are you an expert in some relevant field? Have you research to back any of this up, or a cohesive philosophical argument that doesn't have any major holes in it like all others before it?
I doubt all that, really. It's easy to see a "simple" solution when you can't even process the complexity of the actual problem. When you can prove to me what makes "life" alive, I'll reconsider your argument in full, but first I want to see that you even remotely grasp the sheer scope of the problem underlying this topic.
Re:Yay heart valves (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Preventing Rejection (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Yay heart valves (Score:1, Insightful)
I had my Ross done in 1995, but they had to fix an issue with my ascending aorta last year and had to go back in. They typically stint the aorta now when they do a Ross, since it will eventually become an issue later in life. I have no restrictions (other than no weight lifting) and the recovery time isn't as bad as you might think. As scary as the prospect seems, it's a pretty common procedure and beats the alternative of having to fix it in an emergency.
I think the possibility of heart valves from stem cells is huge for infants and kids, and there are a lot of kids that have this done each year.
Re:php (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Whole heart next? (Score:3, Insightful)