Scotty Scooped Up 90
mmarlett writes "Scotty has been found. 'The ashes of late Star Trek actor James Doohan have been found in mountains in the US state of New Mexico, where they landed after a brief flight in space.' And pretty much where they thought they put them, too."
But.. (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Still, getting lost in the mountains isn't quite getting cheated on... but getting sent to space for FOUR MINUTES!!! That would make me spin in my creamted grave...
send him back (Score:1)
atleast a lagrange point
Re: (Score:1)
what impact did he leave ? (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
a brief flight in space (Score:1, Interesting)
Somehow that is worse than a common burial.
Are we so afraid that space-trash could bring down our satellites that we fuck with space-burials but don't care about climate changes on the other hand?
Re:a brief flight in space (Score:4, Insightful)
Cool! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
The problem with things like this is that the stuff we're made of isn't who we are. Not in a metaphorical sense, but literally.
If you look at an old photo of yourself what you see is no longer what you are made of (except your teeth, if you're an looking at an adult photo).
Your remains/cremated ashes are just the matter you were made of when you die. No more or less sacred than your skin flakes, sweat, crap, etc, which also contains matter which us
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Cool! (Score:4, Insightful)
What you're advocating is the old "Isn't there anything more important?" logical fallacy.
We should, therefore, stop all human activity that doesn't directly involve keeping people alive and basically healthy. Which, incidentally, means artists and specifically actors like Mr. Doohan would be out of work, and a complete unknown.
Doing the "emotional" stuff is actually quite important. What's the point of living 150 years with no art, no entertainment, nothing fun or enjoyable at all?
Logical falacy? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, we say it's a logical fallacy because it's a logical fallacy.
You can't claim that doing one thing precludes doing another.
It's also anything but a foregone conclusion that expending all human effort into research is effective, and will result in more treatments, more quickly.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Cool! (Score:5, Insightful)
I'd say most people don't work that way. People don't put flowers on graves to show off for others, but for the buried person and themselves. What has meaning and what is sacred is measured in beliefs and intentions, not in results.
Everything about a dead person is a token. The body or the ashes is a token. The gravestone is a token. The flowers are a token. Sending him ashes on a small slingshot into space is a token. Sending them permanently out into space would be a token. If we raise a statue of him it's a token. If we hang up a picture on the family wall it's a token.
In short, if it has meaning to the people willing to do it then STFU and let them pay their respects. The you can pay your respect to the dead the way you want, or not at all. But don't go around claiming to have the answer to "more appropriate ways to pay your respects that actually mean something" unless you want me pissing on your grave (does that have meaning?).
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
If you take the absoulte view that the body is nothing but a meatbag you used to live in, then no there's no way to "pay your respects".
Maybe you're paying your respects to the person and not the meatbag? Maybe that was my whole point?
But don't go around claiming to have the answer to "more appropriate ways to pay your respects that actually mean something" unless you want me pissing on your grave (does that have meaning?).
If at some point you need a kidney transplant you might end up pissing on my grave using my own kidney. Maybe if you ever need a transplant you'll think twice about a persons legacy and what it has to do with the matter they're made out of.
Re: (Score:1)
I wish I had mod points.
That is the most hilarious reply I have seen for a long while.
Re: (Score:2)
Unfortunately for your argument, we are also composed of various important internal organs and structures which do not change or change very little (skeleton, brain, lungs, kidneys, heart...)
how much to chase a pioneer ? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
4 Minutes in Space (Score:5, Interesting)
It seems as though all of these high profile space-related personalities, when they have heir remains famously 'sent into space' neglect to mention the trip is always temporary.
I wonder if there will ever be an option to send one's remains into deep space. Surely there might even be some kind of value in hurling as many human bodies as we can as far out into the abyss of the universe as is possible. The bacteria present on a full corpse could, if it landed on a hospitable planet, thrive and create a new ecosystem. Or, in the exraordinarily unlikely event that billions of year hence, one of these space coffins encountered some intelligent life, we sould have given THEM proof there was was other life in the universe.
Of course these last two assume that bodies would be sent into space uncremated, which isn't all that practical I guess, but even cremated remains ought to be hurled out into deep space in my opinion.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
So that they could sell the engraved plaque option at an extra price. I think that's in the Rules of Acquisition somewhere. Oops, wrong Star Trek series.
Re:4 Minutes in Space (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
A person's cremains weigh only a few pounds, a typical satellite anywhere from half a ton upwards. Why would the rocket have to be 'larger than usual'? (Assuming there is such a thing as 'usual', which there really isn't - [commercial] rockets com
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
It may become practical if the space elevator gets built. And there are some high profile people working hard on it.
It may make space ceremony cheaper than the normal one.
Re: (Score:2)
Except in that case they neglected to kill off Khan and his followers BEFORE sending them on their way.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:4 Minutes in Space (Score:5, Funny)
DOOOOOOOOHHHAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: (Score:2)
Fixed it for you.
Flaming zombie corpses attack from space (Score:2)
Of course these last two assume that bodies would be sent into space uncremated, which isn't all that practical I guess, but even cremated remains ought to be hurled out into deep space in my opinion.
Couldn't they put uncremated bodies into a very low, unstable orbit and let them re-enter the atmosphere and burn up on their own?
I'm assuming that a human body would burn up long before it hit the ground. I can only imagine that it would be traumatic if this didn't happen and some hillbilly in an isolated part of Kansas looked up and saw someone's flaming corpse flying towards him at 500MPH.
Re: (Score:1)
Fortunately, (Score:5, Funny)
Rocket Scientists... (Score:2, Funny)
Always... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:1, Redundant)
Well, mission accomplished (Score:4, Interesting)
And for some reason everyone keeps calling the guy "Scotty". His name was James Doohan. The people who paid and organized this trip were apparently not the smartest people around.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Right, pathos is stronger than logic, every time. Thanks for proving that.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
His name was James Doohan.
His name was James Doohan.
His name was James Doohan.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe he hated space, maybe he took a stupid acting job to l
Re: (Score:2)
You know, animals have evolved reasoning adaptively. It's not before primates, that sound logic (with plenty of biases ad flaws still) has evolved into our brains, but we're still susceptible to the ancient ancestor of sound logic: emotions.
Emotions actually is a crude mechanism found
New star trek episode (Score:2)
Ye canna change the laws o'physics, Cap'n! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
this is about a human being's wishes for his remains. even if he portrayed a beloved sci-fi character with a different name. i don't think its whining to not use these semantics. scoop is often equated with pet output. =(
i'd rather repen the unpoetic alliteration of the OP headline in favor of something respectful for a decent guy next go around.
i'll risk a little karma to brave the thought that
Obligatory... (Score:5, Funny)
(I can't believe it hasn't been posted yet...)
Genesis Device (Score:3, Funny)
the truth (Score:1)
What? No movie? (Score:2)
Serves them right next time their dilithium crytals are melting.
Not New Mexico... (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
I need more power Scotty! (Score:3, Funny)
A Hitchhiker's guide... (Score:2)
Other stuff that gets thrown back down (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
The guy is supposedly alknowing, so why do you have to bug him with a rocket filled with letters? He already knew what you were going to write before you wrote the letter, even before you were born. Didn't you read the part you must have blind faith? If he isn't replying, he's tired of your nagging and is trying to ignore you. Leave him alone.
For that alone, it's justified to be sent to hell for spamming god with egocentric and useless requests.
Is the picture from the recovery? (Score:2)
No additional casualties... (Score:1)
New Star Trek movie title revealed (Score:2, Funny)
A leaked script claims Kirk's final words of the film are:
"... Of my friend, I can only say this: of all the souls I have encountered in my travels, his was the most... scottish."
Cue rousing bag pipes and last orders at the bar.
Appearing next week on Ebay... (Score:2)
A piece of the action (Score:1)
Respect (Score:2)